Mailing List Archive: Bricolage: devel

Re: [8159] * Added tests to ensure that calling `set_burn_again()` on a

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

david at kineticode

Apr 25, 2008, 11:40 AM

Post #1 of 8 (276 views)
Permalink

*Re: [8159] Added tests to ensure that calling `set_burn_again()` on a**

On Apr 25, 2008, at 11:37, theory[at]bricolage.cc wrote:

> * Added tests to ensure that calling `set_burn_again()` on a burner
> object
> actually works for Mason, PHP, and Template Toolkit templates. I am
> not able
> to test the PHP test right now (Anyone want to get PHP::Interpreter
> working
> on Leopard?), but it should be right (it's just like the Mason and TT
> changes).

And with that, all Bricolage 1.10.x bugs are closed. Scott, care to
push out 1.10.5? I'm going to merge these changes into trunk now and
start working on getting it ready for 1.11.0 (developer release for
2.0.0).

Thanks,

David

brian at gossamer-threads

Apr 25, 2008, 11:53 AM

Post #2 of 8 (254 views)
Permalink

*Re: [8159] Added tests to ensure that calling `set_burn_again()` on a** [In reply to]

Hi David,

I had one more patch I was going to try to get in before the next
release--or are the changes I suggested heading for 1.11.0?

-Brian

On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 11:40 -0700, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Apr 25, 2008, at 11:37, theory[at]bricolage.cc wrote:
>
> > * Added tests to ensure that calling `set_burn_again()` on a burner
> > object
> > actually works for Mason, PHP, and Template Toolkit templates. I am
> > not able
> > to test the PHP test right now (Anyone want to get PHP::Interpreter
> > working
> > on Leopard?), but it should be right (it's just like the Mason and TT
> > changes).
>
> And with that, all Bricolage 1.10.x bugs are closed. Scott, care to
> push out 1.10.5? I'm going to merge these changes into trunk now and
> start working on getting it ready for 1.11.0 (developer release for
> 2.0.0).
>
> Thanks,
>
> David

david at kineticode

Apr 25, 2008, 11:57 AM

Post #3 of 8 (257 views)
Permalink

*Re: [8159] Added tests to ensure that calling `set_burn_again()` on a** [In reply to]

On Apr 25, 2008, at 11:53, Brian Smith wrote:

> I had one more patch I was going to try to get in before the next
> release--or are the changes I suggested heading for 1.11.0?

Yeah, they're for trunk, 1.11.0. I'm going to work on your other
patches this afternoon.

Best,

David

david at kineticode

Apr 26, 2008, 5:47 PM

Post #4 of 8 (253 views)
Permalink

*Re: [8159] Added tests to ensure that calling `set_burn_again()` on a** [In reply to]

On Apr 25, 2008, at 11:57, David E. Wheeler wrote:

> On Apr 25, 2008, at 11:53, Brian Smith wrote:
>
>> I had one more patch I was going to try to get in before the next
>> release--or are the changes I suggested heading for 1.11.0?
>
> Yeah, they're for trunk, 1.11.0. I'm going to work on your other
> patches this afternoon.

Hey Brian,

You're also going to want to take a look at how the modules in inst/
upgrade/lib work, as they do funky stuff with becoming the database
user, too.

Thanks,

Daivd

lannings at who

Apr 28, 2008, 12:46 AM

Post #5 of 8 (245 views)
Permalink

*Re: [8159] Added tests to ensure that calling `set_burn_again()` on a** [In reply to]

On Fri, 25 Apr 2008, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> And with that, all Bricolage 1.10.x bugs are closed.
> Scott, care to push out 1.10.5?

