Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: Cisco: VOIP

utilization reports on a T1 PRI connection

 

 

Cisco voip RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded


kli at dal

Oct 8, 2008, 9:47 AM

Post #1 of 18 (7833 views)
Permalink
utilization reports on a T1 PRI connection

Does anyone know any software that is able to pull utilization reports on a T1 PRI connection?

Thanks.

Kli


svoll.voip at gmail

Oct 8, 2008, 11:00 AM

Post #2 of 18 (7769 views)
Permalink
Re: utilization reports on a T1 PRI connection [In reply to]

Take a look at this:

http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/2005-June/005565.html

Scott

On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Kuanming Li <kli [at] dal> wrote:

> Does anyone know any software that is able to pull utilization reports on
> a T1 PRI connection?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Kli
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip [at] puck
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>


ealeatherman at gmail

Oct 8, 2008, 12:21 PM

Post #3 of 18 (7734 views)
Permalink
Re: utilization reports on a T1 PRI connection [In reply to]

Couple of us on the list have been working with cacti to pull various data
from call manager, if that is the sort of thing you're looking for. I know
Sean Walberg had a template/script put together for it to graph stats on
H.323 gateways. I just started looking through his work to puzzle it out for
MGCP gateways as well.. i'm very much a novice at XML so it's taking me
awhile :)

http://www.cacti.net/

If you search the list for cacti you should be able to find the thread where
we were discussing it. Not sure if there are MIBs available to poll for for
T1 channel usage, but if there are, cacti would be a good tool for that
also.

On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 12:47 PM, Kuanming Li <kli [at] dal> wrote:

> Does anyone know any software that is able to pull utilization reports on
> a T1 PRI connection?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Kli
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip [at] puck
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>


--
Ed Leatherman
Assistant Director, Voice Services
West Virginia University
Telecommunications and Network Operations


Scott.Voll at wesd

Oct 8, 2008, 12:43 PM

Post #4 of 18 (7733 views)
Permalink
utilization reports on a T1 PRI connection [In reply to]

Cacti does work pretty well.

I need to change the colors.

Scott

[cid:image001.jpg [at] 01C92943]
Attachments: image001.jpg (41.2 KB)


jeff at ocjtech

Oct 8, 2008, 12:48 PM

Post #5 of 18 (7739 views)
Permalink
Re: utilization reports on a T1 PRI connection [In reply to]

On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Voll, Scott <Scott.Voll [at] wesd> wrote:
> Cacti does work pretty well.
>
> I need to change the colors.

Which MIB variables are you using to monitor the channel status? I'm
revamping my network monitoring bit by bit and would like to monitor
my T1s as well.

--
Jeff Ollie

"You know, I used to think it was awful that life was so unfair. Then
I thought, wouldn't it be much worse if life were fair, and all the
terrible things that happen to us come because we actually deserve
them? So, now I take great comfort in the general hostility and
unfairness of the universe."

-- Marcus to Franklin in Babylon 5: "A Late Delivery from Avalon"
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


sean at ertw

Oct 8, 2008, 12:50 PM

Post #6 of 18 (7740 views)
Permalink
Re: utilization reports on a T1 PRI connection [In reply to]

I second the question, and wonder if it works on a 37XX/38XX?

Attached is a Cacti graph of a H.323 gateway that I'm pulling through AXL.

Sean


On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 2:48 PM, Jeffrey Ollie <jeff [at] ocjtech> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Voll, Scott <Scott.Voll [at] wesd> wrote:
> > Cacti does work pretty well.
> >
> > I need to change the colors.
>
> Which MIB variables are you using to monitor the channel status? I'm
> revamping my network monitoring bit by bit and would like to monitor
> my T1s as well.
>
> --
> Jeff Ollie
>
> "You know, I used to think it was awful that life was so unfair. Then
> I thought, wouldn't it be much worse if life were fair, and all the
> terrible things that happen to us come because we actually deserve
> them? So, now I take great comfort in the general hostility and
> unfairness of the universe."
>
> -- Marcus to Franklin in Babylon 5: "A Late Delivery from Avalon"
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip [at] puck
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>



