<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Bricolage | devel</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/devel/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>04 Jul  2009 16:58:26 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Re: Upgrade 1.10.6 -&amp;gt; 1.11.2</title>
<description>On Jun 18, 2009, at 7:06 AM, Matt Rolf wrote: &amp;gt; So I&amp;#039;ve been upgrading. System now runs, I have access to groups,  &amp;gt; elements permissions, etc. Ho</description>
<pubDate>29 Jun  2009 09:43:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/devel/37410</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Net::SFTP Slowness</title>
<description>On Jun 29, 2009, at 5:20 AM, Ryan O&amp;#039;Toole wrote: &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m experiencing similar slowness with SFTP distribution. Were Matt&amp;#039;s &amp;gt; modifications ever rolled</description>
<pubDate>29 Jun  2009 08:53:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/devel/37409</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Net::SFTP Slowness</title>
<description>Little late to this conversation... I&amp;#039;m experiencing similar slowness with SFTP distribution. Were Matt&amp;#039;s modifications ever rolled into a bric distr</description>
<pubDate>29 Jun  2009 05:20:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/devel/37408</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Upgrade 1.10.6 -&amp;gt; 1.11.2</title>
<description>Any thoughts on this? Thanks, Matt On Jun 18, 2009, at 10:06 AM, Matt Rolf wrote: &amp;gt; So I&amp;#039;ve been upgrading. System now runs, I have access to gro</description>
<pubDate>27 Jun  2009 16:19:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/devel/37407</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: bric_queued --user</title>
<description>On Jun 26, 2009, at 8:20 AM, Ryan O&amp;#039;Toole wrote: &amp;gt; Of course after stating the problem I basically answered my own  &amp;gt; question. I love when that ha</description>
<pubDate>26 Jun  2009 09:05:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/devel/37406</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: bric_queued --user</title>
<description>Of course after stating the problem I basically answered my own question. The PID was being written to /var/run/bric_queued.pid, but as www-data and</description>
<pubDate>26 Jun  2009 08:20:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/devel/37405</link>
</item><item>
<title>bric_queued --user</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m using bric_queued for pub/dist with *bric_queued --username publisher --password password*. Where publisher is a bric user I setup just for handli</description>
<pubDate>26 Jun  2009 07:27:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/devel/37404</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Story version corruption, again</title>
<description>On Jun 24, 2009, at 12:19 PM, Bret Dawson wrote: &amp;gt; I updated bug #93 with these steps. Bret++ Best, David</description>
<pubDate>24 Jun  2009 15:22:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/devel/37403</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Story version corruption, again</title>
<description>I updated bug #93 with these steps.  Cheers, Bret  On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 11:34 -0400, Greg Heo wrote: &amp;gt; 0. Create a new story, check it into a desk</description>
<pubDate>24 Jun  2009 12:19:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/devel/37402</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Story version corruption, again</title>
<description>On Jun 24, 2009, at 8:34 AM, Greg Heo wrote: &amp;gt; We&amp;#039;ve come up with a set of steps to consistently reproduce the  &amp;gt; funny version numbers. The root pr</description>
<pubDate>24 Jun  2009 09:55:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/devel/37400</link>
</item><item>
<title>Story version corruption, again</title>
<description>Hi everyone, Bret and I are working on an installation plagued by the old story  corruption problem, running 1.10.7 with David&amp;#039;s patch from this thr</description>
<pubDate>24 Jun  2009 08:34:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/devel/37399</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Users who can edit but not publish</title>
<description>Hi Phillip, Thanks for the link; great tutorial. Ryan On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Phillip Smith &amp;lt; phillip@communitybandwidth.ca&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; O</description>
<pubDate>21 Jun  2009 12:43:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/devel/37393</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Users who can edit but not publish</title>
<description>On 20-Jun-09, at 5:18 PM, Ryan O&amp;#039;Toole wrote: &amp;gt; Hi Bric, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I was under the impression that users in the group &amp;quot;Story Editors&amp;quot;  &amp;gt; and not &amp;gt; in &amp;quot;Pub</description>
