<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Cisco | BBA</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>12 Feb  2012 16:46:29 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>PPPoE on a Cisco 881G</title>
<description>Hello, I&amp;#039;m trying to se up a Cisco 881G router to act as a PPPoE to L2TP LAC. I have the configuration entered, and have created the bba-group, but</description>
<pubDate>11 Jan  2012 10:03:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/156607</link>
</item><item>
<title>Platform feature development for 7200</title>
<description>I learned from our SE today that platform feature development for the 7200 has ended, and that SB code train is going to be EOL very soon. The recomm</description>
<pubDate>20 Jun  2011 13:46:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/149114</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: ASR 1002? was (no subject)</title>
<description>Sorry forgot the subject.  nobody care to comment? Ron.  ---------------------------------------- &amp;gt; From: proutfoo@hotmail.com &amp;gt; To: cisco-bba@puck.</description>
<pubDate>09 Jun  2011 07:19:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/148721</link>
</item><item>
<title>Multiple LNSs: favourite IGP or iBGP?</title>
<description>How do providers typically implement routing for multiple LNSs (terminating ADSL user sessions)? Given that a set of LNSes could be carrying many (tho</description>
<pubDate>08 Jun  2011 12:34:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/148697</link>
</item><item>
<title>(no subject)</title>
<description>Hello,  For those of you using the ASR 1002 as a PPPoE LNS, positive experiences?  I&amp;#039;m looking to replace a 7200VXR/NPE-G1.  Does it support DHCP-</description>
<pubDate>08 Jun  2011 11:06:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/148684</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: LNS redundancy</title>
<description>Hmm that&#039;s odd. It was a while ago but when I was looking into this matter, although the virtual-access interface went down the dialer never did. An</description>
<pubDate>24 Mar  2011 15:29:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/146036</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: LNS redundancy</title>
<description>My way will work to accomplish that too (and easier to remember). If the Dialer is down (ie not connected), IOS will withdraw the route (same with any</description>
<pubDate>24 Mar  2011 11:31:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/146028</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: LNS redundancy</title>
<description>You can also use &amp;quot;ppp ipcp route default&amp;quot; on the dialer interface if you need the default route to go away if the ppp link ever falls over. Useful if</description>
<pubDate>23 Mar  2011 16:31:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/146008</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: LNS redundancy</title>
<description>Your PPPoE clients shouldn&amp;#039;t have a default route pointed at a specific IP, but rather an Interface. On Cisco IOS, for example, it would be &amp;quot;ip route</description>
<pubDate>23 Mar  2011 10:22:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/145975</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: LNS redundancy</title>
<description>For PPPoE redundancy, if a BRAS fails, the sessions would reestablish, and the other BRAS will setup a new session... No session state between differe</description>
<pubDate>23 Mar  2011 09:14:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/145974</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: LNS redundancy</title>
<description>Hi Arie, But the problem is both the LNS would have separate loopback ip addresses configured and under virtual-template we will have ip unnumbered l</description>
<pubDate>23 Mar  2011 07:28:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/145955</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: LNS redundancy</title>
<description>For PPPoE, you can make sessions hit both BRAS devices at the same time. The PADI is a broadcast, so would reach all of them. Each one will send a rep</description>
<pubDate>23 Mar  2011 05:35:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/145954</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: LNS redundancy</title>
<description>Hi Arie, Could you please tell me how the first hop redundancy for pppoe clients would be achieved? Regards Hitesh On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:33 PM</description>
<pubDate>23 Mar  2011 04:43:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/145953</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: LNS redundancy</title>
<description>Just ask the Telco to open L2TP tunnels to both LNSs. They can configure them as active/active (split the users on both LNSs) or active/passive (depen</description>
<pubDate>23 Mar  2011 04:03:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/145938</link>
</item><item>
<title>LNS redundancy</title>
<description>Hi, I m trying to achieve redundancy for gateway of pppoe adsl clients on LNS. My scenario is as below. &amp;gt; Telco LAC sends the PPPOE session to our L</description>