--
Sean Walberg <sean [at] ertw> http://ertw.com/
Attachments: h323.png (36.7 KB)


svoll.voip at gmail

Oct 8, 2008, 1:01 PM

Post #7 of 18 (7737 views)
Permalink
Re: utilization reports on a T1 PRI connection [In reply to]

we are using a Cisco 5350 DS0-7 graph templete. fro my CMM blade that is
running H323

Scott

On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Jeffrey Ollie <jeff [at] ocjtech> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Voll, Scott <Scott.Voll [at] wesd> wrote:
> > Cacti does work pretty well.
> >
> > I need to change the colors.
>
> Which MIB variables are you using to monitor the channel status? I'm
> revamping my network monitoring bit by bit and would like to monitor
> my T1s as well.
>
> --
> Jeff Ollie
>
> "You know, I used to think it was awful that life was so unfair. Then
> I thought, wouldn't it be much worse if life were fair, and all the
> terrible things that happen to us come because we actually deserve
> them? So, now I take great comfort in the general hostility and
> unfairness of the universe."
>
> -- Marcus to Franklin in Babylon 5: "A Late Delivery from Avalon"
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip [at] puck
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>


ealeatherman at gmail

Oct 8, 2008, 1:14 PM

Post #8 of 18 (7742 views)
Permalink
Re: utilization reports on a T1 PRI connection [In reply to]

Is that from a 6608 T1 blade (MGCP)?

On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Voll, Scott <Scott.Voll [at] wesd> wrote:

> Cacti does work pretty well.
>
>
>
> I need to change the colors.
>
>
>
> Scott
>
--
Ed Leatherman
Assistant Director, Voice Services
West Virginia University
Telecommunications and Network Operations


COrtiz at sscincorporated

Oct 8, 2008, 1:31 PM

Post #9 of 18 (7744 views)
Permalink
Re: utilization reports on a T1 PRI connection [In reply to]

Scott,



Can you give a bit more detail of how you are getting this data? (SNMP
MIBS, etc). How often is the PRI polled to plot this graph?



Carlos



________________________________

From: cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Voll, Scott
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 3:44 PM
To: 'ealeatherman [at] gmail'; 'kli [at] dal'
Cc: Cisco VoIPoE List
Subject: [cisco-voip] utilization reports on a T1 PRI connection



Cacti does work pretty well.



I need to change the colors.



Scott
Attachments: image001.jpg (41.2 KB)


Scott.Voll at wesd

Oct 13, 2008, 2:15 PM

Post #10 of 18 (7680 views)
Permalink
Re: utilization reports on a T1 PRI connection [In reply to]

We are currently using the graph / template at the bottom of this link.

http://forums.cacti.net/viewtopic.php?t=20443

Scott


m.rabinovich at nves

Oct 14, 2008, 9:12 AM

Post #11 of 18 (7671 views)
Permalink
Re: utilization reports on a T1 PRI connection [In reply to]

HI,



Are you backhauling call processing to the CallManager? The reason I am
asking is that from what I saw when the control is given to the callmanager
there is no way to get utilization info off the gateway and the only way to
get it is polling perfcounters (windows or axl depending on ccm version).



The gateways in my case are CMM modules. I am going to check the new 3845
just to see if it's a matter of a platform and not backhauling but my
feeling is that it will be the same for 3845.



Regards,



Mordechai

_____

From: cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Voll, Scott
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 5:15 PM
To: 'Carlos Ortiz'; 'Chris Clouse'
Cc: Cisco VoIPoE List
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] utilization reports on a T1 PRI connection



We are currently using the graph / template at the bottom of this link.



http://forums.cacti.net/viewtopic.php?t=20443



Scott

Internal Virus Database is out of date.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.173 / Virus Database: 270.7.6/1712 - Release Date: 10/7/2008
9:41 AM


Scott.Voll at wesd

Oct 14, 2008, 9:14 AM

Post #12 of 18 (7679 views)
Permalink
Re: utilization reports on a T1 PRI connection [In reply to]

I'm using H323

________________________________
From: Mordechai [mailto:m.rabinovich [at] nves]
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 9:12 AM
To: Voll, Scott
Cc: 'Cisco VoIPoE List'
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] utilization reports on a T1 PRI connection

HI,

Are you backhauling call processing to the CallManager? The reason I am asking is that from what I saw when the control is given to the callmanager there is no way to get utilization info off the gateway and the only way to get it is polling perfcounters (windows or axl depending on ccm version).

