Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: Cisco: NSP

ASR-1002 Feedback

 

 

Cisco nsp RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded


ashnet2009 at gmail

Nov 19, 2009, 11:21 AM

Post #1 of 5 (509 views)
Permalink
ASR-1002 Feedback

Hi Folks,

We're looking for a new Edge routing platform for our Core DC
locations. This platform will terminate our internet links and bigger
private links. ASR1002 on paper appears to be a good fit for our
requirements. In the recent past, there have been reported issues with
IOS stability and Featureset (Netflow/Mcast etc) issues with the
Product.

At this point, I'm looking for some feedback as to where the Platform
is at from a software/hw reliability standpoint (ESP5 vs
10/POS/Ethernet (1/10G) SPA's) today. Any major issues/limitations or
shortcomings (# of ports in an EtherChannel?) that currently exist and
overall feel of the Enterprise folks who've deployed the Router in
production.

Any feedback is greatly appreciated.

Thanks in advance
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


pshem.k at gmail

Nov 19, 2009, 12:26 PM

Post #2 of 5 (491 views)
Permalink
Re: ASR-1002 Feedback [In reply to]

Hi,

We've been using various ASR1k variants for the last few months.
Generally the experience's been positive. Devices deliver what is
expected in terms of performance without even breaking a sweat. We
used them mainly as border routers (in a PE configuration). One thing
that you have to pay some attention to is features - since the
platform is relatively new (and effectively hardware-based, so
features take some time to add) some things that you might need might
not be there yet. At some stage (around 2.2.1 if I recall correctly)
you could configure PortChannel, but it wouldn't work. One other
feature that we're missing is 6VPE (that is coming in a few months),
but I'm sure that there are some others too.

I admit that my experience is SP based, but I believe that the ASR1k
is the way of the feature for small-ish Ethernet aggregation.

kind regards
Pshem


2009/11/20 Ash Net <ashnet2009 [at] gmail>:
> Hi Folks,
>
> We're looking for a new Edge routing platform for our Core DC
> locations. This platform will terminate our internet links and bigger
> private links. ASR1002 on paper appears to be a good fit for our
> requirements. In the recent past, there have been reported issues with
> IOS stability and Featureset  (Netflow/Mcast etc) issues with the
> Product.
>
> At this point, I'm looking for some feedback as to where the Platform
> is at from a software/hw reliability standpoint (ESP5 vs
> 10/POS/Ethernet (1/10G) SPA's) today. Any major issues/limitations or
> shortcomings (# of ports in an EtherChannel?) that currently exist and
> overall feel of the Enterprise folks who've deployed the Router in
> production.
>
> Any feedback is greatly appreciated.
>
> Thanks in advance
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp [at] puck
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


mrz at velvet

Nov 19, 2009, 8:30 PM

Post #3 of 5 (473 views)
Permalink
Re: ASR-1002 Feedback [In reply to]

On 11/19/2009 12:26 PM, Pshem Kowalczyk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We've been using various ASR1k variants for the last few months.
> Generally the experience's been positive. Devices deliver what is
> expected in terms of performance without even breaking a sweat. We


What sort of performance are you seeing? Cisco's site a bit obtuse in
that area.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


pshem.k at gmail

Nov 20, 2009, 12:15 AM

Post #4 of 5 (468 views)
Permalink
Re: ASR-1002 Feedback [In reply to]

Hi,

2009/11/20 matthew zeier <mrz [at] velvet>:
>
>
> What sort of performance are you seeing?  Cisco's site a bit obtuse in that
> area.

We're running the router as PE internet borders. With 6 full feeds
into vrf and between 2Gb/s and 4Gb/s of inbound traffic the load is
negligible (with ESP20). What sort of performance metrics are you
after?

kind regards
Pshem
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


ashnet2009 at gmail

Nov 20, 2009, 9:53 AM

Post #5 of 5 (465 views)
Permalink
Re: ASR-1002 Feedback [In reply to]

Thanks for the feedback PShem

On 11/20/09, Pshem Kowalczyk <pshem.k [at] gmail> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2009/11/20 matthew zeier <mrz [at] velvet>:
>>
>>
>> What sort of performance are you seeing?  Cisco's site a bit obtuse in
>> that
>> area.
>
> We're running the router as PE internet borders. With 6 full feeds
> into vrf and between 2Gb/s and 4Gb/s of inbound traffic the load is
> negligible (with ESP20). What sort of performance metrics are you
> after?
>
> kind regards
> Pshem
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Cisco nsp RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.