Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: Cisco: NSP

QoS Cisco Serie 800 and 1800

 

 

Cisco nsp RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded


aselios at gmail

Nov 20, 2009, 7:26 AM

Post #1 of 5 (778 views)
Permalink
QoS Cisco Serie 800 and 1800

Hi,

I want to configure QoS on a Cisco's 800 and 1800 series router and I
couldn't make it work the way I want. I've configured three classes of
service called GOLD, SILVER and BRONZE, designed for low latency, low loss
and data respectively.

* I want the GOLD class to have a maximum bandwidth of 25%, even if there is
traffic in the other classes.

* The SILVER class has a minimum bandwidth of 50% and, if there's no traffic
in the GOLD queue, I want this class to take the available bandwidth which
is not used by the GOLD class. Thats means that the SILVER class has a 50%
of assured bandwidth and can increase to a maximum of 75% of the total
bandwidth.

* The BRONZE class has no assured bandwidth and can only take the bandwidth
which is not used for the other classes.

The problem is that with Cisco's QoS tools I have not reached the desired
goal. I have tried with different configurations and IOS and I couldn't get
any successful result . Below I attach the policy configuration that I have
tried (just to give you an example).

Is there any way in which I can achieve the behavior that was described
above?.

Thanks in advance.


Standard Configuration
-------------------------------------

policy-map QoS_POLICY
class GOLD
priority percent 25
police cir percent 25 pir percent 25
set dscp ef
class SILVER
set dscp af41
bandwidth percent 50
shape average percent 75
class class-default
fair-queue
set dscp af12
bandwidth percent 25




Hierarchical Configuration
---------------------------------------------
policy-map GOLD+SILVER
class GOLD
priority percent 33
police rate percent 33
class class-default
fair-queue

policy-map QOS
class GOLD+SILVER
shape average percent 75
bandwidth percent 75
service-policy GOLD+SILVER
class class-default
fair-queue


Note: This configuration was applied in a subinterface (xDSL, 802.1q
ethernet) and for the outgoing traffic.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


cluestore at gmail

Nov 20, 2009, 8:35 AM

Post #2 of 5 (779 views)
Permalink
Re: QoS Cisco Serie 800 and 1800 [In reply to]

Hi Alejandro,

If you're doing this with xDSL, you will have to apply the service-policy to
the PVC for outgoing to make it work. Here's an example of what I use. I
know your class-maps and policy-maps are different, but you should be able
to get the point.

class-map match-any VoIP
match ip rtp 16384 16383
match access-group name VoicePorts

policy-map Voice
class VoIP
priority percent 75
class class-default
fair-queue


interface ATM0.1 point-to-point
pvc 1/100
vbr-rt 384 384
tx-ring-limit 3
service-policy output Voice


ip access-list extended VoicePorts
permit udp any host x.x.x.x range 22026 62025
permit udp any host x.x.x.x range 22026 62025




HTH,
Clue

On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Alejandro Selios <aselios [at] gmail> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I want to configure QoS on a Cisco's 800 and 1800 series router and I
> couldn't make it work the way I want. I've configured three classes of
> service called GOLD, SILVER and BRONZE, designed for low latency, low loss
> and data respectively.
>
> * I want the GOLD class to have a maximum bandwidth of 25%, even if there
> is
> traffic in the other classes.
>
> * The SILVER class has a minimum bandwidth of 50% and, if there's no
> traffic
> in the GOLD queue, I want this class to take the available bandwidth which
> is not used by the GOLD class. Thats means that the SILVER class has a 50%
> of assured bandwidth and can increase to a maximum of 75% of the total
> bandwidth.
>
> * The BRONZE class has no assured bandwidth and can only take the bandwidth
> which is not used for the other classes.
>
> The problem is that with Cisco's QoS tools I have not reached the desired
> goal. I have tried with different configurations and IOS and I couldn't get
> any successful result . Below I attach the policy configuration that I have
> tried (just to give you an example).
>
> Is there any way in which I can achieve the behavior that was described
> above?.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
> Standard Configuration
> -------------------------------------
>
> policy-map QoS_POLICY
> class GOLD
> priority percent 25
> police cir percent 25 pir percent 25
> set dscp ef
> class SILVER
> set dscp af41
> bandwidth percent 50
> shape average percent 75
> class class-default
> fair-queue
> set dscp af12
> bandwidth percent 25
>
>
>
>
> Hierarchical Configuration
> ---------------------------------------------
> policy-map GOLD+SILVER
> class GOLD
> priority percent 33
> police rate percent 33
> class class-default
> fair-queue
>
> policy-map QOS
> class GOLD+SILVER
> shape average percent 75
> bandwidth percent 75
> service-policy GOLD+SILVER
> class class-default
> fair-queue
>
>
> Note: This configuration was applied in a subinterface (xDSL, 802.1q
> ethernet) and for the outgoing traffic.
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


