Mailing List Archive: Bricolage: devel

Re: [8495] publish_status=1, etc.

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

david at kineticode

Mar 12, 2009, 10:01 AM

Post #1 of 5 (1386 views)
Permalink

Re: [8495] publish_status=1, etc.

On Mar 12, 2009, at 9:20 AM, slanning [at] bricolage wrote:

> + # xxx: here I just declare that if we're updating
> + # then it's already been published before;
> + # I don't know how else to do it with our crappy soap interface
> + my $publish_crap = $operation eq 'create'
> + ? ' <publish_status>0</publish_status>'
> + : <<EOPC;

Between your “craps” and my “fucks,” people are going to start getting
ideas about the quality of our code. ;-P

David

D-Beaudet at NGA

Mar 12, 2009, 12:36 PM

Post #2 of 5 (1272 views)
Permalink

RE: [8495] publish_status=1, etc. [In reply to]

Not exactly descriptive variable names...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David E. Wheeler [mailto:david [at] kineticode]
> Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 1:01 PM
> To: devel [at] lists
> Subject: Re: [8495] publish_status=1, etc.
>
> On Mar 12, 2009, at 9:20 AM, slanning [at] bricolage wrote:
>
> > + # xxx: here I just declare that if we're updating
> > + # then it's already been published before;
> > + # I don't know how else to do it with our crappy soap interface
> > + my $publish_crap = $operation eq 'create'
> > + ? ' <publish_status>0</publish_status>'
> > + : <<EOPC;
>
> Between your "craps" and my "fucks," people are going to start getting
> ideas about the quality of our code. ;-P
>
> David

david at kineticode

Mar 12, 2009, 1:58 PM

Post #3 of 5 (1267 views)
Permalink

Re: [8495] publish_status=1, etc. [In reply to]

On Mar 12, 2009, at 12:36 PM, Beaudet, David wrote:

> Not exactly descriptive variable names...

% ack 'my \$ass\b' lib
lib/Bric/Biz/Workflow/Parts/Desk.pm

:-P

D

lannings at who

Mar 13, 2009, 1:24 AM

Post #4 of 5 (1257 views)
Permalink

RE: [8495] publish_status=1, etc. [In reply to]

It's related to publish elements, and it's crap.
Suggest a better name.

On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Beaudet, David wrote:
> Not exactly descriptive variable names...
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David E. Wheeler [mailto:david [at] kineticode]
>> Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 1:01 PM
>> To: devel [at] lists
>> Subject: Re: [8495] publish_status=1, etc.
>>
>> On Mar 12, 2009, at 9:20 AM, slanning [at] bricolage wrote:
>>
>>> + # xxx: here I just declare that if we're updating
>>> + # then it's already been published before;
>>> + # I don't know how else to do it with our crappy soap interface
>>> + my $publish_crap = $operation eq 'create'
>>> + ? ' <publish_status>0</publish_status>'
>>> + : <<EOPC;
>>
>> Between your "craps" and my "fucks," people are going to start getting
>> ideas about the quality of our code. ;-P
>>
>> David

david at kineticode

Mar 13, 2009, 9:34 AM

Post #5 of 5 (1269 views)
Permalink

Re: [8495] publish_status=1, etc. [In reply to]

On Mar 13, 2009, at 1:24 AM, Scott Lanning wrote:

> It's related to publish elements, and it's crap.
> Suggest a better name.

Crap is perfect. I was amused.

D

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads