<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Catalyst | Dev</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>04 Jul  2009 17:18:09 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Re: [Catalyst] &amp;quot;Use of uninitialized value $buffer&amp;quot; error</title>
<description>On 20 Jun 2009, at 15:32, Jesse Sheidlower wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m having a hell of a time trying to track down the reasons &amp;gt; for this error. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m getting</description>
<pubDate>30 Jun  2009 13:40:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24459</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Proposed patch to Catalyst::Plugin::ConfigLoader</title>
<description>On 25 Jun 2009, at 01:42, Stuart Watt wrote: &amp;gt; Here is a proposed patch to Catalyst::Plugin::ConfigLoader that  &amp;gt; allows it to use environment variab</description>
<pubDate>28 Jun  2009 06:32:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24418</link>
</item><item>
<title>Proposed patch to Catalyst::Plugin::ConfigLoader</title>
<description>Hi all, Here is a proposed patch to Catalyst::Plugin::ConfigLoader that allows  it to use environment variables as a built-in macro for configuratio</description>
<pubDate>24 Jun  2009 17:42:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24388</link>
</item><item>
<title>C::P::I18N patch to include languages list</title>
<description>Hi! Is this a useful patch to Catalyst::Plugin::I18N? Or should it reside  elsewhere? I think it makes sense to put with C::P::I18N. The idea is th</description>
<pubDate>24 Jun  2009 09:21:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24384</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: Catalyst in windows environment</title>
<description>On 20 Jun 2009, at 20:50, kmx wrote: &amp;gt; . Another issue is &amp;gt; with Catalyst::Devel and its disordered dependencies (you have to &amp;gt; install manually Win3</description>
<pubDate>20 Jun  2009 18:14:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24334</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Catalyst in windows environment</title>
<description>Hi, &amp;gt; Hi, good day. it looks like that there are plenty of good examples done on &amp;gt; UNIX/Linux, I just wonder anybody can share some experience with &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>20 Jun  2009 12:50:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24332</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Catalyst in windows environment</title>
<description>On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 04:17:59PM -0500, Joseph He wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, good day. it looks like that there are plenty of good examples done on &amp;gt; UNIX/Linux,</description>
<pubDate>19 Jun  2009 16:11:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24324</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Catalyst in windows environment</title>
<description>On 19/06/2009, at 7:17 AM, Joseph He wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, good day. it looks like that there are plenty of good examples  &amp;gt; done on &amp;gt; UNIX/Linux, I just won</description>
<pubDate>18 Jun  2009 14:48:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24309</link>
</item><item>
<title>Catalyst in windows environment</title>
<description>Hi, good day. it looks like that there are plenty of good examples done on UNIX/Linux, I just wonder anybody can share some experience with Catalyst/W</description>
<pubDate>18 Jun  2009 14:17:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24308</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: RFC: new helper api</title>
<description>On 18 Jun 2009, at 07:25, Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Hmm - I was thinking that running the helpers directly in Perl  &amp;gt; gives you more control, but</description>
<pubDate>18 Jun  2009 01:03:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24299</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: RFC: new helper api</title>
<description>On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 1:05 AM, Tomas Doran &amp;lt;bobtfish@bobtfish.net&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On 17 Jun 2009, at 12:00, Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I think the b</description>
<pubDate>17 Jun  2009 23:25:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24295</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: RFC: new helper api</title>
<description>On 17 Jun 2009, at 12:00, Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote: &amp;gt; I think the beginning would be to just let catalyst.pl run all the  &amp;gt; other helpers. &amp;gt; Like: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>17 Jun  2009 16:05:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24293</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: RFC: new helper api</title>