<pubDate>23 Mar  2011 02:26:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/145937</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Limit CLI Access to a Particular VRF</title>
<description>Sorry about that, this was actually meant for cisco-nsp. GG On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Gary T. Giesen &amp;lt;giesen@snickers.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Is there</description>
<pubDate>09 Mar  2011 15:23:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/145380</link>
</item><item>
<title>Limit CLI Access to a Particular VRF</title>
<description>Is there any way to limit a user&amp;#039;s access to a particular VRF when logging into the CLI? (either via AAA or locally). I seem to remember it was availa</description>
<pubDate>09 Mar  2011 09:02:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/145353</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: To Shape or Police DSL Subscribers ??</title>
<description>Am 21.02.11 20:53, schrieb Gerald Krause: &amp;gt; Is there any other thing that I may have overlooked? Quick Question - do we need some kind of &amp;quot;Broadband</description>
<pubDate>21 Feb  2011 14:43:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/144684</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: To Shape or Police DSL Subscribers ??</title>
<description>Am 21.02.11 21:24, schrieb Tony: &amp;gt; --- On Tue, 22/2/11, Gerald Krause &amp;lt;gk@ax.tc&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hi Tony, &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; on what kind of interface do you receive</description>
<pubDate>21 Feb  2011 13:58:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/144678</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: To Shape or Police DSL Subscribers ??</title>
<description>--- On Tue, 22/2/11, Gerald Krause &amp;lt;gk@ax.tc&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Hi Tony, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; on what kind of interface do you receive the L2TP/VPDN &amp;gt; sessions - GE, &amp;gt; ATM?</description>
<pubDate>21 Feb  2011 12:24:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/144677</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: To Shape or Police DSL Subscribers ??</title>
<description>Am 21.02.2011 12:16, schrieb Gerald Krause: &amp;gt; Am 17.02.2011 12:37, schrieb Tony: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; ! &amp;gt;&amp;gt; policy-map xyz-512k-voip-shaper-child &amp;gt;&amp;gt;  class xyz-voip-tra</description>
<pubDate>21 Feb  2011 12:03:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/144670</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: To Shape or Police DSL Subscribers ??</title>
<description>Am 21.02.2011 12:03, schrieb Gerald Krause: &amp;gt; Am 17.02.2011 14:34, schrieb Arie Vayner: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Gerald, &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; If I am not wrong, the issue is the &amp;quot;percent&amp;quot;</description>
<pubDate>21 Feb  2011 11:53:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/144669</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: To Shape or Police DSL Subscribers ??</title>
<description>Hi Tony, my initial problem was the missing parent shaper in my config (like Arie observed). Right after changing the relative &amp;#039;percent&amp;#039; value in to</description>
<pubDate>21 Feb  2011 03:16:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/144656</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: To Shape or Police DSL Subscribers ??</title>
<description>Am 17.02.2011 14:34, schrieb Arie Vayner: &amp;gt; Gerald, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; If I am not wrong, the issue is the &amp;quot;percent&amp;quot; value you are using... &amp;gt; percent has to be appl</description>
<pubDate>21 Feb  2011 03:03:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/144655</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: To Shape or Police DSL Subscribers ??</title>
<description>Gerald, If I am not wrong, the issue is the &amp;quot;percent&amp;quot; value you are using... percent has to be applied in your case with a parent shaper, which would</description>
<pubDate>17 Feb  2011 05:34:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/144491</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: To Shape or Police DSL Subscribers ??</title>
<description>Hi Gerald, --- On Thu, 17/2/11, Gerald Krause &amp;lt;gk@ax.tc&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; From: Gerald Krause &amp;lt;gk@ax.tc&amp;gt; &amp;gt; Subject: Re: [cisco-bba] To Shape or Police DSL S</description>
<pubDate>17 Feb  2011 03:37:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/144478</link>
</item><item>
<title>configuration for LTS for cisco 10k</title>
<description>!--- Configuration LTS vpdn enable /* Activation du processus VPDN (LTS + LNS) */ vpdn multihop /* activation de la fonction LTS */ vpdn authen-befor</description>
<pubDate>17 Feb  2011 00:19:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/144477</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: To Shape or Police DSL Subscribers ??</title>
<description>Sorry for dig out this old thread but I&amp;#039;am in the process to test some QoS features on our LNS and stumbled upon this post :-). My question - what IO</description>
