pubcrawler.com at gmail
Aug 1, 2009, 9:23 PM
Post #4 of 4
(309 views)
Permalink
|
I think we need to step up replicating whatever load/performance tests
anyone tries and see if indeed the numbers are fact or fiction and
determine where Cherokee is indeed the fastest and where we might look
at getting even more performance out of Cherokee. Claiming to be the
fastest web server leaves Cherokee open to these sorts of flame wars
and will result in the increase of people bring different numbers our
way disputing this claim.
We can call someone lame or demean them all we want -- but this
generally makes the community look disorganized and certain people
seem sharp tongued. We aren't going to gain more converts and bring
more energy to Cherokee by insulting anyone. We all have our own
individual ways we use Cherokee. Someone might have a good enough
reason to test on localhost. Numbers are numbers...
Anyone want to form a testing group to put Cherokee and other web
servers through the paces when someone submits a new performance
claim?
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Milo van der
Linden<milovanderlinden [at] gmail> wrote:
> I just wanted to say that even I, as a cherokee end-user with an
> excellent admin (Stefan de Konink) am getting anoyed by all the hassle.
>
> Let me just say this:
>
> I am an absolut fan of cherokee because:
> - performance meets my needs
> - project members are extremely respectfull and polite, helpful
> - I personaly hate monopolies, having no choice makes communities lazy
> and ignorant to their users. Cherokee keeps Apache developers sharp and
> vice versa.
> - It is stable enough for me
>
> Cherokee-project, keep up the excellent work! And as far as I am
> concerned, simply ignore the flames and organize internal group hugs
> when needed ;-)
>
> Oli Warner schreef:
>> Indeed. Drama is a big waste of time.
>>
>> *blushes* That said, I don't abide rude people. I just had a go in the
>> thread of doom.
>>
>> *hugs Stefan* Sorry!
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Stefan de Konink <stefan [at] konink
>> <mailto:stefan [at] konink>> wrote:
>>
>> Can we please be friends again?
>>
>> ...because I like group hugs and parties. Not flamewars on
>> mailinglist.
>> Anyone that want to have a kiss on the cheek :*
>>
>> I like Cherokee, I like Alvaro, I like everybody here :) binb4sh
>> you too!
>>
>>
>> If you don't like someone there is also a reply -not to list-
>> button. But
>> keep in mind if many of us never responded on this list, or the
>> bugtracker
>> we would still have a lot of bugs and don't spot the competition.
>> We would
>> be friends and friends usually work with eachother and don't see what
>> happens around them.
>>
>>
>> Stefan
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cherokee mailing list
>> Cherokee [at] lists <mailto:Cherokee [at] lists>
>> http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cherokee mailing list
>> Cherokee [at] lists
>> http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cherokee mailing list
> Cherokee [at] lists
> http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
>
_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
Cherokee [at] lists
http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
|
