Axel.Thimm at ATrpms
Aug 13, 2009, 5:54 AM
Post #3 of 3
(341 views)
Permalink
|
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 02:51:34AM +0100, John Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, 12 August, 2009 9:10 pm, Tim Verhoeven wrote:
> > I was talking to someone in #centos that wants to install Asterisk. So
> > I pointed him to Atrpms. But it seems that right now the latest
> > Asterisk package (1.4.26.1) is in the bleeding section and not stable.
> > I'm guessing you are doing stuff ?
> >
> > Just wondering what is going on.
The new packages use /usr/share instead of /var/lib for places like
asterisk sounds etc, just like the BSD platforms do (actually this is
a small bug in asterisk's Makefile). So I fixed this, but there was a
bug report that this may affect the astdb:
http://bugzilla.atrpms.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1512#c7
(ignore the symlink/dir issue with the soundfiles, this has been fixed
by now).
I just wanted to investigate this more, before burning out any
Asterisk installations out there.
> Actually I was rather wondering too, following on from previous
> discussion, whether rather than asterisk, asterisk160 and asterisk140 (or
> whatever) packages, you ought to have atrpms-bleeding asterisk (1.6.x),
> atrpms-testing asterisk (1.6.0) and atrpms (stable) asterisk (1.4)?
Actually this new plan would allow them all to live in stable. They
are tagged as stable from upstream and with the names separated that
way, they wouldn't harm each other. But that hasn't happened yet.
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
|
