Mailing List Archive: Cisco: NSP

VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x)

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

ihsan.junaidi at gmail

May 9, 2012, 7:36 AM

Post #1 of 17 (1382 views)
Permalink

VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x)

Hi all,

My topology as follows:

PE1--P1--P2--P3--P4--P5--PE2

PE1 lo0 - 200.28.0.15 (15.2(2)S) loader 12.2(52r)EY1
PE2 lo0 - 200.28.0.120 (15.2(2)S) loader 12.2(52r)EY2

Are there specific nuances for an LDP signaled transport for EoMPLS and VPLS in the Whales platform?

An xconnect from PE1 to PE2 is signaled successfully however a VPLS instance based on BGP autodiscovery (manual VPLS works) is unable to bring up the LDP l2transport signal although the VFI is signaled up.

EoMPLS
----
es-103-glsfb#sh xconnect peer 200.28.0.120 vc 5070
Legend: XC ST=Xconnect State S1=Segment1 State S2=Segment2 State
UP=Up DN=Down AD=Admin Down IA=Inactive
SB=Standby HS=Hot Standby RV=Recovering NH=No Hardware

XC ST Segment 1 S1 Segment 2 S2
------+---------------------------------+--+---------------------------------+--
UP pri ac Gi0/19:1(Ethernet) UP mpls 200.28.0.120:5070 UP

es-103-glsfb#sh mpls l2transport vc 5070 detail
Local interface: Gi0/19 up, line protocol up, Ethernet:1 up
Destination address: 200.28.0.120, VC ID: 5070, VC status: up
Output interface: Te0/2, imposed label stack {298 16}
Preferred path: not configured
Default path: active
Next hop: 200.28.2.242
Create time: 02:10:43, last status change time: 02:08:57
Signaling protocol: LDP, peer 200.28.0.120:0 up
Targeted Hello: 200.28.0.15(LDP Id) -> 200.28.0.120, LDP is UP
Status TLV support (local/remote) : enabled/supported
LDP route watch : disabled
Label/status state machine : established, LruRru
Last local dataplane status rcvd: No fault
Last BFD dataplane status rcvd: Not sent
Last BFD peer monitor status rcvd: No fault
Last local AC circuit status rcvd: No fault
Last local AC circuit status sent: No fault
Last local LDP TLV status sent: No fault
Last remote LDP TLV status rcvd: No fault
Last remote LDP ADJ status rcvd: No fault
MPLS VC labels: local 17, remote 16
Group ID: local 0, remote 0
MTU: local 9178, remote 9178
Remote interface description:
Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled
Control Word: On (configured: autosense)
Dataplane:
SSM segment/switch IDs: 45083/8194 (used), PWID: 2
VC statistics:
transit packet totals: receive 24, send 21
transit byte totals: receive 2064, send 1344
transit packet drops: receive 0, seq error 0, send 0

VPLS
----
es-103-glsfb#sh vfi
Legend: RT=Route-target, S=Split-horizon, Y=Yes, N=No

VFI name: ME002555, state: up, type: multipoint signaling: LDP
VPN ID: 116, VPLS-ID: 9930:116
RD: 9930:116, RT: 9930:116
Bridge-Domain 116 attachment circuits:
Vlan116
Neighbors connected via pseudowires:
Peer Address VC ID Discovered Router ID S
200.28.9.146 116 200.28.0.120 Y

es-103-glsfb#sh mpls l2transport vc 116 detail
Local interface: VFI ME002555 vfi up
Interworking type is Ethernet
Destination address: 200.28.0.120, VC ID: 116, VC status: down
Last error: Local access circuit is not ready for label advertise
Next hop PE address: 200.28.9.146
Output interface: none, imposed label stack {}
Preferred path: not configured
Default path: no route
No adjacency
Create time: 02:07:55, last status change time: 02:07:55
Signaling protocol: LDP, peer unknown
Targeted Hello: 200.28.0.15(LDP Id) -> 200.28.9.146, LDP is DOWN, no binding
Status TLV support (local/remote) : enabled/None (no remote binding)
LDP route watch : disabled
Label/status state machine : local standby, AC-ready, LnuRnd
Last local dataplane status rcvd: No fault
Last BFD dataplane status rcvd: Not sent
Last BFD peer monitor status rcvd: No fault
Last local AC circuit status rcvd: No fault
Last local AC circuit status sent: Not sent
Last local LDP TLV status sent: None
Last remote LDP TLV status rcvd: None (no remote binding)
Last remote LDP ADJ status rcvd: None (no remote binding)
MPLS VC labels: local 23, remote unassigned
AGI: type 1, len 8, 000A 26CA 0000 0074
Local AII: type 1, len 4, DF1C 000F (200.28.0.15)
Remote AII: type 1, len 4, DF1C 0078 (200.28.0.120)
Group ID: local n/a, remote unknown
MTU: local 9178, remote unknown
Remote interface description:
Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled
Control Word: On (configured: autosense)
Dataplane:
SSM segment/switch IDs: 0/0 (used), PWID: 14
VC statistics:
transit packet totals: receive 0, send 0
transit byte totals: receive 0, send 0
transit packet drops: receive 0, seq error 0, send 0

I'm getting the account team into the loop but if anyone has encountered this scenario before and managed to find the answer, that would be most helpful.

ihsan
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

avayner at cisco

May 9, 2012, 3:44 PM

Post #2 of 17 (1284 views)
Permalink

Re: VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x) [In reply to]

Ihsan,

On which IOS version are you?
This should work on 15.2S

Arie

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces [at] puck
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Ihsan Junaidi
Ibrahim
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 07:37
To: cisco-nsp [at] puck
Subject: [c-nsp] VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x)

Hi all,

My topology as follows:

PE1--P1--P2--P3--P4--P5--PE2

PE1 lo0 - 200.28.0.15 (15.2(2)S) loader 12.2(52r)EY1
PE2 lo0 - 200.28.0.120 (15.2(2)S) loader 12.2(52r)EY2

Are there specific nuances for an LDP signaled transport for EoMPLS and
VPLS in the Whales platform?

An xconnect from PE1 to PE2 is signaled successfully however a VPLS
instance based on BGP autodiscovery (manual VPLS works) is unable to
bring up the LDP l2transport signal although the VFI is signaled up.

EoMPLS
----
es-103-glsfb#sh xconnect peer 200.28.0.120 vc 5070
Legend: XC ST=Xconnect State S1=Segment1 State S2=Segment2 State
UP=Up DN=Down AD=Admin Down IA=Inactive
SB=Standby HS=Hot Standby RV=Recovering NH=No Hardware

XC ST Segment 1 S1 Segment 2
S2
------+---------------------------------+--+----------------------------
-----+--
UP pri ac Gi0/19:1(Ethernet) UP mpls 200.28.0.120:5070
UP

es-103-glsfb#sh mpls l2transport vc 5070 detail Local interface: Gi0/19
up, line protocol up, Ethernet:1 up
Destination address: 200.28.0.120, VC ID: 5070, VC status: up
Output interface: Te0/2, imposed label stack {298 16}
Preferred path: not configured
Default path: active
Next hop: 200.28.2.242
Create time: 02:10:43, last status change time: 02:08:57
Signaling protocol: LDP, peer 200.28.0.120:0 up
Targeted Hello: 200.28.0.15(LDP Id) -> 200.28.0.120, LDP is UP
Status TLV support (local/remote) : enabled/supported
LDP route watch : disabled
Label/status state machine : established, LruRru
Last local dataplane status rcvd: No fault
Last BFD dataplane status rcvd: Not sent
Last BFD peer monitor status rcvd: No fault
Last local AC circuit status rcvd: No fault
Last local AC circuit status sent: No fault
Last local LDP TLV status sent: No fault
Last remote LDP TLV status rcvd: No fault
Last remote LDP ADJ status rcvd: No fault
MPLS VC labels: local 17, remote 16
Group ID: local 0, remote 0
MTU: local 9178, remote 9178
Remote interface description:
Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled
Control Word: On (configured: autosense)
Dataplane:
SSM segment/switch IDs: 45083/8194 (used), PWID: 2
VC statistics:
transit packet totals: receive 24, send 21
transit byte totals: receive 2064, send 1344
transit packet drops: receive 0, seq error 0, send 0

VPLS
----
es-103-glsfb#sh vfi
Legend: RT=Route-target, S=Split-horizon, Y=Yes, N=No

VFI name: ME002555, state: up, type: multipoint signaling: LDP
VPN ID: 116, VPLS-ID: 9930:116
RD: 9930:116, RT: 9930:116
Bridge-Domain 116 attachment circuits:
Vlan116
Neighbors connected via pseudowires:
Peer Address VC ID Discovered Router ID S
200.28.9.146 116 200.28.0.120 Y

es-103-glsfb#sh mpls l2transport vc 116 detail Local interface: VFI
ME002555 vfi up
Interworking type is Ethernet
Destination address: 200.28.0.120, VC ID: 116, VC status: down
Last error: Local access circuit is not ready for label advertise
Next hop PE address: 200.28.9.146
Output interface: none, imposed label stack {}
Preferred path: not configured
Default path: no route
No adjacency
Create time: 02:07:55, last status change time: 02:07:55
Signaling protocol: LDP, peer unknown
Targeted Hello: 200.28.0.15(LDP Id) -> 200.28.9.146, LDP is DOWN, no
binding
Status TLV support (local/remote) : enabled/None (no remote
binding)
LDP route watch : disabled
Label/status state machine : local standby, AC-ready,
LnuRnd
Last local dataplane status rcvd: No fault
Last BFD dataplane status rcvd: Not sent
Last BFD peer monitor status rcvd: No fault
Last local AC circuit status rcvd: No fault
Last local AC circuit status sent: Not sent
Last local LDP TLV status sent: None
Last remote LDP TLV status rcvd: None (no remote binding)
Last remote LDP ADJ status rcvd: None (no remote binding)
MPLS VC labels: local 23, remote unassigned
AGI: type 1, len 8, 000A 26CA 0000 0074
Local AII: type 1, len 4, DF1C 000F (200.28.0.15)
Remote AII: type 1, len 4, DF1C 0078 (200.28.0.120)
Group ID: local n/a, remote unknown
MTU: local 9178, remote unknown
Remote interface description:
Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled
Control Word: On (configured: autosense)
Dataplane:
SSM segment/switch IDs: 0/0 (used), PWID: 14
VC statistics:
transit packet totals: receive 0, send 0
transit byte totals: receive 0, send 0
transit packet drops: receive 0, seq error 0, send 0

I'm getting the account team into the loop but if anyone has encountered
this scenario before and managed to find the answer, that would be most
helpful.

ihsan
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

ihsan.junaidi at gmail

May 9, 2012, 6:36 PM

Post #3 of 17 (1366 views)
Permalink

Re: VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x) [In reply to]

Arie,

Both boxes are on 15.2S with the exception of PE1 having the bootloader version of EY1 while PE2 is on EY2.

The issue I'm facing with VPLS is only happening when using BGP autodiscovery.

From the output that I'm seeing on PE1, it is failing to establish a targeted LDP session with the PE2 lo0 next-hop router which the physical interface IP is correctly determined i.e. 200.28.9.246.

On PE2, it correctly detects PE1's next-hop router lo0.

es-03-akhmw#sh mpls l2transport vc 116 det
Local interface: VFI ME002617 vfi up
Interworking type is Ethernet
Destination address: 200.28.0.15, VC ID: 116, VC status: down
Last error: Local access circuit is not ready for label advertise
Next hop PE address: 200.28.2.242
Output interface: none, imposed label stack {}
Preferred path: not configured
Default path: no route
No adjacency
Create time: 13:08:55, last status change time: 00:00:09
Signaling protocol: LDP, peer 200.28.0.16:0 up
Targeted Hello: 200.28.0.120(LDP Id) -> 200.28.2.242, LDP is DOWN, no binding
Status TLV support (local/remote) : enabled/None (no remote binding)
LDP route watch : disabled
Label/status state machine : local ready, LruRnd
Last local dataplane status rcvd: No fault
Last BFD dataplane status rcvd: Not sent
Last BFD peer monitor status rcvd: No fault
Last local AC circuit status rcvd: No fault
Last local AC circuit status sent: Not sent
Last local LDP TLV status sent: No fault
Last remote LDP TLV status rcvd: None (no remote binding)
Last remote LDP ADJ status rcvd: None (no remote binding)
MPLS VC labels: local 637, remote unassigned
AGI: type 1, len 8, 000A 26CA 0000 0074
Local AII: type 1, len 4, DF1C 0078 (200.28.0.120)
Remote AII: type 1, len 4, DF1C 000F (200.28.0.15)
Group ID: local n/a, remote unknown
MTU: local 9178, remote unknown
Remote interface description:
Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled
Control Word: On (configured: autosense)
Dataplane:
SSM segment/switch IDs: 0/0 (used), PWID: 2
VC statistics:
transit packet totals: receive 0, send 0
transit byte totals: receive 0, send 0
transit packet drops: receive 0, seq error 0, send 0

Manual VPLS provisioning and EoMPLS work as advertised.

ihsan

On May 10, 2012, at 6:44 AM, Arie Vayner (avayner) wrote:

> Ihsan,
>
> On which IOS version are you?
> This should work on 15.2S
>
> Arie
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces [at] puck
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Ihsan Junaidi
> Ibrahim
> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 07:37
> To: cisco-nsp [at] puck
> Subject: [c-nsp] VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x)
>
> Hi all,
>
> My topology as follows:
>
> PE1--P1--P2--P3--P4--P5--PE2
>
> PE1 lo0 - 200.28.0.15 (15.2(2)S) loader 12.2(52r)EY1
> PE2 lo0 - 200.28.0.120 (15.2(2)S) loader 12.2(52r)EY2
>
> Are there specific nuances for an LDP signaled transport for EoMPLS and
> VPLS in the Whales platform?
>
> An xconnect from PE1 to PE2 is signaled successfully however a VPLS
> instance based on BGP autodiscovery (manual VPLS works) is unable to
> bring up the LDP l2transport signal although the VFI is signaled up.
>
> EoMPLS
> ----
> es-103-glsfb#sh xconnect peer 200.28.0.120 vc 5070
> Legend: XC ST=Xconnect State S1=Segment1 State S2=Segment2 State
> UP=Up DN=Down AD=Admin Down IA=Inactive
> SB=Standby HS=Hot Standby RV=Recovering NH=No Hardware
>
> XC ST Segment 1 S1 Segment 2
> S2
> ------+---------------------------------+--+----------------------------
> -----+--
> UP pri ac Gi0/19:1(Ethernet) UP mpls 200.28.0.120:5070
> UP
>
> es-103-glsfb#sh mpls l2transport vc 5070 detail Local interface: Gi0/19
> up, line protocol up, Ethernet:1 up
> Destination address: 200.28.0.120, VC ID: 5070, VC status: up
> Output interface: Te0/2, imposed label stack {298 16}
> Preferred path: not configured
> Default path: active
> Next hop: 200.28.2.242
> Create time: 02:10:43, last status change time: 02:08:57
> Signaling protocol: LDP, peer 200.28.0.120:0 up
> Targeted Hello: 200.28.0.15(LDP Id) -> 200.28.0.120, LDP is UP
> Status TLV support (local/remote) : enabled/supported
> LDP route watch : disabled
> Label/status state machine : established, LruRru
> Last local dataplane status rcvd: No fault
> Last BFD dataplane status rcvd: Not sent
> Last BFD peer monitor status rcvd: No fault
> Last local AC circuit status rcvd: No fault
> Last local AC circuit status sent: No fault
> Last local LDP TLV status sent: No fault
> Last remote LDP TLV status rcvd: No fault
> Last remote LDP ADJ status rcvd: No fault
> MPLS VC labels: local 17, remote 16
> Group ID: local 0, remote 0
> MTU: local 9178, remote 9178
> Remote interface description:
> Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled
> Control Word: On (configured: autosense)
> Dataplane:
> SSM segment/switch IDs: 45083/8194 (used), PWID: 2
> VC statistics:
> transit packet totals: receive 24, send 21
> transit byte totals: receive 2064, send 1344
> transit packet drops: receive 0, seq error 0, send 0
>
> VPLS
> ----
> es-103-glsfb#sh vfi
> Legend: RT=Route-target, S=Split-horizon, Y=Yes, N=No
>
> VFI name: ME002555, state: up, type: multipoint signaling: LDP
> VPN ID: 116, VPLS-ID: 9930:116
> RD: 9930:116, RT: 9930:116
> Bridge-Domain 116 attachment circuits:
> Vlan116
> Neighbors connected via pseudowires:
> Peer Address VC ID Discovered Router ID S
> 200.28.9.146 116 200.28.0.120 Y
>
> es-103-glsfb#sh mpls l2transport vc 116 detail Local interface: VFI
> ME002555 vfi up
> Interworking type is Ethernet
> Destination address: 200.28.0.120, VC ID: 116, VC status: down
> Last error: Local access circuit is not ready for label advertise
> Next hop PE address: 200.28.9.146
> Output interface: none, imposed label stack {}
> Preferred path: not configured
> Default path: no route
> No adjacency
> Create time: 02:07:55, last status change time: 02:07:55
> Signaling protocol: LDP, peer unknown
> Targeted Hello: 200.28.0.15(LDP Id) -> 200.28.9.146, LDP is DOWN, no
> binding
> Status TLV support (local/remote) : enabled/None (no remote
> binding)
> LDP route watch : disabled
> Label/status state machine : local standby, AC-ready,
> LnuRnd
> Last local dataplane status rcvd: No fault
> Last BFD dataplane status rcvd: Not sent
> Last BFD peer monitor status rcvd: No fault
> Last local AC circuit status rcvd: No fault
> Last local AC circuit status sent: Not sent
> Last local LDP TLV status sent: None
> Last remote LDP TLV status rcvd: None (no remote binding)
> Last remote LDP ADJ status rcvd: None (no remote binding)
> MPLS VC labels: local 23, remote unassigned
> AGI: type 1, len 8, 000A 26CA 0000 0074
> Local AII: type 1, len 4, DF1C 000F (200.28.0.15)
> Remote AII: type 1, len 4, DF1C 0078 (200.28.0.120)
> Group ID: local n/a, remote unknown
> MTU: local 9178, remote unknown
> Remote interface description:
> Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled
> Control Word: On (configured: autosense)
> Dataplane:
> SSM segment/switch IDs: 0/0 (used), PWID: 14
> VC statistics:
> transit packet totals: receive 0, send 0
> transit byte totals: receive 0, send 0
> transit packet drops: receive 0, seq error 0, send 0
>
> I'm getting the account team into the loop but if anyone has encountered
> this scenario before and managed to find the answer, that would be most
> helpful.
>
> ihsan
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

alumbis at gmail

May 9, 2012, 7:40 PM

Post #4 of 17 (1299 views)
Permalink

Re: VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x) [In reply to]

What do you see in "show xconn rib"?