I notice a little more rev_1_10 activity over the weekend..
I'll try to put out a RC at lunchtime, then if things are okay
maybe I could upload the final version tomorrow or something.

lannings at who

Apr 28, 2008, 4:41 AM

Post #6 of 8 (246 views)
Permalink

*Re: [8159] Added tests to ensure that calling `set_burn_again()` on a** [In reply to]

On Mon, 28 Apr 2008, Scott Lanning wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Apr 2008, David E. Wheeler wrote:
>> And with that, all Bricolage 1.10.x bugs are closed.
>> Scott, care to push out 1.10.5?
>
> I notice a little more rev_1_10 activity over the weekend..
> I'll try to put out a RC at lunchtime, then if things are okay
> maybe I could upload the final version tomorrow or something.

During `make devtest`, I get a bunch of failures
in addition to the "normal" alert-related ones.
Look like anything related to any recent changes?
(I don't have time today for debugging this.)

t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 5996/11273
# Failed test 'There should be ten story fields'
# at t/Bric/Biz/Element/Field/DevTest.pm line 155.
# got: '20'
# expected: '10'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 6020/11273
# Failed test 'Should have eight fields'
# at t/Bric/Biz/Element/Field/DevTest.pm line 168.
# got: '12'
# expected: '8'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 6024/11273
# Failed test 'Should have five fields'
# at t/Bric/Biz/Element/Field/DevTest.pm line 180.
# got: '7'
# expected: '5'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 6026/11273
# Failed test 'Should have eight fields'
# at t/Bric/Biz/Element/Field/DevTest.pm line 185.
# got: '12'
# expected: '8'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 6028/11273
# Failed test 'Should have seven fields'
# at t/Bric/Biz/Element/Field/DevTest.pm line 190.
# got: '9'
# expected: '7'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 6032/11273
# Failed test 'Should have seven fields'
# at t/Bric/Biz/Element/Field/DevTest.pm line 203.
# got: '9'
# expected: '7'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 6048/11273
# Failed test 'There should be eight active fields'
# at t/Bric/Biz/Element/Field/DevTest.pm line 252.
# got: '18'
# expected: '8'
# expected 89 test(s) in test_list, 99 completed
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 6095/11273
# Failed test 'There should be ten story field ids'
# at t/Bric/Biz/Element/Field/DevTest.pm line 318.
# got: '20'
# expected: '10'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 6119/11273
# Failed test 'Should have eight field ids'
# at t/Bric/Biz/Element/Field/DevTest.pm line 331.
# got: '12'
# expected: '8'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 6123/11273
# Failed test 'Should have five field ids'
# at t/Bric/Biz/Element/Field/DevTest.pm line 343.
# got: '7'
# expected: '5'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 6125/11273
# Failed test 'Should have eight field ids'
# at t/Bric/Biz/Element/Field/DevTest.pm line 348.
# got: '12'
# expected: '8'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 6127/11273
# Failed test 'Should have seven field ids'
# at t/Bric/Biz/Element/Field/DevTest.pm line 353.
# got: '9'
# expected: '7'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 6131/11273
# Failed test 'Should have seven field ids'
# at t/Bric/Biz/Element/Field/DevTest.pm line 366.
# got: '9'
# expected: '7'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 6148/11273
# Failed test 'There should be eight active field ids'
# at t/Bric/Biz/Element/Field/DevTest.pm line 419.
# got: '18'
# expected: '8'
# expected 90 test(s) in test_list_ids, 100 completed
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 6287/11273
# Failed test 'There should be five top-level story elements'
# at t/Bric/Biz/Element/Container/DevTest.pm line 188.
# got: '11'
# expected: '5'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 6300/11273
# Failed test 'There should be two subelements'
# at t/Bric/Biz/Element/Container/DevTest.pm line 197.
# got: '1'
# expected: '2'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 6302/11273
# Failed test 'Should be six subelements'
# at t/Bric/Biz/Element/Container/DevTest.pm line 201.
# got: '2'
# expected: '6'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 6303/11273
# Failed test 'Get subelement subelements'
# at t/Bric/Biz/Element/Container/DevTest.pm line 203.
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 6304/11273
# Failed test 'Should have three subelements'
# at t/Bric/Biz/Element/Container/DevTest.pm line 204.
# got: '0'
# expected: '3'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 6306/11273
# Failed test 'There should be fifteen story elements'
# at t/Bric/Biz/Element/Container/DevTest.pm line 213.
# got: '33'
# expected: '15'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 6312/11273
# Failed test 'There should be ten elements'
# at t/Bric/Biz/Element/Container/DevTest.pm line 234.
# got: '11'
# expected: '10'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 6314/11273
# Failed test 'There should be thirteen active elements'
# at t/Bric/Biz/Element/Container/DevTest.pm line 243.
# got: '31'
# expected: '13'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....ok 9358/11273Use of uninitialized value in substitution (s///) at lib/Bric/Dist/Action/Email.pm line 579.

