Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: Cisco: NSP

Recommendations for bridging/tunneling hardware

 

 

Cisco nsp RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded


hal.epstien at gmail

Sep 11, 2007, 11:14 PM

Post #1 of 2 (148 views)
Permalink
Recommendations for bridging/tunneling hardware

Hi folks! We're trying to determine a low cost solution to bridge
802.11Q vlans over the internet between two locations. We are thinking
of using IOS with bridge groups and a IPIP or GRE tunnel between the
two locations. Encryption is not required.


Peak traffic is about 50Mbps and will be on fast ethernet. Not sure
how many packets per second...


Right now we are using some HP DL145 servers running linux and vtun to
do this. It seems to work well, but I'd like to replace the servers
with more reliable devices.


We are considering the 3600 series products to do this, but I'm not
sure how they will hold up under the kind of traffic levels we are
looking at.

Any suggestions?


Thanks!

Hal
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp[at]puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


lists at swaggi

Sep 12, 2007, 5:20 AM

Post #2 of 2 (146 views)
Permalink
Re: Recommendations for bridging/tunneling hardware [In reply to]

On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 23:14:45 -0700, Hal Epstien wrote
> Hi folks! We're trying to determine a low cost solution to bridge
> 802.11Q vlans over the internet between two locations. We are
> thinking of using IOS with bridge groups and a IPIP or GRE tunnel
> between the two locations. Encryption is not required.
>
> Peak traffic is about 50Mbps and will be on fast ethernet. Not sure
> how many packets per second...
>
> Right now we are using some HP DL145 servers running linux and vtun
> to do this. It seems to work well, but I'd like to replace the
> servers with more reliable devices.
>
> We are considering the 3600 series products to do this, but I'm not
> sure how they will hold up under the kind of traffic levels we are
> looking at.
>
> Any suggestions?
>


I recently went through the same scenario. Our requirements were roughly the
same and we decided on L2TPv3 with a 3745 and a 3845 as endpoints for the
tunnel. I don't think the 3600 series supports L2TPv3. We will be implementing
this in about two weeks so I will let you know how well it works (worked well
in the lab).

I'm curious to see your linux/vtun solution, perhaps you can share it off-list?

Yuri

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp[at]puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Cisco nsp RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact lists@gossamer-threads.com
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.