Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 23 Nov 2009 04:00:54 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg probably Cisco needs a knob very similar to vendor Juniper out-delay. you can delay the time between when BGP and the routing table exchange route inf 23 Nov 2009 01:30:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121097 On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 09:10:25AM +0100, Gert Doering wrote: > "bgp update-delay <n>" > > "the bgp update-delay command is used to tune the maxim 23 Nov 2009 00:58:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121096 > Normally, hardware-forwarding boxes should never show significant CPU > load. With the exception of the old 3500XL series using 50% or more of the 23 Nov 2009 00:45:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121095 Hi, On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 08:46:56AM +0100, Gert Doering wrote: > One possible solution would be to have a knob that tells IOS "delay bringing > up 23 Nov 2009 00:10:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121094 > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 04:45:18PM -0800, Hector Herrera wrote: > > So I'm still at a loss ... Should I expect better performance from the > > 3550- 22 Nov 2009 23:48:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121093 Hi, so I'm now following the design that everbody claims is "best" (loopbacks in OSPF, everything else in BGP), and I've found a few corner cases tha 22 Nov 2009 23:46:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121092 Hi, On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 04:45:18PM -0800, Hector Herrera wrote: > So I'm still at a loss ... Should I expect better performance from the > 3550-1 22 Nov 2009 23:28:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121091 William McCall wrote: > Sorry to re-open. Good job to HP for generating noise. Anyone want to > buy some procurve switches? I don't own a boat, hence 22 Nov 2009 21:31:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121089 Second this - we've had this running (with LDAP authentication via pam_ldap) for some time now. Very easy to get up and running, great support from t 22 Nov 2009 19:25:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121088 On Monday 23 November 2009 10:53:20 am Andy Saykao wrote: > The version from www.shrubbery.net/tac_plus/ > <http://www.shrubbery.net/tac_plus/> was 22 Nov 2009 19:06:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121087 Hi All, For those running tacacs+, are you using the version from www.shrubbery.net/tac_plus/ <http://www.shrubbery.net/tac_plus/> or the version f 22 Nov 2009 18:53:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121086 On Monday 23 November 2009 08:34:32 am Ilya Balashov wrote: > I'm looking for upgrade my 7606 filled with X6704-GE and > X6748-SFP (all with CFC rig 22 Nov 2009 17:55:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121084 On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 4:01 PM, e ninja <eninja@gmail.com> wrote: > Hector, > > It is interesting that the cisco article tells you how to profile you 22 Nov 2009 16:45:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121082 Hi I'm looking for upgrade my 7606 filled with X6704-GE and X6748-SFP (all with CFC right now) My first phase will be swap SUP720-3BXL for RSP720-3CX 22 Nov 2009 16:34:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121083 Hector, It is interesting that the cisco article tells you how to profile your cpu but not how to interpret the results ;-) There is only one way to 22 Nov 2009 16:01:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121081 On Sunday 22 November 2009 18:28:07 Nick Hilliard wrote: > > If you disable autonegotiation, you will need to use a GE cross-over cable, I don't thin 22 Nov 2009 14:17:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121080 Hi, What is the general recommendation regarding enabling flow control on Ethernet interfaces. Is it a legacy issue when devices had smaller buffers, 22 Nov 2009 12:28:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121073 William McCall wrote: > Sorry to re-open. Good job to HP for generating noise. Anyone want to > buy some procurve switches? > I have a few that I've 22 Nov 2009 11:32:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121070 Sorry to re-open. Good job to HP for generating noise. Anyone want to buy some procurve switches? On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 12:34 AM, christian koch <ck 22 Nov 2009 11:20:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121069 On 22/11/2009 16:52, Juuso Lehtinen wrote: > Cables straight-thru, and identical cables are used for the working and > suspended trunks. > > I will tr 22 Nov 2009 09:28:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121067 Thanks to all for answers, Cables straight-thru, and identical cables are used for the working and suspended trunks. I will try replacing the cable 22 Nov 2009 08:52:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121066 On 22/11/2009 12:46, Juuso Lehtinen wrote: > Any ideas what might be causing this. I wonder if I'm running into some kind > of minimum cable length pr 22 Nov 2009 08:05:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121063 Its not like we can run Cisco IOS on any other vendor's equipment. If I buy an ISR from Cisco, I have to pay them additional money to use the softwar 22 Nov 2009 07:42:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121065 On Sunday 22 November 2009 13:46:34 Juuso Lehtinen wrote: > > Any ideas what might be causing this. I wonder if I'm running into some > kind of mini 22 Nov 2009 07:37:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121064 > I have Catalyst 3560 and 2960 switches connected by a two member > Etherchannel trunk using built in copper GE interfaces. For some reason > Etherne 22 Nov 2009 06:26:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121062