Mailing List Archive: atrpms: users

why is older alsa-kmdl being selected

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

mylists at wilsononline

Jun 14, 2011, 12:25 AM

Post #1 of 7 (453 views)
Permalink

why is older alsa-kmdl being selected

I assume the kmdl is loading this ...

package alsa-kmdl-2.6.34.8-68.fc13-1.0.24-89.fc13.i686
(which is newer than alsa-kmdl-2.6.34.8-68.fc13-1.0.23-85.fc13.i686) is already installed

...

========================================================================================================================
Package Arch Version
Repository Size
========================================================================================================================
Installing:
alsa-kmdl-2.6.34.8-68.fc13 i686 1.0.23-85.fc13
atrpms 1.4 M
Updating:
ffmpeg i686 0.7-45_rc1.fc13
atrpms 696 k
Installing for dependencies:
libx264_115 i686 0.115-16_20110610.2245.fc13
atrpms 282 k
Updating for dependencies:
ffmpeg-devel i686 0.7-45_rc1.fc13
atrpms 3.4 M
libavcodec52 i686 0.7-45_rc1.fc13
atrpms 2.2 M
libavdevice52 i686 0.7-45_rc1.fc13
atrpms 27 k
libavfilter1 i686 0.7-45_rc1.fc13
atrpms 169 k
libavformat52 i686 0.7-45_rc1.fc13
atrpms 465 k
libavutil50 i686 0.7-45_rc1.fc13
atrpms 58 k
libpostproc51 i686 0.7-45_rc1.fc13
atrpms 64 k
libswscale0 i686 0.7-45_rc1.fc13
atrpms 94 k

Transaction Summary
========================================================================================================================
Install 2 Package(s)
Upgrade 9 Package(s)

Transaction Check Error:
package alsa-kmdl-2.6.34.8-68.fc13-1.0.24-89.fc13.i686 (which is newer than
alsa-kmdl-2.6.34.8-68.fc13-1.0.23-85.fc13.i686) is already installed

Error Summary
-------------

_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users [at] atrpms
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users

Axel.Thimm at ATrpms

Jun 14, 2011, 1:33 AM

Post #2 of 7 (430 views)
Permalink

Re: why is older alsa-kmdl being selected [In reply to]

On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 17:25 +1000, Paul wrote:
> Transaction Check Error:
> package alsa-kmdl-2.6.34.8-68.fc13-1.0.24-89.fc13.i686 (which is newer than
> alsa-kmdl-2.6.34.8-68.fc13-1.0.23-85.fc13.i686) is already installed

I haven't seen this before. The kmdl plugin does try to trigger an
update of all kmdls, but leaves the specifics to yum's engine. Try

rm -f /var/lib/rpm/__*
rpm --rebuilddb
yum clean all

and retry. If it works something in the databases was messed up. If it
still has this issue, there is a bug in some code, either yum or the
plugin. But the plugin has been the same for ages and there haven't been
any similar issues in the past.
--
http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/

Attachments:

signature.asc (0.19 KB)

mylists at wilsononline

Jun 14, 2011, 3:14 PM

Post #3 of 7 (437 views)
Permalink

Re: why is older alsa-kmdl being selected [In reply to]

On 14/06/2011 5:25 PM, Paul wrote:
> I assume the kmdl is loading this ...
>
> package alsa-kmdl-2.6.34.8-68.fc13-1.0.24-89.fc13.i686
> (which is newer than alsa-kmdl-2.6.34.8-68.fc13-1.0.23-85.fc13.i686) is already installed
>
> ...
>
>
> ========================================================================================================================
>
> Package Arch Version Repository Size
> ========================================================================================================================
>
> Installing:
> alsa-kmdl-2.6.34.8-68.fc13 i686 1.0.23-85.fc13 atrpms 1.4 M
> Updating:
> ffmpeg i686 0.7-45_rc1.fc13 atrpms 696 k
> Installing for dependencies:
> libx264_115 i686 0.115-16_20110610.2245.fc13 atrpms 282 k
> Updating for dependencies:
> ffmpeg-devel i686 0.7-45_rc1.fc13 atrpms 3.4 M
> libavcodec52 i686 0.7-45_rc1.fc13 atrpms 2.2 M
> libavdevice52 i686 0.7-45_rc1.fc13 atrpms 27 k
> libavfilter1 i686 0.7-45_rc1.fc13 atrpms 169 k
> libavformat52 i686 0.7-45_rc1.fc13 atrpms 465 k
> libavutil50 i686 0.7-45_rc1.fc13 atrpms 58 k
> libpostproc51 i686 0.7-45_rc1.fc13 atrpms 64 k
> libswscale0 i686 0.7-45_rc1.fc13 atrpms 94 k
>
> Transaction Summary
> ========================================================================================================================
>
> Install 2 Package(s)
> Upgrade 9 Package(s)
>
>
>
> Transaction Check Error:
> package alsa-kmdl-2.6.34.8-68.fc13-1.0.24-89.fc13.i686 (which is newer than
> alsa-kmdl-2.6.34.8-68.fc13-1.0.23-85.fc13.i686) is already installed
>
> Error Summary
> -------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> atrpms-users mailing list
> atrpms-users [at] atrpms
> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
>

I've rebuilt rpm database but still occuring , is this a dependency issue ?

eg

---> Package libavutil50.i686 0:0.7-45_rc1.fc13 set to be updated
---> Package libpostproc51.i686 0:0.7-45_rc1.fc13 set to be updated
---> Package libswscale0.i686 0:0.7-45_rc1.fc13 set to be updated
---> Package mplayer.i686 4:1.0-85_snap20110607.fc13 set to be updated
---> Package x264-devel.i686 0:0.115-16_20110610.2245.fc13 set to be updated
--> Running transaction check
---> Package libx264_115.i686 0:0.115-16_20110610.2245.fc13 set to be installed
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
---> Package alsa-kmdl-2.6.34.8-68.fc13.i686 0:1.0.23-85.fc13 set to be installed
--> Running transaction check
---> Package alsa-kmdl-2.6.34.8-68.fc13.i686 0:1.0.23-85.fc13 set to be installed

Paul

_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users [at] atrpms
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users

mylists at wilsononline

Jun 21, 2011, 4:33 PM

Post #4 of 7 (421 views)
Permalink

Re: why is older alsa-kmdl being selected [In reply to]

Any solution to this issue yet?

thanks

On 15/06/2011 8:14 AM, Paul wrote:
> On 14/06/2011 5:25 PM, Paul wrote:
>> I assume the kmdl is loading this ...
>>
>> package alsa-kmdl-2.6.34.8-68.fc13-1.0.24-89.fc13.i686
>> (which is newer than alsa-kmdl-2.6.34.8-68.fc13-1.0.23-85.fc13.i686) is already installed
>>
>> ...
>>
>>
>> ========================================================================================================================
>>
>>
>> Package Arch Version Repository Size
>> ========================================================================================================================
>>
>>
>> Installing:
>> alsa-kmdl-2.6.34.8-68.fc13 i686 1.0.23-85.fc13 atrpms 1.4 M
>> Updating:
>> ffmpeg i686 0.7-45_rc1.fc13 atrpms 696 k
>> Installing for dependencies:
>> libx264_115 i686 0.115-16_20110610.2245.fc13 atrpms 282 k
>> Updating for dependencies:
>> ffmpeg-devel i686 0.7-45_rc1.fc13 atrpms 3.4 M
>> libavcodec52 i686 0.7-45_rc1.fc13 atrpms 2.2 M
>> libavdevice52 i686 0.7-45_rc1.fc13 atrpms 27 k
>> libavfilter1 i686 0.7-45_rc1.fc13 atrpms 169 k
>> libavformat52 i686 0.7-45_rc1.fc13 atrpms 465 k
>> libavutil50 i686 0.7-45_rc1.fc13 atrpms 58 k
>> libpostproc51 i686 0.7-45_rc1.fc13 atrpms 64 k
>> libswscale0 i686 0.7-45_rc1.fc13 atrpms 94 k
>>
>> Transaction Summary
>> ========================================================================================================================
>>
>>
>> Install 2 Package(s)
>> Upgrade 9 Package(s)
>>
>>
>>
>> Transaction Check Error:
>> package alsa-kmdl-2.6.34.8-68.fc13-1.0.24-89.fc13.i686 (which is newer than
>> alsa-kmdl-2.6.34.8-68.fc13-1.0.23-85.fc13.i686) is already installed
>>
>> Error Summary
>> -------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> atrpms-users mailing list
>> atrpms-users [at] atrpms
>> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
>>
>
> I've rebuilt rpm database but still occuring , is this a dependency issue ?
>
> eg
>
> ---> Package libavutil50.i686 0:0.7-45_rc1.fc13 set to be updated
> ---> Package libpostproc51.i686 0:0.7-45_rc1.fc13 set to be updated
> ---> Package libswscale0.i686 0:0.7-45_rc1.fc13 set to be updated
> ---> Package mplayer.i686 4:1.0-85_snap20110607.fc13 set to be updated
> ---> Package x264-devel.i686 0:0.115-16_20110610.2245.fc13 set to be updated
> --> Running transaction check
> ---> Package libx264_115.i686 0:0.115-16_20110610.2245.fc13 set to be installed
> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> ---> Package alsa-kmdl-2.6.34.8-68.fc13.i686 0:1.0.23-85.fc13 set to be installed
> --> Running transaction check
> ---> Package alsa-kmdl-2.6.34.8-68.fc13.i686 0:1.0.23-85.fc13 set to be installed
>
>
> Paul
>
> _______________________________________________
> atrpms-users mailing list
> atrpms-users [at] atrpms
> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
>

_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users [at] atrpms
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users

Axel.Thimm at ATrpms

Jun 22, 2011, 9:10 AM

Post #5 of 7 (411 views)
Permalink

Re: why is older alsa-kmdl being selected [In reply to]

On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 09:33 +1000, Paul wrote:
> Any solution to this issue yet?

I cannot reproduce it, and there are no other similar reports. After rpm
--rebuilddb, did you run yum check to see whether there are any strange
dependency issues present? Maybe that will help identifying the real
issue.
--
http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/

Attachments:

signature.asc (0.19 KB)

J.Pilk at tesco

Jun 22, 2011, 12:53 PM

Post #6 of 7 (411 views)
Permalink

Re: why is older alsa-kmdl being selected [In reply to]

On 22/06/11 17:10, Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 09:33 +1000, Paul wrote:
>> Any solution to this issue yet?
>
> I cannot reproduce it, and there are no other similar reports. After rpm
> --rebuilddb, did you run yum check to see whether there are any strange
> dependency issues present? Maybe that will help identifying the real
> issue.
>

I have alsa-driver-1.0.24-89.fc13.x86_64.rpm installed,
with alsa-kmdl-2.6.34.9-69.fc13-1.0.23-85.fc13.x86_64.rpm.

1.0.24-89 kmdls exist in the repo for earlier kernels but apparently not
for this one. smart shows it as 'required' by the driver but installed
the one I have without complaint.

.. and sound seems ok on my simple analogue stereo system.

HTH

John P

_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users [at] atrpms
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users

mylists at wilsononline

Jun 22, 2011, 3:09 PM

Post #7 of 7 (421 views)
Permalink

Re: why is older alsa-kmdl being selected [In reply to]

hmm,
I tried a few 'yum updates' this morning and issue seems to be gone now..
not sure what happened I didn't do anything on my end as far as I know,
apart from your suggestions and they didn't have any immediate affect.
anyway thanks for looking into it for me , I'll let you know if it
re-occurs.

Paul

On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 2:10 AM, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm [at] atrpms> wrote:

> On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 09:33 +1000, Paul wrote:
> > Any solution to this issue yet?
>
> I cannot reproduce it, and there are no other similar reports. After rpm
> --rebuilddb, did you run yum check to see whether there are any strange
> dependency issues present? Maybe that will help identifying the real
> issue.
> --
> http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/
>
> _______________________________________________
> atrpms-users mailing list
> atrpms-users [at] atrpms
> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
>

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads