Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 17 May 2008 00:03:05 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg On 16. mai. 2008, at 15.22, Brian Cassidy wrote: > Howdy all, > > We're getting close to releasing version 5.7013 of Catalyst::Runtime. > > Now is th 16 May 2008 11:20:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19697 Howdy all, We're getting close to releasing version 5.7013 of Catalyst::Runtime. Now is the time to make sure all of the relevant issues for this re 16 May 2008 06:22:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19694 Matt S Trout wrote: > On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 04:48:03PM -0700, Yuri Shtil wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I am contemplating to write a new Catalyst::Engine 13 May 2008 12:56:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19651 Matt S Trout wrote: > On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 04:48:03PM -0700, Yuri Shtil wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I am contemplating to write a new Catalyst::Engine 12 May 2008 16:55:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19643 Hi, On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 8:40 AM, Paul Cain <fat.perl.hacker@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry for replying to my own email, but it appears that > Catalys 11 May 2008 03:48:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19625 On 11 May 2008, at 16:40, Paul Cain wrote: > Sorry for replying to my own email, but it appears that > Catalyst::Example::InstantCRUD could take care 10 May 2008 23:48:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19613 Sorry for replying to my own email, but it appears that Catalyst::Example::InstantCRUD could take care of a lot of the database configuration work her 10 May 2008 23:40:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19612 I was thinking about what the default options should be for CatalystX::Installer and am wondering what people want. Basically, I was thinking that the 10 May 2008 19:43:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19604 Yuri, for christ's sake stop top posting. On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 11:20:38AM -0700, Yuri Shtil wrote: > I agree that if the scope of a Catalyst reque 10 May 2008 07:42:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19596 On 6 May 2008, at 19:23, Andy Grundman wrote: > OK I can't really comment on doing that... in my mind a Catalyst > app should be portable to any en 07 May 2008 07:44:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19550 On 7 May 2008, at 03:16, Matt S Trout wrote: > On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 11:45:27PM +0200, Andreas Marienborg wrote: >> Then this changed recently? >> 06 May 2008 18:56:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19536 On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 04:48:03PM -0700, Yuri Shtil wrote: > Hi, > > I am contemplating to write a new Catalyst::Engine subclass. What and what for 06 May 2008 12:21:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19534 That your app code blocks the entire process while it's running, waiting for database queries, making LWP requests, or whatever. On May 6, 2008, at 06 May 2008 11:57:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19532 While we are at, what was the blocking problem in the POE engine? >> >> Andy Grundman wrote: >>> The POE engine also has a blocking problem, a reall 06 May 2008 11:50:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19531 OK I can't really comment on doing that... in my mind a Catalyst app should be portable to any engine, and not use POE things that would require a 06 May 2008 11:23:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19529 I agree that if the scope of a Catalyst request is to include an action to finish, you are correct. However if the scope is to start an action, then 06 May 2008 11:20:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19530 YeAAA!! I got the tests working after updating Catalyst. Thank you SO much. Jonathan Rockway wrote: > * On Tue, May 06 2008, Yuri Shtil wrote: > 06 May 2008 11:03:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19528 The POE engine also has a blocking problem, a really big one in fact, and is the reason I gave up on it. What you want to do is currently not pos 06 May 2008 11:02:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19527 I take it back. As I said, I want to be able to integrate a Catalyst engine into an events loop and was contemplating to write a new engine. I fores 06 May 2008 10:49:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19526 Oh for some reason I thought you were writing a new