<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Cherokee | users</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cherokee/users/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>16 May  2008 22:36:38 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Re: wordpress and 500 Internal Server Error</title>
<description>On 16 May 2008, at 09:55, Mario Ibañez wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I thought the same thing, but to execute the command php-v and php- &amp;gt; cgi-v and returns &amp;gt; &amp;gt; PHP 5.</description>
<pubDate>16 May  2008 19:05:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cherokee/users/2805</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: wordpress and 500 Internal Server Error</title>
<description>&amp;gt; &amp;gt; Hi there, Mario!  Hi Alvaro! &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; It sounds like something is happening with your PHP set up. &amp;gt; I thought the same thing, but to execute the c</description>
<pubDate>16 May  2008 09:55:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cherokee/users/2804</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: wordpress and 500 Internal Server Error</title>
<description>Hi there, Mario! It sounds like something is happening with your PHP set up. First of all, ensure that the &amp;quot;Extension php&amp;quot; behavior entry is correct</description>
<pubDate>16 May  2008 07:34:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cherokee/users/2803</link>
</item><item>
<title>wordpress and 500 Internal Server Error</title>
<description>First of all congratulations on the excellent work, I install cherokee 0.6.1 in ubuntu gutsy [1], this works smoothly when developing pages for ssh [2</description>
<pubDate>16 May  2008 00:44:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cherokee/users/2802</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: turning off auth in subdirs</title>
<description>Hi Ross, The easier way right now is to replace the rule match. Try using a  &amp;quot;Request&amp;quot;: ^/protected/?$ instead of the &amp;quot;Directory&amp;quot;. It should make</description>
<pubDate>15 May  2008 00:23:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cherokee/users/2801</link>
</item><item>
<title>turning off auth in subdirs</title>
<description>Hi, I&amp;#039;ve got htpasswd basic auth set in subdirectory /protected, but I don&amp;#039;t want it set for the subdir /protected/login . In cherokee.conf (v0.6) I</description>
<pubDate>14 May  2008 11:51:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cherokee/users/2800</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Bug#479346: [cherokee] cherokee-admin server is not accesible</title>
<description>On 5 May 2008, at 10:47, Gunnar Wolf wrote: &amp;gt; Isaac Gelado dijo [Sun, May 04, 2008 at 01:42:28PM +0200]: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; After launching cherokee-admin, if I open</description>
<pubDate>05 May  2008 11:42:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cherokee/users/2799</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Bug#479346: [cherokee] cherokee-admin server is not accesible</title>
<description>On Mon, 5 May 2008, Gunnar Wolf wrote: &amp;gt; Isaac Gelado dijo [Sun, May 04, 2008 at 01:42:28PM +0200]: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; After launching cherokee-admin, if I open a w</description>
<pubDate>05 May  2008 10:54:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cherokee/users/2798</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Bug#479346: [cherokee] cherokee-admin server is not accesible</title>
<description>Isaac Gelado dijo [Sun, May 04, 2008 at 01:42:28PM +0200]: &amp;gt; After launching cherokee-admin, if I open a web browser and type the URL &amp;gt; http://localho</description>
<pubDate>05 May  2008 10:47:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cherokee/users/2797</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Performance test data and likely memory leak: 0.54 forWindows</title>
<description>Jack wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Since I didn&amp;#039;t have much experience with Cherokee, I did some (brutal) &amp;gt; apache ab testing last night with 0.54 Windows version. May</description>
<pubDate>03 May  2008 14:20:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cherokee/users/2794</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Performance test data and likely memory leak: 0.54for Windows</title>
<description>Stefan de Konink wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On Fri, 2 May 2008, Jack wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; The test also seems to have revealed a memory leak. When the test was &amp;gt; &amp;gt; done, ch</description>
<pubDate>03 May  2008 14:20:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cherokee/users/2795</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Performance test data and likely memory leak: 0.54 forWindows</title>
<description>Sure. I can re-run the test when 0.6 for Windows is available. &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Since I didn&amp;#039;t have much experience with Cherokee, I did some (brutal) &amp;gt;&amp;gt; apache ab</description>