[lib/Bric.pm:944]
[lib/Bric/Dist/Action/Email.pm:579]
[lib/Bric/Dist/Action/Email.pm:444]
[t/Bric/Dist/Action/Email/DevTest.pm:81]
[/usr/local/share/perl/5.8.7/Test/Class.pm:224]
[/usr/local/share/perl/5.8.7/Test/Class.pm:307]
[t/Bric/Test/Runner.pm:106]
Use of uninitialized value in substitution (s///) at lib/Bric/Dist/Action/Email.pm line 579.

[lib/Bric.pm:944]
[lib/Bric/Dist/Action/Email.pm:579]
[lib/Bric/Dist/Action/Email.pm:444]
[t/Bric/Dist/Action/Email/DevTest.pm:82]
[/usr/local/share/perl/5.8.7/Test/Class.pm:224]
[/usr/local/share/perl/5.8.7/Test/Class.pm:307]
[t/Bric/Test/Runner.pm:106]
Use of uninitialized value in substitution (s///) at lib/Bric/Dist/Action/Email.pm line 579.

[lib/Bric.pm:944]
[lib/Bric/Dist/Action/Email.pm:579]
[lib/Bric/Dist/Action/Email.pm:444]
[t/Bric/Dist/Action/Email/DevTest.pm:83]
[/usr/local/share/perl/5.8.7/Test/Class.pm:224]
[/usr/local/share/perl/5.8.7/Test/Class.pm:307]
[t/Bric/Test/Runner.pm:106]
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 9407/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 2 actions'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Action/DevTest.pm line 170.
# got: '3'
# expected: '2'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 9411/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 2 actions'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Action/DevTest.pm line 180.
# got: '3'
# expected: '2'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 9415/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 5 actions'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Action/DevTest.pm line 190.
# got: '6'
# expected: '5'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 9417/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 2 actions'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Action/DevTest.pm line 196.
# got: '3'
# expected: '2'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 9423/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 3 actions'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Action/DevTest.pm line 213.
# got: '4'
# expected: '3'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 9437/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 2 actions'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Action/DevTest.pm line 92.
# got: '3'
# expected: '2'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 9441/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 2 actions'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Action/DevTest.pm line 102.
# got: '3'
# expected: '2'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 9445/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 5 actions'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Action/DevTest.pm line 112.
# got: '6'
# expected: '5'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 9447/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 2 actions'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Action/DevTest.pm line 118.
# got: '3'
# expected: '2'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 9453/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 3 actions'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Action/DevTest.pm line 135.
# got: '4'
# expected: '3'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 9467/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 2 action IDs'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Action/DevTest.pm line 249.
# got: '3'
# expected: '2'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 9471/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 2 actions'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Action/DevTest.pm line 259.
# got: '3'
# expected: '2'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 9475/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 5 actions'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Action/DevTest.pm line 269.
# got: '6'
# expected: '5'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 9477/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 2 action IDs'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Action/DevTest.pm line 275.
# got: '3'
# expected: '2'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 9483/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 3 action IDs'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Action/DevTest.pm line 292.
# got: '4'
# expected: '3'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 9563/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 2 actions'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Action/DevTest.pm line 170.
# got: '3'
# expected: '2'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 9567/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 2 actions'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Action/DevTest.pm line 180.
# got: '3'
# expected: '2'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 9571/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 5 actions'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Action/DevTest.pm line 190.
# got: '6'
# expected: '5'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 9573/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 2 actions'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Action/DevTest.pm line 196.
# got: '3'
# expected: '2'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 9579/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 3 actions'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Action/DevTest.pm line 213.
# got: '4'
# expected: '3'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 9593/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 2 actions'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Action/DevTest.pm line 92.
# got: '3'
# expected: '2'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 9597/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 2 actions'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Action/DevTest.pm line 102.
# got: '3'
# expected: '2'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 9601/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 5 actions'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Action/DevTest.pm line 112.
# got: '6'
# expected: '5'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 9603/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 2 actions'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Action/DevTest.pm line 118.
# got: '3'
# expected: '2'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 9609/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 3 actions'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Action/DevTest.pm line 135.
# got: '4'
# expected: '3'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 9623/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 2 action IDs'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Action/DevTest.pm line 249.
# got: '3'
# expected: '2'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 9627/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 2 actions'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Action/DevTest.pm line 259.
# got: '3'
# expected: '2'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 9631/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 5 actions'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Action/DevTest.pm line 269.
# got: '6'
# expected: '5'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 9633/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 2 action IDs'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Action/DevTest.pm line 275.
# got: '3'
# expected: '2'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 9639/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 3 action IDs'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Action/DevTest.pm line 292.