<description>On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 5:22 AM, Devin Austin &amp;lt;devin.austin@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Zbigniew Lukasiak &amp;lt;zzbbyy@gmail.co</description>
<pubDate>17 Jun  2009 04:00:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24269</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Proposal: C::Plugin::Session new option verify_user_agent</title>
<description>On 12 Jun 2009, at 18:49, kmx wrote: &amp;gt; Please have a look at SVN (I have prepared also some .t and doc patch) &amp;gt; http://dev.catalystframework.org/repos</description>
<pubDate>16 Jun  2009 12:41:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24264</link>
</item><item>
<title>Proposal: C::Plugin::Session new option verify_user_agent</title>
<description>Hi, I have prepared a patch proposal for a new verify_user_agent configuration option. It is very similar to verify_address; it checks whether the Us</description>
<pubDate>12 Jun  2009 10:49:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24247</link>
</item><item>
<title>Proposal: C::Devel (Module::Install::Catalyst) new command catalyst_par_options]</title>
<description>Hi, I have created a branche of Module::Install::Catalyst with a new command catalyst_par_options(...) implemented. It takes a string with parameters</description>
<pubDate>11 Jun  2009 23:55:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24232</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: ACCEPT_CONTEXT broken against latest Catalyst</title>
<description>On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Tomas Doran&amp;lt;bobtfish@bobtfish.net&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Tomas Doran&amp;lt;bobtfish@bobtfish.net&amp;gt; w</description>
<pubDate>11 Jun  2009 04:15:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24222</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: ACCEPT_CONTEXT broken against latest Catalyst</title>
<description>&amp;gt; On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Tomas Doran&amp;lt;bobtfish@bobtfish.net&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Caelum is looking into this to fix the issue and get a test into core</description>
<pubDate>11 Jun  2009 04:07:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24221</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: ACCEPT_CONTEXT broken against latest Catalyst</title>
<description>Paul Makepeace wrote: &amp;gt; Some cursory glancing didn&amp;#039;t reveal if this was logged - is it, and where? No, it isn&amp;#039;t - sorry. Cheers t0m  ______________</description>
<pubDate>10 Jun  2009 07:00:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24201</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: ACCEPT_CONTEXT broken against latest Catalyst</title>
<description>On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Tomas Doran&amp;lt;bobtfish@bobtfish.net&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Paul Makepeace wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Building against Catalyst 5.80005 we&amp;#039;re seein</description>
<pubDate>10 Jun  2009 06:58:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24200</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: ACCEPT_CONTEXT broken against latest Catalyst</title>
<description>Paul Makepeace wrote: &amp;gt; Building against Catalyst 5.80005 we&amp;#039;re seeing, Eeek, that&amp;#039;s not great. http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/svnweb/Catalyst/revisio</description>
<pubDate>10 Jun  2009 06:45:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24199</link>
</item><item>
<title>ACCEPT_CONTEXT broken against latest Catalyst</title>
<description>Building against Catalyst 5.80005 we&amp;#039;re seeing, rpix:~/.cpan/build/Catalyst-Component-ACCEPT_CONTEXT-0.06-yVcsMJ# make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bi</description>
<pubDate>10 Jun  2009 06:13:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24196</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: HTTP::Prefork patch for background and pidfile</title>
<description>On 8 Jun 2009, at 21:33, Andy Grundman wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On May 29, 2009, at 9:20 AM, Ton Voon wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hi! &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; We&amp;#039;ve allowed our app to use C::Engine:</description>
<pubDate>09 Jun  2009 11:51:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24157</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: HTTP::Prefork patch for background and pidfile</title>
<description>On May 29, 2009, at 9:20 AM, Ton Voon wrote: &amp;gt; Hi! &amp;gt; &amp;gt; We&amp;#039;ve allowed our app to use C::Engine::HTTP::Prefork instead of  &amp;gt; C::Engine::HTTP and found</description>
<pubDate>08 Jun  2009 13:33:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24142</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Plugin or controller?</title>
<description>On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 05:50:57PM +0200, Matthias Dietrich wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt;You haven&amp;#039;t in any way explained why you think it _needs_ to be a  &amp;gt; &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>08 Jun  2009 12:02:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24136</link>
</item><item>
<title>RFC: loadable trait search</title>
<description>One of the features of a module I&amp;#039;m trying to get released (I&amp;#039;ve been working on it for 2+ months now, Catalyst::Model::DBIC::Schema) is trait suppor</description>
<pubDate>06 Jun  2009 18:02:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24127</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: RFC: new helper api</title>
<description>On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Zbigniew Lukasiak &amp;lt;zzbbyy@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 4:51 AM, Devin Austin&amp;lt;devin.austin@gmail.com&amp;gt; &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>05 Jun  2009 20:22:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24105</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: RFC: new helper api</title>
<description>On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 4:51 AM, Devin Austin&amp;lt;devin.austin@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Howdy all, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve put together an RFC for the new Catalyst::Helper API</description>
<pubDate>05 Jun  2009 13:28:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24104</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Catalyst] RFC: new helper api</title>
<description>On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 4:51 AM, Devin Austin &amp;lt;devin.austin@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Howdy all, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve put together an RFC for the new Catalyst::Helper A</description>
<pubDate>05 Jun  2009 04:00:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24097</link>
</item><item>
<title>RFC: new helper api</title>
<description>Howdy all, I&amp;#039;ve put together an RFC for the new Catalyst::Helper API. The body text is located below, but it is also available here in a pretty forma</description>
<pubDate>03 Jun  2009 19:51:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24078</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: Extensible Catalyst Applications: How?!</title>
<description>Ido Perelmutter wrote: &amp;gt; How am I supposed to be reading Ivan&amp;#039;s message? All I see is this: Get a mail client which can deal with MIME and base 64 en</description>
<pubDate>03 Jun  2009 08:04:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24073</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Extensible Catalyst Applications: How?!</title>
<description>How am I supposed to be reading Ivan&amp;#039;s message? All I see is this: Message: 8 Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 11:37:04 +1000 From: Ivan Wills &amp;lt;ivan.wills@gmail</description>
<pubDate>03 Jun  2009 07:57:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24072</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Extensible Catalyst Applications: How?!</title>
<description>On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Tomas Doran &amp;lt;bobtfish@bobtfish.net&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Ivan Wills wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; If any one likes this idea I would consider tryi</description>
<pubDate>03 Jun  2009 02:58:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24071</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Extensible Catalyst Applications: How?!</title>
<description>Ivan Wills wrote: &amp;gt; If any one likes this idea I would consider trying to create such a &amp;gt; beast. Any help would be appreciated though. I kind of lik</description>
<pubDate>03 Jun  2009 02:24:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24070</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Plugin or controller? - How about a Role?</title>
<description>Zbigniew Lukasiak wrote: &amp;gt; A question to the core devs - could that be a controller role? I &amp;gt; don&amp;#039;t see anything preventing that - but I haven&amp;#039;t yet</description>
<pubDate>03 Jun  2009 02:20:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24069</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Plugin or controller? - How about a Role?</title>
<description>A question to the core devs - could that be a controller role? I don&amp;#039;t see anything preventing that - but I haven&amp;#039;t yet gained any experience in writ</description>
<pubDate>03 Jun  2009 01:58:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24068</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Installing Catalyst &amp;amp; friends on OS X?</title>
<description>On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 5:29 AM, Tomas Doran &amp;lt;bobtfish@bobtfish.net&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On 2 Jun 2009, at 20:04, Paul Makepeace wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I read a mail from</description>
