<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Bricolage | users</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>08 Nov  2009 20:30:38 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Re: Installing Bricolage 1.11</title>
<description>On Nov 5, 2009, at 3:34 PM, Justin Wyllie wrote: &amp;gt; Can I confirm that this will run with mod_perl2 ? I don&amp;#039;t know, but I can. It does. :-) &amp;gt; The Bu</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 16:50:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37862</link>
</item><item>
<title>Installing Bricolage 1.11</title>
<description>Hi I&amp;#039;m installing this version Can I confirm that this will run with mod_perl2 ? The Bundle::Bricolage package from cpan seems to be mod_perl 1.3 o</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 15:34:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37861</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: mixing php</title>
<description>Hi Zdravko, Not if you&amp;#039;re using the internal Bricolage preview engine. That one assumes you&amp;#039;re running Mason on the front end and is really only for</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 08:07:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37859</link>
</item><item>
<title>mixing php</title>
<description>Hi, should previewing index.php files work in bricolage just like .html? Regards, Zdravko</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 02:38:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37858</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: &amp;quot;precision&amp;quot; = &amp;#039;precision&amp;#039; MySQL Error</title>
<description>&amp;gt; Or beer. Or gin. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Yes: gin. Official spirit of Bricolage? Beer: Official beer of Bricolage. There - I fixed that for you.  -------------------</description>
<pubDate>30 Oct  2009 11:09:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37811</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: &amp;quot;precision&amp;quot; = &amp;#039;precision&amp;#039; MySQL Error</title>
<description>&amp;gt; Try Mexican Coke. It&amp;#039;s made with sugar instead of HFCS and tastes much  &amp;gt; better. Or beer. Or gin.  Yes: gin. Official spirit of Bricolage?  --</description>
<pubDate>29 Oct  2009 17:18:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37810</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: &amp;quot;precision&amp;quot; = &amp;#039;precision&amp;#039; MySQL Error</title>
<description>On Oct 29, 2009, at 8:14 AM, Waldo Jaquith wrote: &amp;gt; David, that worked just great. Thanks for the idea for that  &amp;gt; solution, Alex, and thank you for</description>
<pubDate>29 Oct  2009 17:11:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37809</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Error: Can&amp;#039;t use string (&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;) as a HASH ref</title>
<description>Waldo Jaquith wrote: &amp;gt; Folks, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On v1.11.1, I attempted to add an &amp;quot;alignment&amp;quot; custom field to a &amp;quot;Pull &amp;gt; Quote&amp;quot; subelement with the attributes &amp;quot;lef</description>
<pubDate>29 Oct  2009 15:05:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37807</link>
</item><item>
<title>Error: Can&amp;#039;t use string (&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;) as a HASH ref</title>
<description>Folks, On v1.11.1, I attempted to add an &amp;quot;alignment&amp;quot; custom field to a &amp;quot;Pull  Quote&amp;quot; subelement with the attributes &amp;quot;left&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;right.&amp;quot; It returned</description>
<pubDate>29 Oct  2009 14:11:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37806</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: &amp;quot;precision&amp;quot; = &amp;#039;precision&amp;#039; MySQL Error</title>
<description>On Oct 28, 2009, at 1:23 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On Oct 28, 2009, at 7:17 AM, Waldo Jaquith wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Alex, your suggestion to establish an</description>
<pubDate>29 Oct  2009 08:14:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37805</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: &amp;quot;precision&amp;quot; = &amp;#039;precision&amp;#039; MySQL Error</title>
<description>On Oct 28, 2009, at 7:17 AM, Waldo Jaquith wrote: &amp;gt; It&amp;#039;s possible that it would fix it, but switching to ANSI- &amp;gt; compatibility mode breaks so many o</description>
<pubDate>28 Oct  2009 10:23:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37804</link>
</item><item>
<title>Fwd: Showcasing Bricolage at FOSDEM</title>
<description>Anyone from the Bricolage community planning to attend FOSDEM 2010?  (See e-mail below.) Begin forwarded message: &amp;gt; ---------- Forwarded message --</description>
<pubDate>28 Oct  2009 08:52:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37803</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Category group permissions?</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m wondering if some kind of permissions API might help in this  regards, i.e., allowing some &amp;quot;programability&amp;quot; when setting up new  groups of permi</description>
<pubDate>28 Oct  2009 08:51:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37802</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Category group permissions?</title>
