Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: atrpms: users

Dovecot CentOS 5 x86_64 stable packages - broken dependencies

 

 

atrpms users RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded


robertoschwald at googlemail

Nov 11, 2011, 4:30 AM

Post #1 of 2 (288 views)
Permalink
Dovecot CentOS 5 x86_64 stable packages - broken dependencies

Hi all,

today I tried to install dovecot-sieve and dovecot-managesieve from stable, but the corresponding dovecot package seems not to be in stable:

--> Finished Dependency Resolution
1:dovecot-sieve-0.1.19-9.el5.x86_64 from atrpms has depsolving problems
--> Missing Dependency: dovecot >= 1.2 is needed by package 1:dovecot-sieve-0.1.19-9.el5.x86_64 (atrpms)

--> Finished Dependency Resolution
dovecot-managesieve-0.11.12-0_5.1.el5.x86_64 from atrpms has depsolving problems
--> Missing Dependency: dovecot >= 1.2 is needed by package dovecot-managesieve-0.11.12-0_5.1.el5.x86_64 (atrpms)

There are many dovecot versions in testing, but 1:2.1-0_130_alpha1.el5 doesn't seem trustable.
dovecot-1.2.17-0_115.el5.x86_64 from testing has issues with dovecot-managesieve-0.11.12-0_5.1.el5.x86_64 and leads to:

dovecot: managesieve-login: Fatal: Dovecot version mismatch: Master is v1.2.17, login is v1.2.16 (if you don't care, set version_ignore=yes)


Shouldn't be all packages in stable resolve their dependencies reliably?
How can I workaround this?



Thanks,
Robert
_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users [at] atrpms
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users


Axel.Thimm at ATrpms

Nov 13, 2011, 1:45 AM

Post #2 of 2 (277 views)
Permalink
Re: Dovecot CentOS 5 x86_64 stable packages - broken dependencies [In reply to]

Hi,

On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 01:30:12PM +0100, Robert Oschwald wrote:
> today I tried to install dovecot-sieve and dovecot-managesieve from
> stable, but the corresponding dovecot package seems not to be in
> stable:

true, this is because some users do not want to see packages in
"stable" that replace vendor packages. So these packages - even though
fully qualified to be in stable - have been moved to testing. This
scheme needs to be revisted, but it kind of complicates the setup even
more (two dimensions in subrepos, one for stability and one for
replacement-or-not).

Anyway, it's a know issue in the RHEL repos of ATrpms.

> There are many dovecot versions in testing, but
> 1:2.1-0_130_alpha1.el5 doesn't seem trustable.

How about 2.0.x? It's the upstream stable version and resides in testing.

> dovecot-1.2.17-0_115.el5.x86_64 from testing has issues with
> dovecot-managesieve-0.11.12-0_5.1.el5.x86_64 and leads to:
>
> dovecot: managesieve-login: Fatal: Dovecot version mismatch: Master is v1.2.17, login is v1.2.16 (if you don't care, set version_ignore=yes)

That's a bug, managesieve wasn't rebuilt when dovecot 1.2.x was. If
you are in a hurry use version_ignore=yes, but I'll respin packages of
1.2.x/0.11.x in the next hours, so you may want to recheck later.

But I still recommend using 2.0.x and pigeonhole 0.2.x instead.
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users [at] atrpms
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users

atrpms users RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.