<pubDate>02 Jun  2009 23:15:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24067</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Extensible Catalyst Applications: How?!</title>
<description>2009/6/3 Peter Karman &amp;lt;peter@peknet.com&amp;gt; &amp;gt; Kee Hinckley wrote on 6/2/09 12:25 PM: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Interesting. Oddly I&amp;#039;m trying to find out how to do the same ty</description>
<pubDate>02 Jun  2009 18:37:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24064</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Installing Catalyst &amp;amp; friends on OS X?</title>
<description>On 2 Jun 2009, at 20:04, Paul Makepeace wrote: &amp;gt; I read a mail from &amp;#039;08 about Catalyst on OS X and there was enough  &amp;gt; in there to suggest times mig</description>
<pubDate>02 Jun  2009 12:29:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24060</link>
</item><item>
<title>Installing Catalyst &amp;amp; friends on OS X?</title>
<description>I read a mail from &amp;#039;08 about Catalyst on OS X and there was enough in there to suggest times might&amp;#039;ve changed things. Things like recommendations on u</description>
<pubDate>02 Jun  2009 12:04:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24059</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Extensible Catalyst Applications: How?!</title>
<description>Kee Hinckley wrote on 6/2/09 12:25 PM: &amp;gt; Interesting. Oddly I&amp;#039;m trying to find out how to do the same type of &amp;gt; thing in Rails right now, and in doing</description>
<pubDate>02 Jun  2009 10:51:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24058</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Extensible Catalyst Applications: How?!</title>
<description>Interesting. Oddly I&amp;#039;m trying to find out how to do the same type of  thing in Rails right now, and in doing so I realized I didn&amp;#039;t know how  to do</description>
<pubDate>02 Jun  2009 10:25:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24057</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Extensible Catalyst Applications: How?!</title>
<description>Ido Perelmutter wrote on 6/2/09 5:45 AM: &amp;gt; Hi everyone. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; For the last week and a half I&amp;#039;ve been trying to figure out how to make my &amp;gt; Catalyst app</description>
<pubDate>02 Jun  2009 10:14:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24056</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Extensible Catalyst Applications: How?!</title>
<description>This is possible, but has some drawbacks: 1. Both apps are entirely separate. The parent-plugin connection is kinda lost. I can&amp;#039;t handle the plugins</description>
<pubDate>02 Jun  2009 06:52:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24054</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Extensible Catalyst Applications: How?!</title>
<description>On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Ido Perelmutter &amp;lt;ido50@yahoo.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Hi everyone. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; For the last week and a half I&amp;#039;ve been trying to figure</description>
<pubDate>02 Jun  2009 06:30:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24053</link>
</item><item>
<title>Extensible Catalyst Applications: How?!</title>
<description>Hi everyone. For the last week and a half I&amp;#039;ve been trying to figure out how to make my Catalyst application extensible, to no avail. SCENARIO: 1.</description>
<pubDate>02 Jun  2009 03:45:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24051</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Plugin or controller?</title>
<description>* Matthias Dietrich &amp;lt;mdietrich@cpan.org&amp;gt; [2009-06-01 19:15]: &amp;gt; But as I understand it, not every plugin module on CPAN should &amp;gt; be a plugin? But whe</description>
<pubDate>02 Jun  2009 03:31:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24050</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Plugin or controller?</title>
<description>Matthias Dietrich wrote: &amp;gt; Don&amp;#039;t get me wrong, I don&amp;#039;t want to create this as a plugin under all &amp;gt; circumstances. I just want to figure out when a m</description>
<pubDate>02 Jun  2009 02:48:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24049</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Plugin or controller?</title>
<description>Hi Matthias, There are many &amp;#039;plugins&amp;#039; that really never should have been plugins.  The methods described in the Extending Catalyst doc were not alw</description>
<pubDate>01 Jun  2009 14:42:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24047</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Plugin or controller?</title>