aselios at gmail

Nov 20, 2009, 9:51 AM

Post #3 of 5 (788 views)
Permalink
Re: QoS Cisco Serie 800 and 1800 [In reply to]

Thanks Clue for your quick answer.

In the original mail I didn't mention it, but I applied the service-policy
to the PVC like you said. (Below attach the complete configuration for both
cases).

Another issue is that Cisco's 800 and 1800 series routers only have 2 level
of prioritization. Cisco's routers allow to configure a priority queue and
CBWFQ (class base weighted fair queue) but does not has the flexibly to
specify a scheduler policy or any other queuing policies.

I think that weighted fair queue will leave as dead end, I think the way to
follow is a strict priority queuing with a customizable scheduler policy.
I'm looking for a way to do that in Cisco's routers.

I'll appreciate any help you can give me.


Cisco 878/877
--------------------------------------
class-map match-all GOLD
match access-group name GOLD_ACL
class-map match-all SILVER
match access-group name SILVER_ACL


policy-map QoS_POLICY
class GOLD
priority percent 25
police cir percent 25 pir percent 25
set dscp ef
class SILVER
set dscp af41
bandwidth percent 50
shape average percent 75
class class-default
fair-queue
set dscp af12
bandwidth percent 25

interface ATM0
no ip address
load-interval 30
no atm ilmi-keepalive
max-reserved-bandwidth 100
!
interface ATM0.35 point-to-point
description INTERFAZ DE ACCESO
ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.254
atm route-bridged ip
pvc 0/35
vbr-nrt 576 576
oam-pvc 0
encapsulation aal5snap
service-policy output QoS_POLICY



Cisco 1841
--------------------------------------

class-map match-all GOLD
match access-group name GOLD_ACL
class-map match-all SILVER
match access-group name SILVER_ACL


policy-map QoS_POLICY
class GOLD
priority percent 25
police cir percent 25 pir percent 25
set dscp ef
class SILVER
set dscp af41
bandwidth percent 50
shape average percent 75
class class-default
fair-queue
set dscp af12
bandwidth percent 25

policy-map SHAPER
class class-default
shape average 1000000
service-policy QoS_POLICY
!
!
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
description INTERFAZ DE ACCESO
no ip address
load-interval 30
duplex auto
speed auto
!
interface FastEthernet0/0.100
encapsulation dot1Q 100
ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.252
service-policy output SHAPER