The gateways in my case are CMM modules. I am going to check the new 3845 just to see if it's a matter of a platform and not backhauling but my feeling is that it will be the same for 3845.

Regards,

Mordechai
________________________________
From: cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Voll, Scott
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 5:15 PM
To: 'Carlos Ortiz'; 'Chris Clouse'
Cc: Cisco VoIPoE List
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] utilization reports on a T1 PRI connection

We are currently using the graph / template at the bottom of this link.

http://forums.cacti.net/viewtopic.php?t=20443

Scott

Internal Virus Database is out of date.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.173 / Virus Database: 270.7.6/1712 - Release Date: 10/7/2008 9:41 AM


rwest at zyedge

Oct 14, 2008, 9:38 AM

Post #13 of 18 (7684 views)
Permalink
Re: utilization reports on a T1 PRI connection [In reply to]

Mordechai,

You're correct, but someone has written AXL SOAP scripts to pull that information from CCM. The only way to pull directly from the gateway is through H323.

-ryan

From: cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Mordechai
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 12:12 PM
To: 'Voll, Scott'
Cc: 'Cisco VoIPoE List'
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] utilization reports on a T1 PRI connection

HI,

Are you backhauling call processing to the CallManager? The reason I am asking is that from what I saw when the control is given to the callmanager there is no way to get utilization info off the gateway and the only way to get it is polling perfcounters (windows or axl depending on ccm version).

The gateways in my case are CMM modules. I am going to check the new 3845 just to see if it's a matter of a platform and not backhauling but my feeling is that it will be the same for 3845.

Regards,

Mordechai
________________________________
From: cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Voll, Scott
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 5:15 PM
To: 'Carlos Ortiz'; 'Chris Clouse'
Cc: Cisco VoIPoE List
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] utilization reports on a T1 PRI connection

We are currently using the graph / template at the bottom of this link.

http://forums.cacti.net/viewtopic.php?t=20443

Scott

Internal Virus Database is out of date.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.173 / Virus Database: 270.7.6/1712 - Release Date: 10/7/2008 9:41 AM


acydgod at gmail

Nov 10, 2008, 11:27 PM

Post #14 of 18 (7504 views)
Permalink
Re: utilization reports on a T1 PRI connection [In reply to]

I use Clarus..they just added quite a bit in the this area so it's working
out. I've tried OpsMgr and found it less than useless. Did an eval on
Prognosis but it was too complicated and crashed a few times too many.
Clarus is priced per phone as well.

Tom Sparks
Taos Consulting

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of
cisco-voip-request [at] puck
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 12:44 PM
To: cisco-voip [at] puck
Subject: cisco-voip Digest, Vol 60, Issue 64

Send cisco-voip mailing list submissions to
cisco-voip [at] puck

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
cisco-voip-request [at] puck

You can reach the person managing the list at
cisco-voip-owner [at] puck

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of cisco-voip digest..."


Today's Topics:

1. Re: BAT file... sanity check.. (Ed Leatherman)
2. Re: utilization reports on a T1 PRI connection (Ed Leatherman)
3. Re: management / install -- Ops manager suite (Matthew Saskin)
4. utilization reports on a T1 PRI connection (Voll, Scott)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 15:11:34 -0400
From: "Ed Leatherman" <ealeatherman [at] gmail>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] BAT file... sanity check..
To: "James Buchanan" <jbuchanan [at] ctiusa>
Cc: "cisco-voip [at] puck-nether" <cisco-voip [at] puck>
Message-ID:
<94a1afde0810081211i376fe882s4d5027ed3afa5180 [at] mail>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

I generated a user import file from the BAT excel template thing, and it
worked with that.

After adding/removing fields in my file trying various things, I instead
renamed the column headers using all caps since that was now the only
difference now between my custom file and the generated one.. and it worked.
So I went back and removed the extra fields I didnt need and just left what
I started with (except in caps), and it worked. I move the capitalized
headers in the users over to my phones/users import file and that worked
also (despite having mixed case in the device field headers). So I think one
of those headers in the user section needs to be capitalized for some
unknown reason.

