Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 12 Feb 2012 11:58:17 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg hey, > 1000 for 3750 series. Plus *,G and S,G will be counted separate, so in reality it's 500 PIM ASM routes. -- tarko __________________________ 12 Feb 2012 08:33:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157857 On 2/10/12 8:45 PM, Jared Mauch wrote: > Personally, I'm also amazed cisco still sells non-gigabit switches in > 2011/2012. I thought they were a t 12 Feb 2012 03:04:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157855 Hi. Jumping in a bit late, but... On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 15:40, Burak Dikici <bdikici@gmail.com> wrote: > I am looking for the open source flow coll 11 Feb 2012 14:49:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157852 Christian, There are set of CPU queues handling different traffic types. Policing itself is done in hardware. -Waris -----Original Message----- Fr 11 Feb 2012 03:02:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157848 Hi, On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 06:05:33PM -0500, harbor235 wrote: > As far as the "tens of millions of routes" comment goes, my thoughts > are along the 11 Feb 2012 02:02:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157847 On Feb 10, 2012, at 12:14 PM, Waris Sagheer (waris) wrote: > CPU > > -Waris > > > -----Original Message----- > From: cisco-nsp-bounces@puck.nether 10 Feb 2012 22:39:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157846 On 2012-02-11 01:16, Rich Trinkle wrote: > Is there a layer 3 switch that has an sdm template that will allow more than 1k multicast routes + groups? 10 Feb 2012 16:24:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157845 Is there a layer 3 switch that has an sdm template that will allow more than 1k multicast routes + groups? Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Phone 10 Feb 2012 16:16:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157844 As far as the "tens of millions of routes" comment goes, my thoughts are along the lines of no real hardware out there designed for V6 from the get go 10 Feb 2012 15:05:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157841 Fixed at 1k in all SDM templates. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps5023/products_tech_note09186a00801e7bb9.shtml Sent from my mobil 10 Feb 2012 14:54:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157840 Not that I know of. Mike Bushard Jr Network Engineer IV Arvig Sent from my Verizon Wireless DROID RAZR by Motorola Please excuse short responses an 10 Feb 2012 14:48:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157839 Can the default template be changed to allow for more routes and groups? -----Original Message----- From: cisco-nsp-bounces@puck.nether.net [mailto:c 10 Feb 2012 14:36:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157838 1000 for 3750 series. Mike Bushard, Jr | Network Engineer IV | Arvig -----Original Message----- From: cisco-nsp-bounces@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisc 10 Feb 2012 14:30:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157837 Is there a limitation to the number of Multicast IP streams or mroutes that this switch can handle? _______________________________________________ ci 10 Feb 2012 13:51:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157836 On Fri Feb 10, 2012 at 01:31:12PM -0800, Sachin Gupta (sagupta) wrote: > Full IPv6 support at FCS. What I mean by full is feature parity with > Superv 10 Feb 2012 13:39:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157832 32MB centralized buffers, sames as Supervisor Engine 7-E on Catalyst 4500. Still store-and-forward. -- Sachin Gupta | Sr. Director, Product Managem 10 Feb 2012 13:32:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157831 Full IPv6 support at FCS. What I mean by full is feature parity with Supervisor Engine 7-E on Catalyst 4500 platform. No extra license. Route tables 10 Feb 2012 13:31:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157829 Hi, On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 03:07:43PM -0500, harbor235 wrote: > I am sure it will do V6, but is the hardware optimized for V6? > V6 hardware forward 10 Feb 2012 13:29:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157830 On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Sachin Gupta (sagupta) <sagupta@cisco.com> wrote: > 16p SFP+ is $24k (capable of 64k routes) > 24p SFP+ is $32k (capa 10 Feb 2012 12:37:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157828 > I am sure it will do V6, but is the hardware optimized for V6? > V6 hardware forwarding and TCAMs able to handle the tens of millions of > routes > 10 Feb 2012 12:19:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157827 Did you read the datasheet? http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps10902/ps12332/data_sheet_c78-696791.html - IPv6 support in hardwar 10 Feb 2012 12:18:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157819 On 2012-02-10 21:07, harbor235 wrote: > > I am sure it will do V6, but is the hardware optimized for V6? You can check the data sheet for Sup7E. It h 10 Feb 2012 12:13:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157818 I am sure it will do V6, but is the hardware optimized for V6? V6 hardware forwarding and TCAMs able to handle the tens of millions of routes expected 10 Feb 2012 12:07:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157817 On 2012-02-10 19:58, Gert Doering wrote: > What about IPv6? It's a Sup7E in a box. Expect the same features and caveats. -- "There's no sense in b 10 Feb 2012 11:46:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157816 On Feb 10, 2012, at 1:58 PM, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 09:03:10AM -0800, Sachin Gupta (sagupta) wrote: >> The pricing ha 10 Feb 2012 11:45:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157815