On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim
<ihsan.junaidi [at] gmail> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> My topology as follows:
>
> PE1--P1--P2--P3--P4--P5--PE2
>
> PE1 lo0 - 200.28.0.15 (15.2(2)S) loader 12.2(52r)EY1
> PE2 lo0 - 200.28.0.120 (15.2(2)S) loader 12.2(52r)EY2
>
> Are there specific nuances for an LDP signaled transport for EoMPLS and VPLS in the Whales platform?
>
> An xconnect from PE1 to PE2 is signaled successfully however a VPLS instance based on BGP autodiscovery (manual VPLS works) is unable to bring up the LDP l2transport signal although the VFI is signaled up.
>
> EoMPLS
> ----
> es-103-glsfb#sh xconnect peer 200.28.0.120 vc 5070
> Legend: � �XC ST=Xconnect State �S1=Segment1 State �S2=Segment2 State
> �UP=Up � � � DN=Down � � � � � �AD=Admin Down � � �IA=Inactive
> �SB=Standby �HS=Hot Standby � � RV=Recovering � � �NH=No Hardware
>
> XC ST �Segment 1 � � � � � � � � � � � � S1 Segment 2 � � � � � � � � � � � � S2
> ------+---------------------------------+--+---------------------------------+--
> UP pri � ac Gi0/19:1(Ethernet) � � � � � UP mpls 200.28.0.120:5070 � � � � � �UP
>
> es-103-glsfb#sh mpls l2transport vc 5070 detail
> Local interface: Gi0/19 up, line protocol up, Ethernet:1 up
> �Destination address: 200.28.0.120, VC ID: 5070, VC status: up
> � �Output interface: Te0/2, imposed label stack {298 16}
> � �Preferred path: not configured
> � �Default path: active
> � �Next hop: 200.28.2.242
> �Create time: 02:10:43, last status change time: 02:08:57
> �Signaling protocol: LDP, peer 200.28.0.120:0 up
> � �Targeted Hello: 200.28.0.15(LDP Id) -> 200.28.0.120, LDP is UP
> � �Status TLV support (local/remote) � : enabled/supported
> � � �LDP route watch � � � � � � � � � : disabled
> � � �Label/status state machine � � � �: established, LruRru
> � � �Last local dataplane � status rcvd: No fault
> � � �Last BFD dataplane � � status rcvd: Not sent
> � � �Last BFD peer monitor �status rcvd: No fault
> � � �Last local AC �circuit status rcvd: No fault
> � � �Last local AC �circuit status sent: No fault
> � � �Last local LDP TLV � � status sent: No fault
> � � �Last remote LDP TLV � �status rcvd: No fault
> � � �Last remote LDP ADJ � �status rcvd: No fault
> � �MPLS VC labels: local 17, remote 16
> � �Group ID: local 0, remote 0
> � �MTU: local 9178, remote 9178
> � �Remote interface description:
> �Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled
> �Control Word: On (configured: autosense)
> �Dataplane:
> � �SSM segment/switch IDs: 45083/8194 (used), PWID: 2
> �VC statistics:
> � �transit packet totals: receive 24, send 21
> � �transit byte totals: � receive 2064, send 1344
> � �transit packet drops: �receive 0, seq error 0, send 0
>
> VPLS
> ----
> es-103-glsfb#sh vfi
> Legend: RT=Route-target, S=Split-horizon, Y=Yes, N=No
>
> VFI name: ME002555, state: up, type: multipoint signaling: LDP
> �VPN ID: 116, VPLS-ID: 9930:116
> �RD: 9930:116, RT: 9930:116
> �Bridge-Domain 116 attachment circuits:
> � �Vlan116
> �Neighbors connected via pseudowires:
> �Peer Address � � VC ID � � � �Discovered Router ID � �S
> �200.28.9.146 � � 116 � � � � �200.28.0.120 � � � � � �Y
>
> es-103-glsfb#sh mpls l2transport vc 116 detail
> Local interface: VFI ME002555 vfi up
> �Interworking type is Ethernet
> �Destination address: 200.28.0.120, VC ID: 116, VC status: down
> � �Last error: Local access circuit is not ready for label advertise
> �Next hop PE address: 200.28.9.146
> � �Output interface: none, imposed label stack {}
> � �Preferred path: not configured
> � �Default path: no route
> � �No adjacency
> �Create time: 02:07:55, last status change time: 02:07:55
> �Signaling protocol: LDP, peer unknown
> � �Targeted Hello: 200.28.0.15(LDP Id) -> 200.28.9.146, LDP is DOWN, no binding
> � �Status TLV support (local/remote) � : enabled/None (no remote binding)
> � � �LDP route watch � � � � � � � � � : disabled
> � � �Label/status state machine � � � �: local standby, AC-ready, LnuRnd
> � � �Last local dataplane � status rcvd: No fault
> � � �Last BFD dataplane � � status rcvd: Not sent
> � � �Last BFD peer monitor �status rcvd: No fault
> � � �Last local AC �circuit status rcvd: No fault
> � � �Last local AC �circuit status sent: Not sent
> � � �Last local LDP TLV � � status sent: None
> � � �Last remote LDP TLV � �status rcvd: None (no remote binding)
> � � �Last remote LDP ADJ � �status rcvd: None (no remote binding)
> � �MPLS VC labels: local 23, remote unassigned
> � �AGI: type 1, len 8, 000A 26CA 0000 0074
> � �Local AII: type 1, len 4, DF1C 000F (200.28.0.15)
> � �Remote AII: type 1, len 4, DF1C 0078 (200.28.0.120)
> � �Group ID: local n/a, remote unknown
> � �MTU: local 9178, remote unknown
> � �Remote interface description:
> �Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled
> �Control Word: On (configured: autosense)
> �Dataplane:
> � �SSM segment/switch IDs: 0/0 (used), PWID: 14
> �VC statistics:
> � �transit packet totals: receive 0, send 0
> � �transit byte totals: � receive 0, send 0
> � �transit packet drops: �receive 0, seq error 0, send 0
>
> I'm getting the account team into the loop but if anyone has encountered this scenario before and managed to find the answer, that would be most helpful.
>
> ihsan
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list �cisco-nsp [at] puck
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

ihsan.junaidi at gmail

May 9, 2012, 9:00 PM

Post #5 of 17 (1323 views)
Permalink

Re: VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x) [In reply to]

On PE1,

es-103-glsfb#sh xconnect rib detail

Local Router ID: 200.28.0.15

VPLS-ID: 9930:116, Target ID: 200.28.0.120
iBGP Peer
Next-Hop: 200.28.9.146
Hello-Source: 200.28.0.15
Route-Target: 9930:116
Incoming RD: 9930:116
Forwarder: VFI ME002555
Provisioned: Yes
NLRI handle: 69000001

PE2,

es-03-akhmw#sh xconnect rib detail

Local Router ID: 200.28.0.120

VPLS-ID: 9930:116, Target ID: 200.28.0.15
iBGP Peer
Next-Hop: 200.28.2.242
Hello-Source: 200.28.0.120
Route-Target: 9930:116
Incoming RD: 9930:116
Forwarder: VFI ME002617
Provisioned: Yes
NLRI handle: 77000001

On May 10, 2012, at 10:40 AM, Pete Lumbis wrote:

> What do you see in "show xconn rib"?
>
> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim
> <ihsan.junaidi [at] gmail> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> My topology as follows:
>>
>> PE1--P1--P2--P3--P4--P5--PE2
>>
>> PE1 lo0 - 200.28.0.15 (15.2(2)S) loader 12.2(52r)EY1
>> PE2 lo0 - 200.28.0.120 (15.2(2)S) loader 12.2(52r)EY2
>>
>> Are there specific nuances for an LDP signaled transport for EoMPLS and VPLS in the Whales platform?
>>
>> An xconnect from PE1 to PE2 is signaled successfully however a VPLS instance based on BGP autodiscovery (manual VPLS works) is unable to bring up the LDP l2transport signal although the VFI is signaled up.
>>
>> EoMPLS
>> ----
>> es-103-glsfb#sh xconnect peer 200.28.0.120 vc 5070
>> Legend: XC ST=Xconnect State S1=Segment1 State S2=Segment2 State
>> UP=Up DN=Down AD=Admin Down IA=Inactive
>> SB=Standby HS=Hot Standby RV=Recovering NH=No Hardware
>>
>> XC ST Segment 1 S1 Segment 2 S2
>> ------+---------------------------------+--+---------------------------------+--
>> UP pri ac Gi0/19:1(Ethernet) UP mpls 200.28.0.120:5070 UP
>>
>> es-103-glsfb#sh mpls l2transport vc 5070 detail
>> Local interface: Gi0/19 up, line protocol up, Ethernet:1 up
>> Destination address: 200.28.0.120, VC ID: 5070, VC status: up
>> Output interface: Te0/2, imposed label stack {298 16}
>> Preferred path: not configured
>> Default path: active
>> Next hop: 200.28.2.242
>> Create time: 02:10:43, last status change time: 02:08:57
>> Signaling protocol: LDP, peer 200.28.0.120:0 up
>> Targeted Hello: 200.28.0.15(LDP Id) -> 200.28.0.120, LDP is UP
>> Status TLV support (local/remote) : enabled/supported
>> LDP route watch : disabled
>> Label/status state machine : established, LruRru
>> Last local dataplane status rcvd: No fault
>> Last BFD dataplane status rcvd: Not sent
>> Last BFD peer monitor status rcvd: No fault
>> Last local AC circuit status rcvd: No fault
>> Last local AC circuit status sent: No fault
>> Last local LDP TLV status sent: No fault
>> Last remote LDP TLV status rcvd: No fault
>> Last remote LDP ADJ status rcvd: No fault
>> MPLS VC labels: local 17, remote 16
>> Group ID: local 0, remote 0
>> MTU: local 9178, remote 9178
>> Remote interface description:
>> Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled
>> Control Word: On (configured: autosense)
>> Dataplane:
>> SSM segment/switch IDs: 45083/8194 (used), PWID: 2
>> VC statistics:
>> transit packet totals: receive 24, send 21
>> transit byte totals: receive 2064, send 1344
>> transit packet drops: receive 0, seq error 0, send 0
>>
>> VPLS
>> ----
>> es-103-glsfb#sh vfi
>> Legend: RT=Route-target, S=Split-horizon, Y=Yes, N=No
>>
>> VFI name: ME002555, state: up, type: multipoint signaling: LDP
>> VPN ID: 116, VPLS-ID: 9930:116
>> RD: 9930:116, RT: 9930:116
>> Bridge-Domain 116 attachment circuits:
>> Vlan116
>> Neighbors connected via pseudowires:
>> Peer Address VC ID Discovered Router ID S
>> 200.28.9.146 116 200.28.0.120 Y
>>
>> es-103-glsfb#sh mpls l2transport vc 116 detail
>> Local interface: VFI ME002555 vfi up
>> Interworking type is Ethernet
>> Destination address: 200.28.0.120, VC ID: 116, VC status: down
>> Last error: Local access circuit is not ready for label advertise
>> Next hop PE address: 200.28.9.146
>> Output interface: none, imposed label stack {}
>> Preferred path: not configured
>> Default path: no route
>> No adjacency
>> Create time: 02:07:55, last status change time: 02:07:55
>> Signaling protocol: LDP, peer unknown
>> Targeted Hello: 200.28.0.15(LDP Id) -> 200.28.9.146, LDP is DOWN, no binding
>> Status TLV support (local/remote) : enabled/None (no remote binding)
>> LDP route watch : disabled
>> Label/status state machine : local standby, AC-ready, LnuRnd
>> Last local dataplane status rcvd: No fault
>> Last BFD dataplane status rcvd: Not sent
>> Last BFD peer monitor status rcvd: No fault
>> Last local AC circuit status rcvd: No fault
>> Last local AC circuit status sent: Not sent
>> Last local LDP TLV status sent: None
>> Last remote LDP TLV status rcvd: None (no remote binding)
>> Last remote LDP ADJ status rcvd: None (no remote binding)
>> MPLS VC labels: local 23, remote unassigned
>> AGI: type 1, len 8, 000A 26CA 0000 0074
>> Local AII: type 1, len 4, DF1C 000F (200.28.0.15)
>> Remote AII: type 1, len 4, DF1C 0078 (200.28.0.120)
>> Group ID: local n/a, remote unknown
>> MTU: local 9178, remote unknown
>> Remote interface description:
>> Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled
>> Control Word: On (configured: autosense)
>> Dataplane:
>> SSM segment/switch IDs: 0/0 (used), PWID: 14
>> VC statistics:
>> transit packet totals: receive 0, send 0
>> transit byte totals: receive 0, send 0
>> transit packet drops: receive 0, seq error 0, send 0
>>
>> I'm getting the account team into the loop but if anyone has encountered this scenario before and managed to find the answer, that would be most helpful.
>>
>> ihsan
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

waris at cisco

May 10, 2012, 12:12 AM

Post #6 of 17 (1287 views)
Permalink

Re: VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x) [In reply to]

You need to have attachment circuit up for flat VPLS with autodiscovery
to work.
Attached is the working configuration.

Regards,
Waris

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces [at] puck
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Arie Vayner
(avayner)
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 3:44 PM
To: Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim; cisco-nsp [at] puck
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x)

Ihsan,

On which IOS version are you?
This should work on 15.2S

Arie

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces [at] puck
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Ihsan Junaidi
Ibrahim
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 07:37
To: cisco-nsp [at] puck
Subject: [c-nsp] VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x)

Hi all,

My topology as follows:

PE1--P1--P2--P3--P4--P5--PE2

PE1 lo0 - 200.28.0.15 (15.2(2)S) loader 12.2(52r)EY1
PE2 lo0 - 200.28.0.120 (15.2(2)S) loader 12.2(52r)EY2

Are there specific nuances for an LDP signaled transport for EoMPLS and
VPLS in the Whales platform?

An xconnect from PE1 to PE2 is signaled successfully however a VPLS
instance based on BGP autodiscovery (manual VPLS works) is unable to
bring up the LDP l2transport signal although the VFI is signaled up.

EoMPLS
----
es-103-glsfb#sh xconnect peer 200.28.0.120 vc 5070
Legend: XC ST=Xconnect State S1=Segment1 State S2=Segment2 State
UP=Up DN=Down AD=Admin Down IA=Inactive
SB=Standby HS=Hot Standby RV=Recovering NH=No Hardware

XC ST Segment 1 S1 Segment 2
S2
------+---------------------------------+--+----------------------------
-----+--
UP pri ac Gi0/19:1(Ethernet) UP mpls 200.28.0.120:5070
UP

es-103-glsfb#sh mpls l2transport vc 5070 detail Local interface: Gi0/19
up, line protocol up, Ethernet:1 up
Destination address: 200.28.0.120, VC ID: 5070, VC status: up
Output interface: Te0/2, imposed label stack {298 16}
Preferred path: not configured
Default path: active
Next hop: 200.28.2.242
Create time: 02:10:43, last status change time: 02:08:57
Signaling protocol: LDP, peer 200.28.0.120:0 up
Targeted Hello: 200.28.0.15(LDP Id) -> 200.28.0.120, LDP is UP
Status TLV support (local/remote) : enabled/supported
LDP route watch : disabled
Label/status state machine : established, LruRru
Last local dataplane status rcvd: No fault
Last BFD dataplane status rcvd: Not sent
Last BFD peer monitor status rcvd: No fault
Last local AC circuit status rcvd: No fault
Last local AC circuit status sent: No fault
Last local LDP TLV status sent: No fault
Last remote LDP TLV status rcvd: No fault
Last remote LDP ADJ status rcvd: No fault
MPLS VC labels: local 17, remote 16
Group ID: local 0, remote 0
MTU: local 9178, remote 9178
Remote interface description:
Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled
Control Word: On (configured: autosense)
Dataplane:
SSM segment/switch IDs: 45083/8194 (used), PWID: 2
VC statistics:
transit packet totals: receive 24, send 21
transit byte totals: receive 2064, send 1344
transit packet drops: receive 0, seq error 0, send 0

VPLS
----
es-103-glsfb#sh vfi
Legend: RT=Route-target, S=Split-horizon, Y=Yes, N=No

VFI name: ME002555, state: up, type: multipoint signaling: LDP
VPN ID: 116, VPLS-ID: 9930:116
RD: 9930:116, RT: 9930:116
Bridge-Domain 116 attachment circuits:
Vlan116
Neighbors connected via pseudowires:
Peer Address VC ID Discovered Router ID S
200.28.9.146 116 200.28.0.120 Y

es-103-glsfb#sh mpls l2transport vc 116 detail Local interface: VFI
ME002555 vfi up
Interworking type is Ethernet
Destination address: 200.28.0.120, VC ID: 116, VC status: down
Last error: Local access circuit is not ready for label advertise
Next hop PE address: 200.28.9.146
Output interface: none, imposed label stack {}
Preferred path: not configured
Default path: no route
No adjacency
Create time: 02:07:55, last status change time: 02:07:55
Signaling protocol: LDP, peer unknown
Targeted Hello: 200.28.0.15(LDP Id) -> 200.28.9.146, LDP is DOWN, no
binding
Status TLV support (local/remote) : enabled/None (no remote
binding)
LDP route watch : disabled
Label/status state machine : local standby, AC-ready,
LnuRnd
Last local dataplane status rcvd: No fault
Last BFD dataplane status rcvd: Not sent
Last BFD peer monitor status rcvd: No fault
Last local AC circuit status rcvd: No fault
Last local AC circuit status sent: Not sent
Last local LDP TLV status sent: None
Last remote LDP TLV status rcvd: None (no remote binding)
Last remote LDP ADJ status rcvd: None (no remote binding)
MPLS VC labels: local 23, remote unassigned
AGI: type 1, len 8, 000A 26CA 0000 0074
Local AII: type 1, len 4, DF1C 000F (200.28.0.15)
Remote AII: type 1, len 4, DF1C 0078 (200.28.0.120)
Group ID: local n/a, remote unknown
MTU: local 9178, remote unknown
Remote interface description:
Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled
Control Word: On (configured: autosense)
Dataplane:
SSM segment/switch IDs: 0/0 (used), PWID: 14
VC statistics:
transit packet totals: receive 0, send 0
transit byte totals: receive 0, send 0
transit packet drops: receive 0, seq error 0, send 0

I'm getting the account team into the loop but if anyone has encountered
this scenario before and managed to find the answer, that would be most
helpful.

ihsan
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

adam.vitkovsky at swan

May 10, 2012, 6:42 AM

Post #7 of 17 (1295 views)
Permalink

Re: VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x) [In reply to]

It almost appears like one of the routers doesn't accept targeted sessions
Can you please check whether both ends are conf to accept ldp targeted
sessions
Or maybe the debug of targeted sessions would shed some light on why the
session won't come up
The bgp auto-discovery looks good

adam

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces [at] puck
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Ihsan Junaidi
Ibrahim
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 6:00 AM
To: Pete Lumbis
Cc: cisco-nsp [at] puck
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x)

On PE1,

es-103-glsfb#sh xconnect rib detail

Local Router ID: 200.28.0.15

VPLS-ID: 9930:116, Target ID: 200.28.0.120
iBGP Peer
Next-Hop: 200.28.9.146
Hello-Source: 200.28.0.15
Route-Target: 9930:116
Incoming RD: 9930:116
Forwarder: VFI ME002555
Provisioned: Yes
NLRI handle: 69000001

