<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>mod_backhand | Wackamole</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/backhand/wackamole/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>08 Nov  2009 20:24:35 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Re: IPv6 Support</title>
<description>On 11/05/2009 03:19 AM, Mark Blackman wrote: &amp;gt; On 05/11/2009 09:16, Angelo Höngens wrote: &amp;gt;   &amp;gt;&amp;gt; On 5-11-2009 10:12, Mark Blackman wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;    &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 05:28:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/backhand/wackamole/2090</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: IPv6 Support</title>
<description>* This list is dead, buried, decomposed, with bones turning to powder... * The fully part is that they send out reminders for the subscribers! Regar</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 01:26:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/backhand/wackamole/2089</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: IPv6 Support</title>
<description>On 05/11/2009 09:16, Angelo Höngens wrote: &amp;gt; On 5-11-2009 10:12, Mark Blackman wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; On 05/11/2009 08:14, Angelo Höngens wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; On 4-11-2009 2</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 01:19:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/backhand/wackamole/2088</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: IPv6 Support</title>
<description>On 5-11-2009 10:12, Mark Blackman wrote: &amp;gt; On 05/11/2009 08:14, Angelo Höngens wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; On 4-11-2009 23:06, Michael Stegeman wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m new to th</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 01:16:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/backhand/wackamole/2087</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: IPv6 Support</title>
<description>On 05/11/2009 08:14, Angelo Höngens wrote: &amp;gt; On 4-11-2009 23:06, Michael Stegeman wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m new to this list and have read through the archives re</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 01:12:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/backhand/wackamole/2086</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: IPv6 Support</title>
<description>On 4-11-2009 23:06, Michael Stegeman wrote: &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m new to this list and have read through the archives regarding this &amp;gt; topic, but I&amp;#039;m wondering what w</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 00:14:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/backhand/wackamole/2085</link>
</item><item>
<title>IPv6 Support</title>
<description>Hi all, I&amp;#039;m new to this list and have read through the archives regarding this topic, but I&amp;#039;m wondering what would be involved in adding IPv6 support</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2009 14:06:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/backhand/wackamole/2084</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: wackamole and ipv6</title>
<description>Salaam, Wackamole is wonderful software, but I think that It lacks in support from the developers. so I doubt that someone may even reply to this re</description>
<pubDate>27 May  2009 02:50:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/backhand/wackamole/2083</link>
</item><item>
<title>wackamole and ipv6</title>
<description>Hey guys and girls,  I&amp;#039;m just getting started with wackamole, after reading Theo Schlossnagle&amp;#039;s great book on Scalable Internet Architectures. My pl</description>
<pubDate>27 May  2009 01:31:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/backhand/wackamole/2082</link>
</item><item>
<title>3 node active-active-passive setup</title>
<description>Salaam, I did some experimentation with wackamole and set up an active-active-passive cluster, say node A, node B and node C I have assigned the fo</description>
<pubDate>29 Apr  2009 12:38:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/backhand/wackamole/2081</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: multi-IP ARP announcement bugs?</title>
<description>On 20 Mar 2009, at 10:24, Mark Blackman wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m writing to report that &amp;gt; &amp;gt; a) wackamole failover events seem to lead to an excess of ide</description>
<pubDate>02 Apr  2009 04:32:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/backhand/wackamole/2080</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: multi-IP ARP announcement bugs?</title>
<description>----------------------------------------------------------- First, regarding the duplication issue : tcpdump -e -r s1-tcpdump-arp.dat -n | fgrep 82.1</description>
<pubDate>23 Mar  2009 09:58:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/backhand/wackamole/2079</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: multi-IP ARP announcement bugs?</title>