<pubDate>20 Jun  2009 13:35:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/devel/37392</link>
</item><item>
<title>Users who can edit but not publish</title>
<description>Hi Bric, I was under the impression that users in the group &amp;quot;Story Editors&amp;quot; and not in &amp;quot;Publishing Admins&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Global Admins&amp;quot; would not have the righ</description>
<pubDate>20 Jun  2009 13:18:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/devel/37391</link>
</item><item>
<title>Upgrade 1.10.6 -&amp;gt; 1.11.2</title>
<description>So I&amp;#039;ve been upgrading. System now runs, I have access to groups,  elements permissions, etc. However, any time I try to get to a screen  with sto</description>
<pubDate>18 Jun  2009 07:06:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/devel/37386</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: (Hopefully) quick question about approaches to re-developing a content-heavy site.</title>
<description>Many thanks to everyone for input on the question of how to approach  the re-development of a content-heavy site on Bricolage. Greatly  appreciated.</description>
<pubDate>10 Jun  2009 07:26:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/devel/37373</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: (Hopefully) quick question about approaches to re-developing a content-heavy site.</title>
<description>On Jun 4, 2009, at 11:45 PM, Simon Wilcox wrote: &amp;gt; We are for our big content client. It&amp;#039;s &amp;#039;OK&amp;#039;. The story UI is  &amp;gt; definitely better than it was be</description>
<pubDate>05 Jun  2009 10:10:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/devel/37343</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: (Hopefully) quick question about approaches to re-developing a content-heavy site.</title>
<description>On 4/6/09 21:36, Phillip Smith wrote: &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m about to get underway with the re-development of a site that &amp;gt; receives frequent content updates. The re-</description>
<pubDate>04 Jun  2009 23:45:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/devel/37335</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: (Hopefully) quick question about approaches to re-developing a content-heavy site.</title>
<description>On Jun 4, 2009, at 2:04 PM, Adam Wilson wrote: &amp;gt; There is one issue that I am not sure is an issue, but think it  &amp;gt; might be. I haven&amp;#039;t been able t</description>
<pubDate>04 Jun  2009 18:54:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/devel/37333</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: (Hopefully) quick question about approaches to re-developing a content-heavy site.</title>
<description>On Jun 4, 2009, at 1:36 PM, Phillip Smith wrote: &amp;gt; One change that makes things a bit trickier is that the page  &amp;gt; extensions are changing from .php</description>
<pubDate>04 Jun  2009 18:54:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/devel/37332</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: (Hopefully) quick question about approaches to re-developing a content-heavy site.</title>
<description>&amp;gt; -----Original Message----- &amp;gt; From: Phillip Smith [mailto:phillip@communitybandwidth.ca] &amp;gt; Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 4:36 PM &amp;gt; To: Bricolage Deve</description>
<pubDate>04 Jun  2009 14:04:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/devel/37330</link>
</item><item>
<title>(Hopefully) quick question about approaches to re-developing a content-heavy site.</title>
<description>Hello, I&amp;#039;m about to get underway with the re-development of a site that  receives frequent content updates. The re-development is comprised  mostly</description>
<pubDate>04 Jun  2009 13:36:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/devel/37329</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Bricolage #90] ApacheConfig.pm generates vhost.conf with typo</title>
<description>On May 13, 2009, at 5:03 PM, Lighthouse wrote: &amp;gt; // Add your reply above here &amp;gt; ================================================== &amp;gt; theory updated t</description>
<pubDate>13 May  2009 17:09:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/devel/37293</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Bricolage Bugs is down</title>
<description>On 13-May-09, at 9:54 AM, Paul Orrock wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; That said, I agree that it might be useful to have read-only, or  &amp;gt;&amp;gt; password-protected, access to B</description>
<pubDate>13 May  2009 11:51:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/devel/37285</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Bricolage Bugs is down</title>
<description>&amp;gt; That said, I agree that it might be useful to have read-only, or &amp;gt; password-protected, access to Bugzilla until these imported Lighthouse &amp;gt; bugs a</description>
<pubDate>13 May  2009 05:54:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/bricolage/devel/37281</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
