
aperez at skarcha
Nov 27, 2009, 12:13 AM
Post #16 of 17
(961 views)
Permalink
|
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Taher Shihadeh <taher [at] unixwars> wrote: > Rodrigo Fernandez-Vizarra wrote: >> >> > +1. I don't think graphs have so much value. >> > Why do you have then? my 2cens ;-) >> >> It's a nice and interesting nice-to-have. >> Anyway, IMO the question is backwards; so, “Why wouldn't you have >> them?”. >> >> In this case, we'll lose a few weeks of history. That's certainly >> unfortunate, but that doesn't mean you wouldn't like to restart >> after the update. >> >> >> Does it make sense to allow the user to export the data to XML for >> backup/external processing/reports/whatever? I might be more >> interested in having the data available for processing than just >> having a nice graph. > As a matter of fact, I do see the value in that. > Not sure if we should program anything or simply document where to find > the data files, the format in which they are recorded and any conversion > utilities that might be of use. I still think that it doesn't worth the effort... As Leonel says, Cherokee is under heavy development and graphs, IMHO, is not a vital component. In a couple of days you will have interesting data again. -- Saludos: Antonio Pérez _______________________________________________ Cherokee-dev mailing list Cherokee-dev [at] lists http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee-dev
|