Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 12 Feb 2012 17:45:31 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg Hello, I'm trying to se up a Cisco 881G router to act as a PPPoE to L2TP LAC. I have the configuration entered, and have created the bba-group, but 11 Jan 2012 10:03:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/156607 I learned from our SE today that platform feature development for the 7200 has ended, and that SB code train is going to be EOL very soon. The recomm 20 Jun 2011 13:46:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/149114 Sorry forgot the subject.  nobody care to comment? Ron. ---------------------------------------- > From: proutfoo@hotmail.com > To: cisco-bba@puck. 09 Jun 2011 07:19:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/148721 How do providers typically implement routing for multiple LNSs (terminating ADSL user sessions)? Given that a set of LNSes could be carrying many (tho 08 Jun 2011 12:34:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/148697 Hello, For those of you using the ASR 1002 as a PPPoE LNS, positive experiences?  I'm looking to replace a 7200VXR/NPE-G1.  Does it support DHCP- 08 Jun 2011 11:06:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/148684 Hmm that's odd. It was a while ago but when I was looking into this matter, although the virtual-access interface went down the dialer never did. An 24 Mar 2011 15:29:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/146036 My way will work to accomplish that too (and easier to remember). If the Dialer is down (ie not connected), IOS will withdraw the route (same with any 24 Mar 2011 11:31:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/146028 You can also use "ppp ipcp route default" on the dialer interface if you need the default route to go away if the ppp link ever falls over. Useful if 23 Mar 2011 16:31:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/146008 Your PPPoE clients shouldn't have a default route pointed at a specific IP, but rather an Interface. On Cisco IOS, for example, it would be "ip route 23 Mar 2011 10:22:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/145975 For PPPoE redundancy, if a BRAS fails, the sessions would reestablish, and the other BRAS will setup a new session... No session state between differe 23 Mar 2011 09:14:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/145974 Hi Arie, But the problem is both the LNS would have separate loopback ip addresses configured and under virtual-template we will have ip unnumbered l 23 Mar 2011 07:28:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/145955 For PPPoE, you can make sessions hit both BRAS devices at the same time. The PADI is a broadcast, so would reach all of them. Each one will send a rep 23 Mar 2011 05:35:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/145954 Hi Arie, Could you please tell me how the first hop redundancy for pppoe clients would be achieved? Regards Hitesh On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:33 PM 23 Mar 2011 04:43:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/145953 Just ask the Telco to open L2TP tunnels to both LNSs. They can configure them as active/active (split the users on both LNSs) or active/passive (depen 23 Mar 2011 04:03:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/145938 Hi, I m trying to achieve redundancy for gateway of pppoe adsl clients on LNS. My scenario is as below. > Telco LAC sends the PPPOE session to our L 23 Mar 2011 02:26:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/145937 Sorry about that, this was actually meant for cisco-nsp. GG On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Gary T. Giesen <giesen@snickers.org> wrote: > Is there 09 Mar 2011 15:23:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/145380 Is there any way to limit a user's access to a particular VRF when logging into the CLI? (either via AAA or locally). I seem to remember it was availa 09 Mar 2011 09:02:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/145353 Am 21.02.11 20:53, schrieb Gerald Krause: > Is there any other thing that I may have overlooked? Quick Question - do we need some kind of "Broadband 21 Feb 2011 14:43:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/144684 Am 21.02.11 21:24, schrieb Tony: > --- On Tue, 22/2/11, Gerald Krause <gk@ax.tc> wrote: >> >> Hi Tony, >> >> on what kind of interface do you receive 21 Feb 2011 13:58:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/144678 --- On Tue, 22/2/11, Gerald Krause <gk@ax.tc> wrote: > > Hi Tony, > > on what kind of interface do you receive the L2TP/VPDN > sessions - GE, > ATM? 21 Feb 2011 12:24:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/144677 Am 21.02.2011 12:16, schrieb Gerald Krause: > Am 17.02.2011 12:37, schrieb Tony: >> ! >> policy-map xyz-512k-voip-shaper-child >> class xyz-voip-tra 21 Feb 2011 12:03:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/144670 Am 21.02.2011 12:03, schrieb Gerald Krause: > Am 17.02.2011 14:34, schrieb Arie Vayner: >> Gerald, >> >> If I am not wrong, the issue is the "percent" 21 Feb 2011 11:53:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/144669 Hi Tony, my initial problem was the missing parent shaper in my config (like Arie observed). Right after changing the relative 'percent' value in to 21 Feb 2011 03:16:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/144656 Am 17.02.2011 14:34, schrieb Arie Vayner: > Gerald, > > If I am not wrong, the issue is the "percent" value you are using... > percent has to be appl 21 Feb 2011 03:03:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/144655 Gerald, If I am not wrong, the issue is the "percent" value you are using... percent has to be applied in your case with a parent shaper, which would 17 Feb 2011 05:34:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/144491