
rama at pitties
Jan 9, 2004, 1:31 PM
Views: 896
Permalink
|
|
Wackamole exits on RH9 and works fine on RH7.3
|
|
Hello Wackamole Users, I am using Wackamole to maintain a virtual IP on 2 machines. I am using the latest CVS code as of today. Both machines use identical wackamole.conf configurations (below). One machine is running RH7.3 while the other is running RH9. I have no problems with the RH7 box. Howerver, if the RH9 box has the virtual IP and I issue a wackatrl -f command __on the RH7 box__, wackamole exits on the RH9 box with the following message in the log file: Jan 9 12:10:03 jedi wackamole[23444]: DOWN: eth0:1:10.10.10.25/255.255.255.255 Note: I get the same behaviour if I kill the process on the RH7 box (i.e. RH9 has the IP, I kill the wackamole process on the RH7 box and wackamole process exits on the RH9 box). If I run "wackamole -d" in the forground, the problem goes away and everything works as expected. If I reverse the machines (i.e. mess with the RH9 box while the RH7 box has the IP) everything works fine. The only other thing that might be of interest, I see the folloing error when wacamole starts up on both machines and connects to spread: Jan 9 12:09:47 jedi wackamole[23444]: 867 No such interface The RH9 box has 2.4.20-XXX kernal while the RH7 box has a 2.4.18-xxx kernal. Here is my wackamole.conf (identical for both machines): -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- # The Spread daemon we are going to connect to. It should be on the local box Spread = 4803 SpreadRetryInterval = 5s # The group name Group = wack1 # Named socket for online control Control = /var/run/wack.it # Denote the interface we prefer to have #prefer eth0:10.3.4.5/8 #prefer { eth0:10.2.3.4/8 eth1:192.168.10.23/24 } # In most cases, I just don't care. Let wackamole decide. Prefer None #Prefer { eth0:10.10.10.25/32 } # List all the virtual interfaces (ALL of them) VirtualInterfaces { # The following two lines have the same effect # en0:192.168.1.2/24 { eth0:10.10.10.25/32 } # This is how you say 2 or more IPs are to be treated as a single # "set" or "virtual interface". If wackamole decides that this # machine will manage it, you are ensured to get ALL the ips in the # set. # { en1:10.0.0.1/8 en0:192.168.35.64/26 } } # Collect and broadcast the IPs in our ARP table every so often Arp-Cache = 90s # List who we will notify # Here the netblock (/24 or /28) can be deceptive. It is NOT a netmask # for a single IP. It is how one will describe that they want to # notify ALL IPs in a segment. Notify { # Let's notify our router: eth0:10.10.10.1/32 # Notify out DB server eth1:10.0.0.4/32 # 10.0.0.0 -> 10.0.0.255, but only 128 notifications/sec eth0:10.10.10.0/24 throttle 128 # Wackamole shares arp-cache across machines, this says to # notify every IP address in the aggregate shared arp-cache. arp-cache } balance { # This field is the maximum number of IP addresses that will move # from one wackamole to another during a round of balancing. AcquisitionsPerRound = all # Time interval in each balancing round. interval = 4s } # How long it takes us to mature mature = 5s -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks, -Rama
|