<description>Sorry to be late with this, but I wanted to add in my 2 cents and it  took some time to jell. For those not familiar with the Denison permissions se</description>
<pubDate>28 Oct  2009 07:44:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37800</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: &amp;quot;precision&amp;quot; = &amp;#039;precision&amp;#039; MySQL Error</title>
<description>On Oct 27, 2009, at 5:23 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On Oct 27, 2009, at 1:56 PM, Waldo Jaquith wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Ah, it&amp;#039;s setting sql-mode to ANSI that</description>
<pubDate>28 Oct  2009 07:17:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37799</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: &amp;quot;precision&amp;quot; = &amp;#039;precision&amp;#039; MySQL Error</title>
<description>On Oct 27, 2009, at 5:30 PM, Waldo Jaquith wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I suppose we should have Bricolage itself do it on connect, eh? &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;d forgotten until now that</description>
<pubDate>27 Oct  2009 17:55:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37798</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: &amp;quot;precision&amp;quot; = &amp;#039;precision&amp;#039; MySQL Error</title>
<description>On Oct 27, 2009, at 7:21 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote: &amp;gt; On Oct 27, 2009, at 2:32 PM, Alex Krohn wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Does that fix it? Perhaps we could set those</description>
<pubDate>27 Oct  2009 17:30:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37797</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Better separation of presentation and logic?</title>
<description>On 22-Oct-09, at 2:19 PM, Simon Wilcox wrote: &amp;gt; On 22/10/09 17:11, Bret Dawson wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Greg and I had a good conversation about the MVC approach th</description>
<pubDate>27 Oct  2009 16:55:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37796</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: &amp;quot;precision&amp;quot; = &amp;#039;precision&amp;#039; MySQL Error</title>
<description>On Oct 27, 2009, at 2:32 PM, Alex Krohn wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Does that fix it? Perhaps we could set those from within Bricolage on &amp;gt;&amp;gt; connecting to the database</description>
<pubDate>27 Oct  2009 16:21:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37795</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: &amp;quot;precision&amp;quot; = &amp;#039;precision&amp;#039; MySQL Error</title>
<description>Hi, &amp;gt; Does that fix it? Perhaps we could set those from within Bricolage on  &amp;gt; connecting to the database? Anyone know? Yup, you can set this up wi</description>
<pubDate>27 Oct  2009 14:32:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37793</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: &amp;quot;precision&amp;quot; = &amp;#039;precision&amp;#039; MySQL Error</title>
<description>On Oct 27, 2009, at 1:56 PM, Waldo Jaquith wrote: &amp;gt; Ah, it&amp;#039;s setting sql-mode to ANSI that&amp;#039;d make the difference. I  &amp;gt; can&amp;#039;t find any mention of any</description>
<pubDate>27 Oct  2009 14:23:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37792</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: &amp;quot;precision&amp;quot; = &amp;#039;precision&amp;#039; MySQL Error</title>
<description>On Oct 27, 2009, at 3:57 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote: &amp;gt; On Oct 27, 2009, at 11:24 AM, Waldo Jaquith wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Ah, the surest way to make process when d</description>
<pubDate>27 Oct  2009 13:56:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37791</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: &amp;quot;precision&amp;quot; = &amp;#039;precision&amp;#039; MySQL Error</title>
<description>On Oct 27, 2009, at 11:24 AM, Waldo Jaquith wrote: &amp;gt; Ah, the surest way to make process when debugging is to e-mail a  &amp;gt; group about it, isn&amp;#039;t it? :</description>
<pubDate>27 Oct  2009 12:57:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37790</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: &amp;quot;precision&amp;quot; = &amp;#039;precision&amp;#039; MySQL Error</title>
<description>Folks, Ah, the surest way to make process when debugging is to e-mail a group  about it, isn&amp;#039;t it? :) Of course, the entire MySQL string *is* liste</description>
<pubDate>27 Oct  2009 11:24:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37789</link>
</item><item>
<title>&amp;quot;precision&amp;quot; = &amp;#039;precision&amp;#039; MySQL Error</title>
<description>Folks, In anticipation of v2.0 being finished, I&amp;#039;m returning to my two-years- on-hold project of moving VQR to Bricolage. Having installed the  lat</description>
<pubDate>27 Oct  2009 10:58:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37788</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Unable to cache value</title>
<description>On Oct 26, 2009, at 7:53 AM, Zdravko Balorda wrote: &amp;gt; Well, unfortunately, it keeps breaking. Reinstalling Storable &amp;gt; helps for a while, but when I c</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2009 09:13:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37787</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Unable to cache value</title>
