Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: Cisco: NSP

ME3600X IOS Version

 

 

Cisco nsp RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded


cisco-nsp at itpro

Jun 25, 2012, 12:08 AM

Post #1 of 6 (644 views)
Permalink
ME3600X IOS Version

Hi,

I know the ME3600X has come up quite a lot recently on this list, but as
far as I recall and can find, it has been a while since there have been
any comments regarding the "best/most stable" version.

I am currently running 151-2.EY but will deploying some more hardware
shortly and would be interested what versions others are successfully
using, especially 15.2S or 15.2S1. 151-2.EY has been good so far but I
am aware of the rapid development on software for this platform and also
that there are quite a few issues around.

Thanks

Ivan
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


reuben-cisco-nsp at reub

Jun 25, 2012, 12:28 AM

Post #2 of 6 (605 views)
Permalink
Re: ME3600X IOS Version [In reply to]

I'd recommend 15.2(2)S1. 15.1(2)EY is a branch release which probably
won't have a long lifespan now that these switches have been integrated
into mainline S code.

15.2(2)S1 has been solidly stable for us with the exception of what
appears to be a cosmetic bug in that these messages are printed to the
console:

"Jun 25 17:10:02.164: %SFF8472-3-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te0/2: Rx power
high alarm; Operating value: 1.4 dBm, Threshold value: 0.0 dBm."

I vaguely recall seeing a DDTS Caveat about this problem too.

Otherwise all good, no other issues....and really like the hardware.

Reuben


On 25/06/2012 5:08 PM, Ivan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know the ME3600X has come up quite a lot recently on this list, but as
> far as I recall and can find, it has been a while since there have been
> any comments regarding the "best/most stable" version.
>
> I am currently running 151-2.EY but will deploying some more hardware
> shortly and would be interested what versions others are successfully
> using, especially 15.2S or 15.2S1. 151-2.EY has been good so far but I
> am aware of the rapid development on software for this platform and also
> that there are quite a few issues around.

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


faruk.sejdic at bhtelecom

Jun 25, 2012, 4:22 AM

Post #3 of 6 (604 views)
Permalink
Re: ME3600X IOS Version [In reply to]

It's hard to say, we're still waiting for right release. :(

We already tried all this versions but all of them have serious bugs.
Even with new 15.2(2)S1 we hit a bug with Multicast Traffic Failure on EVC Interface
In general, if you have EVC on interface configured with IPTV VLAN (mostly multicast traffic)
and tried to add this EVC to an other interface multicast stops.

Cisco TAC says this should be fixed in 15.2(4)S.
:)

Regards
Faruk




I'd recommend 15.2(2)S1. 15.1(2)EY is a branch release which probably
won't have a long lifespan now that these switches have been integrated
into mainline S code.

15.2(2)S1 has been solidly stable for us with the exception of what
appears to be a cosmetic bug in that these messages are printed to the
console:

"Jun 25 17:10:02.164: %SFF8472-3-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te0/2: Rx power
high alarm; Operating value: 1.4 dBm, Threshold value: 0.0 dBm."

I vaguely recall seeing a DDTS Caveat about this problem too.

Otherwise all good, no other issues....and really like the hardware.

Reuben


On 25/06/2012 5:08 PM, Ivan wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I know the ME3600X has come up quite a lot recently on this list, but as
> far as I recall and can find, it has been a while since there have been
> any comments regarding the "best/most stable" version.
>
> I am currently running 151-2.EY but will deploying some more hardware
> shortly and would be interested what versions others are successfully
> using, especially 15.2S or 15.2S1. 151-2.EY has been good so far but I
> am aware of the rapid development on software for this platform and also
> that there are quite a few issues around.


_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


waris at cisco

Jul 2, 2012, 1:56 AM

Post #4 of 6 (563 views)
Permalink
Re: ME3600X IOS Version [In reply to]

Faruk,
Can you send me the SR number for the following issue?
It should be fixed in 15.2(2)S too. Let me confirm the release and will get back to you.

Regards,
Waris


-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces [at] puck [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Faruk Sejdic
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 4:22 AM
To: cisco-nsp [at] puck
Cc: cisco-nsp-request [at] puck
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X IOS Version

It's hard to say, we're still waiting for right release. :(

We already tried all this versions but all of them have serious bugs.
Even with new 15.2(2)S1 we hit a bug with Multicast Traffic Failure on EVC Interface In general, if you have EVC on interface configured with IPTV VLAN (mostly multicast traffic) and tried to add this EVC to an other interface multicast stops.

Cisco TAC says this should be fixed in 15.2(4)S.
:)

Regards
Faruk




I'd recommend 15.2(2)S1. 15.1(2)EY is a branch release which probably won't have a long lifespan now that these switches have been integrated into mainline S code.

15.2(2)S1 has been solidly stable for us with the exception of what appears to be a cosmetic bug in that these messages are printed to the
console:

"Jun 25 17:10:02.164: %SFF8472-3-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te0/2: Rx power
high alarm; Operating value: 1.4 dBm, Threshold value: 0.0 dBm."

I vaguely recall seeing a DDTS Caveat about this problem too.

Otherwise all good, no other issues....and really like the hardware.

Reuben


On 25/06/2012 5:08 PM, Ivan wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I know the ME3600X has come up quite a lot recently on this list, but
> as far as I recall and can find, it has been a while since there have
> been any comments regarding the "best/most stable" version.
>
> I am currently running 151-2.EY but will deploying some more hardware
> shortly and would be interested what versions others are successfully
> using, especially 15.2S or 15.2S1. 151-2.EY has been good so far but
> I am aware of the rapid development on software for this platform and
> also that there are quite a few issues around.