Thanks,






2009/11/20 Clue Store <cluestore [at] gmail>

> Hi Alejandro,
>
> If you're doing this with xDSL, you will have to apply the service-policy
> to the PVC for outgoing to make it work. Here's an example of what I use. I
> know your class-maps and policy-maps are different, but you should be able
> to get the point.
>
> class-map match-any VoIP
> match ip rtp 16384 16383
> match access-group name VoicePorts
>
> policy-map Voice
> class VoIP
> priority percent 75
>
> class class-default
> fair-queue
>
>
> interface ATM0.1 point-to-point
> pvc 1/100
> vbr-rt 384 384
> tx-ring-limit 3
> service-policy output Voice
>
>
> ip access-list extended VoicePorts
> permit udp any host x.x.x.x range 22026 62025
> permit udp any host x.x.x.x range 22026 62025
>
>
>
>
> HTH,
> Clue
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Alejandro Selios <aselios [at] gmail>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I want to configure QoS on a Cisco's 800 and 1800 series router and I
>> couldn't make it work the way I want. I've configured three classes of
>> service called GOLD, SILVER and BRONZE, designed for low latency, low loss
>> and data respectively.
>>
>> * I want the GOLD class to have a maximum bandwidth of 25%, even if there
>> is
>> traffic in the other classes.
>>
>> * The SILVER class has a minimum bandwidth of 50% and, if there's no
>> traffic
>> in the GOLD queue, I want this class to take the available bandwidth which
>> is not used by the GOLD class. Thats means that the SILVER class has a 50%
>> of assured bandwidth and can increase to a maximum of 75% of the total
>> bandwidth.
>>
>> * The BRONZE class has no assured bandwidth and can only take the
>> bandwidth
>> which is not used for the other classes.
>>
>> The problem is that with Cisco's QoS tools I have not reached the desired
>> goal. I have tried with different configurations and IOS and I couldn't
>> get
>> any successful result . Below I attach the policy configuration that I
>> have
>> tried (just to give you an example).
>>
>> Is there any way in which I can achieve the behavior that was described
>> above?.
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>>
>> Standard Configuration
>> -------------------------------------
>>
>> policy-map QoS_POLICY
>> class GOLD
>> priority percent 25
>> police cir percent 25 pir percent 25
>> set dscp ef
>> class SILVER
>> set dscp af41
>> bandwidth percent 50
>> shape average percent 75
>> class class-default
>> fair-queue
>> set dscp af12
>> bandwidth percent 25
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Hierarchical Configuration
>> ---------------------------------------------
>> policy-map GOLD+SILVER
>> class GOLD
>> priority percent 33
>> police rate percent 33
>> class class-default
>> fair-queue
>>
>> policy-map QOS
>> class GOLD+SILVER
>> shape average percent 75
>> bandwidth percent 75
>> service-policy GOLD+SILVER
>> class class-default
>> fair-queue
>>
>>
>> Note: This configuration was applied in a subinterface (xDSL, 802.1q
>> ethernet) and for the outgoing traffic.
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


dave.cardwell1 at googlemail

Nov 21, 2009, 2:47 AM

Post #4 of 5 (737 views)
Permalink
Re: QoS Cisco Serie 800 and 1800 [In reply to]

Hi Alejandro,

If you can run 15.0 code you may want try HQF, rather then CBWFQ.

There is a good description at the link below:
http://blog.ioshints.info/2009/11/first-hqf-impressions-excellent-job.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=RSS&utm_campaign=IOS+hints+Feed

Hope it helps,
Dave

On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Alejandro Selios <aselios [at] gmail> wrote:
> Thanks Clue for your quick answer.
>
> In the original mail I didn't mention it, but I applied the service-policy
> to the PVC like you said. (Below attach the complete configuration for both
> cases).
>
> Another issue is that Cisco's 800 and 1800 series routers only have 2 level
> of prioritization. Cisco's routers allow to configure a priority queue and
> CBWFQ (class base weighted fair queue) but does not has the flexibly to
> specify a scheduler policy or any other queuing policies.
>
> I think that weighted fair queue will leave as dead end, I think the way to
> follow is a strict priority queuing with a customizable scheduler policy.
> I'm looking for a way to do that in Cisco's routers.
>
> I'll appreciate any help you can give me.
>
>
> Cisco 878/877
> --------------------------------------
> class-map match-all GOLD
>  match access-group name GOLD_ACL
> class-map match-all SILVER
>  match access-group name SILVER_ACL
>
>
> policy-map QoS_POLICY
>  class GOLD
>  priority percent 25
>  police cir percent 25 pir percent 25
>  set dscp ef
>  class SILVER
>  set dscp af41
>   bandwidth percent 50
>   shape average percent 75
>  class class-default
>   fair-queue
>   set dscp af12
>   bandwidth percent 25
>
> interface ATM0
>  no ip address
>  load-interval 30
>  no atm ilmi-keepalive
>  max-reserved-bandwidth 100
> !
> interface ATM0.35 point-to-point
>  description INTERFAZ DE ACCESO
>  ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.254
>  atm route-bridged ip
>  pvc 0/35
>  vbr-nrt 576 576
>  oam-pvc 0
>  encapsulation aal5snap
>  service-policy output QoS_POLICY
>
>
>
> Cisco 1841
> --------------------------------------
>
> class-map match-all GOLD
>  match access-group name GOLD_ACL
> class-map match-all SILVER
>  match access-group name SILVER_ACL
>
>
> policy-map QoS_POLICY
>  class GOLD
>  priority percent 25
>  police cir percent 25 pir percent 25
>  set dscp ef
>  class SILVER
>  set dscp af41
>   bandwidth percent 50
>   shape average percent 75
>  class class-default
>   fair-queue
>   set dscp af12
>   bandwidth percent 25
>
> policy-map SHAPER
>  class class-default
>    shape average 1000000
>  service-policy QoS_POLICY
> !
> !
> !
> interface FastEthernet0/0
>  description INTERFAZ DE ACCESO
>  no ip address
>  load-interval 30
>  duplex auto
>  speed auto
> !
> interface FastEthernet0/0.100
>  encapsulation dot1Q 100
>  ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.252
>  service-policy output SHAPER
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 2009/11/20 Clue Store <cluestore [at] gmail>
>
>> Hi Alejandro,
>>
>> If you're doing this with xDSL, you will have to apply the service-policy
>> to the PVC for outgoing to make it work. Here's an example of what I use. I
>> know your class-maps and policy-maps are different, but you should be able
>> to get the point.
>>
>> class-map match-any VoIP
>>  match ip rtp 16384 16383
>>  match access-group name VoicePorts
>>
>> policy-map Voice
>>  class VoIP
>>   priority percent 75
>>
>>  class class-default
>>   fair-queue
>>
>>
>> interface ATM0.1 point-to-point
>>  pvc 1/100
>>   vbr-rt 384 384
>>   tx-ring-limit 3
>>   service-policy output Voice
>>
>>
>> ip access-list extended VoicePorts
>>  permit udp any host x.x.x.x range 22026 62025
>>  permit udp any host x.x.x.x range 22026 62025
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> HTH,
>> Clue
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Alejandro Selios <aselios [at] gmail>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I want to configure QoS on a Cisco's 800 and 1800 series router and I
>>> couldn't make it work the way I want. I've configured three classes of
>>> service called GOLD, SILVER and BRONZE, designed for low latency, low loss
>>> and data respectively.
>>>
>>> * I want the GOLD class to have a maximum bandwidth of 25%, even if there
>>> is
>>> traffic in the other classes.
>>>
>>> * The SILVER class has a minimum bandwidth of 50% and, if there's no
>>> traffic
>>> in the GOLD queue, I want this class to take the available bandwidth which
>>> is not used by the GOLD class. Thats means that the SILVER class has a 50%
>>> of assured bandwidth and can increase to a maximum of 75% of the total
>>> bandwidth.
>>>
>>> * The BRONZE class has no assured bandwidth and can only take the
>>> bandwidth
>>> which is not used for the other classes.
>>>
>>> The problem is that with Cisco's QoS tools I have not reached the desired
>>> goal. I have tried with different configurations and IOS and I couldn't
>>> get
>>> any successful result . Below I attach the policy configuration that I
>>> have
>>> tried (just to give you an example).
>>>
>>> Is there any way in which I can achieve the behavior that was described
>>> above?.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>
>>>
>>> Standard Configuration
>>> -------------------------------------
>>>
>>> policy-map QoS_POLICY
>>>  class GOLD
>>>   priority percent 25
>>>   police cir percent 25 pir percent 25
>>>   set dscp ef
>>>  class SILVER
>>>   set dscp af41
>>>    bandwidth percent 50
>>>    shape average percent 75
>>>  class class-default
>>>    fair-queue
>>>    set dscp af12
>>>    bandwidth percent 25
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hierarchical Configuration
>>> ---------------------------------------------
>>> policy-map GOLD+SILVER
>>>  class GOLD
>>>    priority percent 33
>>>    police rate percent 33
>>>  class class-default
>>>    fair-queue
>>>
>>> policy-map QOS
>>>  class GOLD+SILVER
>>>    shape average percent 75
>>>    bandwidth percent 75
>>>    service-policy GOLD+SILVER
>>>  class class-default
>>>    fair-queue
>>>
>>>
>>> Note: This configuration was applied in a subinterface (xDSL, 802.1q
>>> ethernet) and for the outgoing traffic.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp [at] puck
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp [at] puck
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