<description>Thanks. During start-up I agree it&amp;#039;s doing the right thing. I&amp;#039;m not so  sure I agree it does the right thing when a &amp;#039;wackatrl -f&amp;#039; is issued on one</description>
<pubDate>23 Mar  2009 08:54:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/backhand/wackamole/2078</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: multi-IP ARP announcement bugs?</title>
<description>On 20 Mar 2009, at 17:02, Theo Schlossnagle wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; b) wackamole doesn&amp;#039;t seem to do ARP announcements for more than 2 IP &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; addresses in a group</description>
<pubDate>20 Mar  2009 10:17:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/backhand/wackamole/2077</link>
</item><item>
<title>multi-IP ARP announcement bugs?</title>
<description>Hi, I&amp;#039;m writing to report that a) wackamole failover events seem to lead to an excess of identical  ARP announcements (using wackamole 2.1.4) b) w</description>
<pubDate>20 Mar  2009 03:24:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/backhand/wackamole/2076</link>
</item><item>
<title>EC2 and wackamole?</title>
<description>Has anybody tried using wackamole with Amazon&amp;#039;s EC2 instances? -Dan _______________________________________________ wackamole-users mailing list wack</description>
<pubDate>09 Sep  2008 11:40:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/backhand/wackamole/2074</link>
</item><item>
<title>wackatrl -l hanging</title>
<description>Has anyone run into wackatrl -l hanging? This is occuring on one server in a three server cluster. The other two servers are reporting correctly from</description>
<pubDate>11 Mar  2008 13:43:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/backhand/wackamole/2072</link>
</item><item>
<title>No such interface</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m seeing this in syslog when I start the wackamole daemon: Mar 11 12:49:13 web001 wackamole[11012]: connecting to 4803 Mar 11 12:49:13 web001 wacka</description>
<pubDate>11 Mar  2008 13:09:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/backhand/wackamole/2071</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Interesting logic problem with wackamole andmultiple apache vhosts</title>
<description>Thanks Rob, that solution worked great. -Tim  -----Original Message----- From: wackamole-users-bounces@lists.backhand.org [mailto:wackamole-users-bo</description>
<pubDate>28 Dec  2007 09:47:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/backhand/wackamole/2070</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Interesting logic problem with wackamole and multiple apache vhosts</title>
<description>Spangler, Tim wrote: &amp;gt; In my scenario, each Apache vhost needs its own IP address (they are all &amp;gt; running SSL, thus the IP), and Wackamole is used as</description>
<pubDate>21 Dec  2007 11:10:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/backhand/wackamole/2069</link>
</item><item>
<title>Interesting logic problem with wackamole and multiple apache vhosts</title>
<description>All,   I&amp;#039;ve run into an interesting problem with Apache running several vhosts and wackmole that I can&amp;#039;t seem to work out in my head, thus I&amp;#039;m look</description>
<pubDate>20 Dec  2007 16:07:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/backhand/wackamole/2068</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: config.w32.h is missing when compiling in win32</title>
<description>Finally got this file, hope it helps to compile on win32,  /* Don&amp;#039;t edit this file, edit config.w32.h instead */ #ifndef CONFIG_H #define CONFIG_H #</description>
<pubDate>02 Dec  2007 01:07:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/backhand/wackamole/2067</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Wrong route reserved</title>
<description>Theo Schlossnagle schrieb: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; You have 192.168..x.y in your verbiage, but 10.0.78.y in your config. &amp;gt; The inconsistency is a bit confusing -- if y</description>
<pubDate>15 Nov  2007 12:29:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/backhand/wackamole/2066</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Wrong route reserved</title>
<description>On Nov 15, 2007, at 8:56 AM, Björn Keil wrote: &amp;gt; Hello, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I am having a problem with a route being reserved at the startup of a &amp;gt; two servers that</description>
<pubDate>15 Nov  2007 06:06:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/backhand/wackamole/2065</link>
</item><item>
<title>Wrong route reserved</title>
<description>Hello, I am having a problem with a route being reserved at the startup of a two servers that should *not* be reserved. It&amp;#039;s a debian Linux system an</description>
<pubDate>15 Nov  2007 05:56:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/backhand/wackamole/2064</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