<pubDate>16 Feb  2011 10:49:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/144423</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Per-User Multihop VPDN</title>
<description>You also need the following command on the LNS: *authen-before-forward * http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/vpdn/command/reference/vpd_a1.html#wp10</description>
<pubDate>15 Feb  2011 05:25:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/144337</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Per-User Multihop VPDN</title>
<description>When a request comes in to RADIUS from the initial LNS, you just need to chuck back a set VPDN tunnel attributes and the multihop should &amp;#039;just work&amp;#039;.</description>
<pubDate>15 Feb  2011 02:30:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/144332</link>
</item><item>
<title>Per-User Multihop VPDN</title>
<description>Hi, I have a scenario where I would like to forward particular user sessions from one LNS to another (which is VRF-aware), ideally under the control</description>
<pubDate>15 Feb  2011 01:56:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/144325</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: IPv6 PPPoE clients into VRF</title>
<description>Hiya, It doesn&amp;#039;t work with those lines added. I&amp;#039;ve contacted our Cisco SE and will update the list when/if I make it work :) Regards, Rado -----Ori</description>
<pubDate>11 Feb  2011 08:45:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/144208</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: IPv6 PPPoE clients into VRF</title>
<description>Have you tried the following?  Cisco-AVPair = &amp;quot;lcp:interface-config#1=vrf forwarding ZZZ&amp;quot; Cisco-AVPair = &amp;quot;lcp:interface-config#2=ipv6 unnumbered Loo</description>
<pubDate>07 Feb  2011 10:20:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/143964</link>
</item><item>
<title>IPv6 PPPoE clients into VRF</title>
<description>Hello,   I&amp;#039;m wondering if it&amp;#039;s currently possible to insert a dual-stack IPv4/IPv6 PPPoE session into a VRF?   My setup is very straightforward wi</description>
<pubDate>04 Feb  2011 08:49:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/143856</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: L2TP on dynamic IP</title>
<description>I have running L2TP between Android mobiles and Cisco routers for remote access in the team. L2TP configuration is based on Virtual-template, so a c</description>
<pubDate>26 Jan  2011 02:26:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/143407</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: L2TP on dynamic IP</title>
<description>In that case I would suggest looking at EasyVPN or simple DMVPN solutions, which are built for this dynamic spoke model, and use GRE, which will allow</description>
<pubDate>20 Jan  2011 08:28:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/143123</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: L2TP on dynamic IP</title>
<description>Hi Arie,   I definitely would like to define a fixed IP to the customer, but on the WAN side the CPE is configured by a third party provider (an acc</description>
<pubDate>20 Jan  2011 07:42:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/143112</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: L2TP on dynamic IP</title>
<description>John, What would most likely be a better solution for both solutions is to assign the customer a fixed IP allocated from RADIUS when they connect ove</description>
<pubDate>19 Jan  2011 11:58:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/143055</link>
</item><item>
<title>L2TP on dynamic IP</title>
<description>Hi, I&amp;#039;ve got two design questions:  1. Is it possible to map a net via L2TP (IPv4 PI Space) to a client, which comes from a dynamic IP Address? E.g</description>
<pubDate>19 Jan  2011 10:23:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/143054</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Specify PPPoE Virtual-Access Interface bandwidth on LNS via RADIUS/AAA</title>
<description>Sorry, missed this part.... #show int vi3 configuration Virtual-Access3 is an VPDN link (sub)interface Derived configuration : 200 bytes ! interface</description>
<pubDate>14 Jan  2011 15:01:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/142817</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Specify PPPoE Virtual-Access Interface bandwidth on LNS via RADIUS/AAA</title>
<description>Virtual Template is: interface Virtual-Template1 mtu 1492 ip vrf forwarding TEST ip unnumbered Loopback64757 ppp max-bad-auth 5 ppp authenticati</description>
<pubDate>14 Jan  2011 14:59:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/142816</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Specify PPPoE Virtual-Access Interface bandwidth on LNS via RADIUS/AAA</title>
<description>On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Gary T. Giesen &amp;lt;giesen@snickers.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Is there any way to specify the bandwidth on virtual-access interfaces</description>
<pubDate>13 Jan  2011 16:18:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/142768</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Specify PPPoE Virtual-Access Interface bandwidth on LNS	via RADIUS/AAA</title>
