Axel.Thimm at ATrpms
Nov 24, 2009, 8:08 PM
Post #4 of 4
(730 views)
Permalink
|
|
Re: libsndfile1 = 1.0.16-8.at is needed by libsndfile-devel-1.0.16-8.RHL5.i386
[In reply to]
|
|
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 09:25:53PM +0100, Ron Arts wrote:
> Axel,
>
> I don't think so. Look at the error message. libsndfile-devel
> requires libsndfile1 = 1.0.16-8.at . See the 'at' at the end?
>
> The libsndfile-devel rpm that I generate on one system requires
> that, the other one doesn't.
I see, I thought you were building on one system and distribution to
others (which I would recommend to do actually, but that is another
story).
So obviously there is a discrepancy in you build environments on the
two systems, and I also think you are mixng thw two builds with
different naming schemes. Please show what the actual package names
are and how you try to install the packages (yum, repoqueries etc).
> Ron
>
>
> Axel Thimm schreef:
> >Hi,
> >
> >On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 08:02:48PM +0100, Ron Arts wrote:
> >>I am building a lot of rpm's from the atrpms repo myzelf on a couple
> >>of fresh CentOS 5.4 machines. I meant them all to be the same, but
> >>apparently they aren't.
> >>
> >>Now on both machines I can build libsndfile, and on one machine
> >>I can install the resulting rpms, but on the other one I get
> >>the above error message.
> >>
> >>What did I do wrong? It must have something to do with the
> >>atrpms rpm-config macros, but I can't find the problem.
> >
> >No, these macros are needed only for building things, not installing
> >them.
> >
> >Since the same command works on one and not the other, it means that
> >on the one system libsndfile1 is installed, while on the other not.
>
>
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
|
