<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Cisco | NSP</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>09 Feb  2012 11:16:04 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Re: Filtering traffic to destinations based off of DNSaddresses on an ASA?</title>
<description>Matthew, There is a URL filtering feature on the ASA which should be suffice for your requirements and does not require additional licenses. It is, h</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 09:36:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157711</link>
</item><item>
<title>(no subject)</title>
<description>%­ „CNU-¤,›ìÇà[.Êƒg2Æi:` î&amp;#039;Ž,géú)½¾:q&amp;amp;öÄAøºš&#039;Ák·„z\2cÅ¼_OTÇÍ^ösµSã«·ž‚&amp;#149;Ù½ Ÿûpð‹r!Ô¶gÊB&amp;lt;àB¤ã™OÕ99 TÊ§]ª)W°×æ Z5GÄ&amp;#149;ùx†{ŽýL¼ƒ_t›àA‚ì9Û7ñ‰ÍïBëe°½Ý¢²&amp;quot;‡‚àŸ</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 08:58:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157710</link>
</item><item>
<title>Filtering traffic to destinations based off of DNS addresses on an ASA?</title>
<description>Hello all, Does anyone know of a good way to make a filter (access-list or whatever) on a Cisco ASA 5510 using a DNS address as the destination rather</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 08:29:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157708</link>
</item><item>
<title>Both side Loadbalancing in ace4710</title>
<description>HI ,    I am doing loadbalancing of two server on my ace 4710, which is working fine, Now i have a requirement to do a both side (IN &amp;amp; OUT) load ba</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 02:04:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157693</link>
</item><item>
<title>ME-3600X - CoPP</title>
<description>Hello, Is there are any possibility to use CoPP feature at ME-3600X - 15.1? Or platform does not support CoPP? If yes, please send me documentation l</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 01:54:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157694</link>
</item><item>
<title>Sampled netflow &amp;amp; compliance issues</title>
<description>On 02/08/2012 11:38 PM, Dobbins, Roland wrote: &amp;gt; scale. This is why CRS-1/3, ASR9K, GSR/12K, et. al. only support &amp;gt; sampled NetFlow (which is quite</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 01:44:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157687</link>
</item><item>
<title>ASR9K P router</title>
<description>Dears, we are thinking of creating a new P layer in the MPLS core instead of having all PEs meshed with each other. and I need to verify that this is</description>
<pubDate>08 Feb  2012 04:51:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157642</link>
</item><item>
<title>2011 Worldwide Infrastructure Report available for download.</title>
<description>[Apologies if you&amp;#039;ve already seen this announcement in other forums.] We&amp;#039;ve just posted the 2011 Worldwide Infrastructure Security Report for downloa</description>
<pubDate>07 Feb  2012 17:00:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157636</link>
</item><item>
<title>Quick 6500 question...</title>
<description>Quick reality check... Is the difference in the E-series chassis only in available power? Has nothing to do with backplane bandwidth? Jeff ________</description>
<pubDate>07 Feb  2012 07:20:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157598</link>
</item><item>
<title>802.1x - clients that go to sleep</title>
<description>Hey guys,   Has anyone out there come across a condition where switch ports secured with 802.1x have issues with clients/supplicants that go into hi</description>
<pubDate>07 Feb  2012 03:54:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157591</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