Anyway.. i got it working. just a little puzzled, but that isn't anything
new :)

On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 2:01 PM, James Buchanan <jbuchanan [at] ctiusa> wrote:

> Try not setting the primary extension.The primary extension field does
> not work until you associate a device.
>
>
>

--
Ed Leatherman
Assistant Director, Voice Services
West Virginia University
Telecommunications and Network Operations
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20081008/5455ed76/
attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 15:21:05 -0400
From: "Ed Leatherman" <ealeatherman [at] gmail>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] utilization reports on a T1 PRI connection
To: "Kuanming Li" <kli [at] dal>
Cc: CiscoVoip Mailing List <cisco-voip [at] puck>
Message-ID:
<94a1afde0810081221s6d59a6e7g6054dab682b009cd [at] mail>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Couple of us on the list have been working with cacti to pull various data
from call manager, if that is the sort of thing you're looking for. I know
Sean Walberg had a template/script put together for it to graph stats on
H.323 gateways. I just started looking through his work to puzzle it out for
MGCP gateways as well.. i'm very much a novice at XML so it's taking me
awhile :)

http://www.cacti.net/

If you search the list for cacti you should be able to find the thread where
we were discussing it. Not sure if there are MIBs available to poll for for
T1 channel usage, but if there are, cacti would be a good tool for that
also.

On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 12:47 PM, Kuanming Li <kli [at] dal> wrote:

> Does anyone know any software that is able to pull utilization reports on
> a T1 PRI connection?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Kli
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip [at] puck
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>


--
Ed Leatherman
Assistant Director, Voice Services
West Virginia University
Telecommunications and Network Operations
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20081008/437c1796/
attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 15:29:41 -0400
From: Matthew Saskin <matt [at] saskin>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] management / install -- Ops manager suite
To: Scott Voll <svoll.voip [at] gmail>
Cc: "cisco-voip [at] puck" <cisco-voip [at] puck>
Message-ID: <48ED0A25.3080401 [at] saskin>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

If you're not afraid of digging then Prognosis is great. We basically
use it to handle our data capture and real-time monitoring and have
developed our own tools to take the historical data from Prognosis and
analyze/chart accordingly.

Yes, it is priced per handset. There is an uplift if you want their
reporting product with extends the basic reporting capabilities of the
core product. As I said, we use the core app for data collection and
our own reporting/BI platform for parsing, but whatever works for you...

-matt

Scott Voll wrote:
> Looking for something that can do BHCA, BHCC, Capacity planning, Trunk
> utilization, etc.
>
> I'm not apposed to digging in but looking for the best possible
> solution. Any idea how Prognosis is priced? per phone?
>
> Scott
>
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 8:57 AM, Matthew Saskin <matt [at] saskin
> <mailto:matt [at] saskin>> wrote:
>
> IMHO, ops manager is not worth it - Limited feature set for the
> money. I tend to speak highly of Prognosis, however that is also
pricey.
>
> What specific features are you looking for? Do you want something
> you can just install and have it start alerting you or do you not
> mind digging into it and doing some configuration work, etc?
>
> -matt
>
> Scott Voll wrote:
>
> Who is using Ops Mananger Suite?
> Is it worth the money?
> Comments welcome.
> Thanks
> Scott
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip [at] puck <mailto:cisco-voip [at] puck>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>



------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 12:43:51 -0700
From: "Voll, Scott" <Scott.Voll [at] wesd>
Subject: [cisco-voip] utilization reports on a T1 PRI connection
To: "'ealeatherman [at] gmail'" <ealeatherman [at] gmail>,
"'kli [at] dal'" <kli [at] dal>
Cc: Cisco VoIPoE List <cisco-voip [at] puck>
Message-ID:
<06D9FD985A42704BB0E8F483ACA3FE2E3EE30E2BB5 [at] miranda>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Cacti does work pretty well.

I need to change the colors.

Scott

[cid:image001.jpg [at] 01C92943]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20081008/ca80b6bc/
attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 42143 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL:
<https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20081008/ca80b6bc/
attachment.jpg>

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


End of cisco-voip Digest, Vol 60, Issue 64
******************************************

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


erickbee at gmail

Jan 17, 2009, 2:27 PM

Post #15 of 18 (7229 views)
Permalink
Re: utilization reports on a T1 PRI connection [In reply to]

Is the link below still good for getting this PRI info into a cacti
graph? The link is showing E1 information and not info relating to PRI
usage. I'm stumbling around creating my own and finding all the
correct OIDs so rather use an existing template if there is one.