<description>Hi, &amp;gt; So, first, there is no such thing as  &amp;gt; Catalyst::Plugin::Authorization. When you first mentioned it I  &amp;gt; assumed you simply meant Authoriza</description>
<pubDate>01 Jun  2009 10:11:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24044</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Plugin or controller?</title>
<description>Matthias Dietrich wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; You haven&amp;#039;t in any way explained why you think it _needs_ to be a plugin. &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Therefore, it doesn&amp;#039;t need to be, and so s</description>
<pubDate>01 Jun  2009 10:10:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24043</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Plugin or controller?</title>
<description>On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Matthias Dietrich &amp;lt;mdietrich@cpan.org&amp;gt;wrote: Why couldn&amp;#039;t that allow different rates on a per-controller basis? Beca</description>
<pubDate>01 Jun  2009 09:56:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24042</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Plugin or controller?</title>
<description>Hi, &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m not sure why $self-&amp;gt;flood_control is more confusing than $c- &amp;gt; &amp;gt;flood_control. I meant the module&amp;#039;s name. &amp;gt; A controller should determin</description>
<pubDate>01 Jun  2009 09:46:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24041</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Plugin or controller?</title>
<description>On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 8:50 AM, Matthias Dietrich &amp;lt;mdietrich@cpan.org&amp;gt;wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; You haven&amp;#039;t in any way explained why you think it _needs_ to</description>
<pubDate>01 Jun  2009 09:13:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24040</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Plugin or controller?</title>
<description>Hi, &amp;gt; You haven&amp;#039;t in any way explained why you think it _needs_ to be a  &amp;gt; plugin. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Therefore, it doesn&amp;#039;t need to be, and so shouldn&amp;#039;t be. ;) if</description>
<pubDate>01 Jun  2009 08:50:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24039</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Plugin or controller?</title>
<description>Matthias Dietrich wrote: &amp;gt; In my opinion, the module Catalyst::Controller::RateLimit should be &amp;gt; Catalyst::Plugin::RateLimit. But may be I&amp;#039;m wrong.</description>
<pubDate>01 Jun  2009 08:42:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24038</link>
</item><item>
<title>Plugin or controller?</title>
<description>Hi, Matt S Trout redirected me to this list to discuss a &amp;quot;new&amp;quot; plugin for  Catalyst. But I guess I need to reach back a bit. I surfed on CPAN yest</description>
<pubDate>01 Jun  2009 06:47:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24037</link>
</item><item>
<title>HTTP::Prefork patch for background and pidfile</title>
<description>Hi! We&amp;#039;ve allowed our app to use C::Engine::HTTP::Prefork instead of  C::Engine::HTTP and found there were some parameters that were missing. This</description>
<pubDate>29 May  2009 09:20:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/24004</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Small doc patch</title>
<description>On 21 May 2009, at 11:57, Thomas Klausner wrote: &amp;gt; I just had some problems figuring out how to exactly load Moose and &amp;gt; inherit from Catalyst::Contro</description>
<pubDate>26 May  2009 13:49:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/23940</link>
</item><item>
<title>Small doc patch</title>
<description>Hi! I just had some problems figuring out how to exactly load Moose and inherit from Catalyst::Controller in my controller classes. After some help</description>
<pubDate>21 May  2009 03:57:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/23887</link>
</item><item>
<title>RFC: Catalyst::Plugin::PluginLoader</title>
<description>svn: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/Catalyst/Catalyst-Plugin-PluginLoader/1.000/trunk NAME   Catalyst::Plugin::PluginLoader - Load Catalyst Plu</description>
<pubDate>09 May  2009 22:18:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/23742</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: more intelligence inside $c-&amp;gt;uri_for()</title>
<description>On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Wolfgang Kinkeldei &amp;lt;wolfgang@kinkeldei.de&amp;gt;wrote: &amp;gt; Hi everyone, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; currently I am building a small JS/CSS-combining</description>
<pubDate>29 Apr  2009 23:20:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/23598</link>
</item><item>
<title>more intelligence inside $c-&amp;gt;uri_for()</title>
