tim.verhoeven.be at gmail
Aug 11, 2009, 1:46 AM
Post #3 of 3
(823 views)
Permalink
|
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Axel Thimm<Axel.Thimm [at] atrpms> wrote:
>
> thanks, I updated the same, just hours before your mail. :/
> Some questions, though:
>
> @@ -50,5 +50,2 @@
> #patch1 -p1 -b .dev
> -for inc in isdn_compat.h mISDNdebugtool.h mISDNif.h; do
> - grep -rl "#include <linux/$inc>" . | xargs perl -pi -e"s,#include <linux/$inc>,#include \"linux/$inc\","
> -done
>
> @@ -65,4 +62,3 @@
> LINUX_SOURCE=%{kmdl_kernelsrcdir} \
> - INSTALL_PREFIX=%{buildroot} \
> - CC="%{_kernelcompiler} -I`pwd`/include"
> + INSTALL_PREFIX=%{buildroot}
>
> Aren't these headers needed anymore? I know some kernels (officially
> 2.6.27) have misdn support, so it may work w/o them, or the build
> Makefile may be diverting system includes to local includes now.
I've checked my spec file here and I don't have this in a spec file of
a year old (no more history). So I don't think it is needed.
> And for misdnuser: I had seen that you had submitted it ages ago and
> I had forgotten to push it, sorry for that!
No problem.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Verhoeven - tim.verhoeven.be [at] gmail - 0479 / 88 11 83
Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the
"microsoft approach to programming" and should never be allowed.
(Linus Torvalds)
_______________________________________________
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel [at] atrpms
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
|