<pubDate>03 May  2008 14:17:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cherokee/users/2796</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Performance test data and likely memory leak: 0.54 for Windows</title>
<description>On 3 May 2008, at 05:27, Alvaro Lopez Ortega wrote: &amp;gt; On 2 May 2008, at 18:17, Stefan de Konink wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; On Fri, 2 May 2008, Jack wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; The t</description>
<pubDate>03 May  2008 14:07:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cherokee/users/2793</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Performance test data and likely memory leak: 0.54 for Windows</title>
<description>On 2 May 2008, at 18:17, Stefan de Konink wrote: &amp;gt; On Fri, 2 May 2008, Jack wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; The test also seems to have revealed a memory leak. When the t</description>
<pubDate>02 May  2008 20:27:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cherokee/users/2791</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: 0.6 for Windows?</title>
<description>Hi Taher and Jack, A comprehensive new feature list is an important nice-to-have that we  missed for Cherokee 0.6. There was a huge number of change</description>
<pubDate>02 May  2008 20:26:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cherokee/users/2792</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Performance test data and likely memory leak: 0.54 for Windows</title>
<description>On Fri, 2 May 2008, Jack wrote: &amp;gt; The test also seems to have revealed a memory leak. When the test was &amp;gt; done, cherokee process took about 100MB mem</description>
<pubDate>02 May  2008 09:17:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cherokee/users/2790</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: 0.6 for Windows?</title>
<description>Hi Jack. The official release anouncement might help: http://www.cherokee-project.com/pipermail/cherokee/2008-March/002609.html Besides, there is alw</description>
<pubDate>02 May  2008 09:09:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cherokee/users/2789</link>
</item><item>
<title>Performance test data and likely memory leak: 0.54 for Windows</title>
<description>Since I didn&amp;#039;t have much experience with Cherokee, I did some (brutal) apache ab testing last night with 0.54 Windows version. The good news is, Cher</description>
<pubDate>02 May  2008 08:58:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cherokee/users/2788</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: 0.6 for Windows?</title>
<description>Thanks Alvaro. Looking forward to it! I wasn&amp;#039;t able to find a list of new features in 0.6, compared with previous versions. The &amp;quot;learn more&amp;quot; part of</description>
<pubDate>02 May  2008 08:18:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cherokee/users/2787</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: 0.6 for Windows?</title>
<description>On 2 May 2008, at 10:42, Jack wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; It seems that 0.6 for Windows is not available yet? Any chance it&amp;#039;ll &amp;gt; be available soon? It is defini</description>
<pubDate>02 May  2008 06:32:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cherokee/users/2786</link>
</item><item>
<title>Production Windows Server</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m looking for a web server for my Windows production box. I suppose most people are using cherokee on Linux. Anyone using the Windows version on a p</description>
<pubDate>02 May  2008 01:46:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cherokee/users/2785</link>
</item><item>
<title>0.6 for Windows?</title>
<description>Hi, It seems that 0.6 for Windows is not available yet? Any chance it&amp;#039;ll be available soon? Thanks. _______________________________________________</description>
<pubDate>02 May  2008 01:42:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cherokee/users/2784</link>
</item><item>
<title>Bug#477946: cherokee-admin usability issue</title>
<description>&amp;gt; It is a usability issue, indeed. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I can think of a couple ways for fixing it: The first one would be to &amp;gt; remove the Apply button from the side b</description>
<pubDate>28 Apr  2008 15:02:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cherokee/users/2782</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: cherokee-admin usability issue</title>
<description>Alvaro Lopez Ortega escribió: &amp;gt; On 28 Apr 2008, at 22:13, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I think the javascript solution is better, because it l</description>
<pubDate>28 Apr  2008 14:32:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cherokee/users/2783</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: cherokee-admin usability issue</title>
<description>On 28 Apr 2008, at 22:13, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote: &amp;gt; I think the javascript solution is better, because it let you &amp;gt; submit a set of configurat</description>
<pubDate>28 Apr  2008 13:22:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/cherokee/users/2781</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