<description>This thread may help: http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/nsp/44608 Frank -----Original Message----- From: cisco-bba-bounces@puck.nether.ne</description>
<pubDate>13 Jan  2011 15:11:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/142766</link>
</item><item>
<title>Specify PPPoE Virtual-Access Interface bandwidth on LNS via RADIUS/AAA</title>
<description>Is there any way to specify the bandwidth on virtual-access interfaces (to be used for OSPF, QoS, etc) via RADIUS/AAA? I&amp;#039;m currently using &amp;quot;lcp:interf</description>
<pubDate>12 Jan  2011 07:31:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/142672</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Imposing a rate-limiter for DSL users exceeing quotas</title>
<description>Hi, I have never had to do this myself, but I believe it can be done using RADIUS CoA: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3576.txt There is also a post here</description>
<pubDate>06 Jan  2011 04:52:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/142415</link>
</item><item>
<title>Imposing a rate-limiter for DSL users exceeing quotas</title>
<description>Hi, Is there an elegant way of imposing a rate-limit for users which exceed a download quota? We could manipulate a user&amp;#039;s virtual-template on the LN</description>
<pubDate>06 Jan  2011 04:43:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/142414</link>
</item><item>
<title>Imposing a rate-limiter for DSL users exceeing quotas</title>
<description>Hi, Is there an elegant way of imposing a rate-limit for users which exceed a download quota? We could manipulate a user&amp;#039;s virtual-template on the LN</description>
<pubDate>06 Jan  2011 04:42:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/142413</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: ACL application</title>
<description>On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 07:56:54PM +1000, Edward avanti wrote: &amp;gt; Halo all, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I understood that ACL on int&amp;#039;s were transitting traffic and ACL on li</description>
<pubDate>16 Dec  2010 04:18:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/141779</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: ACL application</title>
<description>bump On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 7:56 PM, Edward avanti &amp;lt;edward.avanti@gmail.com&amp;gt;wrote: &amp;gt; Halo all, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I understood that ACL on int&amp;#039;s were transitting</description>
<pubDate>15 Dec  2010 01:45:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/141728</link>
</item><item>
<title>ACL application</title>
<description>Halo all, I understood that ACL on int&amp;#039;s were transitting traffic and ACL on line was to the router? I ask because I could not access router until</description>
<pubDate>11 Dec  2010 01:56:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/141564</link>
</item><item>
<title>ppp multilink issue</title>
<description>I am getting this error when trying to bring up the second link on a multilink ppp Nov 11 16:55:35.110: Vi3 MLP: Request add link to bundle Nov 11 1</description>
<pubDate>12 Nov  2010 06:32:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/140366</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: How to reset DSCP/TOS on LNS?</title>
<description>Hi Tony, Took me ages to work it out, but the TOS I&amp;#039;m talking about or what we used in our Billing System is defined in RFC 1349 as being bits 3-6. I</description>
<pubDate>05 Sep  2010 22:36:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/136840</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: How to reset DSCP/TOS on LNS?</title>
<description>Hi Andy, From my reading of it that is correct. Bits 0-5 are used for TOS and bits 6-7 are used for Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) or are UNU</description>
<pubDate>05 Sep  2010 22:27:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/136839</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: How to reset DSCP/TOS on LNS?</title>
<description>Sorry to re-open this again but is there a way to reset the entire TOS byte. Our Billing System uses the TOS value (bits 3-6) of the TOS byte for bill</description>
<pubDate>05 Sep  2010 17:47:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/136837</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: How to reset DSCP/TOS on LNS?</title>
<description>You&amp;#039;re welcome. Slight correction, you would need to use the correct AVPair to apply the policy INBOUND. The one I gave below was for outbound policy</description>
<pubDate>02 Sep  2010 04:29:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/136697</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: How to reset DSCP/TOS on LNS?</title>
<description>Many thanks to Tony and Arie...and Jason too...  Will definitely give it a shot. ________________________________ From: Tony [mailto:td_miles@yahoo</description>
<pubDate>02 Sep  2010 01:41:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/136689</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: How to reset DSCP/TOS on LNS?</title>
<description>Hi Andy, You could do it by applying a QoS policy via Cisco-AVPair RADIUS attributes, eg: ip:sub-qos-policy-out=qos-policy-reset0 You would then ha</description>