PE2,

es-03-akhmw#sh xconnect rib detail

Local Router ID: 200.28.0.120

VPLS-ID: 9930:116, Target ID: 200.28.0.15
iBGP Peer
Next-Hop: 200.28.2.242
Hello-Source: 200.28.0.120
Route-Target: 9930:116
Incoming RD: 9930:116
Forwarder: VFI ME002617
Provisioned: Yes
NLRI handle: 77000001

On May 10, 2012, at 10:40 AM, Pete Lumbis wrote:

> What do you see in "show xconn rib"?
>
> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim
> <ihsan.junaidi [at] gmail> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> My topology as follows:
>>
>> PE1--P1--P2--P3--P4--P5--PE2
>>
>> PE1 lo0 - 200.28.0.15 (15.2(2)S) loader 12.2(52r)EY1
>> PE2 lo0 - 200.28.0.120 (15.2(2)S) loader 12.2(52r)EY2
>>
>> Are there specific nuances for an LDP signaled transport for EoMPLS and
VPLS in the Whales platform?
>>
>> An xconnect from PE1 to PE2 is signaled successfully however a VPLS
instance based on BGP autodiscovery (manual VPLS works) is unable to bring
up the LDP l2transport signal although the VFI is signaled up.
>>
>> EoMPLS
>> ----
>> es-103-glsfb#sh xconnect peer 200.28.0.120 vc 5070
>> Legend: XC ST=Xconnect State S1=Segment1 State S2=Segment2 State
>> UP=Up DN=Down AD=Admin Down IA=Inactive
>> SB=Standby HS=Hot Standby RV=Recovering NH=No Hardware
>>
>> XC ST Segment 1 S1 Segment 2
S2
>>
------+---------------------------------+--+--------------------------------
-+--
>> UP pri ac Gi0/19:1(Ethernet) UP mpls 200.28.0.120:5070
UP
>>
>> es-103-glsfb#sh mpls l2transport vc 5070 detail Local interface:
>> Gi0/19 up, line protocol up, Ethernet:1 up Destination address:
>> 200.28.0.120, VC ID: 5070, VC status: up
>> Output interface: Te0/2, imposed label stack {298 16}
>> Preferred path: not configured
>> Default path: active
>> Next hop: 200.28.2.242
>> Create time: 02:10:43, last status change time: 02:08:57 Signaling
>> protocol: LDP, peer 200.28.0.120:0 up
>> Targeted Hello: 200.28.0.15(LDP Id) -> 200.28.0.120, LDP is UP
>> Status TLV support (local/remote) : enabled/supported
>> LDP route watch : disabled
>> Label/status state machine : established, LruRru
>> Last local dataplane status rcvd: No fault
>> Last BFD dataplane status rcvd: Not sent
>> Last BFD peer monitor status rcvd: No fault
>> Last local AC circuit status rcvd: No fault
>> Last local AC circuit status sent: No fault
>> Last local LDP TLV status sent: No fault
>> Last remote LDP TLV status rcvd: No fault
>> Last remote LDP ADJ status rcvd: No fault
>> MPLS VC labels: local 17, remote 16
>> Group ID: local 0, remote 0
>> MTU: local 9178, remote 9178
>> Remote interface description:
>> Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled Control Word: On
>> (configured: autosense)
>> Dataplane:
>> SSM segment/switch IDs: 45083/8194 (used), PWID: 2 VC statistics:
>> transit packet totals: receive 24, send 21
>> transit byte totals: receive 2064, send 1344
>> transit packet drops: receive 0, seq error 0, send 0
>>
>> VPLS
>> ----
>> es-103-glsfb#sh vfi
>> Legend: RT=Route-target, S=Split-horizon, Y=Yes, N=No
>>
>> VFI name: ME002555, state: up, type: multipoint signaling: LDP VPN
>> ID: 116, VPLS-ID: 9930:116
>> RD: 9930:116, RT: 9930:116
>> Bridge-Domain 116 attachment circuits:
>> Vlan116
>> Neighbors connected via pseudowires:
>> Peer Address VC ID Discovered Router ID S
>> 200.28.9.146 116 200.28.0.120 Y
>>
>> es-103-glsfb#sh mpls l2transport vc 116 detail Local interface: VFI
>> ME002555 vfi up Interworking type is Ethernet Destination address:
>> 200.28.0.120, VC ID: 116, VC status: down
>> Last error: Local access circuit is not ready for label advertise
>> Next hop PE address: 200.28.9.146
>> Output interface: none, imposed label stack {}
>> Preferred path: not configured
>> Default path: no route
>> No adjacency
>> Create time: 02:07:55, last status change time: 02:07:55 Signaling
>> protocol: LDP, peer unknown
>> Targeted Hello: 200.28.0.15(LDP Id) -> 200.28.9.146, LDP is DOWN, no
binding
>> Status TLV support (local/remote) : enabled/None (no remote binding)
>> LDP route watch : disabled
>> Label/status state machine : local standby, AC-ready, LnuRnd
>> Last local dataplane status rcvd: No fault
>> Last BFD dataplane status rcvd: Not sent
>> Last BFD peer monitor status rcvd: No fault
>> Last local AC circuit status rcvd: No fault
>> Last local AC circuit status sent: Not sent
>> Last local LDP TLV status sent: None
>> Last remote LDP TLV status rcvd: None (no remote binding)
>> Last remote LDP ADJ status rcvd: None (no remote binding)
>> MPLS VC labels: local 23, remote unassigned
>> AGI: type 1, len 8, 000A 26CA 0000 0074
>> Local AII: type 1, len 4, DF1C 000F (200.28.0.15)
>> Remote AII: type 1, len 4, DF1C 0078 (200.28.0.120)
>> Group ID: local n/a, remote unknown
>> MTU: local 9178, remote unknown
>> Remote interface description:
>> Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled Control Word: On
>> (configured: autosense)
>> Dataplane:
>> SSM segment/switch IDs: 0/0 (used), PWID: 14 VC statistics:
>> transit packet totals: receive 0, send 0
>> transit byte totals: receive 0, send 0
>> transit packet drops: receive 0, seq error 0, send 0
>>
>> I'm getting the account team into the loop but if anyone has encountered
this scenario before and managed to find the answer, that would be most
helpful.
>>
>> ihsan
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

adam.vitkovsky at swan

May 10, 2012, 7:38 AM

Post #8 of 17 (1296 views)
Permalink

Re: VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x) [In reply to]

Just curious -wouldn't the vfi be down if the single attachment circuit is
down?

adam
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces [at] puck
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Waris Sagheer
(waris)
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 9:13 AM
To: Arie Vayner (avayner); Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim; cisco-nsp [at] puck
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x)

You need to have attachment circuit up for flat VPLS with autodiscovery to
work.
Attached is the working configuration.

Regards,
Waris

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces [at] puck
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Arie Vayner
(avayner)
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 3:44 PM
To: Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim; cisco-nsp [at] puck
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x)

Ihsan,

On which IOS version are you?
This should work on 15.2S

Arie

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces [at] puck
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Ihsan Junaidi
Ibrahim
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 07:37
To: cisco-nsp [at] puck
Subject: [c-nsp] VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x)

Hi all,

My topology as follows:

PE1--P1--P2--P3--P4--P5--PE2

PE1 lo0 - 200.28.0.15 (15.2(2)S) loader 12.2(52r)EY1
PE2 lo0 - 200.28.0.120 (15.2(2)S) loader 12.2(52r)EY2

Are there specific nuances for an LDP signaled transport for EoMPLS and VPLS
in the Whales platform?

An xconnect from PE1 to PE2 is signaled successfully however a VPLS instance
based on BGP autodiscovery (manual VPLS works) is unable to bring up the LDP
l2transport signal although the VFI is signaled up.

EoMPLS
----
es-103-glsfb#sh xconnect peer 200.28.0.120 vc 5070
Legend: XC ST=Xconnect State S1=Segment1 State S2=Segment2 State
UP=Up DN=Down AD=Admin Down IA=Inactive
SB=Standby HS=Hot Standby RV=Recovering NH=No Hardware

XC ST Segment 1 S1 Segment 2
S2
------+---------------------------------+--+----------------------------
-----+--
UP pri ac Gi0/19:1(Ethernet) UP mpls 200.28.0.120:5070
UP

es-103-glsfb#sh mpls l2transport vc 5070 detail Local interface: Gi0/19 up,
line protocol up, Ethernet:1 up
Destination address: 200.28.0.120, VC ID: 5070, VC status: up
Output interface: Te0/2, imposed label stack {298 16}
Preferred path: not configured
Default path: active
Next hop: 200.28.2.242
Create time: 02:10:43, last status change time: 02:08:57
Signaling protocol: LDP, peer 200.28.0.120:0 up
Targeted Hello: 200.28.0.15(LDP Id) -> 200.28.0.120, LDP is UP
Status TLV support (local/remote) : enabled/supported
LDP route watch : disabled
Label/status state machine : established, LruRru
Last local dataplane status rcvd: No fault
Last BFD dataplane status rcvd: Not sent
Last BFD peer monitor status rcvd: No fault
Last local AC circuit status rcvd: No fault
Last local AC circuit status sent: No fault
Last local LDP TLV status sent: No fault
Last remote LDP TLV status rcvd: No fault
Last remote LDP ADJ status rcvd: No fault
MPLS VC labels: local 17, remote 16
Group ID: local 0, remote 0
MTU: local 9178, remote 9178
Remote interface description:
Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled
Control Word: On (configured: autosense)
Dataplane:
SSM segment/switch IDs: 45083/8194 (used), PWID: 2
VC statistics:
transit packet totals: receive 24, send 21
transit byte totals: receive 2064, send 1344
transit packet drops: receive 0, seq error 0, send 0

VPLS
----
es-103-glsfb#sh vfi
Legend: RT=Route-target, S=Split-horizon, Y=Yes, N=No

VFI name: ME002555, state: up, type: multipoint signaling: LDP
VPN ID: 116, VPLS-ID: 9930:116
RD: 9930:116, RT: 9930:116
Bridge-Domain 116 attachment circuits:
Vlan116
Neighbors connected via pseudowires:
Peer Address VC ID Discovered Router ID S
200.28.9.146 116 200.28.0.120 Y

es-103-glsfb#sh mpls l2transport vc 116 detail Local interface: VFI
ME002555 vfi up
Interworking type is Ethernet
Destination address: 200.28.0.120, VC ID: 116, VC status: down
Last error: Local access circuit is not ready for label advertise
Next hop PE address: 200.28.9.146
Output interface: none, imposed label stack {}
Preferred path: not configured
Default path: no route
No adjacency
Create time: 02:07:55, last status change time: 02:07:55
Signaling protocol: LDP, peer unknown
Targeted Hello: 200.28.0.15(LDP Id) -> 200.28.9.146, LDP is DOWN, no
binding
Status TLV support (local/remote) : enabled/None (no remote
binding)
LDP route watch : disabled
Label/status state machine : local standby, AC-ready,
LnuRnd
Last local dataplane status rcvd: No fault
Last BFD dataplane status rcvd: Not sent
Last BFD peer monitor status rcvd: No fault
Last local AC circuit status rcvd: No fault
Last local AC circuit status sent: Not sent
Last local LDP TLV status sent: None
Last remote LDP TLV status rcvd: None (no remote binding)
Last remote LDP ADJ status rcvd: None (no remote binding)
MPLS VC labels: local 23, remote unassigned
AGI: type 1, len 8, 000A 26CA 0000 0074
Local AII: type 1, len 4, DF1C 000F (200.28.0.15)
Remote AII: type 1, len 4, DF1C 0078 (200.28.0.120)
Group ID: local n/a, remote unknown
MTU: local 9178, remote unknown
Remote interface description:
Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled
Control Word: On (configured: autosense)
Dataplane:
SSM segment/switch IDs: 0/0 (used), PWID: 14
VC statistics:
transit packet totals: receive 0, send 0
transit byte totals: receive 0, send 0
transit packet drops: receive 0, seq error 0, send 0

I'm getting the account team into the loop but if anyone has encountered
this scenario before and managed to find the answer, that would be most
helpful.

ihsan
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

ihsan.junaidi at gmail

May 10, 2012, 7:39 AM

Post #9 of 17 (1296 views)
Permalink

Re: VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x) [In reply to]

Adam,

That's what I initially thought but an EoMPLS or a manual VPLS work just fine. Sample of EoMPLS,

es-103-glsfb#sh mpls l2transport vc 5070 detail
Local interface: Gi0/19 up, line protocol up, Ethernet:1 up
Destination address: 200.28.0.120, VC ID: 5070, VC status: up
Output interface: Te0/2, imposed label stack {298 16}
Preferred path: not configured
Default path: active
Next hop: 200.28.2.242
Create time: 1d02h, last status change time: 00:03:17
Signaling protocol: LDP, peer 200.28.0.120:0 up
Targeted Hello: 200.28.0.15(LDP Id) -> 200.28.0.120, LDP is UP
Status TLV support (local/remote) : enabled/supported
LDP route watch : disabled
Label/status state machine : established, LruRru
Last local dataplane status rcvd: No fault
Last BFD dataplane status rcvd: Not sent
Last BFD peer monitor status rcvd: No fault
Last local AC circuit status rcvd: No fault
Last local AC circuit status sent: No fault
Last local LDP TLV status sent: No fault
Last remote LDP TLV status rcvd: No fault
Last remote LDP ADJ status rcvd: No fault
MPLS VC labels: local 17, remote 16
Group ID: local 0, remote 0
MTU: local 9178, remote 9178
Remote interface description:
Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled
Control Word: On (configured: autosense)
Dataplane:
SSM segment/switch IDs: 45083/8194 (used), PWID: 2
VC statistics:
transit packet totals: receive 1374, send 1374
transit byte totals: receive 118164, send 87936
transit packet drops: receive 0, seq error 0, send 0

Debugging did not turn up a whole lot of useful info that can be used to narrow down the problem.

Resetting the LDP neighbours to a clean state the proceeding logs only logs the EoMPLS targeted LDP session for VC 5070 (the above) but no information at all for VC 116 which is part of the VFI attached circuit.

ihsan

On May 10, 2012, at 9:42 PM, adam vitkovsky wrote:

> It almost appears like one of the routers doesn't accept targeted sessions
> Can you please check whether both ends are conf to accept ldp targeted
> sessions
> Or maybe the debug of targeted sessions would shed some light on why the
> session won't come up
> The bgp auto-discovery looks good
>
> adam
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces [at] puck
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Ihsan Junaidi
> Ibrahim
> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 6:00 AM
> To: Pete Lumbis
> Cc: cisco-nsp [at] puck
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x)
>
> On PE1,
>
> es-103-glsfb#sh xconnect rib detail
>
> Local Router ID: 200.28.0.15
>
> VPLS-ID: 9930:116, Target ID: 200.28.0.120
> iBGP Peer
> Next-Hop: 200.28.9.146
> Hello-Source: 200.28.0.15
> Route-Target: 9930:116
> Incoming RD: 9930:116
> Forwarder: VFI ME002555
> Provisioned: Yes
> NLRI handle: 69000001
>
> PE2,
>
> es-03-akhmw#sh xconnect rib detail
>
> Local Router ID: 200.28.0.120
>
> VPLS-ID: 9930:116, Target ID: 200.28.0.15
> iBGP Peer
> Next-Hop: 200.28.2.242
> Hello-Source: 200.28.0.120
> Route-Target: 9930:116
> Incoming RD: 9930:116
> Forwarder: VFI ME002617
> Provisioned: Yes
> NLRI handle: 77000001
>
> On May 10, 2012, at 10:40 AM, Pete Lumbis wrote:
>
>> What do you see in "show xconn rib"?
>>
>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim
>> <ihsan.junaidi [at] gmail> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> My topology as follows:
>>>
>>> PE1--P1--P2--P3--P4--P5--PE2
>>>
>>> PE1 lo0 - 200.28.0.15 (15.2(2)S) loader 12.2(52r)EY1
>>> PE2 lo0 - 200.28.0.120 (15.2(2)S) loader 12.2(52r)EY2
>>>
>>> Are there specific nuances for an LDP signaled transport for EoMPLS and
> VPLS in the Whales platform?
>>>
>>> An xconnect from PE1 to PE2 is signaled successfully however a VPLS
> instance based on BGP autodiscovery (manual VPLS works) is unable to bring
> up the LDP l2transport signal although the VFI is signaled up.
>>>
>>> EoMPLS
>>> ----
>>> es-103-glsfb#sh xconnect peer 200.28.0.120 vc 5070
>>> Legend: XC ST=Xconnect State S1=Segment1 State S2=Segment2 State
>>> UP=Up DN=Down AD=Admin Down IA=Inactive
>>> SB=Standby HS=Hot Standby RV=Recovering NH=No Hardware
>>>
>>> XC ST Segment 1 S1 Segment 2
> S2
>>>
> ------+---------------------------------+--+--------------------------------
> -+--
>>> UP pri ac Gi0/19:1(Ethernet) UP mpls 200.28.0.120:5070
> UP
>>>
>>> es-103-glsfb#sh mpls l2transport vc 5070 detail Local interface:
>>> Gi0/19 up, line protocol up, Ethernet:1 up Destination address:
>>> 200.28.0.120, VC ID: 5070, VC status: up
>>> Output interface: Te0/2, imposed label stack {298 16}
>>> Preferred path: not configured
>>> Default path: active
>>> Next hop: 200.28.2.242
>>> Create time: 02:10:43, last status change time: 02:08:57 Signaling
>>> protocol: LDP, peer 200.28.0.120:0 up
>>> Targeted Hello: 200.28.0.15(LDP Id) -> 200.28.0.120, LDP is UP
>>> Status TLV support (local/remote) : enabled/supported
>>> LDP route watch : disabled
>>> Label/status state machine : established, LruRru
>>> Last local dataplane status rcvd: No fault
>>> Last BFD dataplane status rcvd: Not sent
>>> Last BFD peer monitor status rcvd: No fault
>>> Last local AC circuit status rcvd: No fault
>>> Last local AC circuit status sent: No fault
>>> Last local LDP TLV status sent: No fault
>>> Last remote LDP TLV status rcvd: No fault
>>> Last remote LDP ADJ status rcvd: No fault
>>> MPLS VC labels: local 17, remote 16
>>> Group ID: local 0, remote 0
>>> MTU: local 9178, remote 9178
>>> Remote interface description:
>>> Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled Control Word: On
>>> (configured: autosense)
>>> Dataplane:
>>> SSM segment/switch IDs: 45083/8194 (used), PWID: 2 VC statistics:
>>> transit packet totals: receive 24, send 21
>>> transit byte totals: receive 2064, send 1344
>>> transit packet drops: receive 0, seq error 0, send 0
>>>
>>> VPLS
>>> ----
>>> es-103-glsfb#sh vfi
>>> Legend: RT=Route-target, S=Split-horizon, Y=Yes, N=No
>>>
>>> VFI name: ME002555, state: up, type: multipoint signaling: LDP VPN
>>> ID: 116, VPLS-ID: 9930:116
>>> RD: 9930:116, RT: 9930:116
>>> Bridge-Domain 116 attachment circuits:
>>> Vlan116
>>> Neighbors connected via pseudowires:
>>> Peer Address VC ID Discovered Router ID S
>>> 200.28.9.146 116 200.28.0.120 Y
>>>
>>> es-103-glsfb#sh mpls l2transport vc 116 detail Local interface: VFI
>>> ME002555 vfi up Interworking type is Ethernet Destination address:
>>> 200.28.0.120, VC ID: 116, VC status: down
>>> Last error: Local access circuit is not ready for label advertise
>>> Next hop PE address: 200.28.9.146
>>> Output interface: none, imposed label stack {}
>>> Preferred path: not configured
>>> Default path: no route
>>> No adjacency
>>> Create time: 02:07:55, last status change time: 02:07:55 Signaling
>>> protocol: LDP, peer unknown
>>> Targeted Hello: 200.28.0.15(LDP Id) -> 200.28.9.146, LDP is DOWN, no
> binding
>>> Status TLV support (local/remote) : enabled/None (no remote binding)
>>> LDP route watch : disabled
>>> Label/status state machine : local standby, AC-ready, LnuRnd
>>> Last local dataplane status rcvd: No fault
>>> Last BFD dataplane status rcvd: Not sent
>>> Last BFD peer monitor status rcvd: No fault
>>> Last local AC circuit status rcvd: No fault
>>> Last local AC circuit status sent: Not sent
>>> Last local LDP TLV status sent: None
>>> Last remote LDP TLV status rcvd: None (no remote binding)
>>> Last remote LDP ADJ status rcvd: None (no remote binding)
>>> MPLS VC labels: local 23, remote unassigned
>>> AGI: type 1, len 8, 000A 26CA 0000 0074
>>> Local AII: type 1, len 4, DF1C 000F (200.28.0.15)
>>> Remote AII: type 1, len 4, DF1C 0078 (200.28.0.120)
>>> Group ID: local n/a, remote unknown
>>> MTU: local 9178, remote unknown
>>> Remote interface description:
>>> Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled Control Word: On
>>> (configured: autosense)
>>> Dataplane:
>>> SSM segment/switch IDs: 0/0 (used), PWID: 14 VC statistics:
>>> transit packet totals: receive 0, send 0
>>> transit byte totals: receive 0, send 0
>>> transit packet drops: receive 0, seq error 0, send 0
>>>
>>> I'm getting the account team into the loop but if anyone has encountered
> this scenario before and managed to find the answer, that would be most
> helpful.
>>>
>>> ihsan
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

