alvaro at alobbs
Apr 6, 2009, 1:46 PM
Post #2 of 2
(583 views)
Permalink
|
On 06-abr-09, at 20:29, Jaime Bozza wrote:
> I noticed that here: http://www.alobbs.com/1341/Cherokee_As_hard_as_a_rock.html
>
> states that fastcgi is much more stable, but here: http://www.cherokee-project.com/doc/dev_issues.html
>
> mentions that the default is still fcgi. The question I have is if
> the fastcgi module handles the issue with PHP or should we still
> stick with the fcgi module?
Stick to "fcgi". Even though the "fastcgi" module is technically
superior, it hasn't been maintained since quite some time. The main
problem is that "fastcgi" supports FastCGI features missing in PHP,
and therefore, they don't play along well together.
--
Octality
http://www.octality.com/
_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
Cherokee [at] lists
http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
|
