Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 12 Feb 2012 16:53:05 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg On Thursday, February 02, 2012 08:50:18 AM annkwok80 wrote: > Can I know why there is "le 24" after network block in > /22 and /21 As Aaron mentione 01 Feb 2012 18:18:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/157414 Hi ... I think the cisco-nas list is nearly defunct (it is/was focused on our now end-of-sale AS5xxx digital modem products.) If you don't get an an 01 Feb 2012 17:04:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/157413 Hello I read this prefix list. Can I know why there is "le 24" after network block in /22 and /21 Why don't have "le 24" after /24? I also saw ano 01 Feb 2012 16:50:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/157412 .Hi! Read this post and you life will change to better! Good luck! http://deutscheunschuld.de/december.site.php?ylSection=97i5 ______________________ 27 Dec 2011 21:10:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/156174 .Do you want to try some amazing thing? http://www.akronia.com/friends.group.php?gyahoo_id=81qy7 _______________________________________________ cisc 26 Dec 2011 02:12:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/156133 Hello, I'm having some difficulty connecting to a Cisco 871 via a remote access IPSec connection. I'm using the Shrew VPN client, and when I connect 15 Nov 2011 07:40:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/154769 Hi, On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 05:36:40PM -0700, Aaron Leonard wrote: > Actually, it *was* resource accounting ("aaa accounting resource") not > connec 14 Jul 2011 08:58:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/149992 Actually, it *was* resource accounting ("aaa accounting resource") not connection accounting ("aaa accounting connection") that I was thinking of, t 13 Jul 2011 17:36:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/149968 Hi, On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 10:33:24AM -0700, Aaron Leonard wrote: > I think you can use "aaa accounting connection" to get the ISDN > signaling inf 13 Jul 2011 11:45:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/149934 Gert, I think you can use "aaa accounting connection" to get the ISDN signaling information, which you could then correlate back to to the X.75 cal 13 Jul 2011 10:33:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/149933 Hi, On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:21:09PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote: > I'm using an AS5300 and a 3640 to terminate incoming X.75 and modem calls, > and 12 Jul 2011 03:23:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/149855 Hi, coming back to an ooold thread... :-) I'm using an AS5300 and a 3640 to terminate incoming X.75 and modem calls, and relay them via "telnet" to 12 Jul 2011 03:21:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/149854 If I was determined to make multilink PPP work over different speed links the first thing I'd try is disabling fragmentation - eg interface Multilin 04 May 2011 16:57:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/147483 Trying to bond together two pppoe links into one multilink bundle. The links admittedly are not the same speed, one goes through a DSL modem bridged e 04 May 2011 14:28:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/147478 Is there more information I could add here that would help make this issue make more sense to people? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joe Mays" 04 Apr 2011 16:13:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/146513 Unsubscribe 01 Apr 2011 11:13:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/146432 Okay, I've almost got this whole ppp multilink over pppoe thing worked out, but I'm dealing with one final mystery. Without ppp multilink in the virt 01 Apr 2011 02:27:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/146416 Okay, I got this to work, for a given value of working. Adding ppp multilink to the virtual template on the 7206 and removing the minimum links entry 28 Mar 2011 09:53:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/146166 > > Which Ethernet interfaces are the session coming in on? > > FE 1/0.2 or FE 1/0.3 > > FE 1/0.2 I'm still rather at a loss as to why this isn't wor 22 Mar 2011 15:17:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/145917 > Which Ethernet interfaces are the session coming in on? > FE 1/0.2 or FE 1/0.3 FE 1/0.2 _______________________________________________ cisco-nas 21 Mar 2011 10:03:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/145826 Okay, I tried adding "ppp multilink" to the 7200 config Without it -- gw1.armplc#show users Line User Host(s) Idle 20 Mar 2011 22:09:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/145812 Okay. At one end is a 2620 running 12.3(15) IPBase, with a 4NME card. At the other is a 7206. Between them are three DSL lines, all running in bridged 19 Mar 2011 00:26:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/145787 Glad I could help! It sure would have been nice if the debugs that you had turned on at first (which sure seemed like they should have been enough) w 04 Jan 2011 06:54:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/142258 > Well I think that's your problem. Your RADIUS server is sending > down attributes that say to use filters called "in-block-smtp-nb" > and "out-bloc 03 Jan 2011 17:12:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/142217 Well I think that's your problem. Your RADIUS server is sending down attributes that say to use filters called "in-block-smtp-nb" and "out-block-smtp 03 Jan 2011 09:40:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/142184 > Hm. Might be an issue with