<description>Hi everyone, currently I am building a small JS/CSS-combining and minifying  controller. To build my URI I am doing business as usual:   $c-&amp;gt;uri_f</description>
<pubDate>29 Apr  2009 22:54:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/23597</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Dynamism in a static model</title>
<description>Ido Perelmutter wrote: &amp;gt; So my question is, is there a way for me to load the schemas I create while the application is running, instead of having to</description>
<pubDate>29 Apr  2009 08:41:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/23581</link>
</item><item>
<title>Dynamism in a static model</title>
<description>Hi everyone. I am working on a Catalyst application that allows the end-user to add their own tables to the database (for the matter it is a CMS). Th</description>
<pubDate>29 Apr  2009 08:33:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/23580</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Catalyst Performance Testing</title>
<description>On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 01:41:55PM -0700, Jason Wieland wrote: &amp;gt; However I&amp;#039;m working on a different project for an ISP (ondemand &amp;gt; anti-phishing prot</description>
<pubDate>27 Apr  2009 04:17:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/23499</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Catalyst Performance Testing</title>
<description>Matt S Trout wrote: &amp;gt; On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 05:50:02PM -0700, Jason Wieland wrote: &amp;gt;  &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Baseline: Just using the webserver (apache or nginx) to</description>
<pubDate>23 Apr  2009 13:41:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/23446</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Catalyst Performance Testing</title>
<description>On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 05:50:02PM -0700, Jason Wieland wrote: &amp;gt; Baseline: Just using the webserver (apache or nginx) to download a &amp;gt; static file &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>23 Apr  2009 10:56:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/23438</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Catalyst Performance Testing</title>
<description>Bear in mind that we know of Catalyst sites with hundreds of bandwidth  intensive hits per second that hasn&amp;#039;t had to be rewritten in scala or  whate</description>
<pubDate>22 Apr  2009 20:51:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/23423</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Catalyst Performance Testing</title>
<description>&amp;gt; Peter Karman wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Catalyst is &amp;gt;&amp;gt; not optimized for serving static content, because there&amp;#039;s already good &amp;gt;&amp;gt; tools &amp;gt;&amp;gt; that do that. It&amp;#039;s optimize</description>
<pubDate>22 Apr  2009 20:45:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/23422</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Catalyst Performance Testing</title>
<description>On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 08:12:15PM -0700, Jason Wieland wrote: &amp;gt; Yes Peter I agree, I do serve all my static content from outside Catalyst. I &amp;gt; was j</description>
<pubDate>22 Apr  2009 20:19:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/23421</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Catalyst Performance Testing</title>
<description>Peter Karman wrote: &amp;gt; Jason Wieland wrote on 4/22/09 7:50 PM: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;  &amp;gt;&amp;gt; So a couple questions: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; * Looking at these results. Do they seem consistent</description>
<pubDate>22 Apr  2009 20:12:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/23414</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Catalyst Performance Testing</title>
<description>Jason Wieland wrote on 4/22/09 7:50 PM: &amp;gt; So a couple questions: &amp;gt; * Looking at these results. Do they seem consistent in what the &amp;gt; overhead of Cat</description>
<pubDate>22 Apr  2009 18:20:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/23413</link>
</item><item>
<title>Catalyst Performance Testing</title>
<description>Hello Crew, I&amp;#039;ve been using Catalyst for a while now, thank you great framework. I have a new project that requires a much higher performance than</description>
<pubDate>22 Apr  2009 17:50:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/23411</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: CATALYST_DEBUG=0 weirdness</title>
<description>On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:07:02PM +1000, Kieren Diment wrote: &amp;gt; Something odd going on here. CATALYST_DEBUG=0 prove -l t still has  &amp;gt; debugging out</description>
<pubDate>22 Apr  2009 07:04:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/23391</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: CataMoose &amp;amp; C::Model::Adaptor do not play nice?</title>