ihsan.junaidi at gmail

May 10, 2012, 7:41 AM

Post #10 of 17 (1295 views)
Permalink

Re: VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x) [In reply to]

Waris,

The attachment circuit is already configured as per the start of the thread.

es-103-glsfb#sh vfi
Legend: RT=Route-target, S=Split-horizon, Y=Yes, N=No

VFI name: ME002555, state: up, type: multipoint signaling: LDP
VPN ID: 116, VPLS-ID: 9930:116
RD: 9930:116, RT: 9930:116
Bridge-Domain 116 attachment circuits:
Vlan116
Neighbors connected via pseudowires:
Peer Address VC ID Discovered Router ID S
200.28.9.146 116 200.28.0.120 Y

es-03-akhmw#sh vfi
Legend: RT=Route-target, S=Split-horizon, Y=Yes, N=No

VFI name: ME002617, state: up, type: multipoint signaling: LDP
VPN ID: 116, VPLS-ID: 9930:116
RD: 9930:116, RT: 9930:116
Bridge-Domain 116 attachment circuits:
Vlan116
Neighbors connected via pseudowires:
Peer Address VC ID Discovered Router ID S
200.28.2.242 116 200.28.0.15 Y

ihsan

On May 10, 2012, at 3:12 PM, Waris Sagheer (waris) wrote:

> You need to have attachment circuit up for flat VPLS with autodiscovery
> to work.
> Attached is the working configuration.
>
> Regards,
> Waris
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces [at] puck
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Arie Vayner
> (avayner)
> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 3:44 PM
> To: Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim; cisco-nsp [at] puck
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x)
>
> Ihsan,
>
> On which IOS version are you?
> This should work on 15.2S
>
> Arie
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces [at] puck
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Ihsan Junaidi
> Ibrahim
> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 07:37
> To: cisco-nsp [at] puck
> Subject: [c-nsp] VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x)
>
> Hi all,
>
> My topology as follows:
>
> PE1--P1--P2--P3--P4--P5--PE2
>
> PE1 lo0 - 200.28.0.15 (15.2(2)S) loader 12.2(52r)EY1
> PE2 lo0 - 200.28.0.120 (15.2(2)S) loader 12.2(52r)EY2
>
> Are there specific nuances for an LDP signaled transport for EoMPLS and
> VPLS in the Whales platform?
>
> An xconnect from PE1 to PE2 is signaled successfully however a VPLS
> instance based on BGP autodiscovery (manual VPLS works) is unable to
> bring up the LDP l2transport signal although the VFI is signaled up.
>
> EoMPLS
> ----
> es-103-glsfb#sh xconnect peer 200.28.0.120 vc 5070
> Legend: XC ST=Xconnect State S1=Segment1 State S2=Segment2 State
> UP=Up DN=Down AD=Admin Down IA=Inactive
> SB=Standby HS=Hot Standby RV=Recovering NH=No Hardware
>
> XC ST Segment 1 S1 Segment 2
> S2
> ------+---------------------------------+--+----------------------------
> -----+--
> UP pri ac Gi0/19:1(Ethernet) UP mpls 200.28.0.120:5070
> UP
>
> es-103-glsfb#sh mpls l2transport vc 5070 detail Local interface: Gi0/19
> up, line protocol up, Ethernet:1 up
> Destination address: 200.28.0.120, VC ID: 5070, VC status: up
> Output interface: Te0/2, imposed label stack {298 16}
> Preferred path: not configured
> Default path: active
> Next hop: 200.28.2.242
> Create time: 02:10:43, last status change time: 02:08:57
> Signaling protocol: LDP, peer 200.28.0.120:0 up
> Targeted Hello: 200.28.0.15(LDP Id) -> 200.28.0.120, LDP is UP
> Status TLV support (local/remote) : enabled/supported
> LDP route watch : disabled
> Label/status state machine : established, LruRru
> Last local dataplane status rcvd: No fault
> Last BFD dataplane status rcvd: Not sent
> Last BFD peer monitor status rcvd: No fault
> Last local AC circuit status rcvd: No fault
> Last local AC circuit status sent: No fault
> Last local LDP TLV status sent: No fault
> Last remote LDP TLV status rcvd: No fault
> Last remote LDP ADJ status rcvd: No fault
> MPLS VC labels: local 17, remote 16
> Group ID: local 0, remote 0
> MTU: local 9178, remote 9178
> Remote interface description:
> Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled
> Control Word: On (configured: autosense)
> Dataplane:
> SSM segment/switch IDs: 45083/8194 (used), PWID: 2
> VC statistics:
> transit packet totals: receive 24, send 21
> transit byte totals: receive 2064, send 1344
> transit packet drops: receive 0, seq error 0, send 0
>
> VPLS
> ----
> es-103-glsfb#sh vfi
> Legend: RT=Route-target, S=Split-horizon, Y=Yes, N=No
>
> VFI name: ME002555, state: up, type: multipoint signaling: LDP
> VPN ID: 116, VPLS-ID: 9930:116
> RD: 9930:116, RT: 9930:116
> Bridge-Domain 116 attachment circuits:
> Vlan116
> Neighbors connected via pseudowires:
> Peer Address VC ID Discovered Router ID S
> 200.28.9.146 116 200.28.0.120 Y
>
> es-103-glsfb#sh mpls l2transport vc 116 detail Local interface: VFI
> ME002555 vfi up
> Interworking type is Ethernet
> Destination address: 200.28.0.120, VC ID: 116, VC status: down
> Last error: Local access circuit is not ready for label advertise
> Next hop PE address: 200.28.9.146
> Output interface: none, imposed label stack {}
> Preferred path: not configured
> Default path: no route
> No adjacency
> Create time: 02:07:55, last status change time: 02:07:55
> Signaling protocol: LDP, peer unknown
> Targeted Hello: 200.28.0.15(LDP Id) -> 200.28.9.146, LDP is DOWN, no
> binding
> Status TLV support (local/remote) : enabled/None (no remote
> binding)
> LDP route watch : disabled
> Label/status state machine : local standby, AC-ready,
> LnuRnd
> Last local dataplane status rcvd: No fault
> Last BFD dataplane status rcvd: Not sent
> Last BFD peer monitor status rcvd: No fault
> Last local AC circuit status rcvd: No fault
> Last local AC circuit status sent: Not sent
> Last local LDP TLV status sent: None
> Last remote LDP TLV status rcvd: None (no remote binding)
> Last remote LDP ADJ status rcvd: None (no remote binding)
> MPLS VC labels: local 23, remote unassigned
> AGI: type 1, len 8, 000A 26CA 0000 0074
> Local AII: type 1, len 4, DF1C 000F (200.28.0.15)
> Remote AII: type 1, len 4, DF1C 0078 (200.28.0.120)
> Group ID: local n/a, remote unknown
> MTU: local 9178, remote unknown
> Remote interface description:
> Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled
> Control Word: On (configured: autosense)
> Dataplane:
> SSM segment/switch IDs: 0/0 (used), PWID: 14
> VC statistics:
> transit packet totals: receive 0, send 0
> transit byte totals: receive 0, send 0
> transit packet drops: receive 0, seq error 0, send 0
>
> I'm getting the account team into the loop but if anyone has encountered
> this scenario before and managed to find the answer, that would be most
> helpful.
>
> ihsan
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> <VPLS_Auto Discovery Testing between Whales_v1.0.docx>

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

waris at cisco

May 10, 2012, 7:52 AM

Post #11 of 17 (1292 views)
Permalink

Re: VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x) [In reply to]

Did you get a chance to look at the configuration which I have sent in
my earlier email?
Are there any gaps?

Regards,
Waris

-----Original Message-----
From: Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim [mailto:ihsan.junaidi [at] gmail]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 7:42 AM
To: Waris Sagheer (waris)
Cc: Arie Vayner (avayner); cisco-nsp [at] puck
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x)

Waris,

The attachment circuit is already configured as per the start of the
thread.

es-103-glsfb#sh vfi
Legend: RT=Route-target, S=Split-horizon, Y=Yes, N=No

VFI name: ME002555, state: up, type: multipoint signaling: LDP
VPN ID: 116, VPLS-ID: 9930:116
RD: 9930:116, RT: 9930:116
Bridge-Domain 116 attachment circuits:
Vlan116
Neighbors connected via pseudowires:
Peer Address VC ID Discovered Router ID S
200.28.9.146 116 200.28.0.120 Y

es-03-akhmw#sh vfi
Legend: RT=Route-target, S=Split-horizon, Y=Yes, N=No

VFI name: ME002617, state: up, type: multipoint signaling: LDP
VPN ID: 116, VPLS-ID: 9930:116
RD: 9930:116, RT: 9930:116
Bridge-Domain 116 attachment circuits:
Vlan116
Neighbors connected via pseudowires:
Peer Address VC ID Discovered Router ID S
200.28.2.242 116 200.28.0.15 Y

ihsan

On May 10, 2012, at 3:12 PM, Waris Sagheer (waris) wrote:

> You need to have attachment circuit up for flat VPLS with
> autodiscovery to work.
> Attached is the working configuration.
>
> Regards,
> Waris
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces [at] puck
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Arie Vayner
> (avayner)
> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 3:44 PM
> To: Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim; cisco-nsp [at] puck
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x)
>
> Ihsan,
>
> On which IOS version are you?
> This should work on 15.2S
>
> Arie
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces [at] puck
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Ihsan Junaidi
> Ibrahim
> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 07:37
> To: cisco-nsp [at] puck
> Subject: [c-nsp] VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x)
>
> Hi all,
>
> My topology as follows:
>
> PE1--P1--P2--P3--P4--P5--PE2
>
> PE1 lo0 - 200.28.0.15 (15.2(2)S) loader 12.2(52r)EY1
> PE2 lo0 - 200.28.0.120 (15.2(2)S) loader 12.2(52r)EY2
>
> Are there specific nuances for an LDP signaled transport for EoMPLS
> and VPLS in the Whales platform?
>
> An xconnect from PE1 to PE2 is signaled successfully however a VPLS
> instance based on BGP autodiscovery (manual VPLS works) is unable to
> bring up the LDP l2transport signal although the VFI is signaled up.
>
> EoMPLS
> ----
> es-103-glsfb#sh xconnect peer 200.28.0.120 vc 5070
> Legend: XC ST=Xconnect State S1=Segment1 State S2=Segment2 State
> UP=Up DN=Down AD=Admin Down IA=Inactive
> SB=Standby HS=Hot Standby RV=Recovering NH=No Hardware
>
> XC ST Segment 1 S1 Segment 2
> S2
> ------+---------------------------------+--+--------------------------
> ------+---------------------------------+--+--
> -----+--
> UP pri ac Gi0/19:1(Ethernet) UP mpls 200.28.0.120:5070
> UP
>
> es-103-glsfb#sh mpls l2transport vc 5070 detail Local interface:
> Gi0/19 up, line protocol up, Ethernet:1 up Destination address:
> 200.28.0.120, VC ID: 5070, VC status: up
> Output interface: Te0/2, imposed label stack {298 16}
> Preferred path: not configured
> Default path: active
> Next hop: 200.28.2.242
> Create time: 02:10:43, last status change time: 02:08:57 Signaling
> protocol: LDP, peer 200.28.0.120:0 up
> Targeted Hello: 200.28.0.15(LDP Id) -> 200.28.0.120, LDP is UP
> Status TLV support (local/remote) : enabled/supported
> LDP route watch : disabled
> Label/status state machine : established, LruRru
> Last local dataplane status rcvd: No fault
> Last BFD dataplane status rcvd: Not sent
> Last BFD peer monitor status rcvd: No fault
> Last local AC circuit status rcvd: No fault
> Last local AC circuit status sent: No fault
> Last local LDP TLV status sent: No fault
> Last remote LDP TLV status rcvd: No fault
> Last remote LDP ADJ status rcvd: No fault
> MPLS VC labels: local 17, remote 16
> Group ID: local 0, remote 0
> MTU: local 9178, remote 9178
> Remote interface description:
> Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled Control Word: On
> (configured: autosense)
> Dataplane:
> SSM segment/switch IDs: 45083/8194 (used), PWID: 2 VC statistics:
> transit packet totals: receive 24, send 21
> transit byte totals: receive 2064, send 1344
> transit packet drops: receive 0, seq error 0, send 0
>
> VPLS
> ----
> es-103-glsfb#sh vfi
> Legend: RT=Route-target, S=Split-horizon, Y=Yes, N=No
>
> VFI name: ME002555, state: up, type: multipoint signaling: LDP VPN
> ID: 116, VPLS-ID: 9930:116
> RD: 9930:116, RT: 9930:116
> Bridge-Domain 116 attachment circuits:
> Vlan116
> Neighbors connected via pseudowires:
> Peer Address VC ID Discovered Router ID S
> 200.28.9.146 116 200.28.0.120 Y
>
> es-103-glsfb#sh mpls l2transport vc 116 detail Local interface: VFI
> ME002555 vfi up
> Interworking type is Ethernet
> Destination address: 200.28.0.120, VC ID: 116, VC status: down
> Last error: Local access circuit is not ready for label advertise
> Next hop PE address: 200.28.9.146
> Output interface: none, imposed label stack {}
> Preferred path: not configured
> Default path: no route
> No adjacency
> Create time: 02:07:55, last status change time: 02:07:55 Signaling
> protocol: LDP, peer unknown
> Targeted Hello: 200.28.0.15(LDP Id) -> 200.28.9.146, LDP is DOWN,
> no binding
> Status TLV support (local/remote) : enabled/None (no remote
> binding)
> LDP route watch : disabled
> Label/status state machine : local standby, AC-ready,
> LnuRnd
> Last local dataplane status rcvd: No fault
> Last BFD dataplane status rcvd: Not sent
> Last BFD peer monitor status rcvd: No fault
> Last local AC circuit status rcvd: No fault
> Last local AC circuit status sent: Not sent
> Last local LDP TLV status sent: None
> Last remote LDP TLV status rcvd: None (no remote binding)
> Last remote LDP ADJ status rcvd: None (no remote binding)
> MPLS VC labels: local 23, remote unassigned
> AGI: type 1, len 8, 000A 26CA 0000 0074
> Local AII: type 1, len 4, DF1C 000F (200.28.0.15)
> Remote AII: type 1, len 4, DF1C 0078 (200.28.0.120)
> Group ID: local n/a, remote unknown
> MTU: local 9178, remote unknown
> Remote interface description:
> Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled Control Word: On
> (configured: autosense)
> Dataplane:
> SSM segment/switch IDs: 0/0 (used), PWID: 14 VC statistics:
> transit packet totals: receive 0, send 0
> transit byte totals: receive 0, send 0
> transit packet drops: receive 0, seq error 0, send 0
>
> I'm getting the account team into the loop but if anyone has
> encountered this scenario before and managed to find the answer, that
> would be most helpful.
>
> ihsan
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> <VPLS_Auto Discovery Testing between Whales_v1.0.docx>

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

ihsan.junaidi at gmail

May 10, 2012, 8:07 AM

Post #12 of 17 (1285 views)
Permalink

Re: VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x) [In reply to]

I did.

Apart from the service policies on the SVI, there's no difference.

