Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 12 Feb 2012 12:17:23 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg hey, > 1000 for 3750 series. Plus *,G and S,G will be counted separate, so in reality it's 500 PIM ASM routes. -- tarko __________________________ 12 Feb 2012 08:33:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157857 On 2/10/12 8:45 PM, Jared Mauch wrote: > Personally, I'm also amazed cisco still sells non-gigabit switches in > 2011/2012. I thought they were a t 12 Feb 2012 03:04:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157855 Hi. Jumping in a bit late, but... On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 15:40, Burak Dikici <bdikici@gmail.com> wrote: > I am looking for the open source flow coll 11 Feb 2012 14:49:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157852 Christian, There are set of CPU queues handling different traffic types. Policing itself is done in hardware. -Waris -----Original Message----- Fr 11 Feb 2012 03:02:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157848 Hi, On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 06:05:33PM -0500, harbor235 wrote: > As far as the "tens of millions of routes" comment goes, my thoughts > are along the 11 Feb 2012 02:02:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157847 On Feb 10, 2012, at 12:14 PM, Waris Sagheer (waris) wrote: > CPU > > -Waris > > > -----Original Message----- > From: cisco-nsp-bounces@puck.nether 10 Feb 2012 22:39:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157846 On 2012-02-11 01:16, Rich Trinkle wrote: > Is there a layer 3 switch that has an sdm template that will allow more than 1k multicast routes + groups? 10 Feb 2012 16:24:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157845 Is there a layer 3 switch that has an sdm template that will allow more than 1k multicast routes + groups? Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Phone 10 Feb 2012 16:16:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157844 As far as the "tens of millions of routes" comment goes, my thoughts are along the lines of no real hardware out there designed for V6 from the get go 10 Feb 2012 15:05:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157841 Fixed at 1k in all SDM templates. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps5023/products_tech_note09186a00801e7bb9.shtml Sent from my mobil 10 Feb 2012 14:54:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157840 Not that I know of. Mike Bushard Jr Network Engineer IV Arvig Sent from my Verizon Wireless DROID RAZR by Motorola Please excuse short responses an 10 Feb 2012 14:48:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157839 Can the default template be changed to allow for more routes and groups? -----Original Message----- From: cisco-nsp-bounces@puck.nether.net [mailto:c 10 Feb 2012 14:36:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157838 1000 for 3750 series. Mike Bushard, Jr | Network Engineer IV | Arvig -----Original Message----- From: cisco-nsp-bounces@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisc 10 Feb 2012 14:30:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157837 Is there a limitation to the number of Multicast IP streams or mroutes that this switch can handle? _______________________________________________ ci 10 Feb 2012 13:51:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157836 On Fri Feb 10, 2012 at 01:31:12PM -0800, Sachin Gupta (sagupta) wrote: > Full IPv6 support at FCS. What I mean by full is feature parity with > Superv 10 Feb 2012 13:39:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157832 32MB centralized buffers, sames as Supervisor Engine 7-E on Catalyst 4500. Still store-and-forward. -- Sachin Gupta | Sr. Director, Product Managem 10 Feb 2012 13:32:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157831 Full IPv6 support at FCS. What I mean by full is feature parity with Supervisor Engine 7-E on Catalyst 4500 platform. No extra license. Route tables 10 Feb 2012 13:31:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157829 Hi, On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 03:07:43PM -0500, harbor235 wrote: > I am sure it will do V6, but is the hardware optimized for V6? > V6 hardware forward 10 Feb 2012 13:29:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157830 On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Sachin Gupta (sagupta) <sagupta@cisco.com> wrote: > 16p SFP+ is $24k (capable of 64k routes) > 24p SFP+ is $32k (capa 10 Feb 2012 12:37:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157828 > I am sure it will do V6, but is the hardware optimized for V6? > V6 hardware forwarding and TCAMs able to handle the tens of millions of > routes > 10 Feb 2012 12:19:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157827 Did you read the datasheet? http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps10902/ps12332/data_sheet_c78-696791.html - IPv6 support in hardwar 10 Feb 2012 12:18:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157819 On 2012-02-10 21:07, harbor235 wrote: > > I am sure it will do V6, but is the hardware optimized for V6? You can check the data sheet for Sup7E. It h 10 Feb 2012 12:13:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157818 I am sure it will do V6, but is the hardware optimized for V6? V6 hardware forwarding and TCAMs able to handle the tens of millions of routes expected 10 Feb 2012 12:07:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157817 On 2012-02-10 19:58, Gert Doering wrote: > What about IPv6? It's a Sup7E in a box. Expect the same features and caveats. -- "There's no sense in b 10 Feb 2012 11:46:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157816 On Feb 10, 2012, at 1:58 PM, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 09:03:10AM -0800, Sachin Gupta (sagupta) wrote: >> The pricing ha 10 Feb 2012 11:45:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157815 Hi, On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 09:03:10AM -0800, Sachin Gupta (sagupta) wrote: > The pricing has been finalized. The 4500-X comes in following configs > 10 Feb 2012 10:58:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157814 On 10/02/12 02:24, Reuben Farrelly wrote: > Looks like just up on CCO in the last week: > > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps1090 10 Feb 2012 09:34:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157803 Hello, The pricing has been finalized. The 4500-X comes in following configs (with one power supply): All list price: 16p SFP+ is $24k (capable of 6 10 Feb 2012 09:03:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157802 Anybody hear if there will be a 100GigE uplink module? Mike Bushard, Jr | Network Engineer IV | Arvig *** Please update your address book with my n 10 Feb 2012 06:46:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157793 > So finally - a 10G 1RU SFP+ access device. It seem to be targeted at > enterprise aggregation but I imagine would have some appeal in service > pro 10 Feb 2012 06:18:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157792 On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 3:24 AM, Reuben Farrelly <reuben-cisco-nsp@reub.net> wrote: > So finally - a 10G 1RU SFP+ access device.  It seem to be target 10 Feb 2012 03:33:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157779 CPU -Waris -----Original Message----- From: cisco-nsp-bounces@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Nick Hilliard 10 Feb 2012 03:14:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157778 Look at these NAT examples: http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Cisco_Application_Control_Engine_(ACE)_Configu ration_Examples_--_Security_Configuration_Ex 10 Feb 2012 02:30:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157777 We were lucky enough to not have any users who were savvy enough to know that ;o) -----Original Message----- From: Nick Hilliard [mailto:nick@foobar. 10 Feb 2012 02:11:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157776 Hi, Anybody can help on below requirement. Regards Daljit Singh -----Original Message----- From: cisco-nsp-bounces@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco- 09 Feb 2012 21:58:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157775 Looks like just up on CCO in the last week: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps10902/ps12332/data_sheet_c78-696791.html So finall 09 Feb 2012 18:24:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157772 IOS-XR has the ability to apply a policy to the redistribution command for both OSPF and BGP so you can filter out the routes you do not want redistri 09 Feb 2012 17:04:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157771 If I redistribute OSPF routes into the MP-BGP/superbackbone from within a particular VRF, those OSPF routes, which are now BGP routes, get announced t 09 Feb 2012 16:43:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157770 On Thu February 9 2012 13:59, Ghassan.khalil wrote: > I have an imap Server behind an ASA firewall > When I telnet from a server on the inside network 09 Feb 2012 12:12:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157753 If may be the result of the SMTP/ESMTP inspection of the ASA, I'd probably