michael.whittle at thus
Aug 13, 2004, 1:04 AM
Post #5 of 5
(524 views)
Permalink
|
|
RE: Problem traffic shaping individual PPPoE sessions on a Cisco 2621 XM running c2600-telco-mz.123-7.T3.bin
[In reply to]
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Excellent, thanks.
I think that's just about the only thing we haven't tried at this
stage.
I have tried using RADIUS to apply a service policy when the user
logs on but maybe using traffic-shape will work.
I'll give it a go.
Cheers,
Mike
- -----Original Message-----
From: Gordon Smith [mailto:gsmith [at] wxc]
Sent: 13 August 2004 00:14
To: Whittle, Michael; Dennis Peng
Cc: cisco-bba [at] puck
Subject: RE: [cisco-bba] Problem traffic shaping individual PPPoE
sessionson a Cisco 2621 XM running c2600-telco-mz.123-7.T3.bin
We managed to get rate-shaping working using RADIUS....
We're terminating PPPoE on a 7301. We solved this by having the
radius server pass back rate-limit attributes in the reply. Applying
templates won't work. I spent quite a bit of time getting this right
:-)
e.g. Cisco-AVpair = "lcp:interface-config=traffic-shape rate 200000"
If you look back through the threads on this list, you'll see a
previous thread on PPPoE Several people here were instrumental in
getting this working
Cheers,
Gordon
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-bba-bounces [at] puck
> [mailto:cisco-bba-bounces [at] puck]On Behalf Of Whittle,
> Michael
> Sent: Tuesday, 10 August 2004 4:21 a.m.
> To: 'Dennis Peng'
> Cc: 'cisco-bba [at] puck'
> Subject: RE: [cisco-bba] Problem traffic shaping individual PPPoE
> sessionson a Cisco 2621 XM running c2600-telco-mz.123-7.T3.bin
>
>
> Hi Denis,
>
> Okay so we've established that traffic shaping on the LAC
> isn't going to
> work. We've tried using CBWFQ, traffic-shape and RADIUS in
> the hope that
> maybe one of them will work but we've had no joy. They don't seem
> to recognise the separate sessions on the LAC.
>
> We configured the exact same service policies on the LNS and
> we've got it
> working outbound but not inbound. I know FastEthernet and Ethernet
> interfaces have a similar problem but then it gives you a
> warning or doesn't
> let you configure it at all. In this case it's allowing the
> configuration
> but it's just not working? Any ideas?
>
> Cheers,
> Mike
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Whittle, Michael [mailto:michael.whittle [at] thus]
> Sent: 06 August 2004 16:20
> To: 'Dennis Peng'
> Cc: 'cisco-bba [at] puck'
> Subject: RE: [cisco-bba] Problem traffic shaping individual
> PPPoE sessions
> on a Cisco 2621 XM running c2600-telco-mz.123-7.T3.bin
>
>
> Hi Dennis,
>
> Thanks for the info. We are hoping to keep the control of the
> traffic shaping on the LAC so hopefully we can find a work around
> for this.
>
> Cheers,
> Mike
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dennis Peng [mailto:dpeng [at] cisco]
> Sent: 06 August 2004 15:53
> To: Whittle, Michael
> Cc: 'cisco-bba [at] puck'
> Subject: Re: [cisco-bba] Problem traffic shaping individual
> PPPoE sessions
> on a Cisco 2621 XM running c2600-telco-mz.123-7.T3.bin
>
>
> I don't think you can shape on the vtemplate when you are the
> LAC. If this
> were the LNS, that would work. If you are doing PPPoEoA, you
> can shape at
> the VC level.
>
> Dennis
>
> Whittle, Michael [michael.whittle [at] thus] wrote:
> >
> > We have configured a Cisco 2621XM as a LAC in which we are
> terminating
> > various PPPoE connections. At the moment the solution is
> working but
> > the bandwidth that each PPPoE session uses is a bit of a
> free for all.
> > We would like to limit each PPPoE session to not exceed
> 512k. I have
> > found some good documentation on the Cisco site which says
> that this
> > can be done using both , 'service policies' or
> 'traffic-shape rate' on
> > the Virtual-Template interface. The router accepts the
> configuration
> > without a problem but for some reason when we check the
> throughput it
> > exceeds 512k.
> >
> > The documentation on the web site bases it's examples on a
> Cisco 10000
> > platform but I don't think that would make a difference in
> this case
> > because all the commands we need are supported on the Cisco
> > 2621XM. The IOS we are running is, 'c2600-telco-mz.123-7.T3.bin'
> > which I'm wondering if it may be the problem here. The router we
> > are
> using also
> > supports Virtual-Template subinterfaces but for some reason
> if I apply
> > the traffic shaping commands to the Virtual-Template I
> should see the
> > commands displayed when I use the following command and I don't:
> >
> > interface Virtual-Template1
> > description PPPoE Session
> > mtu 1492
> > bandwidth 512
> > ip unnumbered Loopback0
> > no peer default ip address
> > no keepalive
> > traffic-shape rate 512000 8000 8000 1000
> > !
> >
> > CPR00227-test#test virtual-template 1 subinterface Subinterfaces
> > may be created using Virtual-Template1 CPR00227-test#
> >
> > The example above should limit each PPPoE session to 512k but it
> > doesn't seem to work. I have also tried the configuration
> below and it
> > also isn't
> > working:
> >
> > policy-map PPPoE-SESSION-TRAFFIC
> > class class-default
> > police cir 512000 bc 96000 be 192000
> > conform-action transmit
> > exceed-action drop
> > violate-action drop
> > !
> >
> > interface Virtual-Template1
> > description PPPoE Session
> > mtu 1492
> > bandwidth 512
> > ip unnumbered Loopback0
> > service-policy input PPPoE-SESSION-TRAFFIC
> > service-policy output PPPoE-SESSION-TRAFFIC
> > no peer default ip address
> > no keepalive
> > !
> >
> > CPR00227-test#show policy-map interface Virtual-Template1
> > Virtual-Template1
> >
> > Service-policy input: PPPoE-SESSION-TRAFFIC
> >
> > Service policy content is displayed for cloned interfaces
> > only such as vaccess and sessions
> >
> > Service-policy output: PPPoE-SESSION-TRAFFIC
> >
> > Service policy content is displayed for cloned interfaces
> > only such as vaccess and sessions CPR00227-test#
> >
> > Any idea what the problem could be?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Mike
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-bba mailing list
> > cisco-bba [at] puck
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-bba
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-bba mailing list
> cisco-bba [at] puck
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-bba
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-bba mailing list
> cisco-bba [at] puck
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-bba
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0
Comment: http://www.thus.co.uk/pgpinfo for more information
iQA/AwUBQRx2Cg/QItQ3gFkHEQIiigCgvPa0AbnPZ7y8ywmkB2b0O6SZS08AoIrV
Tktk5m1/A9wXTE4JwF61/m2c
=Xldz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
