Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: Cherokee: users

Cherokee: Windows build

 

 

Cherokee users RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded


alvaro at gnu

Jun 9, 2008, 5:15 AM

Post #1 of 4 (295 views)
Permalink
Cherokee: Windows build

Hi there guys,

There is good news for the people who were waiting for the Windows
build:

http://www.alobbs.com/1336/Cherokee_Windows_build.html

There will be Windows packages of the upcoming 0.8.0 release (and any
other newer release).

--
Greetings, alo.
http://www.alobbs.com/

_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
Cherokee[at]cherokee-project.com
http://cherokee-project.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cherokee


skinkie at xs4all

Jun 9, 2008, 5:23 AM

Post #2 of 4 (285 views)
Permalink
Re: Cherokee: Windows build [In reply to]

Alvaro Lopez Ortega schreef:
> Hi there guys,
>
> There is good news for the people who were waiting for the Windows
> build:
>
> http://www.alobbs.com/1336/Cherokee_Windows_build.html
>
> There will be Windows packages of the upcoming 0.8.0 release (and any
> other newer release).

Is there anything to say about the performance on the same machine?


Next to this. I read that you have compiled it with mingw32 is 64 bit
doable? What about 'other' compilers?


Stefan
_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
Cherokee[at]cherokee-project.com
http://cherokee-project.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cherokee


alvaro at gnu

Jun 9, 2008, 7:31 AM

Post #3 of 4 (285 views)
Permalink
Re: Cherokee: Windows build [In reply to]

On 9 Jun 2008, at 14:23, Stefan de Konink wrote:

>> There is good news for the people who were waiting for the Windows
>> build:
>> http://www.alobbs.com/1336/Cherokee_Windows_build.html
>> There will be Windows packages of the upcoming 0.8.0 release (and
>> any other newer release).
>
> Is there anything to say about the performance on the same machine?

I have only been focused on stability and feature completeness so far.
Of course performance is important, but I have not had the time.

Actually, any sort of help with the Windows port would be appreciated.
I haven't worked with the platform for ten years or so.

> Next to this. I read that you have compiled it with mingw32 is 64
> bit doable?

Haven't tried, but it ought to work..

> What about 'other' compilers?

It'd be cool to get it compiled with ICC, although I'm afraid it would
be quite difficult. Actually, I'm not even sure whether ICC can be
used with out current Automake based building mechanism. Has someone
worked with this kind of environment?

--
Greetings, alo.
http://www.alobbs.com/

_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
Cherokee[at]cherokee-project.com
http://cherokee-project.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cherokee


aruiz at gnome

Jun 9, 2008, 9:12 AM

Post #4 of 4 (287 views)
Permalink
Re: Cherokee: Windows build [In reply to]

2008/6/9 Alvaro Lopez Ortega <alvaro[at]gnu.org>:

> On 9 Jun 2008, at 14:23, Stefan de Konink wrote:
>
> >> There is good news for the people who were waiting for the Windows
> >> build:
> >> http://www.alobbs.com/1336/Cherokee_Windows_build.html
> >> There will be Windows packages of the upcoming 0.8.0 release (and
> >> any other newer release).
> >
> > Is there anything to say about the performance on the same machine?
>
> I have only been focused on stability and feature completeness so far.
> Of course performance is important, but I have not had the time.
>
> Actually, any sort of help with the Windows port would be appreciated.
> I haven't worked with the platform for ten years or so.
>
> > Next to this. I read that you have compiled it with mingw32 is 64
> > bit doable?
>
> Haven't tried, but it ought to work..


AFAIK mingw32 has no 64 bits version, so far VS is the only 64bit enabled
win32 compiler that I know.


>
> > What about 'other' compilers?
>
> It'd be cool to get it compiled with ICC, although I'm afraid it would
> be quite difficult. Actually, I'm not even sure whether ICC can be
> used with out current Automake based building mechanism. Has someone
> worked with this kind of environment?
>
> --
> Greetings, alo.
> http://www.alobbs.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cherokee mailing list
> Cherokee[at]cherokee-project.com
> http://cherokee-project.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cherokee
>



--
Un saludo,
Alberto Ruiz

Cherokee users RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact lists@gossamer-threads.com
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.