try removing that and seeing what response you get. I would also look at 09 Feb 2012 12:11:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157741 On 09/02/2012 19:15, Waris Sagheer (waris) wrote: > CoPP will be supported in 15.2(2)S, Q2CY12. will the copp policer operate on the data plane, or o 09 Feb 2012 12:06:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157740 On Thu, 9 Feb 2012, Ghassan.khalil wrote: > I have an imap Server behind an ASA firewall > When I telnet from a server on the inside network to the p 09 Feb 2012 12:06:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157739 On 09/02/2012 18:26, Steve McCrory wrote: > It depends on how you structure your regex but the format we used seemed > pretty effective at blocking al 09 Feb 2012 12:04:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157738 I have an imap Server behind an ASA firewall When I telnet from a server on the inside network to the private IP of the IMAP server I get correct res 09 Feb 2012 11:59:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157737 CoPP will be supported in 15.2(2)S, Q2CY12. -Waris -----Original Message----- From: cisco-nsp-bounces@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces@puc 09 Feb 2012 11:15:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157736 I would use the caching resolver idea, but management also wants to have the activity logged and have e-mail based alerting. I figured that I could h 09 Feb 2012 10:57:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157735 Quick and simple configuration using the DNS engine and MPF on the firewall. However, I also prefer and recommend Matthew Huff's suggestion about con 09 Feb 2012 10:43:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157734 It depends on how you structure your regex but the format we used seemed pretty effective at blocking all traffic destined for those domains -----Ori 09 Feb 2012 10:26:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157733 Go into your recursive DNS server. Add a blank authoritative forward zone for google.com. Boom, it's dead to you. ---- Matthew Huff  | 1 M 09 Feb 2012 10:23:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157732 Steve, Will this just block URLs or can it block all traffic to a domain? The latter is what I'm looking for. Say block ALL traffic (make a domain "D 09 Feb 2012 09:49:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157712 Matthew, There is a URL filtering feature on the ASA which should be suffice for your requirements and does not require additional licenses. It is, h 09 Feb 2012 09:36:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157711 %­ „CNU-¤,›ìÇà[.ʃg2Æi:` î'Ž,géú)½¾:q&öÄAøºš'Ák·„z\2cż_OTÇÍ^ösµSã«·ž‚•Ù½ Ÿûpð‹r!Ô¶gÊB<àB¤ã™OÕ99 Tʧ]ª)W°×æ Z5GÄ•ùx†{ŽýL¼ƒ_t›àA‚ì9Û7ñ‰ÍïBëe°½Ý¢²"‡‚à�Ÿ 09 Feb 2012 08:58:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157710 On Wednesday, February 08, 2012 08:51:53 PM Ghassan Khalil wrote: > is their any concern that should be highlighted based on > this ? shall there be 09 Feb 2012 08:44:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157709 Hello all, Does anyone know of a good way to make a filter (access-list or whatever) on a Cisco ASA 5510 using a DNS address as the destination rather 09 Feb 2012 08:29:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157708 Hi Jiri, These total numbers are not a problem, all ports are equal and all traffic goes to the fabric on every port. You will only see drops in th 09 Feb 2012 06:33:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157703 On Feb 9, 2012, at 5:17 PM, Phil Mayers wrote: > At (say) 512:1 sampling, they can simply deny they downloaded a 5Gb file, and claim it was a 10Mb fi 09 Feb 2012 04:41:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157697 On Feb 9, 2012, at 4:44 PM, Phil Mayers wrote: > When providers use sampled netflow, how do they typically deal with issues where a miscreant simply 09 Feb 2012 04:38:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157696 Hi, On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 10:17:54AM +0000, Phil Mayers wrote: > On 02/09/2012 10:00 AM, Gert Doering wrote: > >> Billing using sampled netflow is 09 Feb 2012 02:39:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157692 On 2012-02-09 10:17, Phil Mayers wrote: > On 02/09/2012 10:00 AM, Gert Doering wrote: > >>> >>> "Do you know for certain that IP x emitted packets Y?" 09 Feb 2012 02:35:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157695 On 02/09/2012 10:00 AM, Gert Doering wrote: >> >> "Do you know for certain that IP x emitted packets Y?" >> "Well, we have an X% confidence bound tha 09 