Do you prefer to take this offline with the account team? I'm OK both ways.

ihsan

On May 10, 2012, at 10:52 PM, Waris Sagheer (waris) wrote:

> Did you get a chance to look at the configuration which I have sent in
> my earlier email?
> Are there any gaps?
>
> Regards,
> Waris
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim [mailto:ihsan.junaidi [at] gmail]
> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 7:42 AM
> To: Waris Sagheer (waris)
> Cc: Arie Vayner (avayner); cisco-nsp [at] puck
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x)
>
> Waris,
>
> The attachment circuit is already configured as per the start of the
> thread.
>
> es-103-glsfb#sh vfi
> Legend: RT=Route-target, S=Split-horizon, Y=Yes, N=No
>
> VFI name: ME002555, state: up, type: multipoint signaling: LDP
> VPN ID: 116, VPLS-ID: 9930:116
> RD: 9930:116, RT: 9930:116
> Bridge-Domain 116 attachment circuits:
> Vlan116
> Neighbors connected via pseudowires:
> Peer Address VC ID Discovered Router ID S
> 200.28.9.146 116 200.28.0.120 Y
>
> es-03-akhmw#sh vfi
> Legend: RT=Route-target, S=Split-horizon, Y=Yes, N=No
>
> VFI name: ME002617, state: up, type: multipoint signaling: LDP
> VPN ID: 116, VPLS-ID: 9930:116
> RD: 9930:116, RT: 9930:116
> Bridge-Domain 116 attachment circuits:
> Vlan116
> Neighbors connected via pseudowires:
> Peer Address VC ID Discovered Router ID S
> 200.28.2.242 116 200.28.0.15 Y
>
> ihsan
>
> On May 10, 2012, at 3:12 PM, Waris Sagheer (waris) wrote:
>
>> You need to have attachment circuit up for flat VPLS with
>> autodiscovery to work.
>> Attached is the working configuration.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Waris
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cisco-nsp-bounces [at] puck
>> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Arie Vayner
>> (avayner)
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 3:44 PM
>> To: Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim; cisco-nsp [at] puck
>> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x)
>>
>> Ihsan,
>>
>> On which IOS version are you?
>> This should work on 15.2S
>>
>> Arie
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cisco-nsp-bounces [at] puck
>> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Ihsan Junaidi
>> Ibrahim
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 07:37
>> To: cisco-nsp [at] puck
>> Subject: [c-nsp] VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x)
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> My topology as follows:
>>
>> PE1--P1--P2--P3--P4--P5--PE2
>>
>> PE1 lo0 - 200.28.0.15 (15.2(2)S) loader 12.2(52r)EY1
>> PE2 lo0 - 200.28.0.120 (15.2(2)S) loader 12.2(52r)EY2
>>
>> Are there specific nuances for an LDP signaled transport for EoMPLS
>> and VPLS in the Whales platform?
>>
>> An xconnect from PE1 to PE2 is signaled successfully however a VPLS
>> instance based on BGP autodiscovery (manual VPLS works) is unable to
>> bring up the LDP l2transport signal although the VFI is signaled up.
>>
>> EoMPLS
>> ----
>> es-103-glsfb#sh xconnect peer 200.28.0.120 vc 5070
>> Legend: XC ST=Xconnect State S1=Segment1 State S2=Segment2 State
>> UP=Up DN=Down AD=Admin Down IA=Inactive
>> SB=Standby HS=Hot Standby RV=Recovering NH=No Hardware
>>
>> XC ST Segment 1 S1 Segment 2
>> S2
>> ------+---------------------------------+--+--------------------------
>> ------+---------------------------------+--+--
>> -----+--
>> UP pri ac Gi0/19:1(Ethernet) UP mpls 200.28.0.120:5070
>> UP
>>
>> es-103-glsfb#sh mpls l2transport vc 5070 detail Local interface:
>> Gi0/19 up, line protocol up, Ethernet:1 up Destination address:
>> 200.28.0.120, VC ID: 5070, VC status: up
>> Output interface: Te0/2, imposed label stack {298 16}
>> Preferred path: not configured
>> Default path: active
>> Next hop: 200.28.2.242
>> Create time: 02:10:43, last status change time: 02:08:57 Signaling
>> protocol: LDP, peer 200.28.0.120:0 up
>> Targeted Hello: 200.28.0.15(LDP Id) -> 200.28.0.120, LDP is UP
>> Status TLV support (local/remote) : enabled/supported
>> LDP route watch : disabled
>> Label/status state machine : established, LruRru
>> Last local dataplane status rcvd: No fault
>> Last BFD dataplane status rcvd: Not sent
>> Last BFD peer monitor status rcvd: No fault
>> Last local AC circuit status rcvd: No fault
>> Last local AC circuit status sent: No fault
>> Last local LDP TLV status sent: No fault
>> Last remote LDP TLV status rcvd: No fault
>> Last remote LDP ADJ status rcvd: No fault
>> MPLS VC labels: local 17, remote 16
>> Group ID: local 0, remote 0
>> MTU: local 9178, remote 9178
>> Remote interface description:
>> Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled Control Word: On
>> (configured: autosense)
>> Dataplane:
>> SSM segment/switch IDs: 45083/8194 (used), PWID: 2 VC statistics:
>> transit packet totals: receive 24, send 21
>> transit byte totals: receive 2064, send 1344
>> transit packet drops: receive 0, seq error 0, send 0
>>
>> VPLS
>> ----
>> es-103-glsfb#sh vfi
>> Legend: RT=Route-target, S=Split-horizon, Y=Yes, N=No
>>
>> VFI name: ME002555, state: up, type: multipoint signaling: LDP VPN
>> ID: 116, VPLS-ID: 9930:116
>> RD: 9930:116, RT: 9930:116
>> Bridge-Domain 116 attachment circuits:
>> Vlan116
>> Neighbors connected via pseudowires:
>> Peer Address VC ID Discovered Router ID S
>> 200.28.9.146 116 200.28.0.120 Y
>>
>> es-103-glsfb#sh mpls l2transport vc 116 detail Local interface: VFI
>> ME002555 vfi up
>> Interworking type is Ethernet
>> Destination address: 200.28.0.120, VC ID: 116, VC status: down
>> Last error: Local access circuit is not ready for label advertise
>> Next hop PE address: 200.28.9.146
>> Output interface: none, imposed label stack {}
>> Preferred path: not configured
>> Default path: no route
>> No adjacency
>> Create time: 02:07:55, last status change time: 02:07:55 Signaling
>> protocol: LDP, peer unknown
>> Targeted Hello: 200.28.0.15(LDP Id) -> 200.28.9.146, LDP is DOWN,
>> no binding
>> Status TLV support (local/remote) : enabled/None (no remote
>> binding)
>> LDP route watch : disabled
>> Label/status state machine : local standby, AC-ready,
>> LnuRnd
>> Last local dataplane status rcvd: No fault
>> Last BFD dataplane status rcvd: Not sent
>> Last BFD peer monitor status rcvd: No fault
>> Last local AC circuit status rcvd: No fault
>> Last local AC circuit status sent: Not sent
>> Last local LDP TLV status sent: None
>> Last remote LDP TLV status rcvd: None (no remote binding)
>> Last remote LDP ADJ status rcvd: None (no remote binding)
>> MPLS VC labels: local 23, remote unassigned
>> AGI: type 1, len 8, 000A 26CA 0000 0074
>> Local AII: type 1, len 4, DF1C 000F (200.28.0.15)
>> Remote AII: type 1, len 4, DF1C 0078 (200.28.0.120)
>> Group ID: local n/a, remote unknown
>> MTU: local 9178, remote unknown
>> Remote interface description:
>> Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled Control Word: On
>> (configured: autosense)
>> Dataplane:
>> SSM segment/switch IDs: 0/0 (used), PWID: 14 VC statistics:
>> transit packet totals: receive 0, send 0
>> transit byte totals: receive 0, send 0
>> transit packet drops: receive 0, seq error 0, send 0
>>
>> I'm getting the account team into the loop but if anyone has
>> encountered this scenario before and managed to find the answer, that
>> would be most helpful.
>>
>> ihsan
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>> <VPLS_Auto Discovery Testing between Whales_v1.0.docx>
>

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

waris at cisco

May 10, 2012, 8:10 AM

Post #13 of 17 (1292 views)
Permalink

Re: VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x) [In reply to]

Please open a SR and I'll have someone to work with the TAC engineer.

Regards,
Waris

-----Original Message-----
From: Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim [mailto:ihsan.junaidi [at] gmail]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 8:07 AM
To: Waris Sagheer (waris)
Cc: cisco-nsp [at] puck
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x)

I did.

Apart from the service policies on the SVI, there's no difference.

Do you prefer to take this offline with the account team? I'm OK both
ways.

ihsan

On May 10, 2012, at 10:52 PM, Waris Sagheer (waris) wrote:

> Did you get a chance to look at the configuration which I have sent in

> my earlier email?
> Are there any gaps?
>
> Regards,
> Waris
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim [mailto:ihsan.junaidi [at] gmail]
> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 7:42 AM
> To: Waris Sagheer (waris)
> Cc: Arie Vayner (avayner); cisco-nsp [at] puck
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x)
>
> Waris,
>
> The attachment circuit is already configured as per the start of the
> thread.
>
> es-103-glsfb#sh vfi
> Legend: RT=Route-target, S=Split-horizon, Y=Yes, N=No
>
> VFI name: ME002555, state: up, type: multipoint signaling: LDP VPN
> ID: 116, VPLS-ID: 9930:116
> RD: 9930:116, RT: 9930:116
> Bridge-Domain 116 attachment circuits:
> Vlan116
> Neighbors connected via pseudowires:
> Peer Address VC ID Discovered Router ID S
> 200.28.9.146 116 200.28.0.120 Y
>
> es-03-akhmw#sh vfi
> Legend: RT=Route-target, S=Split-horizon, Y=Yes, N=No
>
> VFI name: ME002617, state: up, type: multipoint signaling: LDP VPN
> ID: 116, VPLS-ID: 9930:116
> RD: 9930:116, RT: 9930:116
> Bridge-Domain 116 attachment circuits:
> Vlan116
> Neighbors connected via pseudowires:
> Peer Address VC ID Discovered Router ID S
> 200.28.2.242 116 200.28.0.15 Y
>
> ihsan
>
> On May 10, 2012, at 3:12 PM, Waris Sagheer (waris) wrote:
>
>> You need to have attachment circuit up for flat VPLS with
>> autodiscovery to work.
>> Attached is the working configuration.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Waris
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cisco-nsp-bounces [at] puck
>> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Arie Vayner
>> (avayner)
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 3:44 PM
>> To: Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim; cisco-nsp [at] puck
>> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x)
>>
>> Ihsan,
>>
>> On which IOS version are you?
>> This should work on 15.2S
>>
>> Arie
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cisco-nsp-bounces [at] puck
>> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Ihsan Junaidi

>> Ibrahim
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 07:37
>> To: cisco-nsp [at] puck
>> Subject: [c-nsp] VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x)
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> My topology as follows:
>>
>> PE1--P1--P2--P3--P4--P5--PE2
>>
>> PE1 lo0 - 200.28.0.15 (15.2(2)S) loader 12.2(52r)EY1
>> PE2 lo0 - 200.28.0.120 (15.2(2)S) loader 12.2(52r)EY2
>>
>> Are there specific nuances for an LDP signaled transport for EoMPLS
>> and VPLS in the Whales platform?
>>
>> An xconnect from PE1 to PE2 is signaled successfully however a VPLS
>> instance based on BGP autodiscovery (manual VPLS works) is unable to
>> bring up the LDP l2transport signal although the VFI is signaled up.
>>
>> EoMPLS
>> ----
>> es-103-glsfb#sh xconnect peer 200.28.0.120 vc 5070
>> Legend: XC ST=Xconnect State S1=Segment1 State S2=Segment2 State
>> UP=Up DN=Down AD=Admin Down IA=Inactive
>> SB=Standby HS=Hot Standby RV=Recovering NH=No Hardware
>>
>> XC ST Segment 1 S1 Segment 2
>> S2
>> ------+---------------------------------+--+-------------------------
>> ------+---------------------------------+--+-
>> ------+---------------------------------+--+--
>> -----+--
>> UP pri ac Gi0/19:1(Ethernet) UP mpls 200.28.0.120:5070
>> UP
>>
>> es-103-glsfb#sh mpls l2transport vc 5070 detail Local interface:
>> Gi0/19 up, line protocol up, Ethernet:1 up Destination address:
>> 200.28.0.120, VC ID: 5070, VC status: up
>> Output interface: Te0/2, imposed label stack {298 16}
>> Preferred path: not configured
>> Default path: active
>> Next hop: 200.28.2.242
>> Create time: 02:10:43, last status change time: 02:08:57 Signaling
>> protocol: LDP, peer 200.28.0.120:0 up
>> Targeted Hello: 200.28.0.15(LDP Id) -> 200.28.0.120, LDP is UP
>> Status TLV support (local/remote) : enabled/supported
>> LDP route watch : disabled
>> Label/status state machine : established, LruRru
>> Last local dataplane status rcvd: No fault
>> Last BFD dataplane status rcvd: Not sent
>> Last BFD peer monitor status rcvd: No fault
>> Last local AC circuit status rcvd: No fault
>> Last local AC circuit status sent: No fault
>> Last local LDP TLV status sent: No fault
>> Last remote LDP TLV status rcvd: No fault
>> Last remote LDP ADJ status rcvd: No fault
>> MPLS VC labels: local 17, remote 16
>> Group ID: local 0, remote 0
>> MTU: local 9178, remote 9178
>> Remote interface description:
>> Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled Control Word: On
>> (configured: autosense)
>> Dataplane:
>> SSM segment/switch IDs: 45083/8194 (used), PWID: 2 VC statistics:
>> transit packet totals: receive 24, send 21
>> transit byte totals: receive 2064, send 1344
>> transit packet drops: receive 0, seq error 0, send 0
>>
>> VPLS
>> ----
>> es-103-glsfb#sh vfi
>> Legend: RT=Route-target, S=Split-horizon, Y=Yes, N=No
>>
>> VFI name: ME002555, state: up, type: multipoint signaling: LDP VPN
>> ID: 116, VPLS-ID: 9930:116
>> RD: 9930:116, RT: 9930:116
>> Bridge-Domain 116 attachment circuits:
>> Vlan116
>> Neighbors connected via pseudowires:
>> Peer Address VC ID Discovered Router ID S
>> 200.28.9.146 116 200.28.0.120 Y
>>
>> es-103-glsfb#sh mpls l2transport vc 116 detail Local interface: VFI
>> ME002555 vfi up
>> Interworking type is Ethernet
>> Destination address: 200.28.0.120, VC ID: 116, VC status: down
>> Last error: Local access circuit is not ready for label advertise
>> Next hop PE address: 200.28.9.146
>> Output interface: none, imposed label stack {}
>> Preferred path: not configured
>> Default path: no route
>> No adjacency
>> Create time: 02:07:55, last status change time: 02:07:55 Signaling
>> protocol: LDP, peer unknown
>> Targeted Hello: 200.28.0.15(LDP Id) -> 200.28.9.146, LDP is DOWN,
>> no binding
>> Status TLV support (local/remote) : enabled/None (no remote
>> binding)
>> LDP route watch : disabled
>> Label/status state machine : local standby, AC-ready,
>> LnuRnd
>> Last local dataplane status rcvd: No fault
>> Last BFD dataplane status rcvd: Not sent
>> Last BFD peer monitor status rcvd: No fault
>> Last local AC circuit status rcvd: No fault
>> Last local AC circuit status sent: Not sent
>> Last local LDP TLV status sent: None
>> Last remote LDP TLV status rcvd: None (no remote binding)
>> Last remote LDP ADJ status rcvd: None (no remote binding)
>> MPLS VC labels: local 23, remote unassigned
>> AGI: type 1, len 8, 000A 26CA 0000 0074
>> Local AII: type 1, len 4, DF1C 000F (200.28.0.15)
>> Remote AII: type 1, len 4, DF1C 0078 (200.28.0.120)
>> Group ID: local n/a, remote unknown
>> MTU: local 9178, remote unknown
>> Remote interface description:
>> Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled Control Word: On
>> (configured: autosense)
>> Dataplane:
>> SSM segment/switch IDs: 0/0 (used), PWID: 14 VC statistics:
>> transit packet totals: receive 0, send 0
>> transit byte totals: receive 0, send 0
>> transit packet drops: receive 0, seq error 0, send 0
>>
>> I'm getting the account team into the loop but if anyone has
>> encountered this scenario before and managed to find the answer, that

>> would be most helpful.
>>
>> ihsan
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>> <VPLS_Auto Discovery Testing between Whales_v1.0.docx>
>

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

adam.vitkovsky at swan

May 10, 2012, 8:19 AM

Post #14 of 17 (1298 views)
Permalink

Re: VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x) [In reply to]

I was just thinking that maybe with the manual config one side gets selected
as the session initiator while with bgp it's the other way around resulting
in the fail -if indeed only one side is configured to accept the targeted
sessions (but now that I think about it I guess it works the way the both
ends initiate the session and than the session with lower id gets thorn
down)
And what does the debug says about the session not coming up please?

adam

-----Original Message-----
From: Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim [mailto:ihsan.junaidi [at] gmail]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 4:40 PM
To: adam vitkovsky
Cc: 'Pete Lumbis'; cisco-nsp [at] puck
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x)

Adam,

That's what I initially thought but an EoMPLS or a manual VPLS work just
fine. Sample of EoMPLS,

es-103-glsfb#sh mpls l2transport vc 5070 detail Local interface: Gi0/19 up,
line protocol up, Ethernet:1 up
Destination address: 200.28.0.120, VC ID: 5070, VC status: up
Output interface: Te0/2, imposed label stack {298 16}
Preferred path: not configured
Default path: active
Next hop: 200.28.2.242
Create time: 1d02h, last status change time: 00:03:17
Signaling protocol: LDP, peer 200.28.0.120:0 up
Targeted Hello: 200.28.0.15(LDP Id) -> 200.28.0.120, LDP is UP
Status TLV support (local/remote) : enabled/supported
LDP route watch : disabled
Label/status state machine : established, LruRru
Last local dataplane status rcvd: No fault
Last BFD dataplane status rcvd: Not sent
Last BFD peer monitor status rcvd: No fault
Last local AC circuit status rcvd: No fault
Last local AC circuit status sent: No fault
Last local LDP TLV status sent: No fault
Last remote LDP TLV status rcvd: No fault
Last remote LDP ADJ status rcvd: No fault
MPLS VC labels: local 17, remote 16
Group ID: local 0, remote 0
MTU: local 9178, remote 9178
Remote interface description:
Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled
Control Word: On (configured: autosense)
Dataplane:
SSM segment/switch IDs: 45083/8194 (used), PWID: 2
VC statistics:
transit packet totals: receive 1374, send 1374
transit byte totals: receive 118164, send 87936
transit packet drops: receive 0, seq error 0, send 0

Debugging did not turn up a whole lot of useful info that can be used to
narrow down the problem.