some of the RADIUS attributes. > Please add "debug aaa authorization", "debug sss events", > "debug sss aaa authorizatio 03 Jan 2011 09:22:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/142185 Hm. Might be an issue with some of the RADIUS attributes. Please add "debug aaa authorization", "debug sss events", "debug sss aaa authorization even 03 Jan 2011 07:53:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/142183 Hello. Dealing with a problem that is mysterious to me, but not to someone more knowledgeable, I expect. I have a cisco 7206 that is configured to ac 31 Dec 2010 11:16:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/142170 hi gerald really the problem is that cisco is sending the same id per interface, i ve that found the way to make some kind of virtual interface, s 07 Oct 2010 23:54:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/138542 Am 06.10.2010 15:31, schrieb Daniel Soto: > i have a problem with nas-port 0. > i´m trying use the attribute simultaneous-use of freeradius v1.1.3 06 Oct 2010 08:34:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/138417 hi. my name is Daniel i have a problem with nas-port 0. i´m trying use the attribute simultaneous-use of freeradius v1.1.3 but my cisco 06 Oct 2010 06:31:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/138399 Hi, First of all - I've posted this to both the NAS en NSP list since it touches on both I guess. We have an old setup that authenticates ISDN dial- 19 Aug 2010 01:31:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/135861 The problem is occuring in main:text. Is that likely to be a bug in IOS, or a slightly corrupted version of the IOS image that is only showing up in 02 Aug 2010 11:37:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/134929 Having a strange problem with an AS5400. Trying to change the number of channels in a pri-group. When we remove the pri-group... "no pri-group times 02 Aug 2010 10:30:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/134908 Hi All, I'm trying to dial in to a Cisco AS5300 and have it L2TP forward the PPP session to a context on a Redback Smart Edge for termination. 15 Mar 2010 04:56:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/127234 Are the power supplies in AS5300's and AS5400's interchangeable? _______________________________________________ cisco-nas mailing list cisco-nas@puck 05 Feb 2010 11:58:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/125035 Ok, after putting the DSL modem in bridge mode and putting a PC behind it worked great. As a side note, at some point in the testing, the guy on th 25 Jan 2010 12:16:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/124318 The netmask is not a standard part of IPCP, but a Cisco extension, and afaik is used only by Cisco CPE. Which would explain why the non-Cisco CPE is 25 Jan 2010 08:54:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/124306 Hi, On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 04:11:38PM -0800, Aaron Seelye wrote: > Ok, here it is, quite a bit there. You can see in the radius debug that > both 23 Jan 2010 09:51:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/124222 Check this out: 17w0d: Vi1 IPCP: I CONFREJ [REQsent] id 1 len 20 17w0d: Vi1 IPCP: CompressType VJ 15 slots (0x0206002D0F00) 17w0d: Vi1 IPCP: VS 22 Jan 2010 17:26:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/124212 Ok, here it is, quite a bit there. You can see in the radius debug that both IP and netmask are specified, but for some reason the netmask isn't ap 22 Jan 2010 16:11:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/124202 I guess you don't need the aaa authen debugs, and only really care about the tail end of debug ppp nego(ncp and beyond)....but add "debug radius". I 22 Jan 2010 16:03:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/124201 Just was going to write back, authorization fixed the IP address portion. Still working on the netmask problem though, it doesn't seem to be taking 22 Jan 2010 15:58:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/124200 Ahh gotcha... It's been awhile since I've looked at this, but...shouldn't aaa authorization local or radius be on? I would do this: confi t aaa aut 22 Jan 2010 15:37:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/124199 No, it's a westell dsl modem. It's giving us problems, presumably because all of my servers are on the same /8, but I can ping google/yahoo/whateve 22 Jan 2010 14:57:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/124198 Is it window clients connecting to this? If so read this: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk713/tk507/technologies_tech_note09186a0080093c77.shtml T 22 Jan 2010 14:44:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/124197 Hello, I have the following config, and for dynamic IP customers, it seems to be good so far (only testing one user, want to get the kinks worked ou 22 Jan 2010 14:26:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/124196 Good sleuthwork, Gert. Looks like you're suffering from a input buffer leak. "show buffer input-interface <interface-name> dump" would dump out the 03 Nov 2009 13:47:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/119770 Hi, On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 05:16:35PM +0100, Gert Doering wrote: > Like "remove lapb-ta autodetection from all ISDN interfaces" or so > (which didn' 03 Nov 2009 08:26:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/119735 Hi, so now it had happened again... (the X.75-got-stuck thing). On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 02:16:44PM -0700, Aaron Leonard wrote: > I think the algorit 03 Nov 2009 08:16:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/119711 hi again, still not resolved that problem.. any suggestions? many