engine. What problems are you having with the FastCGI engine? There are already test scripts 06 May 2008 10:40:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19525 Catalyst::Engine::FastCGI <http://www-homes.juniper.net/%7Eyuris/perldoc/lib/Catalyst/Engine/FastCGI.html> Andy Grundman wrote: > What sort of eng 06 May 2008 10:30:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19524 What sort of engine are you working on? On May 6, 2008, at 1:13 PM, Yuri Shtil wrote: > I guess my question then would be: > - how do I handle acti 06 May 2008 10:21:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19523 On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 11:45:27PM +0200, Andreas Marienborg wrote: > Then this changed recently? > > http://cpansearch.perl.org/~mramberg/Catalyst-R 06 May 2008 10:16:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19515 I guess my question then would be: - how do I handle actions that take a while to execute, for example if I need to talk to an another process tha 06 May 2008 10:13:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19513 On May 6, 2008, at 12:56 PM, Jonathan Rockway wrote: > > I have a feeling you have an old Catalyst installed and are running > the > tests against t 06 May 2008 10:03:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19514 * On Tue, May 06 2008, Yuri Shtil wrote: > I just fetched the trunk (am not sure whether it is 5.7) 5.70 is in the name of the directory; make sure 06 May 2008 09:56:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19512 I guess we weren't testing the same thing... I was running t/ optional_http-server.t not the POE test. BTW, the POE engine is no longer supported 06 May 2008 09:46:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19511 I just fetched the trunk (am not sure whether it is 5.7) and got the same: 'Couldn\'t load plugin "Catalyst::Plugin::+TestApp::Plugin::FullyQualifi 06 May 2008 09:41:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19510 Got it never mind. Yuri Shtil wrote: > Can you send me the command to fetch the source from the repository? > > Andy Grundman wrote: >> I just tried 06 May 2008 09:13:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19509 Can you send me the command to fetch the source from the repository? Andy Grundman wrote: > I just tried it with 5.7 trunk and it worked fine for me. 06 May 2008 09:08:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19508 I just tried it with 5.7 trunk and it worked fine for me. On May 6, 2008, at 11:23 AM, Yuri Shtil wrote: > Hi Andy, > I was trying to run t/optiona 06 May 2008 08:28:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19507 Hi Andy, I was trying to run t/optional_http-server.t. as you advised and got: Couldn't load plugin "Catalyst::Plugin::+TestApp::Plugin::FullyQualif 06 May 2008 08:23:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19506 On May 5, 2008, at 7:48 PM, Yuri Shtil wrote: > Hi, > > I am contemplating to write a new Catalyst::Engine subclass. A > looked at the test suite o 05 May 2008 19:58:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19496 * On Mon, May 05 2008, Yuri Shtil wrote: > Hi, > > I am contemplating to write a new Catalyst::Engine subclass. A looked > at the test suite of an exi 05 May 2008 16:56:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19495 Hi, I am contemplating to write a new Catalyst::Engine subclass. A looked at the test suite of an existing module ( Catalyst::Engine::HTTP::POE) and 05 May 2008 16:48:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19494 On May 5, 2008, at 2:45 PM, Andreas Marienborg wrote: > > On May 5, 2008, at 6:39 PM, Matt S Trout wrote: > >> On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 02:40:16PM +020 05 May 2008 14:58:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19489 On May 5, 2008, at 6:39 PM, Matt S Trout wrote: > On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 02:40:16PM +0200, Andreas Marienborg wrote: >> Then please, please, please 05 May 2008 14:45:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19488 On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 02:40:16PM +0200, Andreas Marienborg wrote: > Then please, please, please make sure you do not have the same file > installe 05 May 2008 09:39:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19463 On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 09:21:18PM +1000, Kieren Diment wrote: > But again, if it's 3am and the server has overflowed it's nappy you > don't need th 05 May 2008 09:38:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19462 On 5 May 2008, at 22:40, Andreas Marienborg wrote: > > Then please, please, please make sure you do not have the same file > installed at the