# got: '4'
# expected: '3'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 9695/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 2 actions'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Action/DevTest.pm line 170.
# got: '3'
# expected: '2'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 9699/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 2 actions'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Action/DevTest.pm line 180.
# got: '3'
# expected: '2'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 9703/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 5 actions'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Action/DevTest.pm line 190.
# got: '6'
# expected: '5'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 9705/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 2 actions'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Action/DevTest.pm line 196.
# got: '3'
# expected: '2'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 9711/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 3 actions'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Action/DevTest.pm line 213.
# got: '4'
# expected: '3'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 9725/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 2 actions'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Action/DevTest.pm line 92.
# got: '3'
# expected: '2'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 9729/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 2 actions'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Action/DevTest.pm line 102.
# got: '3'
# expected: '2'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 9733/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 5 actions'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Action/DevTest.pm line 112.
# got: '6'
# expected: '5'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 9735/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 2 actions'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Action/DevTest.pm line 118.
# got: '3'
# expected: '2'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 9741/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 3 actions'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Action/DevTest.pm line 135.
# got: '4'
# expected: '3'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 9755/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 2 action IDs'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Action/DevTest.pm line 249.
# got: '3'
# expected: '2'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 9759/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 2 actions'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Action/DevTest.pm line 259.
# got: '3'
# expected: '2'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 9763/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 5 actions'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Action/DevTest.pm line 269.
# got: '6'
# expected: '5'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 9765/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 2 action IDs'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Action/DevTest.pm line 275.
# got: '3'
# expected: '2'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 9771/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 3 action IDs'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Action/DevTest.pm line 292.
# got: '4'
# expected: '3'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 10427/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 3 servers'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Server/DevTest.pm line 184.
# got: '4'
# expected: '3'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 10429/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 2 servers'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Server/DevTest.pm line 190.
# got: '3'
# expected: '2'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 10431/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 5 servers'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Server/DevTest.pm line 196.
# got: '6'
# expected: '5'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 10445/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 5 servers'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Server/DevTest.pm line 233.
# got: '6'
# expected: '5'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 10463/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 3 servers'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Server/DevTest.pm line 105.
# got: '4'
# expected: '3'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 10465/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 2 servers'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Server/DevTest.pm line 111.
# got: '3'
# expected: '2'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 10467/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 5 servers'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Server/DevTest.pm line 117.
# got: '6'
# expected: '5'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 10481/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 5 servers'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Server/DevTest.pm line 154.
# got: '6'
# expected: '5'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 10499/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 3 server IDs'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Server/DevTest.pm line 259.
# got: '4'
# expected: '3'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 10501/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 2 server IDs'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Server/DevTest.pm line 265.
# got: '3'
# expected: '2'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 10503/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 5 server IDs'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Server/DevTest.pm line 271.
# got: '6'
# expected: '5'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 10517/11273
# Failed test 'Check for 5 server IDs'
# at t/Bric/Dist/Server/DevTest.pm line 308.
# got: '6'
# expected: '5'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....ok 11265/11273# Looks like you planned 11273 tests but ran 20 extra.
# Looks like you failed 122 tests of 11293 run.
t/Bric/Test/Runner....dubious
Test returned status 122 (wstat 31232, 0x7a00)
DIED. FAILED tests 631-636, 684-689, 699, 739, 4330, 4355-4360, 4363-4368, 4403, 4428-4433, 4436-4441, 4454, 4457, 4460, 5996, 6020, 6024, 6026, 6028, 6032, 6048, 6095, 6119, 6123, 6125, 6127, 6131, 6148, 6287, 6300, 6302-6304, 6306, 6312, 6314, 9407, 9411, 9415, 9417, 9423, 9437, 9441, 9445, 9447, 9453, 9467, 9471, 9475, 9477, 9483, 9563, 9567, 9571, 9573, 9579, 9593, 9597, 9601, 9603, 9609, 9623, 9627, 9631, 9633, 9639, 9695, 9699, 9703, 9705, 9711, 9725, 9729, 9733, 9735, 9741, 9755, 9759, 9763, 9765, 9771, 10427, 10429, 10431, 10445, 10463, 10465, 10467, 10481, 10499, 10501, 10503, 10517, 11274-11293
Failed 142/11273 tests, 98.74% okay (less 354 skipped tests: 10777 okay, 95.60%)
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail List of Failed
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
t/Bric/Test/Runner.pm 122 31232 11273 142 631-636 684-689 699 739 4330 4355-
4360 4363-4368 4403 4428-4433
4436-4441 4454 4457 4460 5996 6020
6024 6026 6028 6032 6048 6095 6119
6123 6125 6127 6131 6148 6287 6300
6302-6304 6306 6312 6314 9407 9411
9415 9417 9423 9437 9441 9445 9447
9453 9467 9471 9475 9477 9483 9563
9567 9571 9573 9579 9593 9597 9601
9603 9609 9623 9627 9631 9633 9639
9695 9699 9703 9705 9711 9725 9729
9733 9735 9741 9755 9759 9763 9765
9771 10427 10429 10431 10445 10463
10465 10467 10481 10499 10501
10503 10517 11274-11293
354 subtests skipped.
Failed 1/1 test scripts. 102/11273 subtests failed.
Files=1, Tests=11273, 121 wallclock secs (81.10 cusr + 1.61 csys = 82.71 CPU)
Failed 1/1 test programs. 102/11273 subtests failed.
make: *** [devtest] Error 122

