<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Cisco | NSP</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>07 Nov  2009 11:50:28 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>dmzlink-bw and ebgp-multihop 2</title>
<description>I have a very unusual network setup, ISP-A requires me to have ebgp-multihop of 2 because we&amp;#039;re not physically connected (we seem to be 2 hops away)</description>
<pubDate>07 Nov  2009 01:56:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/120096</link>
</item><item>
<title>4948 IPv6 Throughput</title>
<description>The only thing I can find on the 4948 for IPv6 performance is that it&amp;#039;s &amp;quot;in software&amp;quot;. Does anyone know what that means? ~Seth ______________________</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 13:26:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/120080</link>
</item><item>
<title>IOS retraction?</title>
<description>In chasing my notes and upgrade schedules to respond to the last vulnerabilities announcement (September?), had a list of then-running platforms and I</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 12:05:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/120075</link>
</item><item>
<title>DHCP_PD / IPv6</title>
<description>Hello all I have been trying testing DHCP-PD functionality for ADSL / PPPoE users. Using basic cisco-site examples I was able to assign an IPv6 prefi</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 12:03:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/120068</link>
</item><item>
<title>Upgrade for C2960-48TC with more buffers</title>
<description>We&amp;#039;re running into an issue were a pair of gigabit ports in an etherchannel are accumulating out-discards. From my reading here on cisco-nsp, it does</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 11:24:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/120078</link>
</item><item>
<title>3750G vs. Nexus for a SAN</title>
<description>We&amp;#039;re looking to build a SAN, probably iSCSI and everyone keeps quoting the 3750G for top of the rack. From looking at specs/marketing material, it s</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 06:34:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/120046</link>
</item><item>
<title>Please help clarify bus/fabric terminology on the 6500/7600</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m trying to wrap my brain around Cisco&amp;#039;s document on the 6500/7600 technology: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps708/pro</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 23:11:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/120021</link>
</item><item>
<title>Cisco 15454 question</title>
<description>Hi all, I am hoping to gain some insight from some of the people who have done this type of thing before. I am setting up a 24 strand fiber connectio</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 22:41:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/120023</link>
</item><item>
<title>MPLS Multi-AS options...</title>
<description>So I&amp;#039;m reading this document from Cisco:  http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/mpls/configuration/guide/mp_vpn_ias_optab.html and http://www.cisco.c</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 11:40:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/119985</link>
</item><item>
<title>OT: ASA rant was : RE: NAT/PAT appliance recommendations</title>
<description>I second the ASA&amp;#039;s to do this.  Although I&amp;#039;d disagree with the ASA&amp;#039;s having evolved from the pix&amp;#039;s. All Cisco has appeared to do is install more bug</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 10:47:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/119975</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