<pubDate>02 Sep  2010 00:28:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/136688</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: How to reset DSCP/TOS on LNS?</title>
<description>Andy, You can just apply a policy-map on your Virtual-Template that does &amp;quot;set prec 0&amp;quot; on class-default... Arie On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Andy</description>
<pubDate>02 Sep  2010 00:12:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/136682</link>
</item><item>
<title>How to reset DSCP/TOS on LNS?</title>
<description>Hi All,  I&amp;#039;m looking for a way to re-mark customer packets as it enters/hits the LNS.  Eg: cust_1 --upload--&amp;gt;&amp;gt; [ LNS ] --download--&amp;gt;&amp;gt; cust_2  - In</description>
<pubDate>01 Sep  2010 23:22:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/136681</link>
</item><item>
<title>remove unused virtual access interfaces</title>
<description>Hi, We have 7204&amp;#039;s as LNS and they accumulate unused virtual access interfaces such that on one device that has about 100 active connections it has j</description>
<pubDate>25 Aug  2010 21:48:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/136307</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SNMP is administratively shutting down the Virtual-Access on the LNS</title>
<description>Thanks guys, found the culprit.  There is a script which will issue snmp disconnection requests to reshape customers if it doesn&amp;#039;t know that the rout</description>
<pubDate>25 Aug  2010 16:31:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/136300</link>
</item><item>
<title>SNMP is administratively shutting down the Virtual-Access on the LNS</title>
<description>Hi All,  Just wondering if anyone has come across a situation where snmp is administratively shutting down the Virtual-Access on the LNS. What snmp c</description>
<pubDate>25 Aug  2010 15:43:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/136299</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: LNS IPv6 dual-stacked</title>
<description>Hi Alex, You don&amp;#039;t appear to be setting an unnumbered interface for address family ipv6. Try adding the following to the virtual-template or supply</description>
<pubDate>07 Jul  2010 01:07:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/133626</link>
</item><item>
<title>LNS IPv6 dual-stacked</title>
<description>Hi, We&amp;#039;re looking to deploy IPv6 across our DSL subscriber base, we are almost there with the configuration but are having issues with &amp;#039;first hop rou</description>
<pubDate>06 Jul  2010 12:52:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/133605</link>
</item><item>
<title>QoS in PPPoE environment</title>
<description>Hi all,   I&amp;#039;m trying to push policy maps to the BRAS through RADIUS for PPPoE customers and essentially have noticed the following problem:   1. I</description>
<pubDate>25 May  2010 03:23:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/131513</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Routing Strategies for Multiple LNSes</title>
<description>Matthew, BGP is the right protocol for this. Most users should be using dynamic addresses from pools, and the pools should be allocated in ranges to</description>
<pubDate>25 Apr  2010 13:58:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/129976</link>
</item><item>
<title>Routing Strategies for Multiple LNSes</title>
<description>We are looking to update our LNS configurations to improve resiliency, by adding LNSes and removing static routing. What do most SPs do in terms of be</description>
<pubDate>25 Apr  2010 11:04:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/129975</link>
</item><item>
<title>high latency / lost fragments / input errors / trouble with multilink SDSL bundles on cisco 7200</title>
<description>Dear colleagues, I&amp;#039;ve got some serious trouble debugging a problem with some of our multilink bundles. I already moved them to an separate LNS, to ha</description>
<pubDate>23 Mar  2010 08:02:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/127882</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: IP Pool selection from Radius server</title>
<description>Thanks a lot Oli for you help ! It works fine. Best regards, Philippe   -----Message d&amp;#039;origine----- De : Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) [mailto:oboehmer</description>
<pubDate>18 Feb  2010 06:16:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/125705</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: IP Pool selection from Radius server</title>
<description>&amp;gt; &amp;gt; I am trying to work out how Cisco IP pool selection can be implemented in a &amp;gt; PPPoe environment. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; BRAS : Cisco 7206, IOS 12.2-31(SB8) &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Le</description>
<pubDate>18 Feb  2010 04:28:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/125704</link>
</item><item>
<title>IP Pool selection from Radius server</title>
<description>Hi all,  I am trying to work out how Cisco IP pool selection can be implemented in a PPPoe environment. BRAS : Cisco 7206, IOS 12.2-31(SB8) Let&amp;#039;s s</description>
<pubDate>18 Feb  2010 01:54:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/125702</link>