The "normal" alert-related failures:

$ make devtest
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl inst/runtests.pl -d
t/Bric/Test/Runner....ok 363/11273
# Failed test 'Search on timestamp'
# at t/Bric/Util/Alert/DevTest.pm line 162.

# Failed test 'Should have one alert'
# at t/Bric/Util/Alert/DevTest.pm line 164.
# got: '0'
# expected: '1'

# Failed test 'Search on ANY(timestamp)'
# at t/Bric/Util/Alert/DevTest.pm line 165.

# Failed test 'Should have two alerts'
# at t/Bric/Util/Alert/DevTest.pm line 167.
# got: '0'
# expected: '2'

# Failed test 'Search on time_start and time_end'
# at t/Bric/Util/Alert/DevTest.pm line 170.

# Failed test 'Should have ten alerts'
# at t/Bric/Util/Alert/DevTest.pm line 174.
# got: '0'
# expected: '10'

# Failed test 'Search on timestamp'
# at t/Bric/Util/Alert/DevTest.pm line 266.

# Failed test 'Should have one alert'
# at t/Bric/Util/Alert/DevTest.pm line 268.
# got: '0'
# expected: '1'

# Failed test 'Search on ANY(timestamp)'
# at t/Bric/Util/Alert/DevTest.pm line 269.

# Failed test 'Should have two alert IDs'
# at t/Bric/Util/Alert/DevTest.pm line 271.
# got: '0'
# expected: '2'

# Failed test 'Search on time_start and time_end'
# at t/Bric/Util/Alert/DevTest.pm line 274.

# Failed test 'Should have ten alert IDs'
# at t/Bric/Util/Alert/DevTest.pm line 278.
# got: '0'
# expected: '10'

# Failed test 'Check timestamp'
# at t/Bric/Util/Alert/DevTest.pm line 72.
# got: '2008-04-28 04:25:04'
# expected: '2008-04-28 04:24:55'

# Failed test 'Now should be now'
# at t/Bric/Util/Time/DevTest.pm line 54.
# got: '2008-04-28 11:24:55.000000'
# expected: '2008-04-28 11:25:04.000000'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 4330/11273
# Failed test 'Should have two alerted'
# at t/Bric/Util/Alerted/DevTest.pm line 153.
# got: '1'
# expected: '2'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 4355/11273
# Failed test 'Search on timestamp'
# at t/Bric/Util/Alerted/DevTest.pm line 207.
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 4356/11273
# Failed test 'Should have two alerteds'
# at t/Bric/Util/Alerted/DevTest.pm line 209.
# got: '0'
# expected: '2'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 4357/11273
# Failed test 'Search on ANY(timestamp)'
# at t/Bric/Util/Alerted/DevTest.pm line 210.
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 4358/11273
# Failed test 'Should have three alerteds'
# at t/Bric/Util/Alerted/DevTest.pm line 212.
# got: '0'
# expected: '3'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 4359/11273
# Failed test 'Search on timestamp array'
# at t/Bric/Util/Alerted/DevTest.pm line 214.
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 4360/11273
# Failed test 'Should have fifteen alerteds'
# at t/Bric/Util/Alerted/DevTest.pm line 217.
# got: '0'
# expected: '15'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 4363/11273
# Failed test 'Search on ack_time'
# at t/Bric/Util/Alerted/DevTest.pm line 230.
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 4364/11273
# Failed test 'Should have one alerteds'
# at t/Bric/Util/Alerted/DevTest.pm line 232.
# got: '0'
# expected: '1'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 4365/11273
# Failed test 'Search on ANY(ack_time)'
# at t/Bric/Util/Alerted/DevTest.pm line 233.
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 4366/11273