<description>&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Oh, dear! &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Unable to cache value. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Uh, updating Storable fixed this. Oh, my. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Best of luck, Zdravko. :) &amp;gt;  Well, unfortunately, it</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2009 07:53:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37786</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Unable to cache value</title>
<description>&amp;gt; Oh, dear! &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Unable to cache value. Uh, updating Storable fixed this. Oh, my. Best of luck, Zdravko. :)</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2009 03:32:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37785</link>
</item><item>
<title>Unable to cache value</title>
<description>Oh, dear! Unable to cache value. Storable binary image v4.116 more recent than I am (v2.7) at blib/lib/Storable.pm (autosplit into blib/lib/auto/Sto</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2009 01:02:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37784</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Better separation of presentation and logic?</title>
<description>On 22/10/09 17:11, Bret Dawson wrote: &amp;gt; Greg and I had a good conversation about the MVC approach the other day. &amp;gt; I hope I&amp;#039;m not misquoting him here,</description>
<pubDate>22 Oct  2009 09:19:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37782</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Better separation of presentation and logic?</title>
<description>Hi Phillip, In the last few sites I&amp;#039;ve worked on (Sportsnet 5.0, IFEX), I&amp;#039;ve been really aggressive about that separation, and I&amp;#039;ve been loving it. S</description>
<pubDate>22 Oct  2009 09:11:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37781</link>
</item><item>
<title>Better separation of presentation and logic?</title>
<description>Hello, Bit of a philosophical question today. :-) I&amp;#039;m wondering about two things: 1. How far do folks go in abstracting &amp;quot;logic&amp;quot; out of element tem</description>
<pubDate>22 Oct  2009 07:37:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37780</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Related Story</title>
<description>On Oct 21, 2009, at 12:32 PM, Pai Han wrote: &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m trying to write a code for an element. I&amp;#039;ve already set up the  &amp;gt; element &amp;gt; as being related to a</description>
<pubDate>21 Oct  2009 13:31:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37776</link>
</item><item>
<title>Related Story</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m trying to write a code for an element. I&amp;#039;ve already set up the element as being related to a story, which is forcefully. So after I published the</description>
<pubDate>21 Oct  2009 12:32:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37775</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Category group permissions?</title>
<description>On Oct 21, 2009, at 8:49 AM, Phillip Smith wrote: &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve not read this thread thoroughly enough to know if they would be  &amp;gt; helpful in the scenario</description>
<pubDate>21 Oct  2009 10:57:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37774</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Category group permissions?</title>
<description>On Oct 20, 2009, at 1:35 PM, Aaron Fuleki wrote: &amp;gt; The only privilege options that you can grant a user group to a  &amp;gt; category group are NONE/READ/E</description>
<pubDate>21 Oct  2009 09:13:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37772</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Category group permissions?</title>
<description>On 21-Oct-09, at 2:13 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote: &amp;gt; On Oct 20, 2009, at 1:35 PM, Aaron Fuleki wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; The only privilege options that you can gra</description>
<pubDate>21 Oct  2009 08:49:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37773</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: mime type</title>
<description>This was fixed in 1.10.7. It&amp;#039;s a small one line fix you can try  applying to 1.10.4 if you aren&amp;#039;t looking to upgrade yet: http://github.com/bricoleu</description>
<pubDate>21 Oct  2009 08:42:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37771</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: mime type</title>
<description>David, while at it, there is a media ending in .WAV that is not recognized. My blind guess is that only .wav works, not .WAV, but when I try to add ne</description>
<pubDate>21 Oct  2009 07:08:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37769</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: mime type</title>
<description>&amp;gt; # This template only handles images. &amp;gt; unless ($image-&amp;gt;get_media_type-&amp;gt;get_name =~ /^image\b/ ) { David, tahnk you, this was just the pointer I nee</description>
<pubDate>21 Oct  2009 03:30:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37768</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Category group permissions?</title>
<description>Hi Aaron, I don&amp;#039;t think there&amp;#039;s a way to do what you want all at once (or if there is, I haven&amp;#039;t managed it). Crazy as it sounds, your best bet migh</description>
<pubDate>20 Oct  2009 14:10:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37767</link>
</item><item>
