Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 12 Feb 2012 09:22:43 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg On Thursday, February 02, 2012 08:50:18 AM annkwok80 wrote: > Can I know why there is "le 24" after network block in > /22 and /21 As Aaron mentione 01 Feb 2012 18:18:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/157414 Hi ... I think the cisco-nas list is nearly defunct (it is/was focused on our now end-of-sale AS5xxx digital modem products.) If you don't get an an 01 Feb 2012 17:04:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/157413 Hello I read this prefix list. Can I know why there is "le 24" after network block in /22 and /21 Why don't have "le 24" after /24? I also saw ano 01 Feb 2012 16:50:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/157412 .Hi! Read this post and you life will change to better! Good luck! http://deutscheunschuld.de/december.site.php?ylSection=97i5 ______________________ 27 Dec 2011 21:10:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/156174 .Do you want to try some amazing thing? http://www.akronia.com/friends.group.php?gyahoo_id=81qy7 _______________________________________________ cisc 26 Dec 2011 02:12:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/156133 Hello, I'm having some difficulty connecting to a Cisco 871 via a remote access IPSec connection. I'm using the Shrew VPN client, and when I connect 15 Nov 2011 07:40:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/154769 Hi, On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 05:36:40PM -0700, Aaron Leonard wrote: > Actually, it *was* resource accounting ("aaa accounting resource") not > connec 14 Jul 2011 08:58:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/149992 Actually, it *was* resource accounting ("aaa accounting resource") not connection accounting ("aaa accounting connection") that I was thinking of, t 13 Jul 2011 17:36:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/149968 Hi, On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 10:33:24AM -0700, Aaron Leonard wrote: > I think you can use "aaa accounting connection" to get the ISDN > signaling inf 13 Jul 2011 11:45:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/149934 Gert, I think you can use "aaa accounting connection" to get the ISDN signaling information, which you could then correlate back to to the X.75 cal 13 Jul 2011 10:33:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/149933 Hi, On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:21:09PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote: > I'm using an AS5300 and a 3640 to terminate incoming X.75 and modem calls, > and 12 Jul 2011 03:23:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/149855 Hi, coming back to an ooold thread... :-) I'm using an AS5300 and a 3640 to terminate incoming X.75 and modem calls, and relay them via "telnet" to 12 Jul 2011 03:21:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/149854 If I was determined to make multilink PPP work over different speed links the first thing I'd try is disabling fragmentation - eg interface Multilin 04 May 2011 16:57:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/147483 Trying to bond together two pppoe links into one multilink bundle. The links admittedly are not the same speed, one goes through a DSL modem bridged e 04 May 2011 14:28:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/147478 Is there more information I could add here that would help make this issue make more sense to people? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joe Mays" 04 Apr 2011 16:13:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/146513 Unsubscribe 01 Apr 2011 11:13:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/146432 Okay, I've almost got this whole ppp multilink over pppoe thing worked out, but I'm dealing with one final mystery. Without ppp multilink in the virt 01 Apr 2011 02:27:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/146416 Okay, I got this to work, for a given value of working. Adding ppp multilink to the virtual template on the 7206 and removing the minimum links entry 28 Mar 2011 09:53:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/146166 > > Which Ethernet interfaces are the session coming in on? > > FE 1/0.2 or FE 1/0.3 > > FE 1/0.2 I'm still rather at a loss as to why this isn't wor 22 Mar 2011 15:17:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/145917 > Which Ethernet interfaces are the session coming in on? > FE 1/0.2 or FE 1/0.3 FE 1/0.2 _______________________________________________ cisco-nas 21 Mar 2011 10:03:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/145826 Okay, I tried adding "ppp multilink" to the 7200 config Without it -- gw1.armplc#show users Line User Host(s) Idle 20 Mar 2011 22:09:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/145812 Okay. At one end is a 2620 running 12.3(15) IPBase, with a 4NME card. At the other is a 7206. Between them are three DSL lines, all running in bridged 19 Mar 2011 00:26:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/145787 Glad I could help! It sure would have been nice if the debugs that you had turned on at first (which sure seemed like they should have been enough) w 04 Jan 2011 06:54:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/142258 > Well I think that's your problem. Your RADIUS server is sending > down attributes that say to use filters called "in-block-smtp-nb" > and "out-bloc 03 Jan 2011 17:12:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/142217 Well I think that's your problem. Your RADIUS server is sending down attributes that say to use filters called "in-block-smtp-nb" and "out-block-smtp 03 Jan 2011 09:40:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/142184