Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 24 Nov 2009 08:36:03 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg > From: sthaug@nethelp.no >> Normally, hardware-forwarding boxes should never show significant CPU >> load. >> > With the exception of the old 3 24 Nov 2009 08:03:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121231 Tim Franklin wrote: >> I've got a PA-A3-OC3 that is terminating a large number of PPPoA >> connections. I need to do basic QoS/prioritization for voi 24 Nov 2009 07:45:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121230 Hi Dave, > I've got a PA-A3-OC3 that is terminating a large number of PPPoA > connections. I need to do basic QoS/prioritization for voice traffic. 24 Nov 2009 07:14:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121229 Heh ,or the old ACC boxes (I think the Danube), where the original design was to not have ANY front-panel LEDs. The 'managers' didn't like that, so al 24 Nov 2009 07:03:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121228 Another thing to look at is the tacacs source-interface. If you don't have it in there, tie it to a loopback. If you do have it in there, verify the 24 Nov 2009 06:48:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121227 Hello all, I would like to talk to anyone who has deployed MPLS VPNs for their University Campus Network. Specifically, I'd like to know about their 24 Nov 2009 06:31:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121225 Hello All I've got a PA-A3-OC3 that is terminating a large number of PPPoA connections. I need to do basic QoS/prioritization for voice traffic. I 24 Nov 2009 06:05:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121226 On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Mohammad Khalil wrote: > the tacacs could not work well as it was in the previous image even > though i had the same configurat 24 Nov 2009 05:42:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121220 hey all i have a cisco metro switch with IOS 12.2 35SE when i upgraded the IOS image to 12.2 52 SE the tacacs could not work well as it was in the p 24 Nov 2009 05:32:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121219 Hello Group, I have 7200's acting as PE's and running 12.4.23 that show an abnormal numbers of runts. The interfaces where this can be seen are E1 ch 24 Nov 2009 03:45:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121217 On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:25 AM, Gert Doering <gert@greenie.muc.de> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 07:03:07PM -0500, Bill Desjardins wrote: 24 Nov 2009 02:05:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121214 On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 8:15 PM, Clinton Work <clinton@scripty.com> wrote: > The Catalyst 4500 supports 3000 logical instances with the SupV from what 24 Nov 2009 00:46:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121210 On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:40:17 -0800 (PST), Kevin Graham wrote > > The answer is very simple: if someone thinks that ethernet flow > > > control is the 24 Nov 2009 00:00:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121213 Since googling yielded nothing, here goes one for the archives. If a Cisco 12000 PRP-1 displays 022A (and is otherwise dead) the cause of the proble 23 Nov 2009 23:49:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121208 Hi, On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 07:03:07PM -0500, Bill Desjardins wrote: > just an idea. I have not tried this and it may also not fit your > application 23 Nov 2009 23:25:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121207 Hi, On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 08:25:45AM +1000, David Hughes wrote: > > both ISP-Routers announce the ISP's aggregate (let's call it 200.1.0.0/16) > > 23 Nov 2009 23:19:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121206 > Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote: > > I think the config doesn't honor TTL, so the implementation is rather > > "basic".. > > Would that be basic as 23 Nov 2009 22:37:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121205 Jeremy Reid wrote: > Hey Group, > > Has anyone recently been seeing unusual/extended delivery dates being provided on Cisco ASR1000 series or Catalys 23 Nov 2009 19:55:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121200 Mark Tinka wrote: > Like when we moved from SRC3 to SRC5 earlier this month, RANCID > reported minor but strange changes to the configuration order, 23 Nov 2009 19:50:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121199 Jared Mauch wrote: > On Nov 23, 2009, at 3:19 PM, Justin Shore wrote: > >> I noticed other changes between 24T1 and 24T2 that bit me this weekend whe 23 Nov 2009 19:43:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121198 On Tuesday 24 November 2009 06:25:45 am David Hughes wrote: > So you are generating the aggregate at the border? That > can certainly leave you bla 23 Nov 2009 19:02:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121197 On Tuesday 24 November 2009 04:36:58 am Jared Mauch wrote: > Cisco does not have a coherent config order that will be > output. Like when we moved 23 Nov 2009 18:38:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121196 Hi, I have two 2821 routers with policy-based firewall configured on them. There's IPSec GRE tunnel configured between the routers. The problem is t 23 Nov 2009 17:57:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121189 On Tuesday 24 November 2009 05:20:17 am loui leaky wrote: > I read through the archives of the list and people have > some strong opinions against 23 Nov 2009 16:58:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121188 Hi Gert, just an idea. I have not tried this and it may also not fit your application... this is on sup2's (SXF17) in