Resetting the LDP neighbours to a clean state the proceeding logs only logs
the EoMPLS targeted LDP session for VC 5070 (the above) but no information
at all for VC 116 which is part of the VFI attached circuit.

ihsan

On May 10, 2012, at 9:42 PM, adam vitkovsky wrote:

> It almost appears like one of the routers doesn't accept targeted
> sessions Can you please check whether both ends are conf to accept ldp
> targeted sessions Or maybe the debug of targeted sessions would shed
> some light on why the session won't come up The bgp auto-discovery
> looks good
>
> adam
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces [at] puck
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Ihsan Junaidi
> Ibrahim
> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 6:00 AM
> To: Pete Lumbis
> Cc: cisco-nsp [at] puck
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x)
>
> On PE1,
>
> es-103-glsfb#sh xconnect rib detail
>
> Local Router ID: 200.28.0.15
>
> VPLS-ID: 9930:116, Target ID: 200.28.0.120 iBGP Peer
> Next-Hop: 200.28.9.146
> Hello-Source: 200.28.0.15
> Route-Target: 9930:116
> Incoming RD: 9930:116
> Forwarder: VFI ME002555
> Provisioned: Yes
> NLRI handle: 69000001
>
> PE2,
>
> es-03-akhmw#sh xconnect rib detail
>
> Local Router ID: 200.28.0.120
>
> VPLS-ID: 9930:116, Target ID: 200.28.0.15 iBGP Peer
> Next-Hop: 200.28.2.242
> Hello-Source: 200.28.0.120
> Route-Target: 9930:116
> Incoming RD: 9930:116
> Forwarder: VFI ME002617
> Provisioned: Yes
> NLRI handle: 77000001
>
> On May 10, 2012, at 10:40 AM, Pete Lumbis wrote:
>
>> What do you see in "show xconn rib"?
>>
>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim
>> <ihsan.junaidi [at] gmail> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> My topology as follows:
>>>
>>> PE1--P1--P2--P3--P4--P5--PE2
>>>
>>> PE1 lo0 - 200.28.0.15 (15.2(2)S) loader 12.2(52r)EY1
>>> PE2 lo0 - 200.28.0.120 (15.2(2)S) loader 12.2(52r)EY2
>>>
>>> Are there specific nuances for an LDP signaled transport for EoMPLS
>>> and
> VPLS in the Whales platform?
>>>
>>> An xconnect from PE1 to PE2 is signaled successfully however a VPLS
> instance based on BGP autodiscovery (manual VPLS works) is unable to
> bring up the LDP l2transport signal although the VFI is signaled up.
>>>
>>> EoMPLS
>>> ----
>>> es-103-glsfb#sh xconnect peer 200.28.0.120 vc 5070
>>> Legend: XC ST=Xconnect State S1=Segment1 State S2=Segment2 State
>>> UP=Up DN=Down AD=Admin Down IA=Inactive
>>> SB=Standby HS=Hot Standby RV=Recovering NH=No Hardware
>>>
>>> XC ST Segment 1 S1 Segment 2
> S2
>>>
> ------+---------------------------------+--+--------------------------
> ------+---------------------------------+--+------
> -+--
>>> UP pri ac Gi0/19:1(Ethernet) UP mpls 200.28.0.120:5070
> UP
>>>
>>> es-103-glsfb#sh mpls l2transport vc 5070 detail Local interface:
>>> Gi0/19 up, line protocol up, Ethernet:1 up Destination address:
>>> 200.28.0.120, VC ID: 5070, VC status: up
>>> Output interface: Te0/2, imposed label stack {298 16}
>>> Preferred path: not configured
>>> Default path: active
>>> Next hop: 200.28.2.242
>>> Create time: 02:10:43, last status change time: 02:08:57 Signaling
>>> protocol: LDP, peer 200.28.0.120:0 up
>>> Targeted Hello: 200.28.0.15(LDP Id) -> 200.28.0.120, LDP is UP
>>> Status TLV support (local/remote) : enabled/supported
>>> LDP route watch : disabled
>>> Label/status state machine : established, LruRru
>>> Last local dataplane status rcvd: No fault
>>> Last BFD dataplane status rcvd: Not sent
>>> Last BFD peer monitor status rcvd: No fault
>>> Last local AC circuit status rcvd: No fault
>>> Last local AC circuit status sent: No fault
>>> Last local LDP TLV status sent: No fault
>>> Last remote LDP TLV status rcvd: No fault
>>> Last remote LDP ADJ status rcvd: No fault
>>> MPLS VC labels: local 17, remote 16
>>> Group ID: local 0, remote 0
>>> MTU: local 9178, remote 9178
>>> Remote interface description:
>>> Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled Control Word: On
>>> (configured: autosense)
>>> Dataplane:
>>> SSM segment/switch IDs: 45083/8194 (used), PWID: 2 VC statistics:
>>> transit packet totals: receive 24, send 21
>>> transit byte totals: receive 2064, send 1344
>>> transit packet drops: receive 0, seq error 0, send 0
>>>
>>> VPLS
>>> ----
>>> es-103-glsfb#sh vfi
>>> Legend: RT=Route-target, S=Split-horizon, Y=Yes, N=No
>>>
>>> VFI name: ME002555, state: up, type: multipoint signaling: LDP VPN
>>> ID: 116, VPLS-ID: 9930:116
>>> RD: 9930:116, RT: 9930:116
>>> Bridge-Domain 116 attachment circuits:
>>> Vlan116
>>> Neighbors connected via pseudowires:
>>> Peer Address VC ID Discovered Router ID S
>>> 200.28.9.146 116 200.28.0.120 Y
>>>
>>> es-103-glsfb#sh mpls l2transport vc 116 detail Local interface: VFI
>>> ME002555 vfi up Interworking type is Ethernet Destination address:
>>> 200.28.0.120, VC ID: 116, VC status: down
>>> Last error: Local access circuit is not ready for label advertise
>>> Next hop PE address: 200.28.9.146
>>> Output interface: none, imposed label stack {}
>>> Preferred path: not configured
>>> Default path: no route
>>> No adjacency
>>> Create time: 02:07:55, last status change time: 02:07:55 Signaling
>>> protocol: LDP, peer unknown
>>> Targeted Hello: 200.28.0.15(LDP Id) -> 200.28.9.146, LDP is DOWN,
>>> no
> binding
>>> Status TLV support (local/remote) : enabled/None (no remote binding)
>>> LDP route watch : disabled
>>> Label/status state machine : local standby, AC-ready, LnuRnd
>>> Last local dataplane status rcvd: No fault
>>> Last BFD dataplane status rcvd: Not sent
>>> Last BFD peer monitor status rcvd: No fault
>>> Last local AC circuit status rcvd: No fault
>>> Last local AC circuit status sent: Not sent
>>> Last local LDP TLV status sent: None
>>> Last remote LDP TLV status rcvd: None (no remote binding)
>>> Last remote LDP ADJ status rcvd: None (no remote binding)
>>> MPLS VC labels: local 23, remote unassigned
>>> AGI: type 1, len 8, 000A 26CA 0000 0074
>>> Local AII: type 1, len 4, DF1C 000F (200.28.0.15)
>>> Remote AII: type 1, len 4, DF1C 0078 (200.28.0.120)
>>> Group ID: local n/a, remote unknown
>>> MTU: local 9178, remote unknown
>>> Remote interface description:
>>> Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled Control Word: On
>>> (configured: autosense)
>>> Dataplane:
>>> SSM segment/switch IDs: 0/0 (used), PWID: 14 VC statistics:
>>> transit packet totals: receive 0, send 0
>>> transit byte totals: receive 0, send 0
>>> transit packet drops: receive 0, seq error 0, send 0
>>>
>>> I'm getting the account team into the loop but if anyone has
>>> encountered
> this scenario before and managed to find the answer, that would be
> most helpful.
>>>
>>> ihsan
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

ihsan.junaidi at gmail

May 10, 2012, 8:56 AM

Post #15 of 17 (1313 views)
Permalink

Re: VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x) [In reply to]

Adam,

Shutting and unshutting both side of the VFIs resulting in the following:

PE1
---
May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: %VFI-6-VFI_STATUS_CHANGED: Status of VFI ME002555 changed from DOWN to UP
May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: Circuit attributes, Receive update:
May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: . Interface handle: 0x3E83
May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: . Status: UP (0x1)
May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: . Circuit directive: Go Active
May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: . Payload encap: Ethernet
May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: . Circuit Encap: VFI
May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: . Segment type: 0x19
May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: . Switch handle: 61469
May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: . MTU: 9178
May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: . I/F Str: pw100001
May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: . Circuit string: vfi
May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: Process attrs
May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: Received Go Active service directive
May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: . Receive status update
May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ...... NMS: VC oper state: DOWN
May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ...... NMS: err codes: no-err
May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ...... SYSLOG: VC is DOWN
May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: .... Local ready
May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: .... Local service is ready; send a label
May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: .... Alloc local binding
May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ..... Alloc label for dynamic
May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ...... Populate local binding
May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ........ Capability C000505, returned cap C000505, mask FFFEFFBF
May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ....... Autosense enabled, no remote, Ethernet(5)
May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ....... MTU set to 9178
May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ....... FEC set to 129
May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ....... Grouping off
May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ....... Grouping ignored, set to 0
May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ....... Control word on
May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ...... PWID: already in use, reuse 14
May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ...... Asking to reuse label 23
May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ...... Requested label: any
May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ...... Label request, label 0 pwid 0
May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: .... Generate local event
May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: .... No label
May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ... Check if can activate dataplane
May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: .... Keep dataplane up
May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM: 277 cumulative msgs handled. rc=0
May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: Label response: label 23 pwid 14 reqid 27
May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: Generate local event
May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: Ready, label 23
May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: Evt local ready, provisioned->local standby, AC-ready
May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: . Take no action
May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM: 278 cumulative msgs handled. rc=0

PE2
---
May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: %VFI-6-VFI_STATUS_CHANGED: Status of VFI ME002617 changed from ADMINDOWN to DOWN
May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: %VFI-6-VFI_STATUS_CHANGED: Status of VFI ME002617 changed from DOWN to UP
May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: Circuit attributes, Receive update:
May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: . Interface handle: 0x3E83
May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: . Status: UP (0x1)
May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: . Circuit directive: Go Active
May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: . Payload encap: Ethernet
May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: . Circuit Encap: VFI
May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: . Segment type: 0x19
May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: . Switch handle: 12297
May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: . MTU: 9178
May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: . I/F Str: pw100001
May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: . Circuit string: vfi
May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: Process attrs
May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: Received Go Active service directive
May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: . Receive status update
May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: ...... NMS: VC oper state: DOWN
May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: ...... NMS: err codes: no-err
May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: ...... SYSLOG: VC is DOWN
May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: .... Local ready
May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: .... Local service is ready; send a label
May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: .... Alloc local binding
May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: ..... Alloc label for dynamic
May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: ...... Populate local binding
May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: ........ Capability C000505, returned cap C000505, mask FFFEFFBF
May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: ....... Autosense enabled, no remote, Ethernet(5)
May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: ....... MTU set to 9178
May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: ....... FEC set to 129
May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: ....... Grouping off
May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: ....... Grouping ignored, set to 0
May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: ....... Control word on
May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: ...... PWID: already in use, reuse 2
May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: ...... Asking to reuse label 637
May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: ...... Requested label: any
May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: ...... Label request, label 0 pwid 0
May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: .... Generate local event
May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: .... No label
May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: ... Check if can activate dataplane
May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: .... Keep dataplane up
May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM: 3306 cumulative msgs handled. rc=0
May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: Label response: label 637 pwid 2 reqid 3
May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: Generate local event
May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: Ready, label 637
May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: Evt local ready, ldp ready->local ready
May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: . Advertise local vc label binding
May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM: 3307 cumulative msgs handled. rc=0
May 10 23:51:20.432 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: Start resend label timer
May 10 23:51:20.432 MYT: AToM LDP[200.28.0.15, 116]: Receive label release
May 10 23:51:20.432 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: Evt remote release, in local ready
May 10 23:51:20.432 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: . Take no action
May 10 23:51:20.432 MYT: AToM: 3308 cumulative msgs handled. rc=0
May 10 23:51:26.756 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: Stop resend label timer
May 10 23:51:26.756 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: Evt resend label timer expired, in local ready
May 10 23:51:26.756 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: . Resend label timer expired
May 10 23:51:27.100 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: Start resend label timer
May 10 23:51:27.100 MYT: AToM LDP[200.28.0.15, 116]: Receive label release
May 10 23:51:27.100 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: Evt remote release, in local ready
May 10 23:51:27.100 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: . Take no action
May 10 23:51:27.100 MYT: AToM: 3309 cumulative msgs handled. rc=0

ihsan
On May 10, 2012, at 11:19 PM, adam vitkovsky wrote:

> I was just thinking that maybe with the manual config one side gets selected
> as the session initiator while with bgp it's the other way around resulting
> in the fail -if indeed only one side is configured to accept the targeted
> sessions (but now that I think about it I guess it works the way the both
> ends initiate the session and than the session with lower id gets thorn
> down)
> And what does the debug says about the session not coming up please?
>
> adam
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim [mailto:ihsan.junaidi [at] gmail]
> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 4:40 PM
> To: adam vitkovsky
> Cc: 'Pete Lumbis'; cisco-nsp [at] puck
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x)
>
> Adam,
>
> That's what I initially thought but an EoMPLS or a manual VPLS work just
> fine. Sample of EoMPLS,
>
> es-103-glsfb#sh mpls l2transport vc 5070 detail Local interface: Gi0/19 up,
> line protocol up, Ethernet:1 up
> Destination address: 200.28.0.120, VC ID: 5070, VC status: up
> Output interface: Te0/2, imposed label stack {298 16}
> Preferred path: not configured
> Default path: active
> Next hop: 200.28.2.242
> Create time: 1d02h, last status change time: 00:03:17
> Signaling protocol: LDP, peer 200.28.0.120:0 up
> Targeted Hello: 200.28.0.15(LDP Id) -> 200.28.0.120, LDP is UP
> Status TLV support (local/remote) : enabled/supported
> LDP route watch : disabled
> Label/status state machine : established, LruRru
> Last local dataplane status rcvd: No fault
> Last BFD dataplane status rcvd: Not sent
> Last BFD peer monitor status rcvd: No fault
> Last local AC circuit status rcvd: No fault
> Last local AC circuit status sent: No fault
> Last local LDP TLV status sent: No fault
> Last remote LDP TLV status rcvd: No fault
> Last remote LDP ADJ status rcvd: No fault
> MPLS VC labels: local 17, remote 16
> Group ID: local 0, remote 0
> MTU: local 9178, remote 9178
> Remote interface description:
> Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled
> Control Word: On (configured: autosense)
> Dataplane:
> SSM segment/switch IDs: 45083/8194 (used), PWID: 2
> VC statistics:
> transit packet totals: receive 1374, send 1374
> transit byte totals: receive 118164, send 87936
> transit packet drops: receive 0, seq error 0, send 0
>
> Debugging did not turn up a whole lot of useful info that can be used to
> narrow down the problem.
>
> Resetting the LDP neighbours to a clean state the proceeding logs only logs
> the EoMPLS targeted LDP session for VC 5070 (the above) but no information
> at all for VC 116 which is part of the VFI attached circuit.
>
> ihsan
>
> On May 10, 2012, at 9:42 PM, adam vitkovsky wrote:
>
>> It almost appears like one of the routers doesn't accept targeted
>> sessions Can you please check whether both ends are conf to accept ldp
>> targeted sessions Or maybe the debug of targeted sessions would shed
>> some light on why the session won't come up The bgp auto-discovery
>> looks good
>>
>> adam
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cisco-nsp-bounces [at] puck
>> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Ihsan Junaidi
>> Ibrahim
>> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 6:00 AM
>> To: Pete Lumbis
>> Cc: cisco-nsp [at] puck
>> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x)
>>
>> On PE1,
>>
>> es-103-glsfb#sh xconnect rib detail
>>
>> Local Router ID: 200.28.0.15
>>
>> VPLS-ID: 9930:116, Target ID: 200.28.0.120 iBGP Peer
>> Next-Hop: 200.28.9.146
>> Hello-Source: 200.28.0.15
>> Route-Target: 9930:116
>> Incoming RD: 9930:116
>> Forwarder: VFI ME002555
>> Provisioned: Yes
>> NLRI handle: 69000001
>>
>> PE2,
>>
>> es-03-akhmw#sh xconnect rib detail
>>
>> Local Router ID: 200.28.0.120
>>
>> VPLS-ID: 9930:116, Target ID: 200.28.0.15 iBGP Peer
>> Next-Hop: 200.28.2.242
>> Hello-Source: 200.28.0.120
>> Route-Target: 9930:116
>> Incoming RD: 9930:116
>> Forwarder: VFI ME002617
>> Provisioned: Yes
>> NLRI handle: 77000001
>>
>> On May 10, 2012, at 10:40 AM, Pete Lumbis wrote:
>>
>>> What do you see in "show xconn rib"?
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim
>>> <ihsan.junaidi [at] gmail> wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> My topology as follows:
>>>>
>>>> PE1--P1--P2--P3--P4--P5--PE2
>>>>
>>>> PE1 lo0 - 200.28.0.15 (15.2(2)S) loader 12.2(52r)EY1
>>>> PE2 lo0 - 200.28.0.120 (15.2(2)S) loader 12.2(52r)EY2
>>>>
>>>> Are there specific nuances for an LDP signaled transport for EoMPLS
>>>> and
>> VPLS in the Whales platform?
>>>>
>>>> An xconnect from PE1 to PE2 is signaled successfully however a VPLS
>> instance based on BGP autodiscovery (manual VPLS works) is unable to
>> bring up the LDP l2transport signal although the VFI is signaled up.
>>>>
>>>> EoMPLS
>>>> ----
>>>> es-103-glsfb#sh xconnect peer 200.28.0.120 vc 5070
>>>> Legend: XC ST=Xconnect State S1=Segment1 State S2=Segment2 State
>>>> UP=Up DN=Down AD=Admin Down IA=Inactive
>>>> SB=Standby HS=Hot Standby RV=Recovering NH=No Hardware
>>>>
>>>> XC ST Segment 1 S1 Segment 2
>> S2
>>>>
>> ------+---------------------------------+--+--------------------------
>> ------+---------------------------------+--+------
>> -+--
>>>> UP pri ac Gi0/19:1(Ethernet) UP mpls 200.28.0.120:5070
>> UP
>>>>
>>>> es-103-glsfb#sh mpls l2transport vc 5070 detail Local interface:
>>>> Gi0/19 up, line protocol up, Ethernet:1 up Destination address:
>>>> 200.28.0.120, VC ID: 5070, VC status: up
>>>> Output interface: Te0/2, imposed label stack {298 16}
>>>> Preferred path: not configured
>>>> Default path: active
>>>> Next hop: 200.28.2.242
>>>> Create time: 02:10:43, last status change time: 02:08:57 Signaling
>>>> protocol: LDP, peer 200.28.0.120:0 up
>>>> Targeted Hello: 200.28.0.15(LDP Id) -> 200.28.0.120, LDP is UP
>>>> Status TLV support (local/remote) : enabled/supported
>>>> LDP route watch : disabled
>>>> Label/status state machine : established, LruRru
>>>> Last local dataplane status rcvd: No fault
>>>> Last BFD dataplane status rcvd: Not sent
>>>> Last BFD peer monitor status rcvd: No fault
>>>> Last local AC circuit status rcvd: No fault
>>>> Last local AC circuit status sent: No fault
>>>> Last local LDP TLV status sent: No fault
>>>> Last remote LDP TLV status rcvd: No fault
>>>> Last remote LDP ADJ status rcvd: No fault
>>>> MPLS VC labels: local 17, remote 16
>>>> Group ID: local 0, remote 0
>>>> MTU: local 9178, remote 9178
>>>> Remote interface description:
>>>> Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled Control Word: On
>>>> (configured: autosense)
>>>> Dataplane:
>>>> SSM segment/switch IDs: 45083/8194 (used), PWID: 2 VC statistics:
>>>> transit packet totals: receive 24, send 21
>>>> transit byte totals: receive 2064, send 1344
>>>> transit packet drops: receive 0, seq error 0, send 0
>>>>
>>>> VPLS
>>>> ----
>>>> es-103-glsfb#sh vfi
>>>> Legend: RT=Route-target, S=Split-horizon, Y=Yes, N=No
>>>>
>>>> VFI name: ME002555, state: up, type: multipoint signaling: LDP VPN
>>>> ID: 116, VPLS-ID: 9930:116
>>>> RD: 9930:116, RT: 9930:116
>>>> Bridge-Domain 116 attachment circuits:
>>>> Vlan116
>>>> Neighbors connected via pseudowires:
>>>> Peer Address VC ID Discovered Router ID S
>>>> 200.28.9.146 116 200.28.0.120 Y
>>>>
>>>> es-103-glsfb#sh mpls l2transport vc 116 detail Local interface: VFI
>>>> ME002555 vfi up Interworking type is Ethernet Destination address:
>>>> 200.28.0.120, VC ID: 116, VC status: down
>>>> Last error: Local access circuit is not ready for label advertise
>>>> Next hop PE address: 200.28.9.146
>>>> Output interface: none, imposed label stack {}
>>>> Preferred path: not configured
>>>> Default path: no route
>>>> No adjacency
>>>> Create time: 02:07:55, last status change time: 02:07:55 Signaling
>>>> protocol: LDP, peer unknown
>>>> Targeted Hello: 200.28.0.15(LDP Id) -> 200.28.9.146, LDP is DOWN,
>>>> no
>> binding
>>>> Status TLV support (local/remote) : enabled/None (no remote binding)
>>>> LDP route watch : disabled
>>>> Label/status state machine : local standby, AC-ready, LnuRnd
>>>> Last local dataplane status rcvd: No fault
>>>> Last BFD dataplane status rcvd: Not sent
>>>> Last BFD peer monitor status rcvd: No fault
>>>> Last local AC circuit status rcvd: No fault
>>>> Last local AC circuit status sent: Not sent
>>>> Last local LDP TLV status sent: None
>>>> Last remote LDP TLV status rcvd: None (no remote binding)
>>>> Last remote LDP ADJ status rcvd: None (no remote binding)
>>>> MPLS VC labels: local 23, remote unassigned
>>>> AGI: type 1, len 8, 000A 26CA 0000 0074
>>>> Local AII: type 1, len 4, DF1C 000F (200.28.0.15)
>>>> Remote AII: type 1, len 4, DF1C 0078 (200.28.0.120)
>>>> Group ID: local n/a, remote unknown
>>>> MTU: local 9178, remote unknown
>>>> Remote interface description:
>>>> Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled Control Word: On
>>>> (configured: autosense)
>>>> Dataplane:
>>>> SSM segment/switch IDs: 0/0 (used), PWID: 14 VC statistics:
>>>> transit packet totals: receive 0, send 0
>>>> transit byte totals: receive 0, send 0
>>>> transit packet drops: receive 0, seq error 0, send 0
>>>>
>>>> I'm getting the account team into the loop but if anyone has
>>>> encountered
>> this scenario before and managed to find the answer, that would be
>> most helpful.
>>>>
>>>> ihsan
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>
>