<title>Category group permissions?</title>
<description>Let&amp;#039;s say you have a user group and a category group, and you want to  grant PUBLISH privileges on all the categories in your category group  to all</description>
<pubDate>20 Oct  2009 13:35:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37766</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: mime type</title>
<description>On Oct 20, 2009, at 6:04 AM, Zdravko Balorda wrote: &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;d like to add a list of related media other than images. &amp;gt; pdf, doc and things that users may</description>
<pubDate>20 Oct  2009 09:08:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37764</link>
</item><item>
<title>mime type</title>
<description>Hi, I&amp;#039;d like to add a list of related media other than images. pdf, doc and things that users may have attached to a story. I wonder how can I check</description>
<pubDate>20 Oct  2009 06:04:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37762</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Media naming weirdness</title>
<description>On Oct 15, 2009, at 1:11 PM, Aaron Fuleki wrote: &amp;gt; Is it this? &amp;gt; http://bricolage.lighthouseapp.com/projects/29601/tickets/82-uploading-media-with-sp</description>
<pubDate>15 Oct  2009 23:38:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37749</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Media naming weirdness</title>
<description>&amp;gt;&amp;gt; First, I uploaded an image named &amp;quot;freddie on pony.JPG&amp;quot; to  &amp;gt;&amp;gt; bricolage. On preview or publish, everything is lowercased as per  &amp;gt;&amp;gt; the output c</description>
<pubDate>15 Oct  2009 13:11:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37733</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Showing related story URI when element is also related media</title>
<description>On 15-Oct-09, at 4:36 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote: &amp;gt; On Oct 15, 2009, at 12:21 PM, Phillip Smith wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Related stories in 1.10.5: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; http://scre</description>
<pubDate>15 Oct  2009 13:06:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37732</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Media naming weirdness</title>
<description>On Oct 15, 2009, at 12:43 PM, Aaron Fuleki wrote: &amp;gt; Could that be done by SOAP exporting/importing the media, or a  &amp;gt; script to update the files and</description>
<pubDate>15 Oct  2009 12:47:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37731</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Media naming weirdness</title>
<description>&amp;gt; No, I think the files need to be re-uploaded to each story. I  &amp;gt; suggest removing the spaces. Could that be done by SOAP exporting/importing the m</description>
<pubDate>15 Oct  2009 12:43:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37730</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Showing related story URI when element is also related media</title>
<description>On Oct 15, 2009, at 12:21 PM, Phillip Smith wrote: &amp;gt; Related stories in 1.10.5: &amp;gt; http://screencast.com/t/gESQy81q What about a related story with a</description>
<pubDate>15 Oct  2009 12:36:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37729</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Media naming weirdness</title>
<description>On Oct 15, 2009, at 12:20 PM, Aaron Fuleki wrote: &amp;gt; I thought you were going to say that :-) Would a bulk republish fix  &amp;gt; it? Republish media to</description>
<pubDate>15 Oct  2009 12:35:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37728</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Showing related story URI when element is also related media</title>
<description>On 15-Oct-09, at 4:08 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote: &amp;gt; On Oct 15, 2009, at 10:20 AM, Schults, Chris wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Can you post a screenshot, as I don&amp;#039;t t</description>
<pubDate>15 Oct  2009 12:21:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37727</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Media naming weirdness</title>
<description>&amp;gt; It&amp;#039;s a bug. I&amp;#039;ll poke around lighthouse and add that if necessary - I have a small  pile of bugs to enter already. I am concerned that this one&amp;#039;s</description>
<pubDate>15 Oct  2009 12:20:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37726</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: Showing related story URI when element is also related media</title>
<description>&amp;gt; Then the URL is missing for some reason. I suspect that was fixed long &amp;gt; ago, though. 1.10.5 has this entry: Actually, that URL is for the related</description>
<pubDate>15 Oct  2009 12:17:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37720</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Showing related story URI when element is also related media</title>
<description>On Oct 15, 2009, at 10:20 AM, Schults, Chris wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Can you post a screenshot, as I don&amp;#039;t think I&amp;#039;m seeing this on my &amp;gt;&amp;gt; (more recent) installatio</description>
<pubDate>15 Oct  2009 12:08:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37719</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Media naming weirdness</title>
