Mailing List Archive: atrpms: users

ATRpms MythTV Stable vs. Testing

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

t004 at kbocek

Jan 11, 2011, 11:03 AM

Post #1 of 5 (449 views)
Permalink

ATRpms MythTV Stable vs. Testing

Axel,
What's your plan regarding MythTV on CentOS 5? Right now you've got 23.1 under
stable and 0.24 under testing. Do you see 23.1 eventually going away or will
we be bifurcated for awhile?

I hate it when I get bifurcated. :)

_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users [at] atrpms
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users

Axel.Thimm at ATrpms

Jan 11, 2011, 11:44 AM

Post #2 of 5 (428 views)
Permalink

Re: ATRpms MythTV Stable vs. Testing [In reply to]

On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 11:03 -0800, Kirk Bocek wrote:
> What's your plan regarding MythTV on CentOS 5? Right now you've got 23.1 under
> stable and 0.24 under testing. Do you see 23.1 eventually going away or will
> we be bifurcated for awhile?
>
> I hate it when I get bifurcated. :)

I moved 0.24 to stable. Although every other build mythtv 0.24 break on
RHEL5, but perhaps it is better that 0.23.1.

0.23.x still remains in the repo as for other distros.
--
http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/

Attachments:

signature.asc (0.19 KB)

t004 at kbocek

Jan 11, 2011, 11:47 AM

Post #3 of 5 (437 views)
Permalink

Re: ATRpms MythTV Stable vs. Testing [In reply to]

On 1/11/2011 11:44 AM, Axel Thimm wrote:
> I moved 0.24 to stable. Although every other build mythtv 0.24 break on
> RHEL5, but perhaps it is better that 0.23.1.

I'm sorry Axel, would please you clarify your statement here. Every other
build breaks on RHEL5??

_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users [at] atrpms
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users

Axel.Thimm at ATrpms

Jan 11, 2011, 12:45 PM

Post #4 of 5 (424 views)
Permalink

Re: ATRpms MythTV Stable vs. Testing [In reply to]

On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 11:47 -0800, Kirk Bocek wrote:
>
> On 1/11/2011 11:44 AM, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > I moved 0.24 to stable. Although every other build mythtv 0.24 break on
> > RHEL5, but perhaps it is better that 0.23.1.
>
> I'm sorry Axel, would please you clarify your statement here. Every other
> build breaks on RHEL5??

Sorry, I missed some pronouns or two, but yes, RHEL5 builds of mythtv
0.24 are far from certain to succeed. Whether it is python, qt, patch or
something new, RHEL5 is just not in mythtv's developers platform matrix.

We're trying to keep te build alive until viable build of RHEL6 clones
populate the community and then any major breakage will remove support
for newer mythtv of RHEL5. Similar to what happened to RHEL4 ages ago.
--
http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/

Attachments:

signature.asc (0.19 KB)

t004 at kbocek

Jan 11, 2011, 1:45 PM

Post #5 of 5 (424 views)
Permalink

Re: ATRpms MythTV Stable vs. Testing [In reply to]

On 1/11/2011 12:45 PM, Axel Thimm wrote:
> Similar to what happened to RHEL4 ages ago.

Yup. This all feels *really* familiar.

_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users [at] atrpms
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads