Mark at u
Feb 24, 2006, 1:50 AM
Post #3 of 3
(1663 views)
Permalink
|
Thanks Oliver.
This is exactly what we done and its working well.
I did however manage to bring down the router by putting a debug
condition on internal interface and a debug vpdn l2x-packets to try and
prove l2tp traffic no longer traveling over that link.
I'll learn....
Thanks again,
Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) [mailto:oboehmer [at] cisco]
Sent: 10 February 2006 11:51
To: Mark Tohill; cisco-bba [at] puck
Cc: cisco-nsp [at] puck
Subject: RE: [cisco-bba] L2TP tunnel persistence and routing
Mark Tohill <> wrote on Friday, February 10, 2006 12:34 PM:
>
> We have 2 x 7200's terminating VPDN DSL traffic.
>
> Each router has a Gig fibre link to providers switching
> infrastructure and have an eBGP peering, both announcing PoP space.
>
> In order to create tunnels, providers net depends on BGP to reach our
> tunnel endpoints, one on each box. Due to current BGP announcements,
> this means tunnels for both boxes arrive on the first box. L2TP
> traffic destined to be terminated on second box travels over internal
> gig link.
>
> We want to change this either via statics being implemented by
> Provider or using BGP /32 announcements for our Loopback.
>
> Would such diversion of L2TP traffic bound for second box bring down
> the tunnels i.e users ?
No, it should not affect the established tunnels, the packets will just
re-route along the more-specific route.
If the provider agrees, I would do this dynamically by announcing /32,
they will then likely tag them with no-export so the announcements stay
local to their AS.
oli
_______________________________________________
cisco-bba mailing list
cisco-bba [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-bba
|