<description>On Oct 15, 2009, at 7:56 AM, Aaron Fuleki wrote: &amp;gt; First, I uploaded an image named &amp;quot;freddie on pony.JPG&amp;quot; to  &amp;gt; bricolage. On preview or publish, e</description>
<pubDate>15 Oct  2009 12:06:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37718</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SOAP bug, or PEBKAC?</title>
<description>On Oct 14, 2009, at 12:01 PM, Bret Dawson wrote: &amp;gt; Unless I&amp;#039;m misreading something, it&amp;#039;s already in bric_republish. Or, &amp;gt; rather, bric_republish only</description>
<pubDate>15 Oct  2009 12:04:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37717</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SOAP bug, or PEBKAC?</title>
<description>On Oct 15, 2009, at 7:25 AM, Aaron Fuleki wrote: &amp;gt; So, what&amp;#039;s the consensus on best practice here? Can we currently do  &amp;gt; what my initial post aske</description>
<pubDate>15 Oct  2009 12:03:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37716</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: Showing related story URI when element is also related media</title>
<description>&amp;gt; Can you post a screenshot, as I don&amp;#039;t think I&amp;#039;m seeing this on my &amp;gt; (more recent) installations. Sure: http://www.pccnaturalmarkets.com/images/bric</description>
<pubDate>15 Oct  2009 10:20:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37715</link>
</item><item>
<title>Media naming weirdness</title>
<description>We were excited to see that bug #1419 was fixed in 1.10.7, as  inconsistent media filenames have been real pain. I&amp;#039;ve noticed some  weird things th</description>
<pubDate>15 Oct  2009 07:56:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37714</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Showing related story URI when element is also related media</title>
<description>On 14-Oct-09, at 8:57 PM, Schults, Chris wrote: &amp;gt; I have a container element that is both a related story and related &amp;gt; media, where related story is</description>
<pubDate>15 Oct  2009 07:42:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37713</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: cleanup processed during story expiration?</title>
<description>On 13-Oct-09, at 12:17 PM, Schults, Chris wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Expiring a story triggers no template execution, so the index page &amp;gt;&amp;gt; would not have been republi</description>
<pubDate>15 Oct  2009 07:40:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37712</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SOAP bug, or PEBKAC?</title>
<description>So, what&amp;#039;s the consensus on best practice here? Can we currently do  what my initial post asked? That is, programatically republish all  published</description>
<pubDate>15 Oct  2009 07:25:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37711</link>
</item><item>
<title>Showing related story URI when element is also related media</title>
<description>I have a container element that is both a related story and related media, where related story is the primary use. When you add a bunch of these elem</description>
<pubDate>14 Oct  2009 16:57:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37710</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SOAP bug, or PEBKAC?</title>
<description>On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 11:28 -0700, David E. Wheeler wrote: &amp;gt; Clearly there needs to be a `--published-version` parameter for  &amp;gt; `workflow publish`. A</description>
<pubDate>14 Oct  2009 12:01:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37709</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SOAP bug, or PEBKAC?</title>
<description>On Oct 14, 2009, at 11:23 AM, Matt Rolf wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Oh, and pass `--published-only` to your call to `workflow publish`. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; And it looks like they did</description>
<pubDate>14 Oct  2009 11:28:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37708</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SOAP bug, or PEBKAC?</title>
<description>On Oct 14, 2009, at 1:42 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote: &amp;gt; On Oct 14, 2009, at 10:33 AM, Bret Dawson wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; One approach would be to add --search &amp;quot;c</description>
<pubDate>14 Oct  2009 11:23:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37707</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SOAP bug, or PEBKAC?</title>
<description>On Oct 14, 2009, at 1:33 PM, Bret Dawson wrote: &amp;gt; In general, it&amp;#039;s a bad idea to use the API to publish a story somebody &amp;gt; else has checked out. Whic</description>
<pubDate>14 Oct  2009 11:18:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37706</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SOAP bug, or PEBKAC?</title>
<description>On Oct 14, 2009, at 10:33 AM, Bret Dawson wrote: &amp;gt; One approach would be to add --search &amp;quot;checked_out=0&amp;quot; to your initial &amp;gt; list_ids pass, and get all</description>
<pubDate>14 Oct  2009 10:42:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37705</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SOAP bug, or PEBKAC?</title>
<description>Hi Aaron, It would be nice if there were powerful AI built into the publish process, but there isn&amp;#039;t, so you can really clobber a lot of stories if y</description>
<pubDate>14 Oct  2009 10:33:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37704</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SOAP bug, or PEBKAC?</title>
