
jerome at hettich
Apr 17, 2012, 1:45 PM
Post #4 of 4
(467 views)
Permalink
|
|
Re: mythtv 0.25 segmentation faults with mythpreviewgen and mythmetadatalookup
[In reply to]
|
|
thanks Neil - for this very useful and informative reply. Jerome On 17 April 2012 08:43, Neil Bird <neil [at] fnxweb> wrote: > Around about 16/04/12 21:18, Jerome Hettich typed ... > > and everything now seems to be working... >> no idea why this would be - so any suggestions as to what was going on >> would be very helpful so I can prevent this happening again. >> > > If there was a small hole in the PRM deps., you may have been missing a > 0.25 lib. that was falling back to an old 0.24 one you still had installed > (although .so numbering should account for that). > > Often some old lib detritus is left behind by myth upgrades due to RPM > library name changes (e.g., not libmythx but libmythx_0.24 abd > libmythx_0.25). Since by what you typed you blew away *all* myth RPMs, > and pulled the *lot* in afresh, that would have cleared it all up. > > > The sort of things I do in this sort of situation usually start with > 'strace problemprogram' to see what happens just before the crash, and in > this case probably 'ldd /path/to/problemprogram' to see what libs it thinks > it wants (watching for rogue versions) and 'strace -eopen problemprogram' > to see what lib files it's actually opening. > > In this case I'd probably have removed *[Mm]yth*0.24* [is yum case > dependant?] as well, as if it was a rogue library you'd have then got a > run-time error reporting a missing library. > > -- > [neil [at] fn ~]# rm -f .signature > [neil [at] fn ~]# ls -l .signature > ls: .signature: No such file or directory > [neil [at] fn ~]# exit > > > ______________________________**_________________ > atrpms-users mailing list > atrpms-users [at] atrpms > http://lists.atrpms.net/**mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users<http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users>
|