Feb 2012 02:17:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157690 HI , I am doing loadbalancing of two server on my ace 4710, which is working fine, Now i have a requirement to do a both side (IN & OUT) load ba 09 Feb 2012 02:04:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157693 Hi, On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 09:44:38AM +0000, Phil Mayers wrote: > On 02/08/2012 11:38 PM, Dobbins, Roland wrote: > > >scale. This is why CRS-1/3, 09 Feb 2012 02:00:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157689 Hello, Is there are any possibility to use CoPP feature at ME-3600X - 15.1? Or platform does not support CoPP? If yes, please send me documentation l 09 Feb 2012 01:54:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157694 John, we are considering these nexus switches as a core for a small (for now) exchange point, so there will definitely be multiple ports talking to 09 Feb 2012 01:52:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157688 On 02/08/2012 11:38 PM, Dobbins, Roland wrote: > scale. This is why CRS-1/3, ASR9K, GSR/12K, et. al. only support > sampled NetFlow (which is quite 09 Feb 2012 01:44:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157687 On Feb 9, 2012, at 1:06 AM, Dmitry Valdov wrote: > In the US.. No, worldwide. > We'd like to have full netflow. On small networks with small route 08 Feb 2012 15:38:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157682 > In the US.. > We'd like to have full netflow. We're rest of the world :-) Good luck. You'll find the data volumes get impractically large when you 08 Feb 2012 11:11:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157671 In the US.. We'd like to have full netflow. We're rest of the world :-) On Wed, 8 Feb 2012, Dobbins, Roland wrote: >> AFAIK, ASR9K doesn't support 08 Feb 2012 10:06:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157660 On Feb 8, 2012, at 11:47 PM, Dmitry Valdov wrote: > AFAIK, ASR9K doesn't support full netflow (without sampling) even with new cards. FYI, sampled 08 Feb 2012 09:16:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157658 AFAIK, ASR9K doesn't support full netflow (without sampling) even with new cards. It supported by ASR1K. On Wed, 8 Feb 2012, Dobbins, Roland wrote: 08 Feb 2012 08:47:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157659 From my experience with an ASR9000, I'd agree with Roland. The ASR9000 has many more features and abilities that make it more attractive on the edge 08 Feb 2012 07:21:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157646 On Feb 8, 2012, at 7:51 PM, Ghassan Khalil wrote: > - The ASR9K P routers will be directly connected to 7606 Internet Gateway Routers (IGR) for inter 08 Feb 2012 05:26:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157643 Dears, we are thinking of creating a new P layer in the MPLS core instead of having all PEs meshed with each other. and I need to verify that this is 08 Feb 2012 04:51:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157642 You could try EVN, which doesn't rely on BGP for route leaking http://blog.ioshints.info/2012/02/easy-virtual-network-nothing-new-under.html En Fri, 08 Feb 2012 04:29:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157641 [Apologies if you've already seen this announcement in other forums.] We've just posted the 2011 Worldwide Infrastructure Security Report for downloa 07 Feb 2012 17:00:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157636 Also non-E 3-slot chassis can't host 67xx modules. On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Bill Wade <billwade98@yahoo.com> wrote: > Also the 6513E backplane 07 Feb 2012 14:29:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157630 On Tue, 7 Feb 2012, Jeff Kell wrote: > On 2/7/2012 3:00 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote: >> Anyway, I don't really have an issue with this - the E chassis ha 07 Feb 2012 12:41:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157626 On 2/7/2012 3:00 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote: > Anyway, I don't really have an issue with this - the E chassis has been sold more or > less exclusively si 07 Feb 2012 12:23:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157625 On 7 Feb 2012, at 15:29, Mack McBride <mack.mcbride@viawest.com> wrote: > But the non-E is theoretically capable of much higher speed than the 40G car 07 Feb 2012 12:00:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157622 We recently found out from Cisco that the plain-old 6509 is not smartnet-able anymore. Might be something you want to consider. -----Original Message 07 Feb 2012 