Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: Bricolage: users

1.11.0 QEMU bricolage image

 

 

Bricolage users RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded


cdmiller at adams

Jun 27, 2008, 2:34 PM

Post #1 of 3 (286 views)
Permalink
1.11.0 QEMU bricolage image

Hello folks,

Short version:
ASC is now leaning towards a Linux KVM virtual environment, rather than
vmware or Xen. I have placed a Bricolage 1.11.0 Ubuntu Hardy qemu vm on
our ftp site. I have only tested on Linux thus far but will be testing
on the OSX and Windows flavors of QEMU when I get the chance. I also
want to test a conversion of the image to vmware disk format and the
creation of a suitable vmx definition. The disk image can be easily
converted to raw format and thus to just about any virtual environment.

New bricolage image: ftp://ftp.adams.edu/pub/bricolage
QEMU: http://bellard.org/qemu/

Longer version:
After much study and testing we went with a roll our own redundant iSCSI
SAN solution (Areca RAID, SATA drives, DRDB, linux-HA, open-iscsi) for
shared storage and proceeded with study and testing of virtualization
solutions.

At first I thought we would realistically only consider Xen as a vmware
alternative but that proved to be a non starter due to limitations in
the Citrix Xen's guest vm support. After a token look at the state of
Microsoft's virtual offering we did some testing of Linux KVM and found
it has matured nicely. We are now in the final stages of testing Linux
KVM 0.70 on stock Ubuntu Hardy servers (64 bit), using OCFS2 on the
iSCSI SAN for storage of vm's. We have working SAN fail over, live
migration of vm's between physical hosts in the cluster, all the qemu
0.9.1 monitor features, and paravirtual drivers (ludicrous speed) for
linux guests. Thus far access to the SAN from our KVM hosts appears
network rather than disk bound. We expect performance of our live
bricolage instance to actually increase if we take it virtual in this
fashion.

- cameron


david at kineticode

Jun 28, 2008, 6:52 PM

Post #2 of 3 (261 views)
Permalink
Re: 1.11.0 QEMU bricolage image [In reply to]

On Jun 27, 2008, at 14:34, cdmiller wrote:

> Hello folks,
>
> Short version:
> ASC is now leaning towards a Linux KVM virtual environment, rather
> than
> vmware or Xen. I have placed a Bricolage 1.11.0 Ubuntu Hardy qemu
> vm on
> our ftp site. I have only tested on Linux thus far but will be
> testing
> on the OSX and Windows flavors of QEMU when I get the chance. I also
> want to test a conversion of the image to vmware disk format and the
> creation of a suitable vmx definition. The disk image can be easily
> converted to raw format and thus to just about any virtual
> environment.
>
> New bricolage image: ftp://ftp.adams.edu/pub/bricolage
> QEMU: http://bellard.org/qemu/

That makes a lot of sense, since, I think, people are more likely to
have VMWare on hand for playing with images.

> After much study and testing we went with a roll our own redundant
> iSCSI
> SAN solution (Areca RAID, SATA drives, DRDB, linux-HA, open-iscsi) for
> shared storage and proceeded with study and testing of virtualization
> solutions.
>
> At first I thought we would realistically only consider Xen as a
> vmware
> alternative but that proved to be a non starter due to limitations in
> the Citrix Xen's guest vm support. After a token look at the state of
> Microsoft's virtual offering we did some testing of Linux KVM and
> found
> it has matured nicely. We are now in the final stages of testing
> Linux
> KVM 0.70 on stock Ubuntu Hardy servers (64 bit), using OCFS2 on the
> iSCSI SAN for storage of vm's. We have working SAN fail over, live
> migration of vm's between physical hosts in the cluster, all the qemu
> 0.9.1 monitor features, and paravirtual drivers (ludicrous speed) for
> linux guests. Thus far access to the SAN from our KVM hosts appears
> network rather than disk bound. We expect performance of our live
> bricolage instance to actually increase if we take it virtual in this
> fashion.

Sounds like it has been an interesting process. You should consider
writing it up (not for Bricolage specifically, just in general).

Best,

David


phillip at communitybandwidth

Jul 1, 2008, 10:38 AM

Post #3 of 3 (251 views)
Permalink
Re: 1.11.0 QEMU bricolage image [In reply to]

On 27-Jun-08, at 5:34 PM, cdmiller wrote:

> also
> want to test a conversion of the image to vmware disk format and the
> creation of a suitable vmx definition.

Happy to give it a whirl, once you've got it converted. :-)

--
Phillip Smith,
Simplifier of Technology
Community Bandwidth
http://www.communitybandwidth.ca

Bricolage users RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact lists@gossamer-threads.com
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.