<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Bricolage | users</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>04 Jul  2009 16:54:11 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>RE: apache 2.0</title>
<description>It&amp;#039;s a fresh install on a brand-new server.  Thanks for your help as always. Mike  -----Original Message----- From: David E. Wheeler [mailto:david@</description>
<pubDate>23 Jun  2009 09:00:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37398</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: apache 2.0</title>
<description>On Jun 23, 2009, at 8:27 AM, Fletcher, Michael wrote: &amp;gt; Please excuse my ignorance here. Why is 1.11.1 called &amp;quot;Bricolage- &amp;gt; Devel&amp;quot; &amp;gt; and not listed</description>
<pubDate>23 Jun  2009 08:53:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37397</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: apache 2.0</title>
<description>Please excuse my ignorance here. Why is 1.11.1 called &amp;quot;Bricolage-Devel&amp;quot; and not listed in the left side list of downloads? Does that mean it&amp;#039;s not s</description>
<pubDate>23 Jun  2009 08:27:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37396</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: apache 2.0</title>
<description>On Jun 23, 2009, at 7:51 AM, Fletcher, Michael wrote: &amp;gt; I noticed this thread is several years old, so I thought I&amp;#039;d ask - is &amp;gt; Apache 2 supported in</description>
<pubDate>23 Jun  2009 07:56:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37395</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: apache 2.0</title>
<description>I noticed this thread is several years old, so I thought I&amp;#039;d ask - is Apache 2 supported in Bricolage 1.10.7?  Thanks, Mike</description>
<pubDate>23 Jun  2009 07:51:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37394</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Tweet from within bricolage</title>
<description>I use Net::Twitter in bric to tweet each new post on our site to our twitter account... it&amp;#039;s a great utility! On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Iván C</description>
<pubDate>18 Jun  2009 16:04:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37390</link>
</item><item>
<title>Tweet from within bricolage</title>
<description>I was playing with Net::Twitter and came up with a little utility template that publishes a message on twitter. Right now we&amp;#039;re using it for tweet th</description>
<pubDate>18 Jun  2009 16:02:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37389</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: changing uri of category did not change stories</title>
<description>On Jun 18, 2009, at 6:58 AM, Ashlee Caul wrote: &amp;gt; Hmm. That&amp;#039;s problematic for a place like ours that changes URLs all  &amp;gt; the time. :-) We maintain a</description>
<pubDate>18 Jun  2009 09:39:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37388</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: changing uri of category did not change stories</title>
<description>&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hi. We changed the uri of one of our categories. (exported via  &amp;gt;&amp;gt; bric_soap, changed the xml, updated via bric_soap) &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; from /science/ &amp;gt;&amp;gt; to /</description>
<pubDate>18 Jun  2009 06:58:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37387</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: changing uri of category did not change stories</title>
<description>On Jun 17, 2009, at 11:31 AM, Ashlee Caul wrote: &amp;gt; Hi. We changed the uri of one of our categories. (exported via  &amp;gt; bric_soap, changed the xml, upd</description>
<pubDate>17 Jun  2009 22:40:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37385</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: changing uri of category did not change stories</title>
<description>&amp;gt; Hi. We changed the uri of one of our categories. (exported via  &amp;gt; bric_soap, changed the xml, updated via bric_soap) &amp;gt; &amp;gt; from /science/ &amp;gt; to /techn</description>
<pubDate>17 Jun  2009 11:38:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37384</link>
</item><item>
<title>changing uri of category did not change stories</title>
<description>Hi. We changed the uri of one of our categories. (exported via  bric_soap, changed the xml, updated via bric_soap) from /science/ to /technology/</description>
<pubDate>17 Jun  2009 11:31:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37383</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Bypassing Keywords internal sorting</title>
<description>On Jun 16, 2009, at 1:14 PM, Fletcher, Michael wrote: &amp;gt; Since I&amp;#039;m somewhat of a newbie still, does anyone recommend that I  &amp;gt; don&amp;#039;t &amp;gt; modify Bric::U</description>
<pubDate>16 Jun  2009 18:10:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37382</link>
</item><item>
<title>Bypassing Keywords internal sorting</title>
<description>Hello,  It appears that Keywords are sorted by Bric on the keyword name. Unfortunately, any call to get_all_keywords or get_keywords will always retu</description>
<pubDate>16 Jun  2009 13:14:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37381</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Code select trouble</title>
<description>Hi Bret, very clever. Thanks! Best, Michael  Bret Dawson escribió: &amp;gt; On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 13:17 +0200, Zambra wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Hi Michael, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Just try</description>
<pubDate>12 Jun  2009 04:35:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37380</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Code select trouble</title>
<description>On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 13:17 +0200, Zambra wrote: Hi Michael, Just try adding something like the following near the start of your select code: if (!</description>
<pubDate>12 Jun  2009 04:25:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37379</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Code select trouble</title>
<description>Zambra escribió: &amp;gt; Bret Dawson escribió: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hi everybody, &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Yeah, the object you have access to is $field. From there you can call &amp;gt;&amp;gt; $field-&amp;gt;get_</description>
<pubDate>12 Jun  2009 04:17:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37378</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Code selects and the current document</title>
<description>On Jun 11, 2009, at 12:01 PM, Adam Wilson wrote: &amp;gt; [Adam Wilson] &amp;gt; The patch to comp/widgets/container_prof/field.mc seems to fix the  &amp;gt; issue. Mos</description>
<pubDate>11 Jun  2009 13:00:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37377</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: Code selects and the current document</title>
<description>&amp;gt; -----Original Message----- &amp;gt; From: David E. Wheeler [mailto:david@kineticode.com] &amp;gt; Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 12:05 PM &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On Jun 11, 2009, at</description>
<pubDate>11 Jun  2009 12:01:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37376</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Code selects and the current document</title>
<description>On Jun 11, 2009, at 8:21 AM, Adam Wilson wrote: &amp;gt; Does anyone know if the story-aware code select patch is in  &amp;gt; bricolage 1.11? It would appear th</description>
<pubDate>11 Jun  2009 09:05:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37375</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: Code selects and the current document</title>
<description>Does anyone know if the story-aware code select patch is in bricolage 1.11? It would appear that $field is defined, but has no value associated with</description>
<pubDate>11 Jun  2009 08:21:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37374</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Code select trouble</title>
<description>Bret Dawson escribió: &amp;gt; Hi everybody, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Yeah, the object you have access to is $field. From there you can call &amp;gt; $field-&amp;gt;get_parent (repeating as ne</description>
<pubDate>10 Jun  2009 02:59:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37372</link>
</item><item>
<title>Template::Declare::Bricolage</title>
<description>Fellow Bricoleurs, I&amp;#039;ve been writing code to generate XML for the Bricolage SOAP  interface, but hating all the options out there. So I wrote  [Tem</description>
<pubDate>09 Jun  2009 16:20:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37371</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Charset for alert emails</title>
<description>On Jun 8, 2009, at 11:08 PM, Zambra wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; No, it&amp;#039;s a bug. Bric::Util::Trans::Mail needs to be updated to  &amp;gt;&amp;gt; specify utf-8. Would you file a bug</description>
<pubDate>09 Jun  2009 08:03:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37370</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Charset for alert emails</title>
<description>David E. Wheeler escribió: &amp;gt; On Jun 8, 2009, at 10:40 AM, Zambra wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve defined some alerts. They work fine, but the e-mail messages I &amp;gt;&amp;gt; g</description>
<pubDate>08 Jun  2009 23:08:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37369</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