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

ihsan.junaidi at gmail

May 10, 2012, 7:12 PM

Post #16 of 17 (1259 views)
Permalink

Re: VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x) [In reply to]

Well took me by surprise and managed to bring the VC l2transport up.

Turned our next-hop-self attribute is not implied for l2vpn VPLS NLRI for my configs, even though the doc Waris attached didn't specify it either.

My understanding is that next-hop-self for l2vpn and inetvpn NLRIs are implied (they are with JUNOS) but I fear something is missing here.

So adding the next-hop-self attribute to both sides of the BGP neighbour configs promptly brought up the VC.

Waris,

Any known issue on this?

I've opened an SR for this so I guess I'll take this with TAC directly.

ihsan

On May 10, 2012, at 11:56 PM, Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim wrote:

> Adam,
>
> Shutting and unshutting both side of the VFIs resulting in the following:
>
> PE1
> ---
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: %VFI-6-VFI_STATUS_CHANGED: Status of VFI ME002555 changed from DOWN to UP
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: Circuit attributes, Receive update:
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: . Interface handle: 0x3E83
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: . Status: UP (0x1)
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: . Circuit directive: Go Active
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: . Payload encap: Ethernet
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: . Circuit Encap: VFI
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: . Segment type: 0x19
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: . Switch handle: 61469
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: . MTU: 9178
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: . I/F Str: pw100001
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: . Circuit string: vfi
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: Process attrs
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: Received Go Active service directive
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: . Receive status update
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ...... NMS: VC oper state: DOWN
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ...... NMS: err codes: no-err
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ...... SYSLOG: VC is DOWN
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: .... Local ready
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: .... Local service is ready; send a label
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: .... Alloc local binding
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ..... Alloc label for dynamic
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ...... Populate local binding
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ........ Capability C000505, returned cap C000505, mask FFFEFFBF
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ....... Autosense enabled, no remote, Ethernet(5)
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ....... MTU set to 9178
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ....... FEC set to 129
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ....... Grouping off
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ....... Grouping ignored, set to 0
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ....... Control word on
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ...... PWID: already in use, reuse 14
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ...... Asking to reuse label 23
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ...... Requested label: any
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ...... Label request, label 0 pwid 0
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: .... Generate local event
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: .... No label
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ... Check if can activate dataplane
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: .... Keep dataplane up
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM: 277 cumulative msgs handled. rc=0
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: Label response: label 23 pwid 14 reqid 27
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: Generate local event
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: Ready, label 23
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: Evt local ready, provisioned->local standby, AC-ready
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: . Take no action
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM: 278 cumulative msgs handled. rc=0
>
> PE2
> ---
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: %VFI-6-VFI_STATUS_CHANGED: Status of VFI ME002617 changed from ADMINDOWN to DOWN
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: %VFI-6-VFI_STATUS_CHANGED: Status of VFI ME002617 changed from DOWN to UP
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: Circuit attributes, Receive update:
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: . Interface handle: 0x3E83
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: . Status: UP (0x1)
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: . Circuit directive: Go Active
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: . Payload encap: Ethernet
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: . Circuit Encap: VFI
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: . Segment type: 0x19
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: . Switch handle: 12297
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: . MTU: 9178
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: . I/F Str: pw100001
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: . Circuit string: vfi
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: Process attrs
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: Received Go Active service directive
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: . Receive status update
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: ...... NMS: VC oper state: DOWN
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: ...... NMS: err codes: no-err
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: ...... SYSLOG: VC is DOWN
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: .... Local ready
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: .... Local service is ready; send a label
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: .... Alloc local binding
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: ..... Alloc label for dynamic
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: ...... Populate local binding
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: ........ Capability C000505, returned cap C000505, mask FFFEFFBF
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: ....... Autosense enabled, no remote, Ethernet(5)
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: ....... MTU set to 9178
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: ....... FEC set to 129
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: ....... Grouping off
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: ....... Grouping ignored, set to 0
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: ....... Control word on
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: ...... PWID: already in use, reuse 2
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: ...... Asking to reuse label 637
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: ...... Requested label: any
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: ...... Label request, label 0 pwid 0
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: .... Generate local event
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: .... No label
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: ... Check if can activate dataplane
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: .... Keep dataplane up
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM: 3306 cumulative msgs handled. rc=0
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: Label response: label 637 pwid 2 reqid 3
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: Generate local event
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: Ready, label 637
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: Evt local ready, ldp ready->local ready
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: . Advertise local vc label binding
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM: 3307 cumulative msgs handled. rc=0
> May 10 23:51:20.432 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: Start resend label timer
> May 10 23:51:20.432 MYT: AToM LDP[200.28.0.15, 116]: Receive label release
> May 10 23:51:20.432 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: Evt remote release, in local ready
> May 10 23:51:20.432 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: . Take no action
> May 10 23:51:20.432 MYT: AToM: 3308 cumulative msgs handled. rc=0
> May 10 23:51:26.756 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: Stop resend label timer
> May 10 23:51:26.756 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: Evt resend label timer expired, in local ready
> May 10 23:51:26.756 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: . Resend label timer expired
> May 10 23:51:27.100 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: Start resend label timer
> May 10 23:51:27.100 MYT: AToM LDP[200.28.0.15, 116]: Receive label release
> May 10 23:51:27.100 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: Evt remote release, in local ready
> May 10 23:51:27.100 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: . Take no action
> May 10 23:51:27.100 MYT: AToM: 3309 cumulative msgs handled. rc=0
>
> ihsan
> On May 10, 2012, at 11:19 PM, adam vitkovsky wrote:
>
>> I was just thinking that maybe with the manual config one side gets selected
>> as the session initiator while with bgp it's the other way around resulting
>> in the fail -if indeed only one side is configured to accept the targeted
>> sessions (but now that I think about it I guess it works the way the both
>> ends initiate the session and than the session with lower id gets thorn
>> down)
>> And what does the debug says about the session not coming up please?
>>
>> adam
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim [mailto:ihsan.junaidi [at] gmail]
>> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 4:40 PM
>> To: adam vitkovsky
>> Cc: 'Pete Lumbis'; cisco-nsp [at] puck
>> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x)
>>
>> Adam,
>>
>> That's what I initially thought but an EoMPLS or a manual VPLS work just
>> fine. Sample of EoMPLS,
>>
>> es-103-glsfb#sh mpls l2transport vc 5070 detail Local interface: Gi0/19 up,
>> line protocol up, Ethernet:1 up
>> Destination address: 200.28.0.120, VC ID: 5070, VC status: up
>> Output interface: Te0/2, imposed label stack {298 16}
>> Preferred path: not configured
>> Default path: active
>> Next hop: 200.28.2.242
>> Create time: 1d02h, last status change time: 00:03:17
>> Signaling protocol: LDP, peer 200.28.0.120:0 up
>> Targeted Hello: 200.28.0.15(LDP Id) -> 200.28.0.120, LDP is UP
>> Status TLV support (local/remote) : enabled/supported
>> LDP route watch : disabled
>> Label/status state machine : established, LruRru
>> Last local dataplane status rcvd: No fault
>> Last BFD dataplane status rcvd: Not sent
>> Last BFD peer monitor status rcvd: No fault
>> Last local AC circuit status rcvd: No fault
>> Last local AC circuit status sent: No fault
>> Last local LDP TLV status sent: No fault
>> Last remote LDP TLV status rcvd: No fault
>> Last remote LDP ADJ status rcvd: No fault
>> MPLS VC labels: local 17, remote 16
>> Group ID: local 0, remote 0
>> MTU: local 9178, remote 9178
>> Remote interface description:
>> Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled
>> Control Word: On (configured: autosense)
>> Dataplane:
>> SSM segment/switch IDs: 45083/8194 (used), PWID: 2
>> VC statistics:
>> transit packet totals: receive 1374, send 1374
>> transit byte totals: receive 118164, send 87936
>> transit packet drops: receive 0, seq error 0, send 0
>>
>> Debugging did not turn up a whole lot of useful info that can be used to
>> narrow down the problem.
>>
>> Resetting the LDP neighbours to a clean state the proceeding logs only logs
>> the EoMPLS targeted LDP session for VC 5070 (the above) but no information
>> at all for VC 116 which is part of the VFI attached circuit.
>>
>> ihsan
>>
>> On May 10, 2012, at 9:42 PM, adam vitkovsky wrote:
>>
>>> It almost appears like one of the routers doesn't accept targeted
>>> sessions Can you please check whether both ends are conf to accept ldp
>>> targeted sessions Or maybe the debug of targeted sessions would shed
>>> some light on why the session won't come up The bgp auto-discovery
>>> looks good
>>>
>>> adam
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: cisco-nsp-bounces [at] puck
>>> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Ihsan Junaidi
>>> Ibrahim
>>> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 6:00 AM
>>> To: Pete Lumbis
>>> Cc: cisco-nsp [at] puck
>>> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x)
>>>
>>> On PE1,
>>>
>>> es-103-glsfb#sh xconnect rib detail
>>>
>>> Local Router ID: 200.28.0.15
>>>
>>> VPLS-ID: 9930:116, Target ID: 200.28.0.120 iBGP Peer
>>> Next-Hop: 200.28.9.146
>>> Hello-Source: 200.28.0.15
>>> Route-Target: 9930:116
>>> Incoming RD: 9930:116
>>> Forwarder: VFI ME002555
>>> Provisioned: Yes
>>> NLRI handle: 69000001
>>>
>>> PE2,
>>>
>>> es-03-akhmw#sh xconnect rib detail
>>>
>>> Local Router ID: 200.28.0.120
>>>
>>> VPLS-ID: 9930:116, Target ID: 200.28.0.15 iBGP Peer
>>> Next-Hop: 200.28.2.242
>>> Hello-Source: 200.28.0.120
>>> Route-Target: 9930:116
>>> Incoming RD: 9930:116
>>> Forwarder: VFI ME002617
>>> Provisioned: Yes
>>> NLRI handle: 77000001
>>>
>>> On May 10, 2012, at 10:40 AM, Pete Lumbis wrote:
>>>
>>>> What do you see in "show xconn rib"?
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim
>>>> <ihsan.junaidi [at] gmail> wrote:
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> My topology as follows:
>>>>>
>>>>> PE1--P1--P2--P3--P4--P5--PE2
>>>>>
>>>>> PE1 lo0 - 200.28.0.15 (15.2(2)S) loader 12.2(52r)EY1
>>>>> PE2 lo0 - 200.28.0.120 (15.2(2)S) loader 12.2(52r)EY2
>>>>>
>>>>> Are there specific nuances for an LDP signaled transport for EoMPLS
>>>>> and
>>> VPLS in the Whales platform?
>>>>>
>>>>> An xconnect from PE1 to PE2 is signaled successfully however a VPLS
>>> instance based on BGP autodiscovery (manual VPLS works) is unable to
>>> bring up the LDP l2transport signal although the VFI is signaled up.
>>>>>
>>>>> EoMPLS
>>>>> ----
>>>>> es-103-glsfb#sh xconnect peer 200.28.0.120 vc 5070
>>>>> Legend: XC ST=Xconnect State S1=Segment1 State S2=Segment2 State
>>>>> UP=Up DN=Down AD=Admin Down IA=Inactive
>>>>> SB=Standby HS=Hot Standby RV=Recovering NH=No Hardware
>>>>>
>>>>> XC ST Segment 1 S1 Segment 2
>>> S2
>>>>>
>>> ------+---------------------------------+--+--------------------------
>>> ------+---------------------------------+--+------
>>> -+--
>>>>> UP pri ac Gi0/19:1(Ethernet) UP mpls 200.28.0.120:5070
>>> UP
>>>>>
>>>>> es-103-glsfb#sh mpls l2transport vc 5070 detail Local interface:
>>>>> Gi0/19 up, line protocol up, Ethernet:1 up Destination address:
>>>>> 200.28.0.120, VC ID: 5070, VC status: up
>>>>> Output interface: Te0/2, imposed label stack {298 16}
>>>>> Preferred path: not configured
>>>>> Default path: active
>>>>> Next hop: 200.28.2.242
>>>>> Create time: 02:10:43, last status change time: 02:08:57 Signaling
>>>>> protocol: LDP, peer 200.28.0.120:0 up
>>>>> Targeted Hello: 200.28.0.15(LDP Id) -> 200.28.0.120, LDP is UP
>>>>> Status TLV support (local/remote) : enabled/supported
>>>>> LDP route watch : disabled
>>>>> Label/status state machine : established, LruRru
>>>>> Last local dataplane status rcvd: No fault
>>>>> Last BFD dataplane status rcvd: Not sent
>>>>> Last BFD peer monitor status rcvd: No fault
>>>>> Last local AC circuit status rcvd: No fault
>>>>> Last local AC circuit status sent: No fault
>>>>> Last local LDP TLV status sent: No fault
>>>>> Last remote LDP TLV status rcvd: No fault
>>>>> Last remote LDP ADJ status rcvd: No fault
>>>>> MPLS VC labels: local 17, remote 16
>>>>> Group ID: local 0, remote 0
>>>>> MTU: local 9178, remote 9178
>>>>> Remote interface description:
>>>>> Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled Control Word: On
>>>>> (configured: autosense)
>>>>> Dataplane:
>>>>> SSM segment/switch IDs: 45083/8194 (used), PWID: 2 VC statistics:
>>>>> transit packet totals: receive 24, send 21
>>>>> transit byte totals: receive 2064, send 1344
>>>>> transit packet drops: receive 0, seq error 0, send 0
>>>>>
>>>>> VPLS
>>>>> ----
>>>>> es-103-glsfb#sh vfi
>>>>> Legend: RT=Route-target, S=Split-horizon, Y=Yes, N=No
>>>>>
>>>>> VFI name: ME002555, state: up, type: multipoint signaling: LDP VPN
>>>>> ID: 116, VPLS-ID: 9930:116
>>>>> RD: 9930:116, RT: 9930:116
>>>>> Bridge-Domain 116 attachment circuits:
>>>>> Vlan116
>>>>> Neighbors connected via pseudowires:
>>>>> Peer Address VC ID Discovered Router ID S
>>>>> 200.28.9.146 116 200.28.0.120 Y
>>>>>
>>>>> es-103-glsfb#sh mpls l2transport vc 116 detail Local interface: VFI
>>>>> ME002555 vfi up Interworking type is Ethernet Destination address:
>>>>> 200.28.0.120, VC ID: 116, VC status: down
>>>>> Last error: Local access circuit is not ready for label advertise
>>>>> Next hop PE address: 200.28.9.146
>>>>> Output interface: none, imposed label stack {}
>>>>> Preferred path: not configured
>>>>> Default path: no route
>>>>> No adjacency
>>>>> Create time: 02:07:55, last status change time: 02:07:55 Signaling
>>>>> protocol: LDP, peer unknown
>>>>> Targeted Hello: 200.28.0.15(LDP Id) -> 200.28.9.146, LDP is DOWN,
>>>>> no
>>> binding
>>>>> Status TLV support (local/remote) : enabled/None (no remote binding)
>>>>> LDP route watch : disabled
>>>>> Label/status state machine : local standby, AC-ready, LnuRnd
>>>>> Last local dataplane status rcvd: No fault
>>>>> Last BFD dataplane status rcvd: Not sent
>>>>> Last BFD peer monitor status rcvd: No fault
>>>>> Last local AC circuit status rcvd: No fault
>>>>> Last local AC circuit status sent: Not sent
>>>>> Last local LDP TLV status sent: None
>>>>> Last remote LDP TLV status rcvd: None (no remote binding)
>>>>> Last remote LDP ADJ status rcvd: None (no remote binding)
>>>>> MPLS VC labels: local 23, remote unassigned
>>>>> AGI: type 1, len 8, 000A 26CA 0000 0074
>>>>> Local AII: type 1, len 4, DF1C 000F (200.28.0.15)
>>>>> Remote AII: type 1, len 4, DF1C 0078 (200.28.0.120)
>>>>> Group ID: local n/a, remote unknown
>>>>> MTU: local 9178, remote unknown
>>>>> Remote interface description:
>>>>> Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled Control Word: On
>>>>> (configured: autosense)
>>>>> Dataplane:
>>>>> SSM segment/switch IDs: 0/0 (used), PWID: 14 VC statistics:
>>>>> transit packet totals: receive 0, send 0
>>>>> transit byte totals: receive 0, send 0
>>>>> transit packet drops: receive 0, seq error 0, send 0
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm getting the account team into the loop but if anyone has
>>>>> encountered
>>> this scenario before and managed to find the answer, that would be
>>> most helpful.
>>>>>
>>>>> ihsan
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
>>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>>>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>>
>>
>>
>

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

waris at cisco

May 10, 2012, 7:26 PM

Post #17 of 17 (1263 views)
Permalink

Re: VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x) [In reply to]

Hi Ihsan,
The VC did come up in our case without the bgp next hop self command. I
am not sure why it should make a difference in this case.
I am not aware of any issue since it seems to be working in our setup
without any knobs.
Copying Ahmed for his inputs.