aselios at gmail

Nov 21, 2009, 11:50 AM

Post #5 of 5 (745 views)
Permalink
Re: QoS Cisco Serie 800 and 1800 [In reply to]

Hi Dave,

I've been tried configure HQF but runing 12.4T IOS and didn't work. I'm
going to get the 15.0 IOS and I'll try again with HQF.

Thanks


2009/11/21 Dave Cardwell <dave.cardwell1 [at] googlemail>

> Hi Alejandro,
>
> If you can run 15.0 code you may want try HQF, rather then CBWFQ.
>
> There is a good description at the link below:
>
> http://blog.ioshints.info/2009/11/first-hqf-impressions-excellent-job.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=RSS&utm_campaign=IOS+hints+Feed
>
> Hope it helps,
> Dave
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Alejandro Selios <aselios [at] gmail>
> wrote:
> > Thanks Clue for your quick answer.
> >
> > In the original mail I didn't mention it, but I applied the
> service-policy
> > to the PVC like you said. (Below attach the complete configuration for
> both
> > cases).
> >
> > Another issue is that Cisco's 800 and 1800 series routers only have 2
> level
> > of prioritization. Cisco's routers allow to configure a priority queue
> and
> > CBWFQ (class base weighted fair queue) but does not has the flexibly to
> > specify a scheduler policy or any other queuing policies.
> >
> > I think that weighted fair queue will leave as dead end, I think the way
> to
> > follow is a strict priority queuing with a customizable scheduler policy.
> > I'm looking for a way to do that in Cisco's routers.
> >
> > I'll appreciate any help you can give me.
> >
> >
> > Cisco 878/877
> > --------------------------------------
> > class-map match-all GOLD
> > match access-group name GOLD_ACL
> > class-map match-all SILVER
> > match access-group name SILVER_ACL
> >
> >
> > policy-map QoS_POLICY
> > class GOLD
> > priority percent 25
> > police cir percent 25 pir percent 25
> > set dscp ef
> > class SILVER
> > set dscp af41
> > bandwidth percent 50
> > shape average percent 75
> > class class-default
> > fair-queue
> > set dscp af12
> > bandwidth percent 25
> >
> > interface ATM0
> > no ip address
> > load-interval 30
> > no atm ilmi-keepalive
> > max-reserved-bandwidth 100
> > !
> > interface ATM0.35 point-to-point
> > description INTERFAZ DE ACCESO
> > ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.254
> > atm route-bridged ip
> > pvc 0/35
> > vbr-nrt 576 576
> > oam-pvc 0
> > encapsulation aal5snap
> > service-policy output QoS_POLICY
> >
> >
> >
> > Cisco 1841
> > --------------------------------------
> >
> > class-map match-all GOLD
> > match access-group name GOLD_ACL
> > class-map match-all SILVER
> > match access-group name SILVER_ACL
> >
> >
> > policy-map QoS_POLICY
> > class GOLD
> > priority percent 25
> > police cir percent 25 pir percent 25
> > set dscp ef
> > class SILVER
> > set dscp af41
> > bandwidth percent 50
> > shape average percent 75
> > class class-default
> > fair-queue
> > set dscp af12
> > bandwidth percent 25
> >
> > policy-map SHAPER
> > class class-default
> > shape average 1000000
> > service-policy QoS_POLICY
> > !
> > !
> > !
> > interface FastEthernet0/0
> > description INTERFAZ DE ACCESO
> > no ip address
> > load-interval 30
> > duplex auto
> > speed auto
> > !
> > interface FastEthernet0/0.100
> > encapsulation dot1Q 100
> > ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.252
> > service-policy output SHAPER
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 2009/11/20 Clue Store <cluestore [at] gmail>
> >
> >> Hi Alejandro,
> >>
> >> If you're doing this with xDSL, you will have to apply the
> service-policy
