Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: Cisco: NSP
Capture expressions on an FWSM (was Re: Telnet FROM a PIX Appliance?)
 

Index | Next | Previous | View Flat


sam_mailinglists at spacething

Jun 30, 2008, 9:54 AM


Views: 505
Permalink
Capture expressions on an FWSM (was Re: Telnet FROM a PIX Appliance?)

Tony Varriale wrote:
> Any chance you could give the group more details before saying it
> can't be trusted?
>
I'm afraid I don't have any concrete details to add, but I've found
capture expressions on Firewall Service Modules to be quite
inconsistent. Presumably this is something to do with the modules
interaction with the chassis? I haven't had the time to lab this, and I
haven't always had problems, but I now generally work to the mantra that
"the absence of a packet in an FWSM capture is not proof that the packet
does not exist, but the presence of a packet in a capture does prove
it's existence".

Perhaps there is a cisco documentation on this, listing known caveats
and limitations?

Sam

> tv
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Higham, Josh" <jhigham[at]epri.com>
> To: <cisco-nsp[at]puck.nether.net>
> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 10:41 AM
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Telnet FROM a PIX Appliance?
>
>
>>> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces[at]puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ziv Leyes
>>>
>>> I guess it's more as a "working right" educational purpose,
>>> so you won't use your firewall as a debugging client.
>>> In newer versions there's the packet tracker that can help
>>> you debug connectivity problems.
>>> Ziv
>>
>> As an FYI, the ASA/Pix packet capture cannot currently be completely
>> trusted (version 8.0). I found an annoying bug where I would capture
>> the frame on a span session monitoring the port connected to the
>> firewall, but it wouldn't show up on the firewall capture.
>>
>> The packet in question was also being dropped by the firewall, but with
>> no logging (and with a permit ip any any rule in place). The 'fix' was
>> to apply a nat translation and then remove it. TAC was completely
>> unhelpful (worst ever TAC experience).
>>
>> Blocking outbound sessions on the firewall also means that it can't be
>> used to bounce an attack, if compromised.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Josh
>

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp[at]puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Subject User Time
Capture expressions on an FWSM (was Re: Telnet FROM a PIX Appliance?) sam_mailinglists at spacething Jun 30, 2008, 9:54 AM
    Re: Capture expressions on an FWSM (was Re: Telnet FROM a PIX Appliance?) jhigham at epri Jul 1, 2008, 9:06 AM
    Re: Capture expressions on an FWSM (was Re: Telnet FROM a PIX Appliance?) ayourtch at gmail Jul 2, 2008, 2:19 AM

  Index | Next | Previous | View Flat
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact lists@gossamer-threads.com
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.