same 05 May 2008 05:44:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19451 On May 5, 2008, at 1:21 PM, Kieren Diment wrote: > > On 5 May 2008, at 21:01, Matt S Trout wrote: > >> And here's the reason: If something fucks itse 05 May 2008 05:40:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19450 On 5 May 2008, at 21:01, Matt S Trout wrote: > And here's the reason: If something fucks itself on a production > server > and you're the poor bast 05 May 2008 04:21:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19449 On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 10:52:07AM +0200, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote: > * Matt S Trout <dbix-class@trout.me.uk> [2008-05-04 16:00]: > > So move Catalys 05 May 2008 04:01:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19441 * Matt S Trout <dbix-class@trout.me.uk> [2008-05-04 16:00]: > So move Catalyst::Manual:: into devel and have a separate > tutorial dist? > > Could wo 05 May 2008 01:52:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19440 On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 6:53 AM, Matt S Trout <dbix-class@trout.me.uk> wrote: > On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 08:15:16AM +1000, Kieren Diment wrote: > > > 04 May 2008 09:16:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19419 On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 08:15:16AM +1000, Kieren Diment wrote: > > On 4 May 2008, at 07:35, Matt S Trout wrote: > > >On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 09:03:4 04 May 2008 06:53:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19410 On 4 May 2008, at 13:18, Jonathan Rockway wrote: > * On Sat, May 03 2008, Kieren Diment wrote: >> So we've got two independent dists here - the first 03 May 2008 21:10:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19399 * On Sat, May 03 2008, Kieren Diment wrote: > So we've got two independent dists here - the first are informational > pages (mostly pretty stable, Int 03 May 2008 20:18:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19398 On 4 May 2008, at 07:35, Matt S Trout wrote: > On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 09:03:43PM +1000, Kieren Diment wrote: >> Please consider this idea: >> >> Dit 03 May 2008 15:15:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19389 On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 09:03:43PM +1000, Kieren Diment wrote: > Please consider this idea: > > Ditch the Catalyst::Manual dist, move everhthing that 03 May 2008 14:35:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19388 On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 10:10:26AM -0700, J. Shirley wrote: > Doubly so if that means people can install the docs from cpan... They already can as of 03 May 2008 14:31:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19387 Hi, I wrote a simple example Authentication::Authorization test application, with configured DBIx::Class and Minimal stores, and good test covera 30 Apr 2008 18:29:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19357 On 28. april. 2008, at 13.09, Andreas Marienborg wrote: > Hello > > I try to use Template::Provider::Encoding, to make usage of utf-8 > encoded tem 30 Apr 2008 03:53:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19345 On Apr 29, 2008, at 11:53 PM, Kieren Diment wrote: > > On 30 Apr 2008, at 07:49, Paul Cain wrote: > >> Part of the problem with command line >> opti 29 Apr 2008 22:20:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19341 fair enough :) now that you have the idea in mind, you may make design decisions that will make it easier - from there refactoring to separate teh Ca 29 Apr 2008 17:46:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19340 After reviewing Getopt::Long some more, I think it would fit the task quite well. Since the deadline is almost here, I'm going to go ahead and submit 29 Apr 2008 16:16:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19334 On 30 Apr 2008, at 07:49, Paul Cain wrote: > Part of the problem with command line > options is that parsing them can be a painful experience. Howev 29 Apr 2008 14:53:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19333 Edmund, I see what you mean about the GUI and command line becoming closely tied if I use WWW::Mechanize. Part of the problem with command line opti 29 Apr 2008 14:49:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19331 Sven, Your idea is certainly intriguing; it would be nice to create a generic web deployment module, perhaps as a sister module to CatalystX::Install 29 Apr 2008 14:49:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19332 2008/4/28 Paul Cain <fat.perl.hacker@gmail.com>: > What if rather than having command