<description>On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 06:07:54PM +0100, Tomas Doran wrote: Aaaand I clearly misread the year on that when clearing the mailman queue. I&amp;#039;m a fuckin</description>
<pubDate>22 Apr  2009 06:54:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/23390</link>
</item><item>
<title>CATALYST_DEBUG=0 weirdness</title>
<description>Something odd going on here. CATALYST_DEBUG=0 prove -l t still has  debugging output when -Debug is set but the env var is 0. This is  different f</description>
<pubDate>21 Apr  2009 06:07:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/23355</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Patch] Bug in warning message in Catalyst::Component (5.8001)</title>
<description>On 20 Apr 2009, at 04:31, Emanuele Zeppieri wrote: &amp;gt; Line 82 in Catalyst::Component (5.8001) says: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; warn &amp;quot;Your linearised isa hierarchy is: &amp;quot; . jo</description>
<pubDate>20 Apr  2009 01:53:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/23315</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Patch] Bug in warning message in Catalyst::Component (5.8001)</title>
<description>Line 82 in Catalyst::Component (5.8001) says: warn &amp;quot;Your linearised isa hierarchy is: &amp;quot; . join(&amp;#039;, &amp;#039;, mro::get_linear_isa($class)) . &amp;quot;\n&amp;quot;; however m</description>
<pubDate>19 Apr  2009 20:31:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/23312</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Proposed patch for ActionClass attribute</title>
<description>On 3 Apr 2009, at 19:19, Bruce McKenzie wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I implemented application-specific an Application-specific action,  &amp;gt; and found the &amp;quot;MyAction&amp;quot; con</description>
<pubDate>18 Apr  2009 06:46:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/23280</link>
</item><item>
<title>Catalyst::Plugin::Authorization::Abilities</title>
<description>Hello there. This is my first post to the mailing list and what&amp;#039;s going to be my first CPAN module. Anyway, I&amp;#039;ve created an Authorization plugin for</description>
<pubDate>11 Apr  2009 06:54:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/23162</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Implementing Authent/Author via attributes (RFC)</title>
<description>On 04/04/2009, at 12:22 PM, Bruce McKenzie wrote: &amp;gt; Sadly, it was not clear to me that you could have only one  &amp;gt; ActionClass per handler. I finally</description>
<pubDate>03 Apr  2009 18:27:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/23115</link>
</item><item>
<title>Implementing Authent/Author via attributes (RFC)</title>
<description>Sadly, it was not clear to me that you could have only one ActionClass  per handler. I finally figured it out after tracing things and reading  lots</description>
<pubDate>03 Apr  2009 18:22:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/23114</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Proposed patch for XML::Simple ser/deser</title>
<description>On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 11:27:50AM -0700, Bruce McKenzie wrote: &amp;gt; Specifically, I needed control over the conversion options for each direction, &amp;gt; and</description>
<pubDate>03 Apr  2009 11:31:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/23112</link>
</item><item>
<title>Proposed patch for XML::Simple ser/deser</title>
<description>(I filed a ticket about this, but enhanced the solution since then) Subject to Hans&amp;#039; comments about big picture moving of Ser/Deser stuff  out, I ne</description>
<pubDate>03 Apr  2009 11:27:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/23111</link>
</item><item>
<title>Proposed patch for ActionClass attribute</title>
<description>I implemented application-specific an Application-specific action, and  found the &amp;quot;MyAction&amp;quot; construct to be a little odd. So I took a run at  exten</description>
<pubDate>03 Apr  2009 11:19:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/23110</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: uri_for_action</title>
<description>On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 12:51:59AM -0400, Hans Dieter Pearcey wrote: &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve created the &amp;#039;uri_for_action&amp;#039; branch off 5.80 that implements the first two</description>
<pubDate>02 Apr  2009 19:57:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/23102</link>
</item><item>
<title>planet.catalystframework.org</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;ve started posting about Catalyst and other Perl-related stuff for work. Whoever&amp;#039;s in charge of the aggregator may want to add one of these: * any</description>
<pubDate>02 Apr  2009 10:16:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/23093</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: uri_for_action</title>