<description>So, with David&amp;#039;s help we upgraded to 1.10.7. This time I tried the  following SOAP command, in the hopes of successfully republishing all  previous</description>
<pubDate>14 Oct  2009 10:22:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37703</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: cleanup processed during story expiration?</title>
<description>&amp;gt; Expiring a story triggers no template execution, so the index page &amp;gt; would not have been republished by expiring the Job story. Anyone have sugges</description>
<pubDate>13 Oct  2009 08:17:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37701</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: cleanup processed during story expiration?</title>
<description>On Oct 6, 2009, at 5:56 PM, Schults, Chris wrote: &amp;gt; If someone &amp;quot;publishes&amp;quot; a story which is actually an expiration job,  &amp;gt; should the cleanup sectio</description>
<pubDate>06 Oct  2009 19:37:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37693</link>
</item><item>
<title>cleanup processed during story expiration?</title>
<description>If someone &amp;quot;publishes&amp;quot; a story which is actually an expiration job, should the cleanup section of the story templated be executed?  I ask as I have a</description>
<pubDate>06 Oct  2009 17:56:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37692</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SOAP bug, or PEBKAC?</title>
<description>Not yet. Hopefully we&amp;#039;ll be up to 1.10.7 soon (this month), and I&amp;#039;ll  see if it&amp;#039;s still a problem. -Aaron --------------------------------- Aaron</description>
<pubDate>06 Oct  2009 13:42:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37690</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: searching and site context</title>
<description>On Oct 2, 2009, at 9:08 AM, Paul Orrock wrote: &amp;gt; What is the expected behaviour of a simple story search if you have  &amp;gt; a site selected from the dro</description>
<pubDate>02 Oct  2009 09:17:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37686</link>
</item><item>
<title>searching and site context</title>
<description>Hi, What is the expected behaviour of a simple story search if you have a site selected from the drop down at the top right ? I think it should be t</description>
<pubDate>02 Oct  2009 09:08:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37685</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Creating related media from template</title>
<description>On Sep 30, 2009, at 9:02 AM, Harrison, George (STEM) wrote: &amp;gt; Because the media are already stored in Bricolage, &amp;gt; Get the id of the media to be rela</description>
<pubDate>01 Oct  2009 08:54:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37673</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: need advice about two OC&amp;#039;s that share utility template</title>
<description>On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Paul Orrock &amp;lt;paulo@digitalcraftsmen.net&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; OCs have the concept of inheritance so an OC can include the templat</description>
<pubDate>01 Oct  2009 05:12:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37672</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: need advice about two OC&amp;#039;s that share utility template</title>
<description>OCs have the concept of inheritance so an OC can include the templates of another OC. We have a utility OC that is included into our HTML and XML OCs</description>
<pubDate>01 Oct  2009 05:02:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37671</link>
</item><item>
<title>need advice about two OC&amp;#039;s that share utility template</title>
<description>Hi, I&amp;#039;ve defined 2 OC&amp;#039;s: Web and  Category_Story_List (CSL OC) . My Cover stories  go through both of them. In Web OC  regular html pages are generat</description>
<pubDate>01 Oct  2009 04:34:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37670</link>
</item><item>
<title>Creating related media from template</title>
<description>Hi, I have a list of links that for user maintenance reasons I want to convert to a list of related media. But before I over task my brain by writin</description>
<pubDate>30 Sep  2009 09:02:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37669</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: make clone error - wrong db</title>
<description>On Sep 29, 2009, at 10:21 AM, Fletcher, Michael wrote: &amp;gt; I was thinking of installing 1.10.2 on the new server and pointing  &amp;gt; to the existing datab</description>
<pubDate>29 Sep  2009 12:42:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37668</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Subelement not shown correctly in story</title>
<description>David E. Wheeler escribió: &amp;gt; On Sep 27, 2009, at 11:46 AM, Zambra wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m trying to create a site-wide (placed in the root category) table &amp;gt;&amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>29 Sep  2009 11:02:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37666</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: make clone error - wrong db</title>
<description>On Tuesday, September 29, 2009 9:32 AM David E. Wheeler wrote: &amp;gt; I also usually move the media root out of the way, &amp;gt; leaving it out of the clone,</description>
<pubDate>29 Sep  2009 10:21:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37667</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Subelement not shown correctly in story</title>
