steve at sjcnet
Aug 23, 2011, 4:08 AM
Post #2 of 5
(417 views)
Permalink
|
No, the permissions are not right. I installed this a week or two ago on
a CentOS 6 x86_64 box and had to do a "chmod 755 /usr/bin/faad".
Steve.
On 23/08/2011 9:01 PM, huyfuo wrote:
> I use scientificlinux6 and el6-i386 repo.
> Permission of /usr/bin/faad is 0644.
> Is this right?
>
> $ rpm -qpi ~/faad2-2.7-16.el6.i686.rpm
> Name : faad2 Relocations: (not relocatable)
> Version : 2.7 Vendor: ATrpms.net
> Release : 16.el6 Build Date: Sun Jan 23 04:11:22 2011
> Install Date: (not installed) Build Host: flocki.atrpms.net
> Group : Applications/Multimedia Source RPM: faad2-2.7-16.el6.src.rpm
> Size : 71668 License: GPLv2
> Signature : DSA/SHA1, Sun Jan 23 04:11:23 2011, Key ID 508ce5e666534c2b
> Packager : ATrpms<http://ATrpms.net/>
> URL : http://www.audiocoding.com/
> Summary : Library and frontend for decoding MPEG2/4 AAC
> Description :
> FAAD 2 is a LC, MAIN and LTP profile, MPEG2 and MPEG-4 AAC decoder,
> completely written from scratch.
> $ rpm2cpio ~/faad2-2.7-16.el6.i686.rpm |cpio -id
> 143 blocks
> $ ls -l usr/bin/faad
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 48636 Aug 22 21:21 usr/bin/faad
>
> _______________________________________________
> atrpms-users mailing list
> atrpms-users [at] atrpms
> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users [at] atrpms
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
|
signature.asc
