david.carroll at adsdotcom
Nov 21, 2003, 2:39 AM
Post #3 of 3
(978 views)
Permalink
|
Thanks Theo,
Basically ... I don't think enabling the BPF (Berkley Packet Filter) in the
kernel is going to be an option, due= to the potential security risk .. is
there any other way of enabling this .. or will I have to put my hands up
and not use Wackamole (sniff) .. ?
Your replies are much appreciated.
David
-----Original Message-----
From: wackamole-users-admin[at]lists.backhand.org
[mailto:wackamole-users-admin[at]lists.backhand.org]On Behalf Of Theo
Schlossnagle
Sent: 20 November 2003 17:43
To: wackamole-users[at]lists.backhand.org
Cc: Theo Schlossnagle
Subject: Re: [Wackamole-users] BPF
On Nov 20, 2003, at 7:54 AM, David Carroll wrote:
> Do you need to enable BPF in the kernel of each server that runs
> Wackamole ?
wackamole will open the /dev/bpf### device. I am not sure if that
kernel option is required to use the device node, but if it is, then
yes it is required for Wackamole to run.
// Theo Schlossnagle
// Principal Engineer -- http://www.omniti.com/~jesus/
// Postal Engine -- http://www.postalengine.com/
// Ecelerity: fastest MTA on earth
_______________________________________________
wackamole-users mailing list
wackamole-users[at]lists.backhand.org
http://lists.backhand.org/mailman/listinfo/wackamole-users
|
