Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: Cisco: NSP

jumbo frame over the VLAN

 

 

Cisco nsp RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded


tseveendorj at gmail

Oct 28, 2009, 11:17 PM

Post #1 of 3 (1395 views)
Permalink
jumbo frame over the VLAN

Dear all,

Is it possible connection between MD3000i SAN and ESXi 4.0 with jumbo
frame over VLAN. Because I have only one Cisco 3560-E switch.


Best regards,
Tseveen
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


peter at rathlev

Oct 29, 2009, 1:59 AM

Post #2 of 3 (1381 views)
Permalink
Re: jumbo frame over the VLAN [In reply to]

On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 14:17 +0800, tseveendorj wrote:
> Is it possible connection between MD3000i SAN and ESXi 4.0 with jumbo
> frame over VLAN. Because I have only one Cisco 3560-E switch.

Yes, the 3560E supports L2-switching of jumbo frames on GE/TGE
interfaces, default up to 9000 byte frames.

The command "show system mtu" might help. And global config command
"system mtu jumbo <N>" can adjust the setting.

--
Peter


_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


peter at rathlev

Oct 29, 2009, 4:18 AM

Post #3 of 3 (1350 views)
Permalink
Re: jumbo frame over the VLAN [In reply to]

On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 17:11 +0800, tseveendorj wrote:
> My problem is Guest OS couldn't access to MD3000i via mtu 9000. May you
> ask how to know. request timed out when I'm pinging from ESXi CLI with
> vmkping -s 9000 IP address of MD3000i.
>
> I think may be cisco 3560-E added VLAN header byte in front of packet
> then mtu 9000 didn't match. If i'm wrong please correct me.

As far as I know ping utilities like "vmkping" use "-s" to specify
payload size, i.e. "-s 9000" means 9000 bytes payload and 28 bytes
header (ICMP + IP), resulting in something that needs a 9028 byte MTU.
You should probably test with "-s 8972" instead.

If the connection is a trunk you use 4 bytes for the 802.1q tag. Cisco
switches automagically make room for this, I don't know about VMware or
other equipment.

You could also try to adjust the MTU in the switch; the 3560E seems to
support up to 9198 bytes.

Bear in mind that "jumbo frames" isn't a standard in any way. (At least
yet.)

--
Peter


_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Cisco nsp RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.