rolf at ohio
Sep 25, 2009, 8:00 AM
Views: 1769
Permalink
|
You might want to check out the bug lists - I'm 99% sure this is
something that has been fixed, perhaps in 10.7, but that we didn't get
around to patching on our install.
But I could be wrong.
-Mateo
On Sep 25, 2009, at 10:56 AM, Aaron Fuleki wrote:
> We recently tried the following SOAP command to republish all of our
> staff bio/cv stories to reflect some template changes:
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> /usr/local/bricolage/bin/bric_soap --username xxxx --password xxxx --
> server https://freestyle.denison.edu story list_ids --search
> "element_key_name=cv" --search "site=Denison University" --search
> "publish_status=1" --search "unexpired=1" | /usr/local/bricolage/bin/
> bric_soap --username xxxx --password xxxx --server https://freestyle.denison.edu
> workflow --server https://freestyle.denison.edu publish --continue-
> on-errors --published-only --chunks 1 -
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> It worked great for 99% of the stories, except those that were
> checked out and in a workflow. For those, we got the following error:
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Can't call method "get_id" on an undefined value at /usr/local/
> bricolage/lib/Bric/Util/Burner.pm line 1203. [/usr/local/bricolage/
> lib/Bric/Util/Burner.pm:1203] [/usr/local/bricolage/lib/Bric/Util/
> Job/Pub.pm:191] [/usr/local/bricolage/lib/Bric/Util/Job.pm:1889] [/
> usr/local/bricolage/bin/bric_queued:244] [/usr/local/bricolage/bin/
> bric_queued:213]
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Line 1203 of Burner.pm looks like the first time the publish method
> tries to access the bric asset object, where it promptly dies. Is
> this a bug? Shouldn't the code be hardened to not pass incomplete/
> missing parameters to publish?
>
> Is there something we can do to have the SOAP command just grab the
> last published version, and not the checked-out version? I though
> Matt Rolf had figured this out at some point, but I can't find it in
> his notes, or my searches of the list archives and docs.
>
> The SOAP recipes page shows the use of a "checked_out" argument with
> the story module, and the API docs refer to a "no_workflow"
> argument, but I don't think that's what I want. I don't want to
> skip these stories, because that leaves an old version of them on
> the production servers - I want to make sure that every story gets
> published.
>
> -Aaron
>
> ---------------------------------
> Aaron Fuleki
> Senior Web Architect
> Denison University
> 740.587.5752
> ---------------------------------
>
>
>
|
Re: SOAP bug, or PEBKAC?