
anmar at anmar
Jan 6, 2010, 2:36 AM
Post #7 of 7
(898 views)
Permalink
|
On 06/01/10 11:07, Axel Thimm wrote: > On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 09:28:25AM +0100, Angel Marin wrote: >> On 06/01/10 07:24, Axel Thimm wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 01:19:57PM +0100, Angel Marin wrote: >>>> On 17/12/09 22:25, Angel Marin wrote: >>>> New dovecot sieve and managesieve release, so here's the updated set of >>>> packages: >>>> >>>> In the mean time we migrated scripts to the new sieve plugin, enabled >>>> managesieve and everything, packages work just fine, but had to roll >>>> back to cmu plugin as some scripts weren't working as expected with the >>>> new sieve plugin. >>> >>> [...] I decided to go for a suggestion of yours in another mail >>> that wanted the old sieve plugin to be called *-cmu and skip the >>> *-new on the new one. [...] In order to allow automatic upgrades >>> to update the old sieve plugin to *-cmu packages I will keep the >>> new sieve plugin in "testing" for a couple of days (otherwise both >>> new and old plugins will try to upgrade the 1.1.6 packages). > >> just a couple days? missing that window and having a cmu install >> upgraded to the new sieve plugin will break hard. Actually I don't see a >> good solution here. > > OK, let's keep it there for a while longer and make an announcement > here and on dovecot's list. > > Hm - given that Fedora has dovecot-sieve as well, there will never be > a long eneough window. Let's start with testing and we will see what > to do when we cross that bridge. Fedora seems to follow dovecot-* just fine this days, so maybe there's not much point to continue building them for fedora? or at least not in stable repo. For the EL distros, managesieve won't work without atrpms patched dovecot rpm, so it might not be such a good idea to put it in stable either as it could end up installed with EL ancient dovecot releases, and cause confusion when it doesn't work. >> BTW, the managesieve rpm will need changes as configure script has >> changed [1] >> >> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.imap.dovecot/44643 > > But that is not cast into a released tarball yet, or is it? No, that's not part of any release yet. There'll be a minor adjustment needed to the spec to accommodate for next managesieve release though. -- Angel Marin http://anmar.eu.org/ _______________________________________________ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel [at] atrpms http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
|