line options, you could just use > WWW::Mechanize to automatica 29 Apr 2008 01:05:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19316 Paul, Is there a good reason why you're making a Catalyst specific 'generic GUI web deployment module'? Would it not be more useful to make a gener 29 Apr 2008 00:55:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19314 I made the suggested changes to this proposal; below is the diff of the new versions and the old. I plan on submitting this in about 19 hours. Any qu 28 Apr 2008 22:56:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19313 What if rather than having command line options, you could just use WWW::Mechanize to automatically fill out the forms with a script. Something like: 28 Apr 2008 09:57:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19301 Hello I try to use Template::Provider::Encoding, to make usage of utf-8 encoded templates easier. The problem is that to make it work nicely, I n 28 Apr 2008 04:09:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19291 On 28 Apr 2008, at 16:57, Andreas Marienborg wrote: > > On Apr 28, 2008, at 7:26 AM, Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 3:13 AM, K 28 Apr 2008 00:14:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19289 On Apr 28, 2008, at 7:26 AM, Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote: > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 3:13 AM, Kieren Diment <diment@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >>> There is 27 Apr 2008 23:57:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19288 On 28 Apr 2008, at 15:26, Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote: > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 3:13 AM, Kieren Diment <diment@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >>> There is no 27 Apr 2008 23:11:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19290 On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 3:13 AM, Kieren Diment <diment@gmail.com> wrote: > > > There is no command line version of this program since anyone who > > w 27 Apr 2008 22:26:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19287 comments inline On 28 Apr 2008, at 09:56, Paul Cain wrote: > > Paul Cain > > fat.perl.hacker@gmail.com > > CatalystX::Installer - A generic GUI depl 27 Apr 2008 18:13:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19279 Here a draft of my proposal to the Perl Foundation for CatalystX::Installer. I've made quite a few revisions since the last version. Comments are wel 27 Apr 2008 16:56:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19278 Kieren Diment wrote: > Please consider this idea: > > Ditch the Catalyst::Manual dist, move everhthing that's not the tutorial > back into Catalyst: 27 Apr 2008 12:12:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19273 Hi! > +1, esp if this means that there will no longer be a Catalyst/Manual.pm > file in both dists. ...which also makes Gentoo package manage compl 27 Apr 2008 11:22:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19272 * Jonathan Rockway <jon@jrock.us> [2008-04-27 10:10]: > * On Sat, Apr 26 2008, Kieren Diment wrote: > > Please consider this idea: > > > > Ditch the C 27 Apr 2008 08:31:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19270 On 27 Apr 2008, at 18:05, Jonathan Rockway wrote: > * On Sat, Apr 26 2008, Kieren Diment wrote: >> Please consider this idea: >> >> Ditch the Catalys 27 Apr 2008 02:58:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19269 * On Sat, Apr 26 2008, Kieren Diment wrote: > Please consider this idea: > > Ditch the Catalyst::Manual dist, move everhthing that's not the > tutoria 27 Apr 2008 01:05:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19267 On Apr 26, 2008, at 1:03 PM, Kieren Diment wrote: > Please consider this idea: > > Ditch the Catalyst::Manual dist, move everhthing that's not the 26 Apr 2008 14:55:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19263 On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 4:03 AM, Kieren Diment <diment@gmail.com> wrote: > Please consider this idea: > > Ditch the Catalyst::Manual dist, move everh 26 Apr 2008 10:10:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19262 Please consider this idea: Ditch the Catalyst::Manual dist, move everhthing that's not the tutorial back into Catalyst::Devel, and make a separate 26 Apr 2008 04:03:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19261 Jonathan Rockway wrote: > * On Wed, Apr 09 2008, Emanuele Zeppieri wrote: >> Good morning! >> >> Marcus, >> >> is the following (line 622) in Helper. 