Axel.Thimm at ATrpms
Mar 28, 2012, 5:52 PM
Post #3 of 3
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 08:28:53PM +1100, O&M Ugarcina wrote:
> Hello Guys,
> You are no doubt just as confused as me when looking at the NVIDIA
> versioning . I was just at Nvidia Linux forum to see that the long
> liver branch is now at 295.33 . This prompted me to ask a question :
> "I have noticed over the last two releases , that the version
> numbers for the official release is the same as Long Lived . Does
> anyone know why this is , Is it that the long lived has been dropped
> , because I have been using it and think it is a very good idea . Or
> is it just a typo on the web page ?"
> The response that I received from ArronP was :
> Re: Why is official release same as Long Lived?
> Right, the long-lived support branch moved forward from 275.* to
> 295.*. 295.* will continue to be maintained for a while after the
> "official" release moves to a later branch.
> So what do we do here on our end , do we stick with 275 ? or move
> over to 295 ? (we did briefly) , now do we go back there again ?
The nice thing about the way ATrpms packages nvidia is that the choice
is up to the user. Whatever works best for you! :)
> Best Regards
> atrpms-users mailing list
> atrpms-users [at] atrpms
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users [at] atrpms