# Failed test 'Should have two alerteds'
# at t/Bric/Util/Alerted/DevTest.pm line 235.
# got: '0'
# expected: '2'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 4367/11273
# Failed test 'Search on ack_time array'
# at t/Bric/Util/Alerted/DevTest.pm line 237.
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 4368/11273
# Failed test 'Should have fifteen alerteds'
# at t/Bric/Util/Alerted/DevTest.pm line 240.
# got: '0'
# expected: '15'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 4403/11273
# Failed test 'Should have two alerted'
# at t/Bric/Util/Alerted/DevTest.pm line 293.
# got: '1'
# expected: '2'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 4428/11273
# Failed test 'Search on timestamp'
# at t/Bric/Util/Alerted/DevTest.pm line 347.
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 4429/11273
# Failed test 'Should have two alerted ids'
# at t/Bric/Util/Alerted/DevTest.pm line 349.
# got: '0'
# expected: '2'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 4430/11273
# Failed test 'Search on ANY(timestamp)'
# at t/Bric/Util/Alerted/DevTest.pm line 350.
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 4431/11273
# Failed test 'Should have three alerted ids'
# at t/Bric/Util/Alerted/DevTest.pm line 352.
# got: '0'
# expected: '3'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 4432/11273
# Failed test 'Search on timestamp array'
# at t/Bric/Util/Alerted/DevTest.pm line 354.
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 4433/11273
# Failed test 'Should have fifteen alerted ids'
# at t/Bric/Util/Alerted/DevTest.pm line 357.
# got: '0'
# expected: '15'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 4436/11273
# Failed test 'Search on ack_time'
# at t/Bric/Util/Alerted/DevTest.pm line 370.
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 4437/11273
# Failed test 'Should have one alerted ids'
# at t/Bric/Util/Alerted/DevTest.pm line 372.
# got: '0'
# expected: '1'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 4438/11273
# Failed test 'Search on ANY(ack_time)'
# at t/Bric/Util/Alerted/DevTest.pm line 373.
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 4439/11273
# Failed test 'Should have two alerted ids'
# at t/Bric/Util/Alerted/DevTest.pm line 375.
# got: '0'
# expected: '2'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 4440/11273
# Failed test 'Search on ack_time array'
# at t/Bric/Util/Alerted/DevTest.pm line 377.
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 4441/11273
# Failed test 'Should have fifteen alerted ids'
# at t/Bric/Util/Alerted/DevTest.pm line 380.
# got: '0'
# expected: '15'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 4454/11273
# Failed test 'Check timestamp'
# at t/Bric/Util/Alerted/DevTest.pm line 91.
# got: '2008-04-28 04:25:22'
# expected: '2008-04-28 04:24:55'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 4457/11273
# Failed test 'Check ack time again'
# at t/Bric/Util/Alerted/DevTest.pm line 96.
# got: '2008-04-28 04:25:22'
# expected: '2008-04-28 04:24:55'
t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 4460/11273
# Failed test 'Check ack time'
# at t/Bric/Util/Alerted/DevTest.pm line 102.
# got: '2008-04-28 04:25:22'
# expected: '2008-04-28 04:24:55'