<description>On Sep 27, 2009, at 11:46 AM, Zambra wrote: &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m trying to create a site-wide (placed in the root category) table  &amp;gt; subelement, which has roughly</description>
<pubDate>29 Sep  2009 09:33:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37665</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: make clone error - wrong db</title>
<description>On Sep 29, 2009, at 1:43 AM, Paul Orrock wrote: &amp;gt; If you&amp;#039;re running out of disk space you could always delete previews  &amp;gt; and mason cached objects w</description>
<pubDate>29 Sep  2009 09:31:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37664</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SOAP bug, or PEBKAC?</title>
<description>Any luck on this issue, Aaron. On 25-Sep-09, at 12:00 PM, Matt Rolf wrote: &amp;gt; You might want to check out the bug lists - I&amp;#039;m 99% sure this is  &amp;gt; so</description>
<pubDate>29 Sep  2009 06:06:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37663</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: make clone error - wrong db</title>
<description>David E. Wheeler wrote: &amp;gt; It&amp;#039;s about 1/6th of your database size + the full size of all of your &amp;gt; media files. However, you should note that the de</description>
<pubDate>29 Sep  2009 01:43:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37662</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: make clone error - wrong db</title>
<description>On Sep 28, 2009, at 10:34 AM, Fletcher, Michael wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Try cloning your 1.10.2 install from a 1.10.7 download. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; That sounds like a great way t</description>
<pubDate>28 Sep  2009 17:40:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37661</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: make clone error - wrong db</title>
<description>On Thursday, September 24, 2009 3:06 PM David E. Wheeler wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Try cloning your 1.10.2 install from a 1.10.7 download. That sounds like a great</description>
<pubDate>28 Sep  2009 10:34:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37660</link>
</item><item>
<title>Subelement not shown correctly in story</title>
<description>Hello, I&amp;#039;m trying to create a site-wide (placed in the root category) table subelement, which has roughly the following structure:  - Element Type</description>
<pubDate>27 Sep  2009 11:46:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37659</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Find the source of an alias</title>
<description>On Sep 25, 2009, at 9:01 AM, Adam Wilson wrote: &amp;gt; I have created an alias to a story, but now I cannot figure out a  &amp;gt; way to figure out what the or</description>
<pubDate>25 Sep  2009 10:13:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37658</link>
</item><item>
<title>Find the source of an alias</title>
<description>I have created an alias to a story, but now I cannot figure out a way to figure out what the original story was that I aliased to. Anyone have any id</description>
<pubDate>25 Sep  2009 09:01:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37657</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SOAP bug, or PEBKAC?</title>
<description>You might want to check out the bug lists - I&amp;#039;m 99% sure this is  something that has been fixed, perhaps in 10.7, but that we didn&amp;#039;t get  around to</description>
<pubDate>25 Sep  2009 08:00:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37656</link>
</item><item>
<title>SOAP bug, or PEBKAC?</title>
<description>We recently tried the following SOAP command to republish all of our  staff bio/cv stories to reflect some template changes: -----------------------</description>
<pubDate>25 Sep  2009 07:56:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37655</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: make clone error - wrong db</title>
<description>On Sep 24, 2009, at 2:50 PM, Fletcher, Michael wrote: &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m trying &amp;quot;make clone&amp;quot; on a 10.1.2 installation. Try cloning your 1.10.2 install from a 1.1</description>
<pubDate>24 Sep  2009 15:05:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37653</link>
</item><item>
<title>make clone error - wrong db</title>
<description>Hello, I&amp;#039;m trying &amp;quot;make clone&amp;quot; on a 10.1.2 installation. When I type &amp;quot;make clone&amp;quot; all of the questions are pre-populated with the correct answers.</description>
<pubDate>24 Sep  2009 14:50:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37652</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: site context and categories - possible bug ?</title>
<description>On Sep 24, 2009, at 6:11 AM, Paul Orrock wrote: &amp;gt; Actually further investigation reveals that the site context is  &amp;gt; switching between the default s</description>
<pubDate>24 Sep  2009 08:28:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37651</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: site context and categories - possible bug ?</title>
<description>Actually further investigation reveals that the site context is switching between the default site and the selected site on alternate clicks, so som</description>
<pubDate>24 Sep  2009 06:11:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/users/37649</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