<description>* Hans Dieter Pearcey &amp;lt;hdp.perl.catalyst.dev@weftsoar.net&amp;gt; [2009-03-28 05:55]: &amp;gt; opinions? Yes yes yes yes yes yes yes. Carry on, -- Aristotle Paga</description>
<pubDate>01 Apr  2009 23:04:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/23091</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: uri_for_action</title>
<description>On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 08:26:07PM +0100, Ash Berlin wrote: &amp;gt; What&amp;#039;s the behaviour when you dont provide enough @other_stuff, or if  &amp;gt; you provide to</description>
<pubDate>30 Mar  2009 13:35:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/23062</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: uri_for_action</title>
<description>On 28 Mar 2009, at 04:51, Hans Dieter Pearcey wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;lt;@confound&amp;gt; I really want $c-&amp;gt;uri_for_action(&amp;#039;/private/path&amp;#039;,  &amp;gt; @other_stuff) &amp;gt; &amp;lt;@confound&amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>30 Mar  2009 12:26:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/23061</link>
</item><item>
<title>uri_for_action</title>
<description>&amp;lt;@confound&amp;gt; I really want $c-&amp;gt;uri_for_action(&amp;#039;/private/path&amp;#039;, @other_stuff) &amp;lt;@confound&amp;gt; that is EXACTLY LIKE uri_for except it runs $c-&amp;gt;dispatcher-&amp;gt;ge</description>
<pubDate>27 Mar  2009 21:51:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/23039</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: [Catalyst-Plugin-FillInForm PATCH] documentation fix - short-circuit view rather than fillform</title>
<description>On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 10:40:45PM +0100, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote: &amp;gt; * Peter Collingbourne &amp;lt;peter@pcc.me.uk&amp;gt; [2009-03-09 22:25]: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; -    $c-&amp;gt;fo</description>
<pubDate>10 Mar  2009 07:30:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/22897</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Catalyst-Plugin-FillInForm PATCH] documentation fix - short-circuit view rather than fillform</title>
<description>* Peter Collingbourne &amp;lt;peter@pcc.me.uk&amp;gt; [2009-03-09 22:25]: &amp;gt; -    $c-&amp;gt;forward(&amp;#039;render&amp;#039;); &amp;gt; -    $c-&amp;gt;fillform($c-&amp;gt;req-&amp;gt;params) unless $c-&amp;gt;res-</description>
<pubDate>09 Mar  2009 14:40:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/22887</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Catalyst-Plugin-FillInForm PATCH] documentation fix - short-circuit view rather than fillform</title>
<description>--- lib/Catalyst/Plugin/FillInForm.pm |  4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/Catalyst/Plugin/FillInForm.pm b</description>
<pubDate>09 Mar  2009 14:24:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/22886</link>
</item><item>
<title>Google Summer of Code - mentors, projects</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;ve sent a mail about this to the main list since I think there are probably people who can mentor who -aren&amp;#039;t- on here. If you&amp;#039;re on here, not on th</description>
<pubDate>22 Feb  2009 08:29:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/22689</link>
</item><item>
<title>Announce: Test:WWW::Mechanize::Catalyst 0.50</title>
<description>All, After a little time of CPAN somking the dev release and having no  failures, and a few people saying it still works, its time for a  proper re</description>
<pubDate>17 Feb  2009 10:37:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/22554</link>
</item><item>
<title>Session in a Model (Was: RE: [Catalyst] Catalyst::Plugin::Session::Store::CHI)</title>
<description>&amp;gt; -----Original Message----- &amp;gt; From: Tomas Doran [mailto:bobtfish@bobtfish.net] &amp;gt; Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 5:07 AM &amp;gt; To: The elegant MVC web f</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2009 08:46:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/22438</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Suggested patch to	Catalyst::Manual::Tutorial::AdvancedCRUD::FormFu</title>
<description>&amp;gt; &amp;gt; Oops - please disregard that patch, and use this one instead.  &amp;gt; Sloppy of me; sorry! &amp;gt; Happens to the best of us. Thanks for the patch, appli</description>
<pubDate>06 Feb  2009 07:22:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/22388</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Suggested patch to	Catalyst::Manual::Tutorial::AdvancedCRUD::FormFu</title>
<description>Del Merritt wrote: Dear Catalyst developers -  Attached is a patch that updates Catalyst::Manual::Tutorial::AdvancedCRUD::FormFu. I had noticed tha</description>
<pubDate>04 Feb  2009 15:38:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/catalyst/dev/22344</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
