Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 04 Jul 2009 17:14:15 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg On 20 Jun 2009, at 15:32, Jesse Sheidlower wrote: > > I'm having a hell of a time trying to track down the reasons > for this error. > > I'm getting 30 Jun 2009 13:40:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24459 On 25 Jun 2009, at 01:42, Stuart Watt wrote: > Here is a proposed patch to Catalyst::Plugin::ConfigLoader that > allows it to use environment variab 28 Jun 2009 06:32:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24418 Hi all, Here is a proposed patch to Catalyst::Plugin::ConfigLoader that allows it to use environment variables as a built-in macro for configuratio 24 Jun 2009 17:42:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24388 Hi! Is this a useful patch to Catalyst::Plugin::I18N? Or should it reside elsewhere? I think it makes sense to put with C::P::I18N. The idea is th 24 Jun 2009 09:21:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24384 On 20 Jun 2009, at 20:50, kmx wrote: > . Another issue is > with Catalyst::Devel and its disordered dependencies (you have to > install manually Win3 20 Jun 2009 18:14:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24334 Hi, > Hi, good day. it looks like that there are plenty of good examples done on > UNIX/Linux, I just wonder anybody can share some experience with > 20 Jun 2009 12:50:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24332 On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 04:17:59PM -0500, Joseph He wrote: > Hi, good day. it looks like that there are plenty of good examples done on > UNIX/Linux, 19 Jun 2009 16:11:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24324 On 19/06/2009, at 7:17 AM, Joseph He wrote: > Hi, good day. it looks like that there are plenty of good examples > done on > UNIX/Linux, I just won 18 Jun 2009 14:48:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24309 Hi, good day. it looks like that there are plenty of good examples done on UNIX/Linux, I just wonder anybody can share some experience with Catalyst/W 18 Jun 2009 14:17:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24308 On 18 Jun 2009, at 07:25, Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote: > > Hmm - I was thinking that running the helpers directly in Perl > gives you more control, but 18 Jun 2009 01:03:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24299 On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 1:05 AM, Tomas Doran <bobtfish@bobtfish.net> wrote: > > On 17 Jun 2009, at 12:00, Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote: > >> I think the b 17 Jun 2009 23:25:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24295 On 17 Jun 2009, at 12:00, Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote: > I think the beginning would be to just let catalyst.pl run all the > other helpers. > Like: > > 17 Jun 2009 16:05:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24293 On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 5:22 AM, Devin Austin <devin.austin@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Zbigniew Lukasiak <zzbbyy@gmail.co 17 Jun 2009 04:00:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24269 On 12 Jun 2009, at 18:49, kmx wrote: > Please have a look at SVN (I have prepared also some .t and doc patch) > http://dev.catalystframework.org/repos 16 Jun 2009 12:41:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24264 Hi, I have prepared a patch proposal for a new verify_user_agent configuration option. It is very similar to verify_address; it checks whether the Us 12 Jun 2009 10:49:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24247 Hi, I have created a branche of Module::Install::Catalyst with a new command catalyst_par_options(...) implemented. It takes a string with parameters 11 Jun 2009 23:55:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24232 On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Tomas Doran<bobtfish@bobtfish.net> wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Tomas Doran<bobtfish@bobtfish.net> w 11 Jun 2009 04:15:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24222 > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Tomas Doran<bobtfish@bobtfish.net> wrote: >> Caelum is looking into this to fix the issue and get a test into core 11 Jun 2009 04:07:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24221 Paul Makepeace wrote: > Some cursory glancing didn't reveal if this was logged - is it, and where? No, it isn't - sorry. Cheers t0m ______________ 10 Jun 2009 07:00:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24201 On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Tomas Doran<bobtfish@bobtfish.net> wrote: > Paul Makepeace wrote: >> >> Building against Catalyst 5.80005 we're seein 10 Jun 2009 06:58:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24200 Paul Makepeace wrote: > Building against Catalyst 5.80005 we're seeing, Eeek, that's not great. http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/svnweb/Catalyst/revisio 10 Jun 2009 06:45:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24199 Building against Catalyst 5.80005 we're seeing, rpix:~/.cpan/build/Catalyst-Component-ACCEPT_CONTEXT-0.06-yVcsMJ# make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bi 10 Jun 2009 06:13:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24196 On 8 Jun 2009, at 21:33, Andy Grundman wrote: > > On May 29, 2009, at 9:20 AM, Ton Voon wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> We've allowed our app to use C::Engine: 09 Jun 2009 11:51:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24157 On May 29, 2009, at 9:20 AM, Ton Voon wrote: > Hi! > > We've allowed our app to use C::Engine::HTTP::Prefork instead of > C::Engine::HTTP and found 08 Jun 2009 13:33:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24142 On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 05:50:57PM +0200, Matthias Dietrich wrote: > Hi, > > >You haven't in any way explained why you think it _needs_ to be a > > 08 Jun 2009 12:02:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24136