<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Catalyst | Users</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/users/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>16 May  2008 19:21:05 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Re: Anybody who fancies some LWP poking ...</title>
<description>2008/5/15 John Goulah &amp;lt;jgoulah@gmail.com&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; Since these fix tests, will these modules get patched and released &amp;gt; with this applied? Thanks for the</description>
<pubDate>16 May  2008 17:59:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/users/19703</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Anybody who fancies some LWP poking ...</title>
<description>2008/5/15 John Goulah &amp;lt;jgoulah@gmail.com&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; Since these fix tests, will these modules get patched and released &amp;gt; with this applied? Thanks for the</description>
<pubDate>16 May  2008 17:59:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/users/19704</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: RFC: Catalyst::Controller::REST::DBIC</title>
<description>Yes sorry - this was not directed at you Dave...     Mark Dave Rolsky wrote: &amp;gt; On Fri, 16 May 2008, Mark Trostler wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m sorry but some</description>
<pubDate>16 May  2008 14:28:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/users/19702</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re[2]: uri_for() doesn&amp;#039;t encode to utf8 first argument</title>
<description>Hello, J.. You write 16 ìàÿ 2008 ã., 4:27:07: JS&amp;gt; On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 11:50 PM, Dmitriy S. Sinyavskiy &amp;lt;dreel@bk.ru&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; So what about my p</description>
<pubDate>16 May  2008 14:21:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/users/19701</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: RFC: Catalyst::Controller::REST::DBIC</title>
<description>On Fri, 16 May 2008, Mark Trostler wrote: &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m sorry but something just feels wrong about your approach - feels like &amp;gt; your mixing at matching REST</description>
<pubDate>16 May  2008 12:38:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/users/19700</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: RFC: Catalyst::Controller::REST::DBIC</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m sorry but something just feels wrong about your approach - feels like your mixing at matching REST &amp;amp; a UI on top. Get the REST part down first,</description>
<pubDate>16 May  2008 12:07:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/users/19699</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: RFC: Catalyst::Controller::REST::DBIC</title>
<description>On Fri, 16 May 2008, Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Why would anyone care about GET vs POST? I guarantee most users don&amp;#039;t care. &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; If you mean they w</description>
<pubDate>16 May  2008 10:22:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/users/19698</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: RFC: Catalyst::Controller::REST::DBIC</title>
<description>Hi, I don&amp;#039;t know what to do with this thread. On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 6:31 PM, Dave Rolsky &amp;lt;autarch@urth.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On Fri, 16 May 2008, Zbigniew</description>
<pubDate>16 May  2008 09:46:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/users/19696</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: RFC: Catalyst::Controller::REST::DBIC</title>
<description>On Fri, 16 May 2008, Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; - a search &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I tend to prefer expressing searches with query parametersâ€¦ hm. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I understand</description>
<pubDate>16 May  2008 09:31:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/users/19695</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: RFC: Catalyst::Controller::REST::DBIC</title>
<description>On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Aristotle Pagaltzis &amp;lt;pagaltzis@gmx.de&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; * Zbigniew Lukasiak &amp;lt;zzbbyy@gmail.com&amp;gt; [2008-05-16 06:25]: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hmm -</description>
<pubDate>16 May  2008 03:48:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/users/19693</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