09 Apr 2008 11:26:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19032 * On Wed, Apr 09 2008, Emanuele Zeppieri wrote: > Good morning! > > Marcus, > > is the following (line 622) in Helper.pm correct? > > [% name %]->plug 09 Apr 2008 09:48:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19031 n 9. april. 2008, at 08.08, Emanuele Zeppieri wrote: > Good morning! > > Marcus, > > is the following (line 622) in Helper.pm correct? > > [% name %]- 08 Apr 2008 23:20:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19026 Good morning! Marcus, is the following (line 622) in Helper.pm correct? [% name %]->plugins(qw/-Debug ConfigLoader Static::Simple/); since there i 08 Apr 2008 23:08:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19025 Hey Marcus, Thanks for your input; I think it would be great if you were my mentor. I like the first approach better too. I'll make a few small twe 07 Apr 2008 10:15:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19012 On 7. april. 2008, at 09.46, Paul Cain wrote: > Here is the second draft of my proposal for the Generic GUI for > installing > Catalyst Apps, which 07 Apr 2008 09:46:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19011 Qui, 2008-04-03 às 14:23 +0100, Daniel Ruoso escreveu: > So, this is the proposed implementation (actually the documentation for > the proposed imple 07 Apr 2008 04:56:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19005 Here is the second draft of my proposal for the Generic GUI for installing Catalyst Apps, which I have decided to call CatalystX::Installer. Thanks t 07 Apr 2008 00:46:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/19002 On 6. april. 2008, at 21.49, Matt S Trout wrote: >> >> Could we perhaps have a combination of a) a deprecation cycle and b) >> an 'if your app breaks, 06 Apr 2008 14:38:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/18993 On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 05:39:56PM +0100, Mike Whitaker wrote: > > On 31 Mar 2008, at 15:39, Dave Rolsky wrote: > > >On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, John Napio 06 Apr 2008 12:49:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/18986 Looks good Merge back committed as revision 7576. On 6. april. 2008, at 19.25, Matt S Trout wrote: > Did anybody review and apply this? > > I can't r 06 Apr 2008 12:43:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/18985 Did anybody review and apply this? I can't really do the review since I helped diagnose it. ----- Forwarded message from John Goulah <jgoulah@gmail. 06 Apr 2008 10:25:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/18982 Hi Paul, thanks for this. Please followup to catalyst- dev@lists.scsys.co.uk (I have posted this there already) rather than the psoc list - you' 06 Apr 2008 04:23:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/18966 On Apr 4, 2008, at 4:04 PM, Ton Voon wrote: > > On 4 Apr 2008, at 20:35, Andy Grundman wrote: >> Hmm, I don't want to break RESTART though. > > Actual 04 Apr 2008 13:12:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/18952 On 4 Apr 2008, at 20:35, Andy Grundman wrote: > Hmm, I don't want to break RESTART though. Actually, I just thought maybe you could use the $options- 04 Apr 2008 13:04:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/18951 On Apr 4, 2008, at 3:22 PM, Ton Voon wrote: > > On 4 Apr 2008, at 17:08, Andy Grundman wrote: >> >> On Apr 3, 2008, at 5:49 PM, Ton Voon wrote: >>> Hi 04 Apr 2008 12:35:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/18950 On 4 Apr 2008, at 17:08, Andy Grundman wrote: > > On Apr 3, 2008, at 5:49 PM, Ton Voon wrote: >> Hi! >> >> We hit a problem with the HTTP development 04 Apr 2008 12:22:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/18949 On Apr 3, 2008, at 5:49 PM, Ton Voon wrote: > Hi! > > We hit a problem with the HTTP development engine where a connection > would come in without a 04 Apr 2008 09:08:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/18947 * On Thu, Apr 03 2008, Ton Voon wrote: > Hi! > > We hit a problem with the HTTP development engine where a connection > would come in without any head 03 Apr 2008 23:55:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/18943 Hi! We hit a problem with the HTTP development engine where a connection would come in without any headers and the remote socket wasn't being clo 03 Apr 2008 14:49:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/18940 Hi, After Catalyst::Controller::SOAP having support for WSDL, my next step is working to support XMPP as an engine, so I can deploy Web Services usin 03 Apr 2008 06:23:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/18932 I've uploaded a dev release to CPAN as: Catalyst-Plugin-SmartURI-0.01_01.tar.gz http://pause.perl.org/incoming/Catalyst-Plugin-SmartURI-0.01_01.tar.gz 01 Apr 2008 08:58:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/18898