
jrjahangir at yahoo
Feb 26, 2012, 10:18 AM
Post #5 of 5
(2109 views)
Permalink
|
thanks peter for your information. ----- Original Message ----- From: Peter Rathlev <peter [at] rathlev> To: Md. Jahangir Hossain <jrjahangir [at] yahoo> Cc: "cisco-nsp [at] puck" <cisco-nsp [at] puck> Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2012 6:53 PM Subject: Re: [c-nsp] High CPU Usage on CISCO ASA 5510 On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 02:50 -0800, Md. Jahangir Hossain wrote: > My total traffic bellow 50Mbps on Box but total connection per second > usage nearly 10000+ . I think this is the problem. What is the > solution for this. Lower the number of connections per second. ;-) The 5510 is rated for 9000 connections/second, so you're pushing it to the limit. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/vpndevc/ps6032/ps6094/ps6120/product_data_sheet0900aecd802930c5.html#wp9001774 But 10k new connections per second sounds like something you shouldn't really try to push through a firewall. Is the number within what you would expect or is it abnormal? ... > policy-map type inspect dns preset_dns_map > parameters > message-length maximum client auto > message-length maximum 512 > policy-map global_policy > class inspection_default > inspect ftp > inspect h323 h225 > inspect h323 ras > inspect ip-options > inspect netbios > inspect rsh > inspect rtsp > inspect skinny > inspect esmtp > inspect sqlnet > inspect sunrpc > inspect tftp > inspect sip > inspect xdmcp > inspect icmp error > inspect dns That's a very long list of inspections. Could you maybe do without some of these? By the way: The DNS map is preventing DNS functioning correctly. You really should allow a message-length of 4096 bytes. It's probably one specific type of traffic, though I'm not aware of any way to find out which from a policy-map. -- Peter _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
|