david at kineticode

Apr 28, 2008, 8:01 PM

Post #7 of 8 (243 views)
Permalink

*Re: [8159] Added tests to ensure that calling `set_burn_again()` on a** [In reply to]

On Apr 28, 2008, at 04:41, Scott Lanning wrote:

> During `make devtest`, I get a bunch of failures
> in addition to the "normal" alert-related ones.
> Look like anything related to any recent changes?
> (I don't have time today for debugging this.)
>
>
> t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 5996/11273 # Failed test 'There should
> be ten story fields'
> # at t/Bric/Biz/Element/Field/DevTest.pm line 155.
> # got: '20'
> # expected: '10'
> t/Bric/Test/Runner....NOK 6020/11273 # Failed test 'Should have
> eight fields'
> # at t/Bric/Biz/Element/Field/DevTest.pm line 168.
> # got: '12'
> # expected: '8'

No, this doesn't look like anything I've messed with. And all tests
pass for me. Are you sure you had a clean database?

Best,

David

lannings at who

Apr 29, 2008, 3:09 AM

Post #8 of 8 (245 views)
Permalink

*Re: [8159] Added tests to ensure that calling `set_burn_again()` on a** [In reply to]

On Mon, 28 Apr 2008, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> No, this doesn't look like anything I've messed with. And all tests pass for
> me. Are you sure you had a clean database?

I thought so.
But I tried it again from scratch, and it failed in the same way.
So I tried again from another machine, and it worked.
I don't know what is different between the two,
but then again I'm not very interested in knowing either.
So I ignored the "bad" machine and uploaded it to sourceforge.

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

Interested in having your list archived? Contact lists@gossamer-threads.com