</item><item>
<title>Specifying metric/cost for primary/backup dialin users on LNS</title>
<description>Dear collegues, I&amp;#039;m having problems implementing a new LNS setup. For load balancing and redundancy reasons, we&amp;#039;ve got several LNSes (cisco 7200 pla</description>
<pubDate>27 Jan  2010 14:02:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/124454</link>
</item><item>
<title>PPPoE Requirement!</title>
<description>Dear Friends!   I have the following scenario.   (Customer Cisco Router)------Ethernet-----[Routed CPE]-------RF Media---------(ISP Cisco Router)</description>
<pubDate>22 Dec  2009 20:32:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/122754</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: IP POOL allocation</title>
<description>Yeah Paul, The ip location goes sequentially. First range 10 should exhaust and then it goes to range 20 and so on... On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:37 PM</description>
<pubDate>13 Nov  2009 01:04:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/120456</link>
</item><item>
<title>Problems with ppp and ipv6 unicast-routing 7206VXR</title>
<description>Hi, I&amp;#039;m experiencing problems, when I want to turn dual stack IPv6 and IPv4 routing on 7206VXR that is configured as BRAS. When I put command &amp;quot;ipv6 u</description>
<pubDate>12 Nov  2009 05:51:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/120390</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: IP POOL allocation</title>
<description>Hi Paul You can use this config : peer default ip address pool pooltest1 pooltest2 pooltest3 ip local pool pooltest1 10.0.0.10 10.0.0.50 ip local po</description>
<pubDate>11 Nov  2009 04:07:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/120335</link>
</item><item>
<title>IP POOL allocation</title>
<description>Hi all,  I am trying to work out how Cisco NAS allocate IPs to customers in a PPPoe environment.  Lets say that I have a pool named pooltest with di</description>
<pubDate>11 Nov  2009 01:29:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/120331</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Can&amp;#039;t connect with PPPoA for ATM to Eth Migration</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m not aware of a capability to do PPPoA over Ethernet. You need to do it over ATM.   Frank   From: cisco-bba-bounces@puck.nether.net [mailto:ci</description>
<pubDate>29 Oct  2009 13:12:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/119419</link>
</item><item>
<title>Can&amp;#039;t connect with PPPoA for ATM to Eth Migration</title>
<description>Hi All,  We&amp;#039;re moving customers from ATM to Ethernet and we have two customers that are using PPPoX to connect.  customer modem ---phone line---&amp;gt; [</description>
<pubDate>27 Oct  2009 19:22:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/119289</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Help configuring 2 radius servers in PPPoe</title>
<description>&amp;gt;Is there any way to link each radius server (aaaa or bbbb) &amp;gt;with its key (how does it work ? does the key being sent &amp;gt;to both radius aaaa and bbbb an</description>
<pubDate>08 Oct  2009 14:34:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/118231</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Fwd: 7600 -Pppoe service ,hardware requirements]</title>
<description>You need a SIP-400 and a V2 of your SPA (SPA-5X1GE-V2).  -- Tassos Ilir Nako wrote on 08/10/2009 23:03: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Hi all &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I want to implement</description>
<pubDate>08 Oct  2009 13:48:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/118222</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Fwd: 7600 -Pppoe service ,hardware requirements]</title>
<description>Hi all I want to implement the pppoe service at one cisco 7600 -sup720bxl-SIp600-Spa5gbe ,but no success. I have searching at the cisco web to see</description>
<pubDate>08 Oct  2009 13:03:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/118221</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Help configuring 2 radius servers in PPPoe</title>
<description>Hi Frank,   Yes, we have different virtual templates.   I&#039;ve tried this set up but can&#039;t get it to work so far :   aaa group server radius eti</description>
<pubDate>08 Oct  2009 12:11:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/118214</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Help configuring 2 radius servers in PPPoe</title>
<description>Do these customers user different Virtual-Templates? If so, I believe you can assign the radius information in the Virtual-Template, overriding those</description>
<pubDate>08 Oct  2009 08:52:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/118209</link>
</item><item>
<title>Help configuring 2 radius servers in PPPoe</title>
<description>Hi,   I have a 7206VXR router connected to two radius servers and sending radius attributes to those servers.   I have already set up the conf as</description>
<pubDate>08 Oct  2009 03:12:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/118190</link>
</item><item>
<title>Oddities with L4 time redirects</title>
