
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms
Apr 1, 2009, 11:35 AM
Post #7 of 7
(1503 views)
Permalink
|
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 02:07:34PM -0400, Tuan Hoang wrote: > Axel Thimm wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 12:16:59PM -0400, Tuan Hoang wrote: > >> Jean-Yves Avenard wrote: > >>> 2009/4/1 Vnpenguin <vnpenguin [at] vnoss>: > >>>> The current kernel of CentOS is "kernel-2.6.18-128.el5" > >>>> So the module "sk98lin-kmdl-2.6.18-128.1.1.el5" is ok for this kernel > >>>> ? I can not found some thing like "sk98lin-kmdl-2.6.18-128.el5" > >>>> (without 1.1) but not found. > >>> I'm afraid you will have to wait for the modules to be available... > >>> Give Axel a bit of time ... > >>> > >> Nothing for Axel to do. He's already on the errata update kernel > >> 2.6.18-128.1.1.el5. > > > > Indeed, I maintained the latest kernels for 5.2 and 5.3, please make > > sure you upgrade the system first. Kernel errata on RHEL/CentOS are > > really important, as they usually really include needed security > > fixes. > > > >> Of course I would like to see him maintain kmdl's for the stock 5.3 > >> kernel as well as the latest errata kernel...but I have nothing to give > >> in return except my gratitude. > >> > >> BTW, is there any documentation (or FAQ) that has explicit steps in > >> order to setup a clean Linux install to [re]build the kmdl's? > > > > yum/smart/apt-get install atrpms-rpm-config > > rpmbuild --rebuild foo.src.rpm > > > > Maybe you need to choose which kernel you want to build for with > > --define 'kmdl_kernelsrcdir /where/my/sources/are' > > > > Axel - Not sure if you remember, but it was finding the kernel versions > find but wouldn't generate the kmdl RPM's...was build just one but > without the kernel version appended to the RPM name. The current default is to just build the kmdls (as the non-kmdls are the same always, so no need to rebuild them unless the src.rpm also changed). > Under CentOS 4.7, I haven't upgraded my RPM to your 4.4.x...do you know > if this is why? I haven't tried it under my CentOS 5.2 box > yet...downloading the 5.3 ISO's as we speak. I'm not sure why it doesn't upgrade. Do you have any apt/yum/smart output? -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
|