paul at paulstewart
Apr 4, 2012, 1:30 PM
Post #3 of 3
(372 views)
Permalink
|
Thanks... we'll find out soon enough...;)
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Storey [mailto:tom [at] snnap]
Sent: April-04-12 9:42 AM
To: Paul Stewart
Cc: cisco-nsp [at] puck
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 1811/1841 Performance with PPPOE
The 1811 is supposedly even more powerful than the low end 2800's. And on that note, Ive seen a 2801 acting as a LAC (so thats accept PPPoE and forward on via L2TP) for ~100 sessions and barely breaking a sweat. Traffic levels were quite low though (i.e. <= 10mbit/sec perhaps), so that might explain the low CPU util.
On 2 April 2012 14:39, Paul Stewart <paul [at] paulstewart> wrote:
> Hey folks.
>
>
>
> Just wondering regarding performance impacts on 1811/1841 when
> terminating PPPOE on the router? The "router spec sheet" from Cisco
> (http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/downloads/765/tools/quickreference/
> router
> performance.pdf) shows about 35Mb/s of traffic on one of these routers
> but if you also have 100-150 PPPOE users terminating on the router,
> how much does this affect the throughput numbers?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Paul
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
|