> >> to the PVC for outgoing to make it work. Here's an example of what I
> use. I
> >> know your class-maps and policy-maps are different, but you should be
> able
> >> to get the point.
> >>
> >> class-map match-any VoIP
> >> match ip rtp 16384 16383
> >> match access-group name VoicePorts
> >>
> >> policy-map Voice
> >> class VoIP
> >> priority percent 75
> >>
> >> class class-default
> >> fair-queue
> >>
> >>
> >> interface ATM0.1 point-to-point
> >> pvc 1/100
> >> vbr-rt 384 384
> >> tx-ring-limit 3
> >> service-policy output Voice
> >>
> >>
> >> ip access-list extended VoicePorts
> >> permit udp any host x.x.x.x range 22026 62025
> >> permit udp any host x.x.x.x range 22026 62025
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> HTH,
> >> Clue
> >>
> >> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Alejandro Selios <aselios [at] gmail
> >wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I want to configure QoS on a Cisco's 800 and 1800 series router and I
> >>> couldn't make it work the way I want. I've configured three classes of
> >>> service called GOLD, SILVER and BRONZE, designed for low latency, low
> loss
> >>> and data respectively.
> >>>
> >>> * I want the GOLD class to have a maximum bandwidth of 25%, even if
> there
> >>> is
> >>> traffic in the other classes.
> >>>
> >>> * The SILVER class has a minimum bandwidth of 50% and, if there's no
> >>> traffic
> >>> in the GOLD queue, I want this class to take the available bandwidth
> which
> >>> is not used by the GOLD class. Thats means that the SILVER class has a
> 50%
> >>> of assured bandwidth and can increase to a maximum of 75% of the total
> >>> bandwidth.
> >>>
> >>> * The BRONZE class has no assured bandwidth and can only take the
> >>> bandwidth
> >>> which is not used for the other classes.
> >>>
> >>> The problem is that with Cisco's QoS tools I have not reached the
> desired
> >>> goal. I have tried with different configurations and IOS and I couldn't
> >>> get
> >>> any successful result . Below I attach the policy configuration that I
> >>> have
> >>> tried (just to give you an example).
> >>>
> >>> Is there any way in which I can achieve the behavior that was described
> >>> above?.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks in advance.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Standard Configuration
> >>> -------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> policy-map QoS_POLICY
> >>> class GOLD
> >>> priority percent 25
> >>> police cir percent 25 pir percent 25
> >>> set dscp ef
> >>> class SILVER
> >>> set dscp af41
> >>> bandwidth percent 50
> >>> shape average percent 75
> >>> class class-default
> >>> fair-queue
> >>> set dscp af12
> >>> bandwidth percent 25
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Hierarchical Configuration
> >>> ---------------------------------------------
> >>> policy-map GOLD+SILVER
> >>> class GOLD
> >>> priority percent 33
> >>> police rate percent 33
> >>> class class-default
> >>> fair-queue
> >>>
> >>> policy-map QOS
> >>> class GOLD+SILVER
> >>> shape average percent 75
> >>> bandwidth percent 75
> >>> service-policy GOLD+SILVER
> >>> class class-default
> >>> fair-queue
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Note: This configuration was applied in a subinterface (xDSL, 802.1q
> >>> ethernet) and for the outgoing traffic.
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
> >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> >>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Cisco nsp RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.