Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 16 May 2008 22:24:40 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg On 16. mai. 2008, at 15.22, Brian Cassidy wrote: > Howdy all, > > We're getting close to releasing version 5.7013 of Catalyst::Runtime. > > Now is th 16 May 2008 11:20:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19697 Howdy all, We're getting close to releasing version 5.7013 of Catalyst::Runtime. Now is the time to make sure all of the relevant issues for this re 16 May 2008 06:22:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19694 Matt S Trout wrote: > On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 04:48:03PM -0700, Yuri Shtil wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I am contemplating to write a new Catalyst::Engine 13 May 2008 12:56:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19651 Matt S Trout wrote: > On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 04:48:03PM -0700, Yuri Shtil wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I am contemplating to write a new Catalyst::Engine 12 May 2008 16:55:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19643 Hi, On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 8:40 AM, Paul Cain <fat.perl.hacker@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry for replying to my own email, but it appears that > Catalys 11 May 2008 03:48:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19625 On 11 May 2008, at 16:40, Paul Cain wrote: > Sorry for replying to my own email, but it appears that > Catalyst::Example::InstantCRUD could take care 10 May 2008 23:48:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19613 Sorry for replying to my own email, but it appears that Catalyst::Example::InstantCRUD could take care of a lot of the database configuration work her 10 May 2008 23:40:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19612 I was thinking about what the default options should be for CatalystX::Installer and am wondering what people want. Basically, I was thinking that the 10 May 2008 19:43:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19604 Yuri, for christ's sake stop top posting. On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 11:20:38AM -0700, Yuri Shtil wrote: > I agree that if the scope of a Catalyst reque 10 May 2008 07:42:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19596 On 6 May 2008, at 19:23, Andy Grundman wrote: > OK I can't really comment on doing that... in my mind a Catalyst > app should be portable to any en 07 May 2008 07:44:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19550 On 7 May 2008, at 03:16, Matt S Trout wrote: > On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 11:45:27PM +0200, Andreas Marienborg wrote: >> Then this changed recently? >> 06 May 2008 18:56:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19536 On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 04:48:03PM -0700, Yuri Shtil wrote: > Hi, > > I am contemplating to write a new Catalyst::Engine subclass. What and what for 06 May 2008 12:21:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19534 That your app code blocks the entire process while it's running, waiting for database queries, making LWP requests, or whatever. On May 6, 2008, at 06 May 2008 11:57:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19532 While we are at, what was the blocking problem in the POE engine? >> >> Andy Grundman wrote: >>> The POE engine also has a blocking problem, a reall 06 May 2008 11:50:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19531 OK I can't really comment on doing that... in my mind a Catalyst app should be portable to any engine, and not use POE things that would require a 06 May 2008 11:23:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19529 I agree that if the scope of a Catalyst request is to include an action to finish, you are correct. However if the scope is to start an action, then 06 May 2008 11:20:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19530 YeAAA!! I got the tests working after updating Catalyst. Thank you SO much. Jonathan Rockway wrote: > * On Tue, May 06 2008, Yuri Shtil wrote: > 06 May 2008 11:03:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19528 The POE engine also has a blocking problem, a really big one in fact, and is the reason I gave up on it. What you want to do is currently not pos 06 May 2008 11:02:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19527 I take it back. As I said, I want to be able to integrate a Catalyst engine into an events loop and was contemplating to write a new engine. I fores 06 May 2008 10:49:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19526 Oh for some reason I thought you were writing a new engine. What problems are you having with the FastCGI engine? There are already test scripts 06 May 2008 10:40:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19525 Catalyst::Engine::FastCGI <http://www-homes.juniper.net/%7Eyuris/perldoc/lib/Catalyst/Engine/FastCGI.html> Andy Grundman wrote: > What sort of eng 06 May 2008 10:30:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19524 What sort of engine are you working on? On May 6, 2008, at 1:13 PM, Yuri Shtil wrote: > I guess my question then would be: > - how do I handle acti 06 May 2008 10:21:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19523 On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 11:45:27PM +0200, Andreas Marienborg wrote: > Then this changed recently? > > http://cpansearch.perl.org/~mramberg/Catalyst-R 06 May 2008 10:16:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19515 I guess my question then would be: - how do I handle actions that take a while to execute, for example if I need to talk to an another process tha 06 May 2008 10:13:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19513 On May 6, 2008, at 12:56 PM, Jonathan Rockway wrote: > > I have a feeling you have an old Catalyst installed and are running > the > tests against t 06 May 2008 10:03:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19514