_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


faruk.sejdic at bhtelecom

Jul 2, 2012, 2:11 PM

Post #5 of 6 (546 views)
Permalink
Re: ME3600X IOS Version [In reply to]

Hi Waris,

It is SR 620762785

Tnx in advance

Regards,
Faruk

On 2.7.2012 10:56, Waris Sagheer (waris) wrote:
> Faruk,
> Can you send me the SR number for the following issue?
> It should be fixed in 15.2(2)S too. Let me confirm the release and will get back to you.
>
> Regards,
> Waris
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces [at] puck [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Faruk Sejdic
> Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 4:22 AM
> To: cisco-nsp [at] puck
> Cc: cisco-nsp-request [at] puck
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X IOS Version
>
> It's hard to say, we're still waiting for right release. :(
>
> We already tried all this versions but all of them have serious bugs.
> Even with new 15.2(2)S1 we hit a bug with Multicast Traffic Failure on EVC Interface In general, if you have EVC on interface configured with IPTV VLAN (mostly multicast traffic) and tried to add this EVC to an other interface multicast stops.
>
> Cisco TAC says this should be fixed in 15.2(4)S.
> :)
>
> Regards
> Faruk
>
>
>
>
> I'd recommend 15.2(2)S1. 15.1(2)EY is a branch release which probably won't have a long lifespan now that these switches have been integrated into mainline S code.
>
> 15.2(2)S1 has been solidly stable for us with the exception of what appears to be a cosmetic bug in that these messages are printed to the
> console:
>
> "Jun 25 17:10:02.164: %SFF8472-3-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te0/2: Rx power
> high alarm; Operating value: 1.4 dBm, Threshold value: 0.0 dBm."
>
> I vaguely recall seeing a DDTS Caveat about this problem too.
>
> Otherwise all good, no other issues....and really like the hardware.
>
> Reuben
>
>
> On 25/06/2012 5:08 PM, Ivan wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I know the ME3600X has come up quite a lot recently on this list, but
>> as far as I recall and can find, it has been a while since there have
>> been any comments regarding the "best/most stable" version.
>>
>> I am currently running 151-2.EY but will deploying some more hardware
>> shortly and would be interested what versions others are successfully
>> using, especially 15.2S or 15.2S1. 151-2.EY has been good so far but
>> I am aware of the rapid development on software for this platform and
>> also that there are quite a few issues around.
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>




_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


waris at cisco

Jul 3, 2012, 9:56 AM

Post #6 of 6 (543 views)
Permalink
Re: ME3600X IOS Version [In reply to]

Hi Faruk,
The fix for the ddts reported in the SR will be integrated in the following releases,

* 15.2(2)S2 - August 2012
* 15.2(4)S - July 30th 2012
* 15.1(2)EY3 - Already posted on CCO

Regards,
Waris


-----Original Message-----
From: faruk.sejdic [at] bhtelecom [mailto:faruk.sejdic [at] bhtelecom]
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 2:11 PM
To: Waris Sagheer (waris)
Cc: cisco-nsp [at] puck; cisco-nsp-request [at] puck
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X IOS Version

Hi Waris,

It is SR 620762785

Tnx in advance

Regards,
Faruk

On 2.7.2012 10:56, Waris Sagheer (waris) wrote:
> Faruk,
> Can you send me the SR number for the following issue?
> It should be fixed in 15.2(2)S too. Let me confirm the release and will get back to you.
>
> Regards,
> Waris
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces [at] puck
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Faruk Sejdic
> Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 4:22 AM
> To: cisco-nsp [at] puck
> Cc: cisco-nsp-request [at] puck
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME3600X IOS Version
>
> It's hard to say, we're still waiting for right release. :(
>
> We already tried all this versions but all of them have serious bugs.
> Even with new 15.2(2)S1 we hit a bug with Multicast Traffic Failure on EVC Interface In general, if you have EVC on interface configured with IPTV VLAN (mostly multicast traffic) and tried to add this EVC to an other interface multicast stops.
>
> Cisco TAC says this should be fixed in 15.2(4)S.
> :)
>
> Regards
> Faruk
>
>
>
>
> I'd recommend 15.2(2)S1. 15.1(2)EY is a branch release which probably won't have a long lifespan now that these switches have been integrated into mainline S code.
>
> 15.2(2)S1 has been solidly stable for us with the exception of what
> appears to be a cosmetic bug in that these messages are printed to the
> console:
>
> "Jun 25 17:10:02.164: %SFF8472-3-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te0/2: Rx power
> high alarm; Operating value: 1.4 dBm, Threshold value: 0.0 dBm."
>
> I vaguely recall seeing a DDTS Caveat about this problem too.
>
> Otherwise all good, no other issues....and really like the hardware.
>
> Reuben
>
>
> On 25/06/2012 5:08 PM, Ivan wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I know the ME3600X has come up quite a lot recently on this list, but
>> as far as I recall and can find, it has been a while since there have
>> been any comments regarding the "best/most stable" version.
>>
>> I am currently running 151-2.EY but will deploying some more hardware
>> shortly and would be interested what versions others are
>> successfully using, especially 15.2S or 15.2S1. 151-2.EY has been
>> good so far but I am aware of the rapid development on software for
>> this platform and also that there are quite a few issues around.
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>





_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Cisco nsp RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.