my tiny network I have several 23 Nov 2009 16:03:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121181 On 24/11/2009, at 3:50 AM, Brian Turnbow wrote: > The nexus family does PFC (no it's not a card, they reused the acronym) > http://www.cisco.com/en/U 23 Nov 2009 14:30:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121179 Hi Gert, On 23/11/2009, at 5:46 PM, Gert Doering wrote: > both ISP-Routers announce the ISP's aggregate (let's call it 200.1.0.0/16) > to their res 23 Nov 2009 14:25:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121178 > > router ospf > > max-metric router-lsa on-startup wait-for-bgp [...] > not only do you not want to generate a default route during initial BGP > 23 Nov 2009 14:04:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121177 Hi, On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:29:24AM -0800, Kevin Graham wrote: > Similar to Gert's question on on delayed eBGP startup, is there a good way > to d 23 Nov 2009 13:58:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121176 > so you have one ingress port ("the NAS"), 20 egress ports ("the clients"). > > Egress port 1 fills up. > > What are you going to do? Flow-contro 23 Nov 2009 13:57:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121166 Hi, On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 09:10:25AM +0100, Gert Doering wrote: > "bgp update-delay <n>" [..] > Will test, and report. Well, the default indeed 23 Nov 2009 13:54:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121165 On 23/11/2009 21:28, Gert Doering wrote: > What are you going to do? Flow-control (-> slow down 19 other ports) > or drop? The answer to this depen 23 Nov 2009 13:54:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121180 Hi, On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 11:40:17AM -0800, Kevin Graham wrote: > Short of host-side implementation details such as one slow MSI-X queue > starving 23 Nov 2009 13:28:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121163 I am building out a new datacenter. The edge is going to consist of 2 routers. Each device has a 10G interface connected to a different provider with 23 Nov 2009 13:20:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121164 On Nov 23, 2009, at 3:19 PM, Justin Shore wrote: > I noticed other changes between 24T1 and 24T2 that bit me this weekend when I upgraded 2 routers t 23 Nov 2009 12:36:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121162 Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote: > I think the config doesn't honor TTL, so the implementation is rather > "basic".. Would that be basic as in it onl 23 Nov 2009 12:19:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121161 On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 07:57:19PM +0000, Jeff Aitken wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:29:24AM -0800, Kevin Graham wrote: > > Similar to Gert's que 23 Nov 2009 12:14:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121160 On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:29:24AM -0800, Kevin Graham wrote: > Similar to Gert's question on on delayed eBGP startup, is there a good way > to delay 23 Nov 2009 11:57:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121144 > The answer is very simple: if someone thinks that ethernet flow > control is the answer, the burden of proof is on them to answer > difficult quest 23 Nov 2009 11:40:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121143 The Catalyst 4500 supports 3000 logical instances with the SupV from what I was able to find. With MST, the capacity is further increased: MST logi 23 Nov 2009 11:15:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121141 Team, What Cisco IOS version is capable of running IPv6 NAT-PT and creating IPv6 ACLs on a 7204 VXR? So far I've tried both of the following but 23 Nov 2009 10:40:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121139 Similar to Gert's question on on delayed eBGP startup, is there a good way to delay IGP default-route generation? Since our DFZ routers have a 0/0 na 23 Nov 2009 10:29:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121142 try "debug ip cef drops verify" and "debug ip cef drops suppressed-verify" so you can see what is going on inside the router with urpf El vie, 20-11- 23 Nov 2009 10:08:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121133 -----Original Message----- From: cisco-nsp-bounces@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Phil Mayers Sent: luned́ 23 23 Nov 2009 09:50:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121140 We have seen the same type of delays. Make enough noise and assuming you are "important" enough it may help you. On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Je 23 Nov 2009 09:24:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121131 We've seen delays as well. I know some of the used hardware providers are having a spike in business because Cisco isn't able to fill some orders in 23 Nov 2009 09:24:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121130 Hi Jeremy, Yes, we have experienced some delays. This is something you will have to take up with your Cisco account team. Best regards, Charlie G 23 Nov 2009 09:13:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121129 Gert Doering wrote: >An interesting wrinkle (to some) is that stock flow control is not QoS >(i.e. 802.1p codepoint) aware - it's all-or-nothing, me 23 Nov 2009 08:48:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121132 Hi, On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 04:05:16PM +0000, Phil Mayers wrote: > >So indeed, flow control is not a panacea. I agree with this :-) > > An interest 23 Nov 2009 08:31:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121127 Before start to think how I could do that... Is there anyone here with a TCL script to check if an ACL is empty so it is detroying the PBR sequence? 23 Nov 2009 08:28:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121126 Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 08:41:58AM -0500, Ross Vandegrift wrote: >> The answer is very simple: if someone thinks that e 23 Nov 2009 08:05:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121124 > Hey all, > > Ran across this by accident on a 871 running 12.4(24)T2: > > > DE-Atlanta(config)#ntp server ip ? > WORD Hostname of peer > 23 Nov 2009 07:53:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121123 Hi, On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 08:41:58AM -0500, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > The answer is very simple: if someone thinks that ethernet flow > control is t 23 Nov 2009 07:48:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121117 Hey Group, Has anyone recently been seeing unusual/extended delivery dates being provided on Cisco ASR1000 series or Catalyst 4500 gear? We've had so 23 Nov 2009 07:39:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121128 Thanks. Never seen that in the command list of options, so never thought Cisco could do it. florin@futurefreedom.ro wrote: > Hey, > > Just do a sho 23 Nov 2009 07:30:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121125 Hey, Just do a show cable modem cpe_ip. It works on ubr72xxvxr and ubr10k. ------Original Message------ From: D.J. O'Berry Sender: cisco-nsp-bounces 23 Nov 2009 07:22:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121116 Hello all, I'm writing in to ask this. I know that you can run a sho cable modem (ip of modem) to look at a specific modem on a Cisco. What I'm look 23 Nov 2009 07:04:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121115 Hi all, I am planning to implement Secondary VLANs feature on a Metro ETTH based on ME3400+76k. I have read various docs about the best I found is on 23 Nov 2009 06:47:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121114 Bad cable... It happens. -- Randy ---------- Original Message ----------- From: Juuso Lehtinen <juuso.lehtinen@gmail.com> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether 23 Nov 2009 06:39:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121113 Hey all, Ran across this by accident on a 871 running 12.4(24)T2: DE-Atlanta(config)#ntp server ? A.B.C.D IP address of peer WORD 23 Nov 2009 06:23:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121112 On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 08:28:24PM -0000, Matthew Melbourne wrote: > What is the general recommendation regarding enabling flow control on > Ethernet 23 Nov 2009 05:41:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121111 I replaced the cable today with similar straight-thru cable. Links seem to autonegotiate now to a-1000. Tried plugging and unplugging cable several ti 23 Nov 2009 04:16:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121104 Hi, I would approach this the indirect way - try shuffling the switches around to see which combinations work & which not. This is the "universal eng 23 Nov 2009 02:46:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121101 Hi, On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 11:31:42AM +0100, Pavel Skovajsa wrote: > The situation is due to the fact that the upstream solution > architecture is n 23 Nov 2009 02:46:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121102 HI Ilya, Not sure where you pricing came from but this is in GPL: RSP720-3CXL-GE= Cisco 7600 Route Switch Processor 720Gbps fabric,PFC3CXL, GE B 23 Nov 2009 02:42:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121100 Hi all, The situation is due to the fact that the upstream solution architecture is not symetric + the fact that BGP is not designed for milisecond c 23 Nov 2009 02:31:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121099 probably Cisco needs a knob very similar to vendor Juniper out-delay. you can delay the time between when BGP and the routing table exchange route inf 23 Nov 2009 01:30:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121097 On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 09:10:25AM +0100, Gert Doering wrote: > "bgp update-delay <n>" > > "the bgp update-delay command is used to tune the maxim 23 Nov 2009 00:58:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121096 > Normally, hardware-forwarding boxes should never show significant CPU > load. With the exception of the old 3500XL series using 50% or more of the 23 Nov 2009 00:45:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121095 Hi, On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 08:46:56AM +0100, Gert Doering wrote: > One possible solution would be to have a knob that tells IOS "delay bringing > up 23 Nov 2009 00:10:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121094 > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 04:45:18PM -0800, Hector Herrera wrote: > > So I'm still at a loss ... Should I expect better performance from the > > 3550- 22 Nov 2009 23:48:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121093 Hi, so I'm now following the design that everbody claims is "best" (loopbacks in OSPF, everything else in BGP), and I've found a few corner cases tha 22 Nov 2009 23:46:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121092 Hi, On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 04:45:18PM -0800, Hector Herrera wrote: > So I'm still at a loss ... Should I expect better performance from the > 3550-1 22 Nov 2009 23:28:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121091 William McCall wrote: > Sorry to re-open. Good job to HP for generating noise. Anyone want to > buy some procurve switches? I don't own a boat, hence 22 Nov 2009 21:31:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121089 Second this - we've had this running (with LDAP authentication via pam_ldap) for some time now. Very easy to get up and running, great support from t 22 Nov 2009 19:25:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121088 On Monday 23 November 2009 10:53:20 am Andy Saykao wrote: > The version from www.shrubbery.net/tac_plus/ > <http://www.shrubbery.net/tac_plus/> was 22 Nov 2009 19:06:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121087 Hi All, For those running tacacs+, are you using the version from www.shrubbery.net/tac_plus/ <http://www.shrubbery.net/tac_plus/> or the version f 22 Nov 2009 18:53:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121086 On Monday 23 November 2009 08:34:32 am Ilya Balashov wrote: > I'm looking for upgrade my 7606 filled with X6704-GE and > X6748-SFP (all with CFC rig 22 Nov 2009 17:55:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121084 On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 4:01 PM, e ninja <eninja@gmail.com> wrote: > Hector, > > It is interesting that the cisco article tells you how to profile you 22 Nov 2009 16:45:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121082 Hi I'm looking for upgrade my 7606 filled with X6704-GE and X6748-SFP (all with CFC right now) My first phase will be swap SUP720-3BXL for RSP720-3CX 22 Nov 2009 16:34:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121083 Hector, It is interesting that the cisco article tells you how to profile your cpu but not how to interpret the results ;-) There is only one way to 22 Nov 2009 16:01:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121081 On Sunday 22 November 2009 18:28:07 Nick Hilliard wrote: > > If you disable autonegotiation, you will need to use a GE cross-over cable, I don't thin 22 Nov 2009 14:17:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121080 Hi, What is the general recommendation regarding enabling flow control on Ethernet interfaces. Is it a legacy issue when devices had smaller buffers, 22 Nov 2009 12:28:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121073 William McCall wrote: > Sorry to re-open. Good job to HP for generating noise. Anyone want to > buy some procurve switches? > I have a few that I've 22 Nov 2009 11:32:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121070 Sorry to re-open. Good job to HP for generating noise. Anyone want to buy some procurve switches? On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 12:34 AM, christian koch <ck 22 Nov 2009 11:20:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121069 On 22/11/2009 16:52, Juuso Lehtinen wrote: > Cables straight-thru, and identical cables are used for the working and > suspended trunks. > > I will tr 22 Nov 2009 09:28:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121067 Thanks to all for answers, Cables straight-thru, and identical cables are used for the working and suspended trunks. I will try replacing the cable 22 Nov 2009 08:52:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121066 On 22/11/2009 12:46, Juuso Lehtinen wrote: > Any ideas what might be causing this. I wonder if I'm running into some kind > of minimum cable length pr 22 Nov 2009 08:05:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121063 Its not like we can run Cisco IOS on any other vendor's equipment. If I buy an ISR from Cisco, I have to pay them additional money to use the softwar 22 Nov 2009 07:42:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121065 On Sunday 22 November 2009 13:46:34 Juuso Lehtinen wrote: > > Any ideas what might be causing this. I wonder if I'm running into some > kind of mini 22 Nov 2009 07:37:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121064 > I have Catalyst 3560 and 2960 switches connected by a two member > Etherchannel trunk using built in copper GE interfaces. For some reason > Etherne 22 Nov 2009 06:26:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121062 Hi, I have Catalyst 3560 and 2960 switches connected by a two member Etherchannel trunk using built in copper GE interfaces. For some reason Ethernet 22 Nov 2009 04:46:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121061 Doug McIntyre wrote: > > The PACs are tied to the serial number of the box. You can backup the > number you get back from the PAC tool, but if you s 22 Nov 2009 02:31:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121060 Mike wrote: > Yes it's enabled per the above. The drops only occur when I use: > > ip verify unicast source reachable-via rx > > However, I discover 22 Nov 2009 00:08:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121059 On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:53:22AM -0800, Seth Mattinen wrote: > Doug McIntyre wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 01:28:53PM -0800, Seth Mattinen wrot 21 Nov 2009 23:21:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121058 I had another opportunity to debug the high cpu usage on the 3550-12t. show proc cpu indicated that cpu load was 39% interrupt, 40% total So it's de 21 Nov 2009 17:01:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121056 Justin Shore wrote: > Pete Templin wrote: > >> I don't know how well it'll work on an unnumbered interface etc., but >> I always add the option 'allo 21 Nov 2009 12:20:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121050 Hi Dave, I've been tried configure HQF but runing 12.4T IOS and didn't work. I'm going to get the 15.0 IOS and I'll try again with HQF. Thanks 200 21 Nov 2009 11:50:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121049 Hi Alejandro, If you can run 15.0 code you may want try HQF, rather then CBWFQ. There is a good description at the link below: http://blog.ioshints. 21 Nov 2009 02:47:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121042 Minzhi (Catherine) Wu wrote: > Seems it is a Cisco bug, > > ..following error message: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to neighbor 1::1 passive 2/3 (BGP id 20 Nov 2009 21:28:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/121039