Thanks.

On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Voll, Scott <Scott.Voll [at] wesd> wrote:
> We are currently using the graph / template at the bottom of this link.
>
>
>
> http://forums.cacti.net/viewtopic.php?t=20443
>
>
>
> Scott
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip [at] puck
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


keli at carocomp

Jan 18, 2009, 11:46 PM

Post #16 of 18 (7242 views)
Permalink
Re: utilization reports on a T1 PRI connection [In reply to]

Number of voice calls on a E1 is PRI usage, isn't it? The OIDs
discussed/used in that thread show DS0 (E1/T1 channels) usage on
DS1(E1/T1) ports, so it's independent whether it's E1 or T1.

regards,
Zoltan

Erick Bergquist wrote:
> Is the link below still good for getting this PRI info into a cacti
> graph? The link is showing E1 information and not info relating to PRI
> usage. I'm stumbling around creating my own and finding all the
> correct OIDs so rather use an existing template if there is one.
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Voll, Scott <Scott.Voll [at] wesd> wrote:
>
>> We are currently using the graph / template at the bottom of this link.
>>
>>
>>
>> http://forums.cacti.net/viewtopic.php?t=20443
>>
>>
>>
>> Scott
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip [at] puck
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip [at] puck
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


Scott.Voll at wesd

Jan 21, 2009, 8:24 AM

Post #17 of 18 (7181 views)
Permalink
Re: utilization reports on a T1 PRI connection [In reply to]

correct

-----Original Message-----
From: Kelemen Zoltan [mailto:keli [at] carocomp]
Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2009 11:47 PM
To: Erick Bergquist
Cc: Voll, Scott; Cisco VoIPoE List; Carlos Ortiz; Chris Clouse
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] utilization reports on a T1 PRI connection

Number of voice calls on a E1 is PRI usage, isn't it? The OIDs
discussed/used in that thread show DS0 (E1/T1 channels) usage on
DS1(E1/T1) ports, so it's independent whether it's E1 or T1.

regards,
Zoltan

Erick Bergquist wrote:
> Is the link below still good for getting this PRI info into a cacti
> graph? The link is showing E1 information and not info relating to PRI
> usage. I'm stumbling around creating my own and finding all the
> correct OIDs so rather use an existing template if there is one.
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Voll, Scott <Scott.Voll [at] wesd> wrote:
>
>> We are currently using the graph / template at the bottom of this link.
>>
>>
>>
>> http://forums.cacti.net/viewtopic.php?t=20443
>>
>>
>>
>> Scott
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip [at] puck
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip [at] puck
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>


_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


erickbee at gmail

Jan 21, 2009, 8:57 AM

Post #18 of 18 (7194 views)
Permalink
Re: utilization reports on a T1 PRI connection [In reply to]

Ok, my bad. Those work fine. I had a mix of H323/MGCP gateways and
wasn't getting anything back on one but it was a MGCP gateway and that
MIB doesn't get updated for MGCP PRIs.

Thanks.

On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Voll, Scott <Scott.Voll [at] wesd> wrote:
> correct
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kelemen Zoltan [mailto:keli [at] carocomp]
> Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2009 11:47 PM
> To: Erick Bergquist
> Cc: Voll, Scott; Cisco VoIPoE List; Carlos Ortiz; Chris Clouse
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] utilization reports on a T1 PRI connection
>
> Number of voice calls on a E1 is PRI usage, isn't it? The OIDs
> discussed/used in that thread show DS0 (E1/T1 channels) usage on
> DS1(E1/T1) ports, so it's independent whether it's E1 or T1.
>
> regards,
> Zoltan
>
> Erick Bergquist wrote:
>> Is the link below still good for getting this PRI info into a cacti
>> graph? The link is showing E1 information and not info relating to PRI
>> usage. I'm stumbling around creating my own and finding all the
>> correct OIDs so rather use an existing template if there is one.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Voll, Scott <Scott.Voll [at] wesd> wrote:
>>
>>> We are currently using the graph / template at the bottom of this link.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> http://forums.cacti.net/viewtopic.php?t=20443
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Scott
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip [at] puck
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip [at] puck
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Cisco voip RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.