10:05:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157621 Also the 6513E backplane provides 80Gb (dual fabric channels) for each slot whereas the 6513 is limited to 40Gb in slots 1-8. ____________________ 07 Feb 2012 09:38:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157615 On 07/02/12 15:30, Justin M. Streiner wrote: > On Tue, 7 Feb 2012, Jeff Kell wrote: > >> Quick reality check... >> >> Is the difference in the E-serie 07 Feb 2012 09:19:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157614 On Tue, 7 Feb 2012, Jeff Kell wrote: > Quick reality check... > > Is the difference in the E-series chassis only in available power? Has nothing to 07 Feb 2012 07:30:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157600 The back-plane throughput capability is higher in the E chassis. It doesn't really matter since higher BW cards (2T compatible) are only supported in 07 Feb 2012 07:29:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157599 Quick reality check... Is the difference in the E-series chassis only in available power? Has nothing to do with backplane bandwidth? Jeff ________ 07 Feb 2012 07:20:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157598 On 07/02/12 13:26, Chuck Church wrote: > Can you disable WOL on the clients? Seems like if it was disabled in the > BIOS, the NIC would have no reaso 07 Feb 2012 06:11:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157597 On 07/02/12 13:29, Aaron Riemer wrote: > Hi Phil, > > Thanks for your response. > > Essentially I don't want to see a bunch of spurious dot1x failures 07 Feb 2012 06:06:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157596 Thanks Chuck will look into that! -----Original Message----- From: Chuck Church [mailto:chuckchurch@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, 7 February 2012 9:27 P 07 Feb 2012 05:30:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157594 Hi Phil, Thanks for your response. Essentially I don't want to see a bunch of spurious dot1x failures in my log as it makes life hard when you are t 07 Feb 2012 05:29:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157595 Can you disable WOL on the clients? Seems like if it was disabled in the BIOS, the NIC would have no reason to bring up a link when off/sleeping/hibe 07 Feb 2012 05:26:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157593 On 07/02/12 11:54, Aaron Riemer wrote: > Hey guys, > > > > Has anyone out there come across a condition where switch ports secured with > 802.1x have 07 Feb 2012 05:19:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157592 Hey guys, Has anyone out there come across a condition where switch ports secured with 802.1x have issues with clients/supplicants that go into hi 07 Feb 2012 03:54:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157591 Hi, you can use the Cisco IOS Software Checker http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/selectIOSVersion.x I think this is exactly what you are looki 07 Feb 2012 00:28:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157589 Your best bet would be looking at the CVE, BUGTRAQ reports. By the time, CVE/BUGTRAQ release the vulnerability, Cisco releases the vulnerability repo 06 Feb 2012 21:48:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157588 Cisco softwaer advisor tool may be able to do this http://tools.cisco.com/Support/Fusion/FusionHome.do Andrew Jones Alphawest -----Original Mess 06 Feb 2012 21:21:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157587 Hi Guys, Is there an "easy" way to check if a certain version of IOS has any known security vulnerabilities? http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/pu 06 Feb 2012 20:40:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157586 http://lmgtfy.com/?q=VIP4-50+Memory+upgrade http://www.cablesandkits.com/cisco-vip450-memory-c-509_701_750_758.html ----- Original Message ------- 06 Feb 2012 17:50:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157584 Hi All, Does anyone know offhand what memory the VIP4-50 wants? if we enable dCEF it overflows the vip and we need to goto 256mb of ram on the vip. T 06 Feb 2012 16:09:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157583 On 2012-02-06 17:42, Mack McBride wrote: > The QFP is actually forwarding in software to begin with (although > highly specialized and on a forwardin 06 Feb 2012 12:44:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157579 Hello, I'm trying to set up Cisco ISG on 7206VXR NPE-G2 platform for DHCP termination. ISG works as DHCP relay. Control Policy is quite simple: poli 06 Feb 2012 12:41:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/157578