thanks! chris * -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- * Von: cisco-nas-bounces@puck. 22 Oct 2009 03:50:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/118980 hello there, i am trying to setup an szenaria where my LNS should created dynamically an l2tp tunnel while requesting the tunnel parameters from the 19 Oct 2009 01:44:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/118809 > The weird thing is, the effect persists across calls. > > So for the next call, it will behave identically - it will connect, > exchange a few fram 02 Oct 2009 14:16:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/117866 Hi, On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 11:40:33AM -0700, Aaron Leonard wrote: > > I have this AS5300 that is handling incoming X.75/LAPB-TA calls, and > > every 02 Oct 2009 13:44:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/117860 Hi Gert, > I have this AS5300 that is handling incoming X.75/LAPB-TA calls, and > every few weeks, it seems to get stuck in weird ways. Well, since 02 Oct 2009 11:40:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/117848 Hi, I have this AS5300 that is handling incoming X.75/LAPB-TA calls, and every few weeks, it seems to get stuck in weird ways. Incoming calls connec 02 Oct 2009 04:08:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/117814 > Does your radius config line reference a vrf? Some newer ios' do that and > you have to modify the radius command in your config. Well, here I wi 25 Aug 2009 07:21:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/115239 > The PPP debug is of interest; the call connects, an address is taken > from the pool, and PPP should start negotiating. Either it's not > starting 24 Aug 2009 17:00:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/115218 Aaron -- my mistake in one regard, I included a line that I shouldn't have ... > 000059: Aug 24 14:03:34.547: > %MODEMCALLRECORD-6-PM_TERSE_CALL_FA 24 Aug 2009 11:25:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/115196 Aaron -- Because a number of test calls from the telco hit this box, some of the debug commands you suggested produce tons of output, and it's diffic 24 Aug 2009 11:19:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/115195 Yep, saw that one, which is why the additional debugs will be useful too. (incl. the "debug ip peer" that Josh suggested [hi, Josh!]) ---- On 8/24/ 24 Aug 2009 10:37:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/115194 Aaron -- Thanks for the response. I appreciate your help figuring this one out. I posted a later message about the same problem to this list with th 24 Aug 2009 10:35:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/115193 Debug ip peer? :) jd. On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Aaron Leonard <Aaron@cisco.com> wrote: > Let's also add in some AAA and RADIUS stuff: > > 24 Aug 2009 10:16:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/115187 Let's also add in some AAA and RADIUS stuff: debug aaa authen debug aaa author debug radius and get the "show run". Aaron ---- On 8/24/2009 9:56 24 Aug 2009 10:12:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/115186 Joe, I don't have any answer to this, but here's how you would figure it out. 1. while running 12.2(16) and with everything working as desired, you 24 Aug 2009 09:56:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/115185 Hi, for scripting purposes I would like to find a single Cisco IOS command that shows the relation between the ISDN Calling Line ID and the associate 24 Aug 2009 01:32:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/115176 Dave Weis said.... > Wild guess would be put no compress in your virtual template, that's what > CCP appears to be. Good suggestion, thanks, and if 23 Aug 2009 14:33:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/115168 I sent a message yesterday about a problem we are having on an AS5400. PPP works fine with version 12.2.16, but fails with version 12.3.13. The config 23 Aug 2009 10:55:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/115166 Hello. I'd like to hear any insight people might be able to offer on a mysterious problem. We have an AS5400 we have been using for inbound dialup wit 21 Aug 2009 23:12:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/115160 voiptrunks#show resource resource System-voice-pool System-voice-pool is not a configurable/manageable entity 0 resources in the resource grou 12 Aug 2009 14:47:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/114635 Show debug vtsp output. Section of output before the gap was when I was dialing 5678800 to dial in to the unit and get the dialtone. Section after th 12 Aug 2009 13:51:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/114621 Also, if I dump the show dialplan information for dialpeer 93876800 there is no outbound application listed. Is this normal, or should it be something 12 Aug 2009 13:03:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/114619 In the simplest sense, is there a way to tell the cisco to generate a call from the command line out a specific port? ______________________________ 12 Aug 2009 12:50:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/114618 > Have you ever routed an incoming call to go back outbound? We're trying to > set up a cisco 5400 with voice capability to take a call coming in, re 12 Aug 2009 12:14:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/114620 Have you ever routed an incoming call to go back outbound? We're trying to set up a cisco 5400 with voice capability to take a call coming in, return 12 Aug 2009 09:03:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/114590 Hi Aaron, On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 08:36:32AM -0700, Aaron Leonard wrote: > Outbound fax on MICA was broken after 2.7.4.0/2.9.2.0 due to > CSCeb53414. 