Regards,
Waris

-----Original Message-----
From: Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim [mailto:ihsan.junaidi [at] gmail]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 7:12 PM
To: cisco-nsp [at] puck; Waris Sagheer (waris)
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x)

Well took me by surprise and managed to bring the VC l2transport up.

Turned our next-hop-self attribute is not implied for l2vpn VPLS NLRI
for my configs, even though the doc Waris attached didn't specify it
either.

My understanding is that next-hop-self for l2vpn and inetvpn NLRIs are
implied (they are with JUNOS) but I fear something is missing here.

So adding the next-hop-self attribute to both sides of the BGP neighbour
configs promptly brought up the VC.

Waris,

Any known issue on this?

I've opened an SR for this so I guess I'll take this with TAC directly.

ihsan

On May 10, 2012, at 11:56 PM, Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim wrote:

> Adam,
>
> Shutting and unshutting both side of the VFIs resulting in the
following:
>
> PE1
> ---
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: %VFI-6-VFI_STATUS_CHANGED: Status of VFI
> ME002555 changed from DOWN to UP May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT:
AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: Circuit attributes, Receive update:
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: . Interface handle:

> 0x3E83 May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: . Status: UP

> (0x1) May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: . Circuit
> directive: Go Active May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]:

> . Payload encap: Ethernet May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120,

> 116]: . Circuit Encap: VFI May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT:
> AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: . Segment type: 0x19 May 10 23:52:29.485
> MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: . Switch handle: 61469 May 10
> 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: . MTU: 9178 May 10
> 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: . I/F Str: pw100001 May 10

> 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: . Circuit string: vfi May
> 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: Process attrs May 10
> 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: Received Go Active service
> directive May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: . Receive
status update May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ......
NMS: VC oper state: DOWN
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ...... NMS: err
codes: no-err
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ...... SYSLOG: VC is

> DOWN May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: .... Local
> ready May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: .... Local
> service is ready; send a label May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT:
> AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: .... Alloc local binding May 10 23:52:29.485
> MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ..... Alloc label for dynamic May 10
> 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ...... Populate local
> binding May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ........
> Capability C000505, returned cap C000505, mask FFFEFFBF May 10
> 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ....... Autosense enabled,
> no remote, Ethernet(5) May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120,
> 116]: ....... MTU set to 9178 May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT:
> AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ....... FEC set to 129 May 10 23:52:29.485
> MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ....... Grouping off May 10 23:52:29.485

> MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ....... Grouping ignored, set to 0 May
> 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ....... Control word on
> May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ...... PWID: already

> in use, reuse 14 May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]:
> ...... Asking to reuse label 23 May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT:
> AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ...... Requested label: any May 10
> 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ...... Label request, label

> 0 pwid 0 May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ....
> Generate local event May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]:

> .... No label May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: ...
> Check if can activate dataplane May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT:
> AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: .... Keep dataplane up May 10 23:52:29.485
> MYT: AToM: 277 cumulative msgs handled. rc=0 May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT:
> AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: Label response: label 23 pwid 14 reqid 27 May

> 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: Generate local event May

> 10 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: Ready, label 23 May 10
> 23:52:29.485 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: Evt local ready,
> provisioned->local standby, AC-ready May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT:
> AToM[200.28.0.120, 116]: . Take no action May 10 23:52:29.485 MYT:
> AToM: 278 cumulative msgs handled. rc=0
>
> PE2
> ---
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: %VFI-6-VFI_STATUS_CHANGED: Status of VFI
> ME002617 changed from ADMINDOWN to DOWN May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT:
> %VFI-6-VFI_STATUS_CHANGED: Status of VFI ME002617 changed from DOWN to
UP May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: Circuit attributes,
Receive update:
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: . Interface handle:
> 0x3E83 May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: . Status: UP
> (0x1) May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: . Circuit
> directive: Go Active May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]:
> . Payload encap: Ethernet May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15,
> 116]: . Circuit Encap: VFI May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15,

> 116]: . Segment type: 0x19 May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15,

> 116]: . Switch handle: 12297 May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT:
> AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: . MTU: 9178 May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT:
> AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: . I/F Str: pw100001 May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT:
> AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: . Circuit string: vfi May 10 23:51:20.404
> MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: Process attrs May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT:
> AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: Received Go Active service directive May 10
> 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: . Receive status update May
10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: ...... NMS: VC oper state:
DOWN
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: ...... NMS: err
codes: no-err
> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: ...... SYSLOG: VC is
> DOWN May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: .... Local ready

> May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: .... Local service is

> ready; send a label May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]:
> .... Alloc local binding May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15,
> 116]: ..... Alloc label for dynamic May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT:
> AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: ...... Populate local binding May 10
> 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: ........ Capability C000505,

> returned cap C000505, mask FFFEFFBF May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT:
> AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: ....... Autosense enabled, no remote,
> Ethernet(5) May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: .......
> MTU set to 9178 May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]:
> ....... FEC set to 129 May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15,
> 116]: ....... Grouping off May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15,
> 116]: ....... Grouping ignored, set to 0 May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT:
> AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: ....... Control word on May 10 23:51:20.404
> MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: ...... PWID: already in use, reuse 2 May
> 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: ...... Asking to reuse
> label 637 May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: ......
> Requested label: any May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]:
> ...... Label request, label 0 pwid 0 May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT:
> AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: .... Generate local event May 10 23:51:20.404
> MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: .... No label May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT:
> AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: ... Check if can activate dataplane May 10
> 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: .... Keep dataplane up May
> 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM: 3306 cumulative msgs handled. rc=0 May 10
> 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: Label response: label 637
> pwid 2 reqid 3 May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]:
> Generate local event May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]:
> Ready, label 637 May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: Evt
> local ready, ldp ready->local ready May 10 23:51:20.404 MYT:
> AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: . Advertise local vc label binding May 10
> 23:51:20.404 MYT: AToM: 3307 cumulative msgs handled. rc=0 May 10
> 23:51:20.432 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: Start resend label timer May

> 10 23:51:20.432 MYT: AToM LDP[200.28.0.15, 116]: Receive label release

> May 10 23:51:20.432 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: Evt remote release,
> in local ready May 10 23:51:20.432 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: . Take

> no action May 10 23:51:20.432 MYT: AToM: 3308 cumulative msgs handled.

> rc=0 May 10 23:51:26.756 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: Stop resend
> label timer May 10 23:51:26.756 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: Evt
> resend label timer expired, in local ready May 10 23:51:26.756 MYT:
> AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: . Resend label timer expired May 10
> 23:51:27.100 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: Start resend label timer May

> 10 23:51:27.100 MYT: AToM LDP[200.28.0.15, 116]: Receive label release

> May 10 23:51:27.100 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: Evt remote release,
> in local ready May 10 23:51:27.100 MYT: AToM[200.28.0.15, 116]: . Take

> no action May 10 23:51:27.100 MYT: AToM: 3309 cumulative msgs handled.

> rc=0
>
> ihsan
> On May 10, 2012, at 11:19 PM, adam vitkovsky wrote:
>
>> I was just thinking that maybe with the manual config one side gets
>> selected as the session initiator while with bgp it's the other way
>> around resulting in the fail -if indeed only one side is configured
>> to accept the targeted sessions (but now that I think about it I
>> guess it works the way the both ends initiate the session and than
>> the session with lower id gets thorn
>> down)
>> And what does the debug says about the session not coming up please?
>>
>> adam
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim [mailto:ihsan.junaidi [at] gmail]
>> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 4:40 PM
>> To: adam vitkovsky
>> Cc: 'Pete Lumbis'; cisco-nsp [at] puck
>> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x)
>>
>> Adam,
>>
>> That's what I initially thought but an EoMPLS or a manual VPLS work
>> just fine. Sample of EoMPLS,
>>
>> es-103-glsfb#sh mpls l2transport vc 5070 detail Local interface:
>> Gi0/19 up, line protocol up, Ethernet:1 up Destination address:
>> 200.28.0.120, VC ID: 5070, VC status: up
>> Output interface: Te0/2, imposed label stack {298 16}
>> Preferred path: not configured
>> Default path: active
>> Next hop: 200.28.2.242
>> Create time: 1d02h, last status change time: 00:03:17 Signaling
>> protocol: LDP, peer 200.28.0.120:0 up
>> Targeted Hello: 200.28.0.15(LDP Id) -> 200.28.0.120, LDP is UP
>> Status TLV support (local/remote) : enabled/supported
>> LDP route watch : disabled
>> Label/status state machine : established, LruRru
>> Last local dataplane status rcvd: No fault
>> Last BFD dataplane status rcvd: Not sent
>> Last BFD peer monitor status rcvd: No fault
>> Last local AC circuit status rcvd: No fault
>> Last local AC circuit status sent: No fault
>> Last local LDP TLV status sent: No fault
>> Last remote LDP TLV status rcvd: No fault
>> Last remote LDP ADJ status rcvd: No fault
>> MPLS VC labels: local 17, remote 16
>> Group ID: local 0, remote 0
>> MTU: local 9178, remote 9178
>> Remote interface description:
>> Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled Control Word: On
>> (configured: autosense)
>> Dataplane:
>> SSM segment/switch IDs: 45083/8194 (used), PWID: 2 VC statistics:
>> transit packet totals: receive 1374, send 1374
>> transit byte totals: receive 118164, send 87936
>> transit packet drops: receive 0, seq error 0, send 0
>>
>> Debugging did not turn up a whole lot of useful info that can be used

>> to narrow down the problem.
>>
>> Resetting the LDP neighbours to a clean state the proceeding logs
>> only logs the EoMPLS targeted LDP session for VC 5070 (the above) but

>> no information at all for VC 116 which is part of the VFI attached
circuit.
>>
>> ihsan
>>
>> On May 10, 2012, at 9:42 PM, adam vitkovsky wrote:
>>
>>> It almost appears like one of the routers doesn't accept targeted
>>> sessions Can you please check whether both ends are conf to accept
>>> ldp targeted sessions Or maybe the debug of targeted sessions would
>>> shed some light on why the session won't come up The bgp
>>> auto-discovery looks good
>>>
>>> adam
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: cisco-nsp-bounces [at] puck
>>> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Ihsan
>>> Junaidi Ibrahim
>>> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 6:00 AM
>>> To: Pete Lumbis
>>> Cc: cisco-nsp [at] puck
>>> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] VFI LDP transport signaled down (ME3600x)
>>>
>>> On PE1,
>>>
>>> es-103-glsfb#sh xconnect rib detail
>>>
>>> Local Router ID: 200.28.0.15
>>>
>>> VPLS-ID: 9930:116, Target ID: 200.28.0.120 iBGP Peer
>>> Next-Hop: 200.28.9.146
>>> Hello-Source: 200.28.0.15
>>> Route-Target: 9930:116
>>> Incoming RD: 9930:116
>>> Forwarder: VFI ME002555
>>> Provisioned: Yes
>>> NLRI handle: 69000001
>>>
>>> PE2,
>>>
>>> es-03-akhmw#sh xconnect rib detail
>>>
>>> Local Router ID: 200.28.0.120
>>>
>>> VPLS-ID: 9930:116, Target ID: 200.28.0.15 iBGP Peer
>>> Next-Hop: 200.28.2.242
>>> Hello-Source: 200.28.0.120
>>> Route-Target: 9930:116
>>> Incoming RD: 9930:116
>>> Forwarder: VFI ME002617
>>> Provisioned: Yes
>>> NLRI handle: 77000001
>>>
>>> On May 10, 2012, at 10:40 AM, Pete Lumbis wrote:
>>>
>>>> What do you see in "show xconn rib"?
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim
>>>> <ihsan.junaidi [at] gmail> wrote:
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> My topology as follows:
>>>>>
>>>>> PE1--P1--P2--P3--P4--P5--PE2
>>>>>
>>>>> PE1 lo0 - 200.28.0.15 (15.2(2)S) loader 12.2(52r)EY1
>>>>> PE2 lo0 - 200.28.0.120 (15.2(2)S) loader 12.2(52r)EY2
>>>>>
>>>>> Are there specific nuances for an LDP signaled transport for
>>>>> EoMPLS and
>>> VPLS in the Whales platform?
>>>>>
>>>>> An xconnect from PE1 to PE2 is signaled successfully however a
>>>>> VPLS
>>> instance based on BGP autodiscovery (manual VPLS works) is unable to

>>> bring up the LDP l2transport signal although the VFI is signaled up.
>>>>>
>>>>> EoMPLS
>>>>> ----
>>>>> es-103-glsfb#sh xconnect peer 200.28.0.120 vc 5070
>>>>> Legend: XC ST=Xconnect State S1=Segment1 State S2=Segment2
State
>>>>> UP=Up DN=Down AD=Admin Down IA=Inactive
>>>>> SB=Standby HS=Hot Standby RV=Recovering NH=No Hardware
>>>>>
>>>>> XC ST Segment 1 S1 Segment 2
>>> S2
>>>>>
>>> ------+---------------------------------+--+------------------------
>>> ------+---------------------------------+--+--
>>> ------+---------------------------------+--+------
>>> -+--
>>>>> UP pri ac Gi0/19:1(Ethernet) UP mpls 200.28.0.120:5070
>>> UP
>>>>>
>>>>> es-103-glsfb#sh mpls l2transport vc 5070 detail Local interface:
>>>>> Gi0/19 up, line protocol up, Ethernet:1 up Destination address:
>>>>> 200.28.0.120, VC ID: 5070, VC status: up Output interface: Te0/2,
>>>>> imposed label stack {298 16} Preferred path: not configured
>>>>> Default path: active Next hop: 200.28.2.242 Create time: 02:10:43,

>>>>> last status change time: 02:08:57 Signaling
>>>>> protocol: LDP, peer 200.28.0.120:0 up Targeted Hello:
>>>>> 200.28.0.15(LDP Id) -> 200.28.0.120, LDP is UP
>>>>> Status TLV support (local/remote) : enabled/supported
>>>>> LDP route watch : disabled
>>>>> Label/status state machine : established, LruRru
>>>>> Last local dataplane status rcvd: No fault
>>>>> Last BFD dataplane status rcvd: Not sent
>>>>> Last BFD peer monitor status rcvd: No fault
>>>>> Last local AC circuit status rcvd: No fault
>>>>> Last local AC circuit status sent: No fault
>>>>> Last local LDP TLV status sent: No fault
>>>>> Last remote LDP TLV status rcvd: No fault
>>>>> Last remote LDP ADJ status rcvd: No fault
>>>>> MPLS VC labels: local 17, remote 16 Group ID: local 0, remote 0
>>>>> MTU: local 9178, remote 9178
>>>>> Remote interface description:
>>>>> Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled Control Word: On
>>>>> (configured: autosense)
>>>>> Dataplane:
>>>>> SSM segment/switch IDs: 45083/8194 (used), PWID: 2 VC statistics:
>>>>> transit packet totals: receive 24, send 21
>>>>> transit byte totals: receive 2064, send 1344
>>>>> transit packet drops: receive 0, seq error 0, send 0
>>>>>
>>>>> VPLS
>>>>> ----
>>>>> es-103-glsfb#sh vfi
>>>>> Legend: RT=Route-target, S=Split-horizon, Y=Yes, N=No
>>>>>
>>>>> VFI name: ME002555, state: up, type: multipoint signaling: LDP
>>>>> VPN
>>>>> ID: 116, VPLS-ID: 9930:116
>>>>> RD: 9930:116, RT: 9930:116
>>>>> Bridge-Domain 116 attachment circuits:
>>>>> Vlan116
>>>>> Neighbors connected via pseudowires:
>>>>> Peer Address VC ID Discovered Router ID S
>>>>> 200.28.9.146 116 200.28.0.120 Y
>>>>>
>>>>> es-103-glsfb#sh mpls l2transport vc 116 detail Local interface:
>>>>> VFI
>>>>> ME002555 vfi up Interworking type is Ethernet Destination
address:
>>>>> 200.28.0.120, VC ID: 116, VC status: down Last error: Local access

>>>>> circuit is not ready for label advertise Next hop PE address:
>>>>> 200.28.9.146 Output interface: none, imposed label stack {}
>>>>> Preferred path: not configured Default path: no route No adjacency

>>>>> Create time: 02:07:55, last status change time: 02:07:55
>>>>> Signaling
>>>>> protocol: LDP, peer unknown
>>>>> Targeted Hello: 200.28.0.15(LDP Id) -> 200.28.9.146, LDP is DOWN,
>>>>> no
>>> binding
>>>>> Status TLV support (local/remote) : enabled/None (no remote
binding)
>>>>> LDP route watch : disabled
>>>>> Label/status state machine : local standby, AC-ready,
LnuRnd
>>>>> Last local dataplane status rcvd: No fault
>>>>> Last BFD dataplane status rcvd: Not sent
>>>>> Last BFD peer monitor status rcvd: No fault
>>>>> Last local AC circuit status rcvd: No fault
>>>>> Last local AC circuit status sent: Not sent
>>>>> Last local LDP TLV status sent: None
>>>>> Last remote LDP TLV status rcvd: None (no remote binding)
>>>>> Last remote LDP ADJ status rcvd: None (no remote binding)
>>>>> MPLS VC labels: local 23, remote unassigned
>>>>> AGI: type 1, len 8, 000A 26CA 0000 0074 Local AII: type 1, len 4,
>>>>> DF1C 000F (200.28.0.15) Remote AII: type 1, len 4, DF1C 0078
>>>>> (200.28.0.120) Group ID: local n/a, remote unknown
>>>>> MTU: local 9178, remote unknown
>>>>> Remote interface description:
>>>>> Sequencing: receive disabled, send disabled Control Word: On
>>>>> (configured: autosense)
>>>>> Dataplane:
>>>>> SSM segment/switch IDs: 0/0 (used), PWID: 14 VC statistics:
>>>>> transit packet totals: receive 0, send 0
>>>>> transit byte totals: receive 0, send 0
>>>>> transit packet drops: receive 0, seq error 0, send 0
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm getting the account team into the loop but if anyone has
>>>>> encountered
>>> this scenario before and managed to find the answer, that would be
>>> most helpful.
>>>>>
>>>>> ihsan
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
>>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>>>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>>
>>
>>
>

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads