Mark at u
Sep 13, 2006, 12:41 AM
Post #1 of 1
(1054 views)
Permalink
|
|
Re: cisco-bba Digest, Vol 40, Issue 4
|
|
Yes, I saw that yesterday. I apologise. I knew there had been a
discussion on that before but didn't realise I was to blame.
It sounds as if there isn't much control over it and the LAC can send
pretty well much what it likes.
With no other tools, it's difficult figuring out whether a customer is
congesting a link.
Thanks,
Mark
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 14:14:21 +0100
From: Euan Galloway <euang+cisco-bba [at] lists>
Subject: Re: [cisco-bba] BW metric on L2TP VPDN
To: cisco-nsp [at] puck, cisco-bba [at] puck
Message-ID: <20060912131421.GA29377 [at] hyperion>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 10:54:09AM +0100, Mark Tohill wrote:
> I heard that this was connected to the type of DSLAM?
> Is this true?
I was going to say "wasn't this in cisco-bba archives", then I noticed
it
was you that started the discussion about it quite a while ago ;-)
It's still the case on BT IPStream.
Quickly looking at one device I can see almost exactly 50% with valid i
looking BW and 50% with the interface speed.
--
Euan Galloway
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
cisco-bba mailing list
cisco-bba [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-bba
End of cisco-bba Digest, Vol 40, Issue 4
****************************************
_______________________________________________
cisco-bba mailing list
cisco-bba [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-bba
|