15 Jun 2009 10:53:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/111120 Hi Gert, Outbound fax on MICA was broken after 2.7.4.0/2.9.2.0 due to CSCeb53414. CSCeb53414 was fixed in portware 2.9.6.0; however 2.9.6.0 was neve 15 Jun 2009 08:36:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/111109 Hi, On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 02:26:09PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote: > And lo and behold, there's news on this :-) > > - Fax *works* on the 3640 with 12 Jun 2009 06:57:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/110956 Hi, one or the other of you might have seen the thread below - it's about "using AS5xxx devices to send outgoing faxes", and the non-workings of it ( 12 Jun 2009 05:26:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/110949 Roth, Kevin P. <> wrote on Friday, May 22, 2009 17:08: > We have a client machine at the POC which is originating 93+ > dialer-mapped IP connection 31 May 2009 10:06:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/110198 I have another PPP Dialer question, for Cisco 3845's with PVDM2 digital modems. I have a primary and a backup operations center (POC and BOC), each o 22 May 2009 08:07:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/109819 Hello, Finally, I used a another solution than aaa+username. Because, with my configuration (resource-pool enable) the AAA authorization send always 18 May 2009 08:42:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/109455 >>> How does this play together with the "aaa authentication login ... radius", >>> that is "which username and password will radius see"? >>> 13 May 2009 11:09:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/109147 Hi, On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 08:30:53AM -0700, Aaron Leonard wrote: > >> username 5554446164 nopassword dnis > > What exactly does this do? "use the 13 May 2009 10:44:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/109146 For this scheme to work, the session needs to go through local exec authorization (aaa authorization exec ... local). Cheers, Aaron --------------- 13 May 2009 08:55:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/109137 Hello Aaron, Ok for don't use resource-pool manager. But I have already configured aaa authentication and authorization : aaa new-model ! ! aaa gro 13 May 2009 08:38:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/109138 Hi Geert, >> username 5554446164 nopassword dnis >> > > What exactly does this do? "use the called-number as user name"? > Yes. > How does 13 May 2009 08:30:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/109136 Hi, On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 09:24:41AM -0700, Aaron Leonard wrote: > username 5554446164 nopassword dnis What exactly does this do? "use the called 13 May 2009 00:54:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/109116 Bordin, Here's a way that I like to do this sort of thing ... i.e. the case where you have incoming modem calls, and based upon the called number, yo 12 May 2009 09:24:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/109054 Hello, I have a problem for a migration of a "old" application Point of Sales. Before , the terminal async with Zmodem application is connected to a 12 May 2009 08:18:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/109053 Glad you found it ... yes, you need "modem dialin" or "modem inout" configured on your modem lines, for them to be willing to accept incoming calls. 11 May 2009 09:30:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/108967 Hi, On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 02:59:18PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote: > I'm stuck with modem calls, though. Both the 3640 + NM-30DM and the > AS5300 tha 11 May 2009 06:15:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/108950 Hi Aaron, this "X.75 and modem dial-in" thing is slowly proceeding... On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 12:10:56PM -0700, Aaron Leonard wrote: > Here's the co 11 May 2009 05:59:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/108949 Hi Kevin, These "embedded pauses" are what we call "dial modifiers" when used with digital modems. I.e. your 3845 is connected to the circuit networ 04 May 2009 11:19:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/108587 Hey， how are you doing recently? I would like to introduce you a very good company and its website is http://www.welt188.com/"]www.welt188.com It c 04 May 2009 09:06:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/108576 I have a Cisco 3845 services router setup to do dial-on-demand routing using a dialer interface with a "dialer map ip" command to configure the phone 04 May 2009 08:41:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/108575 Hi, On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 09:37:13AM -0700, Christopher Hunt wrote: > Gert's posting RE:3640 + NM-30DM makes me wonder if there's a similar > modu 21 Apr 2009 11:54:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/107868 Nope, no internal modems for the 7200. (Except in the sense that an AS5800 is sort of a 7200 with a modem cage.) ---- Christopher Hunt wrote: > Ger 21 Apr 2009 09:51:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/107864 Gert's posting RE:3640 + NM-30DM makes me wonder if there's a similar module for the 7200VXR line. I'd love to abandon my 3Com Total Control Chassis. 21 Apr 2009 09:37:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/107863 Gert, The 3640+NM-DM (MICA modem NM) doesn't support *everything* that an AS5300 with MICA modems, but certainly most things. Off the top of my head 20 Apr 2009 09:34:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nas/107807