<description>Hi All, Is anyone using L4 time redirects in production?  I&amp;#039;m testing this feature at the moment by using radius flat files to assign them to me whe</description>
<pubDate>30 Sep  2009 19:11:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/117707</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Help with pop up windows for ADSL subscribers</title>
<description>Thanks to those that replied.  I have tried this using ISG&amp;#039;s L4 timed redirect (thanks Paul) and it appears to do the job. We will probably use this</description>
<pubDate>24 Sep  2009 18:33:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/117304</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Help with pop up windows for ADSL subscribers</title>
<description>PerfTech is another vendor that can provide web-based alerts?   Frank   From: cisco-bba-bounces@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-bba-bounces@puck.net</description>
<pubDate>24 Sep  2009 11:53:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/117260</link>
</item><item>
<title>Help with pop up windows for ADSL subscribers</title>
<description>Hi All,  Just trying to get my head around what technologies might be available to alert ADSL subscribers that their credit card is about to expire.</description>
<pubDate>23 Sep  2009 21:25:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/117214</link>
</item><item>
<title>virtual user group</title>
<description>Hi, I&amp;#039;m new to cisco PPPoE server. I&amp;#039;m looking for a feature to put user into different virtual user group (with their own routing table) by using ra</description>
<pubDate>15 Sep  2009 03:40:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/116636</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: avpair for virtual template</title>
<description>Hi David, Have you looked through the archives ? This type of question has been asked before: http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-bba/2007-Februa</description>
<pubDate>10 Sep  2009 05:06:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/116360</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: avpair for virtual template</title>
<description>Hi Tony, Do you have and example of this? Commands from cisco and from radius? Thank you for your interest. David.   David Suárez Rubio SISTEMAS</description>
<pubDate>10 Sep  2009 02:57:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/116353</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: avpair for virtual template</title>
<description>Hi David, I&amp;#039;m not sure if there is a RADIUS attribute for virtual-template, someone else may be able to provide you with a definite answer. As an al</description>
<pubDate>09 Sep  2009 06:22:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/116272</link>
</item><item>
<title>avpair for virtual template</title>
<description>Hi all, Somebody knows if exist a cisco-avpair for virtual templates? I have a lot of PPPoE sessions inbound my router for the same interface inter</description>
<pubDate>09 Sep  2009 04:40:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/116263</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: To Shape or Police DSL Subscribers ??</title>
<description>Hi Andy, My $0.02 is to just police it. If they&amp;#039;re plain old DSL connections don&amp;#039;t waste the resources on shaping them, even if it does seem minute n</description>
<pubDate>07 Sep  2009 00:45:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/116111</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: To Shape or Police DSL Subscribers ??</title>
<description>So from the performance point of view, you would see a hit if you use many shapers on the software based boxes (7301/7200). On ASR it should be better</description>
<pubDate>07 Sep  2009 00:05:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/116107</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: To Shape or Police DSL Subscribers ??</title>
<description>Hi Arie,  We have a mixture of 7301&amp;#039;s, 7200 VXR&amp;#039;s and ASR 1004.  Cheers.  Andy ________________________________ From: Arie Vayner [mailto:arievay</description>
<pubDate>07 Sep  2009 00:03:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/116106</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: To Shape or Police DSL Subscribers ??</title>
<description>Andy, One thing about shaping is that it takes more resources (mainly CPU) from the router. What kind of a router is that? Arie On Mon, Sep 7, 2009</description>
<pubDate>07 Sep  2009 00:01:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/116105</link>
</item><item>
<title>To Shape or Police DSL Subscribers ??</title>
<description>Hi All,  Is it better to shape or police DSL subscribers that have exceeded their quota or does it not matter which method you choose? We are current</description>
<pubDate>06 Sep  2009 23:41:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/116104</link>
</item><item>
<title>vpdn softshut on ASR</title>
<description>Has anyone seen this happen on the Cisco ASR&amp;#039;s?  If I issue the command &amp;quot;vpdn softshut&amp;quot;, all my L2TP sessions start to drop.  lns2#conf t Enter conf</description>
<pubDate>12 Jul  2009 22:11:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cisco/bba/112658</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

