Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: Catalyst: Dev

is _log an 'official' method of Catalyst::Log?

 

 

Catalyst dev RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded


catalyst.miscatzoom.de

Jul 18, 2005, 5:55 PM

Post #1 of 4 (1735 views)
Permalink
is _log an 'official' method of Catalyst::Log?

if not, subclassing would be less easy ...

With kind regards,
Matthias


sriatoook.de

Jul 18, 2005, 8:34 PM

Post #2 of 4 (1660 views)
Permalink
is _log an 'official' method of Catalyst::Log? [In reply to]

Am 18.07.2005 um 17:58 schrieb Matthias Waldorf:

> if not, subclassing would be less easy ...

_ means private, it's not even documented... ;)


--
sebastian


catalyst.miscatzoom.de

Jul 19, 2005, 12:38 PM

Post #3 of 4 (1666 views)
Permalink
is _log an 'official' method of Catalyst::Log? [In reply to]

> _ means private, it's not even documented... ;)

Well, then why not changing it from '_log' to 'log'? Should not do any harm
and make live easier when subclassing . You would need to replace only one
method instead of five ...

Matthias


sriatoook.de

Jul 19, 2005, 5:14 PM

Post #4 of 4 (1641 views)
Permalink
is _log an 'official' method of Catalyst::Log? [In reply to]

Am 19.07.2005 um 12:40 schrieb Matthias Waldorf:

>> _ means private, it's not even documented... ;)
>>
>
> Well, then why not changing it from '_log' to 'log'? Should not do
> any harm and make live easier when subclassing . You would need to
> replace only one method instead of five ...

No, we want to keep it compatible with Log::Dispatch and
Log::Log4perl, that won't work anymore if we expose _log.


--
sebastian

Catalyst dev RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.